reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Demissionary Prime Minister Mark Rutte has been in office for thirteen years. It is unlikely that he would want to leave a legacy of aligning with the PVV's election program, as he aspires to top positions in the European Union or NATO. This could have consequences for his future, as some in Brussels believe that if the VVD were to form a coalition with Geert Wilders, Rutte's chances of becoming NATO's top leader or holding a position within the European Commission would be jeopardized. Therefore, Rutte's future prospects are at stake.

Speaker 1, the potential prime minister, would immediately close the Dutch borders to people from Islamic countries who do not adhere to Dutch laws and values. However, forming a coalition with other parties who do not share this stance poses a challenge. Speaker 1 also expresses skepticism about climate change, believing that humans have minimal impact on global warming. This viewpoint may hinder coalition-building. The speaker mentions other parties that could potentially form a coalition, but emphasizes the difficulties in finding common ground. The speaker also highlights the behind-the-scenes maneuvering that can occur to prevent the largest party from leading the coalition. They predict a similar outcome in the Netherlands.

The speaker discusses how to reduce CO2 emissions by focusing on factors like population control and energy efficiency. They mention concerns about a globalist agenda to depopulate the world and the resistance from groups like Dutch farmers. The speaker also touches on potential food shortages, political tensions, and the need for a worldwide people's revolution against oppressive forces. Stand up against evil now.

Question everything your government does or says, and especially distrust the EU Commission, which is a headquarters for spreading fake news and disinformation. Those who pushed the narrative about the virus are now pushing climate change, which is just another scheme to take taxpayer money and give it to global corporations. They want to get rid of individual mobility by targeting cars. The proposed measures to save the planet won't work but will abolish freedom, democracy, and free will. Stop voting for the same people who created this mess because they are liars.

The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to oppressive agricultural practices by companies like Monsanto and Bill Gates. Farmers use fertilizers due to financial pressure, not by choice. The Great Reset exploits green agendas to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. Support for farmers should come from the community, not globalist bodies, to make sustainable transitions together.

They claim that agriculture is causing global warming and threaten to cut off food supply, benefiting only billionaires. This would lead to poverty and starvation if they achieve net zero emissions. They argue that to reach net zero, all animals, including humans, would need to be killed since we emit CO2. Food and energy are crucial for survival, and they warn of the disastrous consequences if these actions are taken. They also criticize the notion that nitrogen fertilizer is a greenhouse gas and dismiss the campaign against CO2 as phony. Meanwhile, Russia, India, and China continue to build coal and nuclear plants.

The speaker claims that the nitrogen crisis in the Netherlands is a manufactured pretext created by bureaucrats in The Hague and Brussels. They argue that this crisis is being used as a strategy by globalists to control and manipulate farmers, with the ultimate goal of establishing a one world government. The speaker highlights the 2030 agenda, a United Nations initiative consisting of 17 sustainable development goals, and suggests that achieving these goals would require a forceful redistribution of goods, property, and rights, leading to the obliteration of basic liberties. The speaker believes that farmers are being targeted because the globalists want to change our way of life and control what we eat, promoting synthetic meat and insect consumption.

Four parties will form a new government, with the PVV playing a central role. The strictest asylum policy ever will be implemented, including a ban on priority housing for refugees. Healthcare costs will decrease, tax relief will be provided, and investments in elderly care will be made. Changes in transportation, energy, and agriculture are also planned. The focus is on making the Netherlands safer and more prosperous. Collaboration between parties is emphasized, with a message of hope, courage, and pride for the country. Thank you to all voters for their trust.

Achieving net zero emissions would lead to widespread hunger and disease as 50% of the population relies on nitrogen fertilizer for survival. Attempts to ban nitrogen fertilizer in countries like the Netherlands and Sri Lanka are seen as a misguided effort to save the earth, which does not necessarily need saving.

Food prices are rising globally, and world leaders attribute it to climate change. They propose a surprising solution: shifting from beef, chicken, and pork to insects like crickets and mealworms. However, farmers have a different perspective. They believe that high food prices and shortages are not caused by global warming but by an environmental policy implemented 30 years ago called Agenda 21, now known as Agenda 2030. This policy sets 17 sustainable development goals with 169 targets to be achieved by every nation by 2030. Critics argue that these goals require excessive government control and infringe on individual freedom. The Netherlands, for example, is shutting down small and medium-sized farms to comply with the net-zero agenda.

In the Netherlands, the political landscape is different, which may affect the agreements made at the summit. It is uncertain how the new government, with a potentially different stance on climate change, will impact these agreements. The formation of a new government in the Netherlands is typically lengthy and unpredictable, so we cannot know the exact outcome. However, the current government's approach to climate change will be continued, and there seems to be strong support for it.

In this segment, the speaker argues against the idea that exiting the eurozone or the European Union would automatically sever access to the internal market, labeling such fears as fundamentally incorrect. The speaker references a position previously outlined in a Welt article from 2016, stating that every country within the EU should be allowed to leave the EU and automatically fall into the internal market, so that the free internal market continues to guarantee the fundamental freedoms between EU countries. The overarching objective presented is the creation of a European Economic Area, but the speaker rejects what is described as a “monstrous overbuild” currently practiced, characterized by tens of thousands of civil servants who are deemed unnecessary and overpaid, with a level of intrusion that is viewed as excessive. The speaker then shifts to a critique of the current leadership and policies, urging the removal of those in power within the EU framework, specifically naming Ursula von der Leyen and the policies associated with her tenure. The cited policy areas include a ban on combustion engines, CO2-related levies, heating laws, and building energy policy, among others. The demand is to “throw out” these people, as they are viewed as representative of an overreaching EU apparatus that the speaker does not support. The central message is that such a centralized and intrusive EU structure is unnecessary and undesirable. The text emphasizes the need for a free internal market among European nations, paired with the restoration of national sovereignty and secure borders. The speaker advocates for free exchange of goods and services among nations, suggesting that this approach would constitute real progress. The concluding sentiment reinforces a preference for smaller, less intrusive governance and a streamlined framework that prioritizes the free movement of goods and services within a European context, while maintaining secure borders and national autonomy. The overall call is for scrapping what is described as the EU apparatus, empowering nations to engage in open trade and cooperation without the perceived rigidity and overreach of the current EU system.

Demissionary Prime Minister Mark Rutte has been in office for thirteen years. It is unlikely that he would want to leave a legacy of aligning with the PVV's election program, as he aspires to top positions in the European Union or NATO. This could have consequences for his future, as some in Brussels believe that if the VVD were to form a coalition with Geert Wilders, Rutte's chances of becoming NATO's top leader or holding a position within the European Commission would be jeopardized. Therefore, Rutte's future prospects are at stake.

President Biden initially stated that he wanted 50% of new cars to be electric by 2030, but it has now been updated to 60%. It is true that electric cars require six times the mineral inputs compared to conventional cars. However, if 50% of cars were electric today, the current electric grid would not have enough power to charge them all. Achieving EV targets globally by 2030 would only reduce global temperatures by 0.0002 degrees Fahrenheit by 2100. Despite this, unilaterally impacting the U.S. auto market, critical mineral supply chain, and grid stability is not seen as the solution for addressing temperature goals.

We acknowledge the climate change and aim to establish a decarbonized economy with measures to limit its impact. However, we don't want to impose punitive ecological measures or advocate for degrowth. We believe in considering both scientific data, including that of the IPCC, and political vision. While scientists sometimes tend to exaggerate, we should still trust them. Our role is to strike a balance between scientific evidence and the well-being of the French people, just as we did during the Covid pandemic. It is the responsibility of politicians to find this equilibrium between scientific facts and the reality on the ground.

The speaker argues that globalization has failed the West and the United States, calling it a failed policy tied to the World Economic Forum’s approach of exporting, offshoring, and seeking the cheapest labor worldwide. The speaker contends this policy has left America and American workers behind and frames an alternative model: America First, a policy where American workers come first and where policies can directly affect workers. Sovereignty is defined as borders, and the speaker asserts that border control is essential. The message emphasizes not offshoring critical components such as medicine, semiconductors, or the entire industrial base, warning against becoming hollowed out and dependent on other nations for fundamental sovereignty. If dependency is necessary, it should be on one’s best allies. The speaker describes a fundamentally different approach from the WEF, suggesting that the WEF acts as the “flag” and that their stance shifts with the wind. The speaker contrasts the WEF’s position with a vision that prioritizes domestic capability. A critical point is the assertion that Europe’s move to net zero by 2030 is problematic because Europe does not manufacture batteries, implying that, if they aim for 2030 net zero, they would be subordinated to China, which produces batteries. The speaker questions why Europe would pursue solar and wind if domestic battery production is lacking, arguing that relying on external battery production constitutes subservience to China. Key claims include: - Globalization has failed the West and the United States. - The WEF promotes exporting, offshoring, and seeking the cheapest labor, which the speaker characterizes as a failed policy. - America First is a different model in which workers come first and sovereignty includes maintaining borders and not offshoring critical industries. - The United States should avoid dependence on other nations for fundamental sovereignty, and, when dependence is needed, it should be on trusted allies. - The WEF is described as being “the flag” that changes with the wind, contrasting with a domestic-first approach. - Europe’s plan to be net zero by 2030 is criticized due to its lack of battery manufacturing, suggesting that such a plan would make Europe subservient to China for batteries. The speaker frames these ideas as a clear point to be considered at Davos and contrasts them with the direction represented by the World Economic Forum.

By 2035, Canada will mandate that citizens can only purchase electric vehicles due to a change in the Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) quietly put in place by the environmental minister. The mandate stipulates that all vehicles made in Canada must have zero emissions. A speaker argues that the government is overreaching, citing issues such as cold climates, the needs of rural Canadians, and power outages, such as one that occurred in Peterborough three weeks prior, as examples of why the mandate won't work. During the five day outage, electric vehicles were rendered useless. The speaker suggests that families should be able to choose to buy electric vehicles if they want, and the government's role should be to ensure the infrastructure is in place to support them.

Thank you for voting for the VVD. We will use your vote to make the Netherlands better. We aim to limit migration, support middle-income earners, help businesses, and build houses. We want to form a Center-Right coalition with PVG, NRC, and BBB, the three major winners. We take responsibility and will deliver on our promises. We will work towards a Center Bridge Cabinet from the Second Chamber. We understand the need for change and believe we can achieve more for you from the Chamber. We will also bring our own VVD proposals. We do not accept any compromise on the rule of law or the country's financial stability. We are open to discussions with PVG, NRC, and BBB to determine the best form of collaboration. We are ready to start talking.

The Dutch farmer protests are not anti-environmental, but a response to economic pressures and land grabs by corporations like Bill Gates and Monsanto. Farmers use fertilizers out of necessity, not choice. The Great Reset uses a green agenda to bankrupt farmers and seize their land. While supporting a green agenda, it is important for people to stand in solidarity with farmers, allowing them time to transition to more sustainable practices without globalist interference. Together, we can make decisions that benefit both farmers and the environment.

In 2019, the Netherlands faced a supposed nitrogen crisis, which led to government crackdowns on farmers and potential land expropriation. However, the speaker argues that this crisis is manufactured by bureaucrats in The Hague and Brussels. They claim that the attack on farming is part of a global agenda called the 2030 agenda, which is a United Nations initiative consisting of 17 sustainable development goals. While these goals may seem noble, the speaker believes that achieving them would require a forceful redistribution of goods, property, and rights, ultimately leading to the obliteration of basic liberties. The speaker suggests that the true motive behind this agenda is to establish a one world government, controlling every aspect of our lives. Farmers are specifically targeted because the agenda aims to radically change our way of life, including the food we eat.

Conservative leader Pierre Polivier refuses to confirm if Canada will commit to its emission targets under the Paris agreement. When asked if he will denounce the accord, Polivier avoids a direct answer. Instead, he states that his agenda and policy focus on reducing emissions and delivering at a lower cost.

Dutch people want a leader who can unite the country, represent all citizens, and lead internationally. It seems unlikely that Mr. Wilders will form a coalition government with a majority. The choice tomorrow is significant: either a center-right government led by me, offering real solutions to the existing problems, or a left-leaning government with Timmermans' party.

Mark Rutte, the Dutch prime minister, has been in office for thirteen years. It is unlikely that he would want to leave a legacy of aligning with the PVV's election program, as he aspires to top positions in the European Union or NATO. This could have consequences for his future prospects. People in Brussels have already made this connection, suggesting that if the VVD were to form a coalition with Geert Wilders' party, Rutte's chances of becoming NATO's top leader or holding a position within the European Commission could be jeopardized.

Advocates for NetZero need to address the practicalities of achieving it. Without fossil fuels, which are used in almost everything we do, including food production, transportation, and job creation, it's not feasible. The goal of achieving net zero emissions by 2050 is unrealistic and has not been successful so far, as global carbon emissions have actually increased. This policy benefits countries like China, India, and Russia, who don't follow the rules, at the expense of Western nations. Eventually, this will lead to anger and frustration when net zero emissions cannot be achieved.