reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Vaccines date back to 1626 poisoning the people. Okay? Poisoning the people since 1626. This is not new. They're not like, oh, we got some new stuff, and it's not the snake venom or anything else. It's just poison is what it is. They've been poisoning the people since 1626 with vaccines. So no child, no adult, no grandma, no grandpa, no mother, no nothing needs any shots, whether it be tetanus, whether it be rabies, whether it be anything. You do not need to put any shots into your animal, your grandma, your father, your mother, your children. That's it. It's straight poison. And there's a great picture from 1885, and it says, vaccinate, vaccinate, vaccinate. There is money in the side effects. That's it. That is all vaccines. Money in the side effects for the pharmaceutical companies to poison the people and just keep making money off of them. You go back into the nineteen hundreds and doctors used to claim there were no cases of cancer in an unvaccinated person. How about the Amish? The Amish don't put a single vaccine into their body, And you notice that the Amish look pretty darn healthy. Well, altogether. Why? They're not injecting themselves with poison. It makes no sense. So there's all these cultures who didn't use this garbage. And then as they now become like modernized and they start putting this garbage into them their body, then all of a sudden, people start coming down with all the same illnesses. I got autoimmune, lupus. I got allergies. I got this. I got that. Right? Right? All those things. Where do you think they're all stemming from? They get you as you're young because you don't have the ability to consent. Right? Tell that tell the doctor to take the needle and stick it in themselves. Give themselves their own boosters and vaccines. You don't need to do that. And I think people need to stand the ground with that because there has never been a single vaccine that has ever helped helped anybody.

"dreadful use of vaccines and the mandates that have caused so much problem." "From the very beginning, these vaccines were not vaccines, particularly the ones that ended up after AstraZeneca with all the clots and they were shut down." "The messenger RNA vaccines of Pfizer and Moderna, of course, unbelievable problems and damage to people." "They were pushed into this by Pfizer and all the people that Pfizer and Moderna wanted to get this into everybody." "These were not vaccines. These were horrible gene therapies that could actually integrate into your genome." "turbo cancers." "They are incompetence, medical negligence, everything, and nobody is accepting responsibility for this." "This is Nuremberg trial stuff." "They were never ever effective." "There was no evidence that they were effective whatsoever. It was basically hope, and they were never ever safe."

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the real danger is the continued genetic tinkering via mRNA integration into all vaccines. The speaker is now anti-vaxx and will not get any more vaccines for themselves or their family because all vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies, driven by profit.

The transcript discusses the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean, claiming that vaccination goes against the constitution to take this “garbage.” It asserts that most people don’t know that doctors do not take the shots themselves or give them to their own children, yet they administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. It notes that certain physicians have observed patterns such as paralysis within twenty-four hours after the injection, up to six months after, cancer near the injection area, and diseases such as TB within twenty years. The speaker claims that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern in 1796, describing it as poisoning the people. The question is posed: why do they do this? The answer given is that vaccination is a big business, and that it is protected by the government. The speaker asserts that vaccination was protected by the government in 1986 so that people cannot sue. It is stated as part of the argument that vaccination is the leading cause of why children die under the age of 15.

The speaker believes cooperation with companies developing vaccine technology should be outlawed due to "nefarious intent" and financial incentives. They claim the pharmaceutical industry profits from vaccine-induced adverse outcomes, leading to costly medical treatments and prescriptions. Vaccines are described as an "economic loss leader" for the medical-industrial complex. Healthy, unvaccinated children don't generate revenue, while vaccines can lead to health issues like asthma, allergies, ADD/ADHD, diabetes, and cancer. The speaker compares vaccines to a free gift that lures people into purchasing more expensive products or services. They argue that "free" vaccines can cost individuals their health, citing potential side effects like Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, encephalitis, and neurological issues, as well as turbo cancers, respiratory problems, and myocarditis. A forthcoming study will allegedly reveal a significant number of deaths from chronic renal disease linked to vaccines. The speaker concludes that the pharmaceutical industry fiercely defends the vaccine schedule because it drives their profits, especially with the advent of mRNA technology.

Speaker 0 asserts that there is no safe vaccine on the childhood schedule and labels themselves an anti-vaxxer because no vaccine has been properly tested for safety. They state that, in the book Vax Facts, you are more likely to die from the vaccine than from the disease for which there is a vaccine, and that this is true for every single vaccine on the childhood schedule. They acknowledge that death from the vaccine is still a death and “super rare,” but claim you are much more likely to die from the vaccine. They ask which do you want: a greater chance of dying from the vaccine or a lesser chance of dying from the disease, noting that for many of these diseases, the risk is zero.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 engage in a discussion about allegations surrounding vaccines. Speaker 0 asserts that, up until about a year and a half ago, he would not have endorsed such views, but now, after considering what is happening, he feels compelled to admit that colleagues and friends who have claimed this is genocide may be right. He states, “There is no other agenda. There is no other explanation,” insisting that there can be no alternative interpretation for current events. He contends that these vaccines, described as gene-based vaccines, are not needed because we are not dealing with a killer virus that is destroying mankind, and that anyone who says otherwise is lying to one’s face. He further claims that the so-called vaccines could never have protected against infection because the antibodies are not present when they are needed. He adds that resistance and immunity to these viruses is not antibody-based but is based on T cells that are present in every human being. He then makes a grave assertion about the vaccines, describing them as “the most terrible instruments that have ever been introduced into the human body to destroy humans,” asserting that they affect “the mind, going to the heart, going to the organs and to the entire body,” and concluding that these vaccines are going to destroy mankind. Speaker 1 frames the discussion by highlighting that Michael Yiddin described the situation as genocide and criminal, and asks Speaker 0 to explain, noting that Speaker 0 had stated the same views. The exchange centers on whether the situation constitutes genocide and criminal acts, with Speaker 0 acknowledging the possibility but using strong language to emphasize his conclusions about the vaccines’ necessity, mechanism of immunity, and potential harm. Overall, the dialogue presents a trajectory from initial reluctance to endorsement of genocide claims, driven by claims that gene-based vaccines are unnecessary, not protective against infection due to lack of antibodies, rely on T-cell-based immunity, and may cause widespread harm to the mind, heart, and other organs, culminating in the assertion that such vaccines could destroy mankind.

The speaker claims that vaccines are not safe or effective, particularly the COVID-19 jab. They believe that those who promote and administer vaccines should be imprisoned, and parents who allow their children to be vaccinated should have their children taken away. They argue that COVID-19 was created to make the flu seem more dangerous, even though flu statistics show it can be deadlier. The speaker also suggests that the COVID-19 jab weakens the immune system, affects DNA, and can cause cancer. They criticize doctors for administering the vaccine to various groups, including toddlers, patients, school children, and pilots. Lastly, they believe that getting the COVID-19 vaccine is either suicide or murder.

Vaccines eradicated smallpox and polio. The speaker was taught that vaccines are safe, effective, and necessary, and there's no reason to question it. Medical school rotations reinforced that vaccines are safe and effective, and the speaker was told to ignore the inserts because that's lawyer jargon. Medical school provided no education about vaccine contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. The speaker assumed the science was settled and didn't question vaccines.

The speaker advocates for stopping all pregnancy vaccines and hepatitis B vaccines at birth, citing a lack of herd immunity from flu, pertussis, and COVID shots. They claim that repeated pertussis vaccinations lead to IgG4 production, causing immune system unresponsiveness. They attribute resurgences of diseases like measles to the failure of vaccines and the decline of naturally immune individuals. They suggest the measles vaccine should not be continued after eradication due to non-specific effects. The speaker also calls for halting Gardasil/HPV vaccines to reduce harm to teenagers. They express frustration with the current state of vaccine recommendations, viewing even minor concessions as insufficient. They propose a controlled reduction in vaccinations, suggesting tetanus vaccines be elective for older children. The speaker identifies as an "anti-vaxxer" due to their knowledge of immunology and disease management, but remains open to discussion with those who choose to vaccinate.

The transcript argues that discussions of vaccines should be approached as part of eugenics, claiming that this is where the concept originates. It then cites medical claims attributed to “doctor Henry,” stating that “numerous vaccinations” and the “medical monopoly” have caused “more disease and suffering than I could name.” The speaker claims that diseases such as cancer, syphilis, and cold sores are “direct result[s] of vaccination.” Next, it references “doctor Herbert Snow,” asserting that doctors are “always fire[d]” and claiming that in recent years “many women and men in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly.” The speaker says this resembles 2020 and claims that after attending a feast or banquet, “eighty percent of the deaths are caused by inoculation or vaccination.” Finally, it cites “doctor Clark,” claiming that cancer was “practically unknown” until vaccinations with cowpox vaccine were introduced. The speaker adds personal testimony: the speaker “had to deal with at least two hundred cases of cancer” and “never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.”

Speaker 0 asserts that the era of vaccines is over. Vaccinating has been done since the seventeen hundreds, back when bloodletting was state of the art medicine. They didn’t even have a theory of viruses and bacteria back then; they just had crude practices. That technology has failed. It has been revealed to cause catastrophic harms in the population. The treatment for bacteria is antibiotics, and the treatment for viruses should be antivirals. Vaccines have no place in medicine going forward. That’s where we’re gonna get to. That’s what the data actually show us right now. It’s just gonna be a lot of hard fighting between now and arriving at what the data is already showing us right now.

Everything was alive from the beginning, asymptomatic people don't transmit, and kids are a break on the disease, not harbingers. Lockdowns were a farce, and masks don't work. COVID-19 vaccines destroy your immune system and distribute widely in the body. The genetically modified RNA in the vaccines can't be broken down and contains contaminants. Pfizer put an SV40 promoter in the vaccine, known to bind p53, the guardian of the genome, and cause cancers. The vaccines have design flaws, distribute to the brain, bone marrow, ovaries, and testes, and have long-term production. The vaccines are dangerous, have process-related impurities, and cause cancer, strokes, and heart attacks. There were 40% more deaths in 2021 between 18 and 64, so stay away from the vaccines.

The speaker claims colored vaccines are dangerous, with no clinical benefit and over 10,000,000 deaths worldwide. They suggest avoiding vaccination altogether, citing studies showing unvaccinated kids are healthier. They criticize censorship by the government and medical boards, leading to job loss and license revocation for speaking out against the narrative. The medical journals are also deemed corrupt. Speaker 1 mentions not every batch causes harm, as they themselves took a few shots without issue.

More than five years into the COVID-19 “disaster,” a paper published by Holzsher and colleagues in *Science, Public Health Policy and the Law* makes a broad call to remove all COVID-19 vaccines from the market. The paper cites international groups making that call, including lawmakers, and summarizes peer-reviewed scientific manuscripts concluding that risks far outweigh benefits. In the last few weeks, the US CDC dropped its universal recommendation for COVID-19 vaccination across all groups, and the transcript describes public health agencies as “quietly backing away” from COVID-19 vaccination. The group presenting these points is unified in calling for all vaccines to be removed from the market, with particular emphasis on messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines. They call for a moratorium on the entire platform, including Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, and also including the Moderna respiratory syncytial virus vaccine. The transcript states that mRNA vaccines have “no ability to shut off production of the antibody.”

The speaker states they used to believe inoculations were an elegant, minimal intervention with large benefits. They now consider injecting anything into tissue with a hypodermic needle a radical intervention. They argue that comparing mercury in shots to mercury in tuna is a game of smoke and mirrors because there shouldn't be mercury in tuna, the amount in tuna isn't trivial, and there's a huge difference between ingesting mercury and injecting it. The body doesn't have mechanisms to deal with injected mercury, so the consequences are arbitrary. While they still believe vaccination is potentially valuable, they do not trust the mechanisms that generate or test these products for effectiveness or safety.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the danger lies in continued genetic tinkering. mRNA is being integrated into every vaccine. Therefore, no vaccines should be taken. All vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies because there is so much money in it.

The speaker discusses “Santa virus,” swine flu virus, and COVID virus, claiming “viruses are fake.” The speaker then frames the 1976 swine flu campaign as an example, saying the CDC “control plan for the national vaccination campaign against the swine flu in 1976” came out of Atlanta and that “there was not a single known case of this flu in The United States” yet “it did not stop the medical monopoly from their scheme.” The speaker says swine breeders began to inject pigs and animals, after which “all of their animals began to perish,” and claims that if swine breeders would not inject toxins into animals, “Our only market is to inject it into the people.” The speaker then claims “Doctor Morris then went public with his statement” that “at no point was there a swine flu vaccine which was effective,” and says he was fired. The speaker adds that “anybody who goes against the vaccine narrative” is “removed.” Next, the speaker says that because the pigs were passing and the vaccine needed to be delivered to people, “president Ford appears on a news program to urge the American people to submit to the vaccination for the swine flu vaccine, 1976.” The speaker says it “didn’t work with the pigs” because it was killing the pigs, and claims doctors began saying “don’t do that,” leading to the president being involved. The speaker then states that insurance agencies “went public with their warning” that they would not issue insurance to the drug firm because it “can cause a lot of damages.” The speaker ties this to 2020 by saying it “Sounds a lot like 2020.” The speaker claims “it was a foil” that insurance companies warned, while Gerald Ford appealed to “the 215,000,000 Americans” to get “the booster,” “Get the injections,” and “Get your vaccines,” and that the government would provide “donuts” and “Krispy Kreme.” The speaker calls it “Murder by injection,” and says that “within a few months” claims totaling “$1,300,000,000 filed by the victims” included “paralysis from the swine flu vaccine.” The speaker then claims the “medical monopoly” changed the name to “GBS,” and that in 1986 “Reagan signed a bill to protect all vaccines from lawsuits.” The speaker concludes by saying this “sums up vaccines in a nutshell,” asserting that presidents, animals, doctors, and TV were used and that the message is “repeating it to you until you don’t.” The speaker ends with a directive, saying anyone who tells others to put vaccines “into your body” should be “beat them up or put them in a cage and beat them up,” mentioning “UFC” as an example.

The speaker believes that the vaccine is useless and scientifically flawed. They argue that it is based on a protein that is not relevant and is toxic to the endothelium. They criticize the use of mRNA technology in vaccines, stating that it has never been used before and that it is the first time in history that the body is being asked to produce antibodies against the virus. They claim that this goes against medical knowledge and rationality. The speaker also mentions the importance of consent and the need for more time before approving such vaccines. Overall, they believe that the principles of vaccination and medicine have been disregarded.

The speaker claims that vaccines are being used to weaken and destroy people's immune systems, especially in children. They argue that vaccines are useless and harmful, and that they are actually bioweapons. The speaker also mentions the connection between the World Health Organization (WHO) and Rockefeller, suggesting a sinister agenda. They conclude by stating that the intention is to make people die faster.

The speaker argues that the vaccine program should stop and that injecting foreign matter into babies cannot be considered an improvement to their health. They reference Peter McCullough as someone who said the program needs to halt. They criticize the expansion of vaccine policy since the 1986 Act, which granted liability protection for the trio of vaccines (MMR, DPT, and polio) at the time, and suggest there was no foresight about expanding to multiple doses of many vaccines for little babies. Now that this has happened, they insist it must end. They point to polio as an example, noting that children still receive four polio vaccines even though polio has not appeared in the Western Hemisphere since 1991, and that the World Health Organization declared the region polio-free in 1994. They question why four doses of polio vaccines, which contain monkey kidney cells and formaldehyde, are given for a disease the region is no longer exposed to. They ask, “Why? To protect against what? That’s not even here.” They extend the argument to “the same thing” with other vaccines. The speaker asserts that measles has not been deadly since 1963 and explains that the measles virus has a life cycle in which an outbreak occurs roughly every four years regardless of vaccination rates. They make a similar claim about pertussis. They argue that injecting foreign matter into children does not improve their health and is not preventing deadly diseases that are now treated with antibiotics, steroids, inhalers, and other therapies. They point out that it is not a big deal to have multiple tetanus shots and still contract tetanus, using this as evidence about the effectiveness of tetanus vaccination. Overall, the speaker contends that the concept of deadly diseases being eradicated by vaccines is a multi-generational myth and that vaccines are not reliably protective. They argue that the practice has run its course and that it is overdue for the entire vaccine program to end, suggesting that it did its job and should now be discontinued. The concluding stance is that the multi-generational myth of deadly diseases and the safety and protection of vaccines should stop, and that the program should be ended.

The transcript references the book Vaccinations Do Not Protect by Eleanor McBean and presents several assertions about vaccines and the vaccination system. It claims that the book argues taking vaccines is unconstitutional and labels vaccines as “garbage,” suggesting that vaccination is a large, protected industry. It asserts that doctors do not take the shots themselves, do not give them to their own children, but administer them to other people’s children because they receive a commission. The speaker states that some physicians have noticed patterns associated with vaccines, including paralysis within twenty-four hours after an injection, paralysis up to six months after an injection, cancer near the injection site, and diseases such as tuberculosis within twenty years. The speaker also notes that Edward Jenner, the father of vaccination, noticed a similar pattern of “poisoning the people” in 1796. The transcript emphasizes that vaccination is a big business and claims it is protected by the government. It references 1986 as a key date when vaccination was protected by the government so that people cannot sue. The speaker concludes by asserting that vaccination is the leading cause of death among children under the age of 15. Throughout, the claims are presented as facts or observations within the book and its interpretation, with emphasis on alleged patterns, motivations, and systemic protections surrounding vaccination.

Speaker 0 asserts that vaccines have injured hundreds of thousands, and that 'we're not really sure how many have been killed by it, but a significant amount.' The statement continues that 'They had to come off the market' and 'There was no choice.' The speaker links these actions to a goal: 'You want to make America healthy again, it had to be stopped.' The overall message claims widespread harm, uncertainty about fatalities, regulatory removal, and a necessity to halt the program to improve national health.

German summary: Speaker 0 äußert eine ganz konkrete, sehr gewagte These: "ich sage offen, dass ich von Impfungen bei Kindern unter 3 Jahren abrate." Speaker 1 fordert, das Buch zu lesen, das "so geschrieben ist, dass sogar Oberstufenschüler es verstehen", und sagt: "Wenn ein Arzt das liest und das nicht versteht, dann soll er seinen Titel an die Wand hängen." Er behauptet, Impfstoffe seien "lebensgefährlich" und die "größte Gefahr der Menschheit." Begründung: klassische Impfstoffe enthalten Zusatzstoffe wie Aluminiumsalze, die "Gift" seien und in die Blutbahn gelangen; der Unterschied zwischen Injektion und Verzehr sei entscheidend; in Muskeln injizierte Substanzen gelangen in die Blutbahn. Bei Kleinkindern sei die Konzentration nach einer Impfung mit Diphtherie, Tetanus, Patusis "unglaublich hoch." Er schlägt vor, "wartet wenigstens die 3 Jahre ab." Lebendimpfstoffe hält er für problematisch; "niemand hat's wirklich gezeigt, dass die Viren harmlos sind." Er verweist auf Polio, Tollwut und Tetanus und behauptet, "für keinen Impfung ... echte Wirksamkeit nachgewiesen worden" außer Tollwut und Tetanus. English translation: Speaker 0 asserts a very concrete, very bold thesis: "I openly say that I advise against vaccinations for children under 3." Speaker 1 urges reading the book, which is "written in a way that even high school students can understand," and says: "If a doctor reads it and does not understand it, then he should hang his title on the wall." He claims vaccines are "life-threatening" and the "greatest danger to humanity." Reasoning: classical vaccines contain additives such as aluminum salts, which are "poison" and reach the bloodstream; the difference between injection and ingestion is crucial; substances injected into muscle reach the bloodstream. In toddlers, the concentration after a vaccination with Diphtherie, Tetanus, Patusis is "incredibly high." He suggests "wait at least 3 years." He regards live vaccines as problematic; "no one has shown that the viruses are harmless." He references polio, rabies, and tetanus, and claims "for no vaccine has real efficacy been demonstrated" except for rabies and tetanus.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.