reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In this video, the speaker criticizes a news article and a social media agency funded by corporate donors. They discuss the term "conspiracy theorists" and its use in mainstream news sources. The speaker then delves into the World Economic Forum and its founder, Klaus Schwab, mentioning his connection to Henry Kissinger and the CIA. They highlight the partners of the World Economic Forum and the high fees they pay to be a part of it. The speaker questions the benefits of membership and suggests that these corporations are investing for their own interests. They argue that globalist organizations prioritize corporate interests over democracy and challenge viewers to find a non-evil corporation among the forum's partners. The speaker also mentions their research on the Bilderberg group and the Atlantic Council.

Moderna, currently in stage 3 of vaccine development, is believed to have already developed the vaccine. Interestingly, Anthony Fauci, the first CEO of Moderna, was a Cornell graduate and roommates with Bill Gates. Moderna has connections to IG Farben, a company involved in World War II, which was later broken up by George Soros, who then formed Moderna. Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, and George Soros are all associated with Moderna. Additionally, Jeffrey Epstein was a major financial backer of Moderna until his alleged death.

A network president revealed that allowing certain voices on air could lead to the host's firing due to advertiser pressures, particularly from pharmaceutical companies. During non-election years, up to 70% of news revenue can come from pharma ads, which serve as a public relations tactic rather than simply promoting drugs. This funding influences the media, making it reluctant to investigate pharmaceutical practices, even when there are serious concerns about vaccine safety and corporate misconduct. The media often dismisses legitimate questions as anti-science, silencing discussions about vaccine injuries. There's a growing need to reconsider trust in the pharmaceutical industry, especially with the increasing government funding for drugs like Ozempic.

I'm an investigative reporter who initially trusted the medical establishment, but I've uncovered conflicts of interest and financial incentives that corrupt health research. The pharmaceutical industry legally launders taxpayer money through universities to produce unchallenged, biased studies. For example, a researcher who found a chemical feminizing frogs faced immense pressure to suppress his findings. Scientific journals are also compromised; former editors admit they couldn't stop industry-tainted studies. Drug companies ghostwrite articles for doctors to promote their products. They also influence medical schools, doctor education, media, and federal agencies, prioritizing profit over public health. This has led to a rise in chronic diseases, especially among children, that the medical establishment largely ignores. There's pressure to normalize these outcomes rather than address the root causes, as that is more profitable. Informed consent is also threatened, with the FDA loosening requirements for disclosing study risks.

The Chinese lab in Wuhan is linked to GlaxoSmithKline, which owns Pfizer. Dr. Fauci funded the lab, promoting the vaccine. BlackRock manages GlaxoSmithKline, which is tied to Soros Foundation. Soros owns companies involved in Wuhan lab. Allianz, with Vanguard as a shareholder, is connected. BlackRock, controlling central banks, has ties to Microsoft, owned by Bill Gates. Gates is linked to BioNTech and Pfizer, sponsors of WHO. A bat in Wuhan led to a global outbreak.

The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of vaccine manufacturers Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies that have implemented strict travel restrictions and of junk food companies. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta (formerly Facebook), Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which are all pushing the same narrative as the media. They conclude that Vanguard and BlackRock are behind it all.

Government regulators are influenced by big pharma, with FDA employees receiving royalties from approved vaccines and drugs. FDA's budget heavily relies on pharmaceutical industries, leading to agency capture. For instance, NIH owns half of the Moderna vaccine, with high-level deputies under Fauci receiving $150,000 annually from it indefinitely. This conflict of interest is not widely discussed in mainstream media, as speaking out can lead to censorship.

Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai describes his early work and views on medicine, the immune system, and systemic thinking. He states he was “on to this, believe it or not, 2007” and notes his PhD at MIT is in systems biology, focused on the immune system, particularly the interferon system. He has worked in medical research since he was 14, and he advocates a systems approach to understanding the body, arguing that medical education teaches organs in silos and that doctors often do not view the body as a connected system. He says this is why he did not become an MD. In 2019, he was invited by the National Science Foundation to give the prestige lecture on the immune system. He argues the immune system is not just innate and adaptive, but involves the gut, the microbiome, the vagus nerve, and gut-brain interactions. He asserts that a single government-imposed intervention, such as everyone getting a vaccine, is “stupid” from a precision medicine perspective, given individual variations in body chemistries and histories. He traveled across the U.S. giving lectures and led protests against vaccine mandates even before COVID, and he states he was known as a scientist who told the truth about the immune system. Shiva recounts his criticism of Fauci, whom he says he has followed since 1993, and claims Fauci helped “save” Robert Gallo in the AIDS era. He says Fauci became the subject of a tweet in March 2020 predicting mandated medicine, censorship, and economic destruction, which he says went viral. He describes launching the Fire Fauci campaign in May 2020 and organizing a mock debate after Fauci did not attend a debate invitation. In March 2020, he allegedly advised then-President Trump not to shut down the economy, instead to focus on boosting immune systems, and quarantine only those with pre-existing conditions or those who already have COVID. He asserts that other political figures promoted lockdowns and mandates, and he criticizes many elites as part of an establishment. He discusses media dynamics, alleging a theater where indictments or investigations are used to raise money for both sides, and he claims a small group, including Ari Emanuel, wields significant influence over Hollywood, media, and entertainment, including ownership of Endeavor and WWE, and that this creates distractions for the public. He contends Ari Emanuel’s agency represents many celebrities, including Trump and Obama, and suggests entertainment and publicity are controlled by a few. Shiva explains his independent presidential campaign, arguing that changing the system requires a movement, not just winning an election. He says his movement has grown to roughly half a million people and a global reach, with a leadership program and educational framework. He asserts that elections are fixed in terms of who appears on debates and visibility, and that real power comes from bottom-up movements. He references Truth Freedom Health as a platform with a curriculum and community to teach the science of systems so individuals can become leaders in their communities, not relying on Russell Brand or other elites. Shiva promotes downloadable materials: a flyer stating “the lesser of two evils is killing your children,” available at shivaforpresident.com, and encourages visitors to truthfreedomhealth.com for curriculum and community resources. He emphasizes that life expectancy in the U.S. has fallen since 1970-80, due to food, healthcare, stress, and income inequality, and argues this trajectory is a systemic issue connected to policies of the “swarm” across political lines.

Bill Gates' investments and interests are examined to determine his motives. He has been associated with suspicious companies, shown a focus on depopulation, and expressed contradictory views on vaccines. Gates has invested in criticized companies involved in human rights abuses, labor abuses, and tax avoidance. He also has financial stakes in fossil fuel companies and supports a plan to spray dust into the stratosphere to combat global warming. Gates' influence extends to organizations like Gavi and AGRA, where he has control over vaccine prices and agricultural policies. Critics argue that Gates' philanthropy is driven by his own agenda rather than genuine concern for others.

I've uncovered bombshell evidence that Travis Browne, the hacker who leaked a Doge employee's name to the Wall Street Journal, is funded by the German government. Browne, an ex-Twitter employee and Antifa supporter, runs the HateSpeech Tracker, which collects usernames of people he deems Nazis. Wall Street Journal journalist Catherine Long, who wrote the hit piece that led to the Doge employee's resignation, follows Browne on GitHub. Browne's HateSpeech Tracker was launched with help from Prototype Fund, which is funded by the German government. Browne is now suing X because he keeps getting banned for his doxing tactics. The media and government are endangering pro-freedom individuals. We must hold these people accountable.

Twitter released the long-awaited Fauci files, revealing that Dr. Anthony Fauci lied under oath about his use of Twitter. Despite denying any association with the platform, the files show that Fauci took control of the White House COVID response account twice in March and April 2021. Elon Musk had previously mentioned a dedicated Fauci fan club on Twitter, and the report confirms that a former lead company attorney at Twitter worked with Fauci on disinformation. Additionally, Twitter collaborated with pharmaceutical companies to shape vaccine marketing campaigns, actively suppressing opposing views while promoting COVID-19 vaccines.

The speaker claims MrBeast is not independent but owned by a web of powerful media owners and investors. They say he’s connected to the same people who own other creators and were once under a group called Scale Lab. At one million subs, the speaker says MrBeast sought more money and became involved with Reed Dusher, described as the CEO of Knight Media, who allegedly facilitated a honey sponsorship and a sponsorship with Aspirian, an entity linked to a money-lending network run by a prominent family. The narrative continues that Knight Media allegedly steered MrBeast toward major deals, including a recent NBA-related arrangement and an Amazon partnership. The speaker claims Alpha Wave Gamma invested $300 million, run by Rick Gerson, who purportedly knows high-profile figures. The closing question asks why MrBeast refused an interview and what the mentioned entities have in common.

The evidence shows that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation profited significantly from vaccines. After selling his stock, Bill Gates shifted his narrative, claiming vaccines were ineffective and the virus wasn't as serious as initially thought. This is surprising, given that throughout the pandemic, he promoted vaccines as highly effective in stopping the virus and transmission. These assertions turned out to be false, and he profited from them. Many view him as a philanthropist, but his actions suggest a motivation driven by financial gain throughout his career.

Andy Fauci is praised as a pandemic hero, urging people to get vaccinated to stop the virus. However, an investigation revealed $350 million in royalties hidden by Fauci and the NIH from pharma companies. Fauci is now charging up to $100,000 for speaking engagements post-Biden administration. He is listed as a motivational speaker. Fauci and Bill Gates were influential voices during the pandemic, with dissenting voices labeled as conspiracy theories.

The discussion traces the alleged dark origins and long-running influence behind modern medicine and vaccines, framing today’s pharmaceutical system as the culmination of a century-long strategy led by powerful interests. - Rockefeller’s role is presented as foundational. Speaker 0 describes John D. Rockefeller becoming America’s first billionaire in 1913 and using strategic philanthropy through the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (1901) and the Rockefeller Foundation (1913) to shape Western medicine toward laboratory-based, drug-centered approaches. The narrative claims this shift marginalized herbalism, naturopathy, homeopathy, and holistic remedies, promoting a model in which a pill is developed for every illness and patients remain chronically ill to sustain repeat business. - The early to mid-20th century is characterized as a period of regulatory capture and a pivot to synthetic, patentable drugs. From the 1920s to the 1940s, oil and chemical companies supposedly moved into synthetic drugs with Rockefeller guidance, removing incentives to patent natural remedies while patenting synthetic ones. This, the speaker argues, created a profit motive to treat illness as a recurring revenue stream. - Regulatory capture and the FDA’s evolution are discussed. The claim is that the FDA became more of a gatekeeper dependent on the industry it regulates, with former pharma executives and consultants filling key roles and rubber-stamping drugs. The only notable counterpoint highlighted is Doctor Francis Kelsey, who reportedly blocked the thalidomide approval in the 1960s, preventing birth defects in the United States and illustrating a brief period when public safety was prioritized. - The subsequent decades are summarized as intensifying industry influence. The 1970s are described as a time when pharmaceutical funding of clinical trials and lobbying expanded, and the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act is cited as enabling private patenting of publicly funded research, increasing collaboration between universities and industry and training medical professionals to favor pharmaceuticals. The 1990s are marked by direct-to-consumer advertising on U.S. television, which allegedly shifted patient behavior and doctor prescribing patterns toward medications advertised directly to the public. - Whistleblower testimony is invoked to illustrate ongoing concerns about drug safety and industry practices. A whistleblower recounts bribes and perks tied to drug promotion, including lavish gifts and trips to doctors, and asserts that patients are often treated as a means to profit for corporations. - The conversation shifts to vaccine safety and regulatory issues. The discussion includes claims about the COVID-19 vaccines, with assertions that the FDA acknowledges a number of child deaths, and a reference to an autopsy-based analysis by Dr. Peter McCullough suggesting a high proportion of vaccine-related deaths in examined cases. There is mention that Dr. McCullough faced professional pushback. - The importance of gut health and the microbiome is emphasized as a counterpoint to pharmaceutical-centric medicine. Speaker 3 argues that gut microbiome diversity is linked to many chronic conditions and aging, and cites the benefits of fermentation and kimchi. A specific emphasis is placed on kimchi as having a broad spectrum of beneficial bacteria and on the purported anti-aging effects observed in cell studies. - Kim Bright of Brightcore Nutrition advocates kimchi-based products (Kimchi One) as a practical approach to support gut health and overall well-being, describing customer testimonials about improved digestion, immune function, skin and hair health, and weight management. She argues for the daily use of gut-supporting probiotics, especially after antibiotic use, and asserts that antibiotics can disrupt gut flora, necessitating restoration of beneficial bacteria. - The speakers discuss consumer engagement and the role of direct customer contact, contrasting it with impersonal pharmaceutical industry practices. They express optimism about changes in medicine and a desire to reduce reliance on processed foods and large pharmaceutical advertising, hoping for reforms and greater transparency. Throughout, the tone asserts a pervasive influence of Rockefeller-era strategies on today’s medical and vaccine landscape, while promoting kimchi-based approaches as a healthier counterbalance and offering products as a practical embodiment of that stance.

We're injecting genetically modified organisms into kids' arms. My business strategies were questioned during the Microsoft antitrust trial. To counter the negative press, I invested in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, transforming my image. Vaccines are the best investment I've ever made, with over a 20 to 1 return. The Gates Foundation controls a vast supply chain, but it faces criticism for profiting from companies causing the very problems it aims to solve. Normalcy returns only with global vaccination. Until then, new vaccines and therapeutics are needed. Vaccine manufacturers have immunity. In India, the Gates Foundation incentivized mass vaccinations. An untested vaccine was given to tribal girls without proper consent, causing injuries and even deaths. The Indian Parliament investigated and initially kicked out the Gates Foundation. Studies show the oral polio vaccine caused paralysis in nearly 500,000 Indian children.

The speaker claims that those who oppose the pharmaceutical industry are punished, while those who support it, like Anthony Fauci, rise to the top. Fauci, who has been in his position for 50 years, is highly paid and serves the agency's ambition. The speaker accuses the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of abandoning its mission to understand why Americans are sick and instead focusing on developing drugs for profit. The NIH earns billions of dollars from the Moderna vaccine, with Fauci's employees benefiting from patents and royalties. The speaker suggests that the agency's commercial interests have overshadowed its regulatory responsibilities.

The speaker discusses Vivek Rameswami and raises concerns about his background and affiliations. They mention his education, internships, and business ventures, suggesting possible connections to influential figures like George Soros and Justin Trudeau. The speaker also questions Rameswami's stance on China, pointing out his business ties to the country. They highlight his involvement with various organizations, including the Milken Institute and the World Economic Forum. The speaker concludes by accusing Rameswami of being a corporate Trojan horse and insinuates that he is working against former President Trump. They offer to provide advice to Rameswami's team.

I'm definitely not buying Mark Zuckerberg's supposed MAGA conversion. After I posted a Twitter thread linking a group he donated to with organizations that are actively sabotaging Trump's agenda, Meta ran to the New York Times to smear me. Their defense was basically, "We gave money, but don't know what they did with it." Digging deeper, I found over a dozen organizations funded by Zuckerberg that are suing Trump and organizing protests against his policies. Zuckerberg hasn't publicly stated any intention to withdraw funds from these groups. He issued a letter apologizing for their impact on the 2020 election, but provided no evidence. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative website, which previously listed thousands of grants to left-wing organizations, now only shows grants from 2024 onward, conveniently erasing the record of election interference.

The speaker points out that major media outlets like CNBC, Fox, and CNN are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock, who are also the top shareholders of Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, and Moderna. They mention that Vanguard and BlackRock are also the top shareholders of flight companies and junk food manufacturers. The speaker suggests that this control extends to social media platforms like Meta, Snapchat, Twitter, and Google, which they claim are pushing the same narrative as the media. They emphasize that these companies are profit-driven.

Bill Gates is criticized for his philanthropy, tax avoidance, and influence over media. His foundation is accused of promoting eugenics, investing in harmful industries, and pushing vaccines with negative side effects. Gates is portrayed as a powerful figure manipulating information and controlling narratives. The transcript raises concerns about his actions and questions the trustworthiness of his initiatives.

The speaker recaps an investigation into the "Rumble influencer pipeline," starting with Steven Crowder, who is funded by several companies. Pure Talk sponsors numerous conservative figures and is owned by Tellrite Holdings, run by Reggie McFarland. Tax Network USA sponsors a wide range of figures, including those on Rumble, as well as Russell Brand, Dave Rubin, and Donald Trump Jr. Seventeen Seventy Five Coffee also sponsors similar figures. A wellness company sponsors Kimberly Guilfoyle, Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, Megan Kelly, Michael Flynn, and others. These roll up to Colson Capital, owned by Foster Colson, which also owns Positive (sponsors Laura Loomer) and Alenco Labs. Colson Capital owns nanobiosym, a nanotech company with board members including Tenley Albright, Robert Langer (tied to Moderna, Koch, Pfizer, Unilever, Johnson & Johnson, and Eli Lilly), Ratan Intata, Homi Milan, and Paul Maritz. Nanobiosym is headed by Anita Goel, who has ties to Lockheed Martin, PepsiCo, the Air Force, DARPA, and other organizations, as well as John Kerry, Tony Blair, and Barack Obama's advisory council. The speaker suggests these figures are being paid to lie and plans to investigate Michael Shellenberger next.

The discussion traces a long, shadowy arc in the development of modern vaccines and medicine, arguing that rapid COVID-19 vaccine progress rests on over a century of influence by powerful interests rather than sudden breakthroughs. - The narrative centers on John D. Rockefeller, who became America’s first billionaire in 1913, the same year the Federal Reserve was created. It frames Rockefeller as leveraging his oil wealth to monopolize medicine, promoting prescription drugs while vilifying natural and holistic remedies. The claim is that Rockefeller used strategic philanthropy (Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, established 1901; Rockefeller Foundation, 1913) to push laboratory-based, drug-centered medicine, marginalize herbalism and naturopathy, and steer doctors toward pharmaceuticals. The effect, according to the speakers, was to keep people sick so they would return for ongoing treatments rather than cures. - The timeline continues with the rise of the pharmaceutical industry from the 1920s to 1940s, described as moving into synthetic drugs with Rockefeller guidance. Natural remedies were said to be non-patentable while synthetic drugs could be patented, creating a business incentive for ongoing, chronic treatment rather than cures. - The conversation shifts to regulatory dynamics, arguing that regulation became regulatory capture from the 1930s to 1960s, with the FDA functioning as a gatekeeper increasingly populated by former pharma professionals. The FDA’s integrity is debated through the example of Dr. Francis Kelsey, who resisted approving thalidomide; the drug was later linked to birth defects worldwide, and Kelsey’s stance is presented as a rare early stand for public safety. - In the 1970s and 1980s, the narrative asserts growing corporate influence: pharma lobbies expand, advertising budgets explode, and medicine becomes a growth industry. The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 is cited as enabling private patents on publicly funded research, tying universities to pharma interests and shaping medical education toward pharmaceutical solutions. Direct-to-consumer advertising is highlighted as a turning point in the 1990s, pressuring doctors through patient demand spurred by TV ads. - The discussion includes a first-hand account from a former pharmaceutical sales representative, Lisa Prada, who describes bribes and perks (golf outings, concerts, strip clubs, etc.) to influence prescribing, and asserts that patients were often treated as means to corporate ends. - Kim Bright, founder of Brightcore Nutrition, joins to discuss current health issues, arguing that the pharmaceutical industry prioritizes profits over patient well-being. She notes that the Rockefeller Foundation funded COVID-19 vaccine efforts (she cites $55 million) and argues the foundation and industry continued to push medical interventions globally. She notes that the FDA’s public acknowledgment of COVID vaccine-related child deaths is incongruent with whistleblowers’ claims and autopsy data. - The program underscores the idea that prescription drugs are the third leading cause of death in the United States and Europe, citing studies on gut microbiome disruption from medications like antibiotics and acid-reducing drugs (dysbiosis) as a major contributor to chronic disease. - The gut microbiome is emphasized as central to health. Dr. David Perlmutter’s work on the gut-brain connection is referenced, including criticism faced for linking diet and fermented foods to health outcomes. Kimchi is highlighted as a powerful antimicrobial and a potential anti-aging agent in cellular studies. The hosts discuss kimchi’s health benefits, including improved digestion, immune function, and weight management. - Brightcore promotes Kimchi One capsules as a convenient alternative for Americans who dislike traditional kimchi, claiming benefits such as reduced bloating, better digestion, improved hair and skin, and weight loss. A discount offer is advertised: 25% off online, up to 50% off with a phone order, free shipping, and a free vitamin D3 with the first 100 callers, using the code provided. - The conversation closes with reflections on the do-not-mistake-the-system dynamic, optimism about changes in medicine, and calls for removing dependency on processed foods and advertising-driven medicine, with an acknowledgment of RFK Jr.’s activism against pharmaceutical ads on television.