reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In Helsinki, Dr. Hanna Nochonek testified that Finnish health authorities knew COVID vaccines didn't fully prevent transmission since summer 2021. They advised the government to stop using COVID passes by the end of the year, but the government ignored it. A citizen, Mikka Vahokala, is suing the government over this issue. For more information, visit casecovidpass.com. Helsinki correspondent for Positivity and Good TV.

The speaker believes mandating vaccines and negating natural immunity from infection was a big mistake. They agree that the general public's negative sentiment towards vaccines is now greater than when they became CDC director in 2018 or 2019. This increased negativity is largely due to how the COVID vaccines were positioned on the American public.

A doctor claims there were "perverse incentives" during the pandemic to administer COVID vaccines. As an outpatient physician, she states she could have made $1,500,000 if she had vaccinated the 6,000 COVID patients she treated. She suggests that both outpatient and inpatient settings had "financial incentives" to adhere to government protocols.

An Australian man has won a landmark claim against his employer after suffering severe health issues from the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Daniel Sheppard, a youth worker, was forced to take the vaccine to keep his job and later developed pericarditis, a potentially life-threatening condition. The South Australian Employment Tribunal ruled that Sheppard is entitled to workers' compensation benefits and reimbursement for medical expenses. This case sets an important precedent for holding employers accountable for injuries caused by workplace vaccine mandates. It also highlights the growing number of people seeking legal action against vaccine mandates and the need for informed consent and medical freedom.

As scientists, our job during a pandemic is to provide policymakers with answers to inform their decisions. We shouldn't dictate personal choices like saying goodbye to loved ones or attending funerals. Instead, we should present the risks and allow individuals to decide for themselves. Scientists shouldn't close schools or limit hospital treatments. Our role is to offer reliable data, empowering people to make informed choices. Science should promote freedom and knowledge, not impose restrictions. Pushing mandates, especially for rapidly developed vaccines like the COVID vaccines, can erode public trust. If science champions freedom and knowledge, it will have widespread support.

Australians were shocked by Professor Angus Dalglish's segment on Sky News, where he discussed the controversial mRNA vaccines. As a prominent oncologist, he criticized the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns and vaccine mandates, and highlighted Sweden's better approach. Dalglish expressed serious concerns about the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, labeling them as harmful gene therapies rather than traditional vaccines. He warned of potential long-term effects, including a rise in cancers, particularly affecting children. He called for an immediate halt to these vaccines and accountability from health authorities, likening the situation to historical medical negligence. The urgency for public health oversight was emphasized, with a reference to the need for accountability in the future.

Politicians and health bureaucrats are denying their role in advocating for lockdowns, vaccine mandates, and school closures during the pandemic. Justin Trudeau, the Canadian Prime Minister, claims he never insisted on mandatory vaccinations for everyone, despite evidence to the contrary. Anthony Fauci, a key figure in the COVID response, also tries to distance himself from the heavy-handed measures. Both leaders are attempting to rewrite history and avoid responsibility for the negative consequences of their actions. It is important to hold them accountable for the overreach and inhumane policies imposed on free people in the name of safety.

Vaccine mandates were a challenging time, but ultimately, individuals made their own choices regarding vaccination; there was no compulsory vaccination. Early next year, efforts will focus on reaching those who have not yet been vaccinated. To New Zealanders who haven't received their first dose: if you want to enjoy summer activities like going to bars, restaurants, getting a haircut, attending concerts or festivals, and participating in gym or sports events, getting vaccinated is essential.

Mandating vaccines, similar to France's approach, is sensible for reopening. The federal government compensates Australians with vaccine injuries, including serious conditions like heart inflammation and autoimmune disorders. Customers want assurance that employees in stores and restaurants are vaccinated. News Corp should mandate vaccines for its employees. Currently, 1,000 individuals are awaiting compensation claims. Most Australians are likely to get vaccinated, and there should be incentives for those who choose not to, such as the No Jab, No Pay policy. It's crucial to expedite the assessment of these claims, as there’s no reason for delays in 2023.

Health workers are facing reemployment issues due to not having 2 COVID shots, despite media reports of vaccine mandates being over. The Health Department has no national mandate, but some state health departments are taking action. The Minister is unaware of nurses being sacked in Queensland for not getting vaccinated. The issue is left to individual jurisdictions, with no national policy in place.

Mandating vaccines, like in France, is seen as a sensible approach to reopen. The Australian government compensates hundreds of citizens for COVID vaccine injuries. It is important for customers to know that store employees are vaccinated. COVID injuries include heart inflammation, damaged capillaries, and autoimmune disorders. News Corp supports mandating vaccines for its employees. Former Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Nick Coatsworth, suggests incentives or penalties for those who choose not to get vaccinated. He also emphasizes the need to assess compensation claims promptly. Currently, 1,000 individuals are awaiting approval for compensation. Mandating vaccines is considered a sensible approach.

Top experts accuse the government and big pharma of covering up information about COVID-19 vaccine injuries and adverse events. The US Supreme Court in Australia has ruled that COVID vaccine mandates for police and ambulance workers are unlawful. Embalmers are finding strange white fibrous clots inside bodies, possibly related to the COVID vaccine. Richard Hirschman, a lead embalmer, has discovered these structures forming outside of the body as well. The cause of these abnormal clots is still unknown, but they may contain foreign proteins and conductive metals. The findings raise concerns about the safety and long-term effects of the COVID vaccine. Further investigation is needed to understand the full extent of this phenomenon.

- The speaker notes dated 07/25/2022, reporting on developments related to baby deaths and baby funerals. They reference the UK government website, and specifically Northampton NHS in detail mentioning children's funerals, noting that contracts for this area have appeared that were previously unseen. They point to contractfinderservice.gov.uk and advise looking for “children's and babies' funerals.” They identify several awarded contracts, including one for Hertfordshire, another for Hertfordshire specifically for baby funerals, and contracts awarded for Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS, and Leicester Hospitals NHS. - The speaker mentions that the WNHS is another organization involved for those who do not want to have Mexican arranged funerals, stating that they will do that for you now. - A doctor in Australia, Dr. Luke McClinton, is described as leading the fertility services at the Mater Hospital and as a principal investigator for a series of randomized controlled trials. He is also described as the president of the Australian Institute for Restorative Reproductive Medicine and is labeled as “the top doctor in Australia in this field.” - The speaker asserts that Dr. Luke McClinton was sacked on Friday for not getting the jab and for attempting to release his data on miscarriages post-vaccination. They state that he has until the following Friday to exit his private practice rooms, as he is no longer allowed to practice in public or private settings. - The speaker claims that Dr. McClinton has been investigating miscarriages in couples post-vaccination and states that the “normal miscarriage rate” is between five and perhaps as high as sixteen percent. They then claim that since the introduction of the vaccine, he has found that seventy-four percent of women who are vaccinated are now having miscarriages. - The speaker reiterates the statistic: “Seventy four percent of women are having miscarriages who are vaccinated.” They suggest that this statistic would explain why hospitals allegedly want to deal directly with crematoria, with vans taking multiple babies directly to the crematorium, bypassing funeral directors. The speaker emphasizes that they had previously mentioned these points.

Senator Ron Johnson introduces Aaron Siri at the Kennedy Center, praising Siri as a highly consequential attorney and highlighting Siri’s work since the COVID era. Johnson recounts how his own oversight role in Congress evolved to rely on the adversarial legal process to extract information from a large government, noting that enforcement power rests in the courts. He frames Siri as someone who, through litigation and testimony, has exposed what he views as flaws in vaccine science, regulation, and safety oversight. Johnson describes Siri’s rise to prominence during the COVID period, beginning with public hearings on vaccine injuries in Milwaukee (June 2021) and Washington, DC (November 2021). He notes that Siri represented Dr. Patricia Lee, a physician who publicly discussed vaccine injection injuries and medical treatment obstacles, illustrating how federal health agencies and the CDC/FDA were perceived to respond to reports of injury. Siri’s testimony is credited with exposing calls to his practice from vaccine-injured doctors seeking treatment and the CDC/FDA officials’ defense of VAERS. Johnson highlights Siri’s 2022 and 2025 hearings, including the release of the VAERS data via the v-safe system, which Siri reportedly showed indicated higher rates of medical care sought and activity impairment among the vaccinated. Siri’s deposition of Stanley Plotkin and other experts is cited as foundational to his arguments about safety science, conflicts of interest, and the integrity of the vaccine schedule. Johnson points to the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) conclusions as being insufficient to prove vaccine safety for the entire childhood schedule, and to Siri’s presentation of the Henry Ford study (vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children) showing higher rates of chronic illness among the vaccinated. A central claim Johnson attributes to Siri is that vaccines have immunity from liability, due to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA). Siri’s summary is that vaccines are the only product in America with blanket liability protection for manufacturers and administrators, preempting design-defect claims via the Supreme Court interpretation that “the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act preempts all design defect claims.” Siri argues this immunity removes the market incentive to develop safer vaccines and leaves safety oversight to federal health authorities (HHS agencies: NIH, CDC, FDA) rather than to private manufacturers. Siri’s account of the 1986 act is that it created a mandate for safer childhood vaccines, with three provisions: (1) the general rule placing the secretary of HHS in charge of vaccine safety; (2) a task force of NIH, CDC, and FDA to make safety recommendations to the secretary; and (3) a biannual report to Congress on actions to improve vaccine safety. Siri contends that the biannual reports have never been submitted, and the task force produced only one report (in 1998) before disbanding, with Secretary Kennedy recently reinstating the task force. Siri’s firm ICANN has filed FOIA requests and submitted recommendations to HHS about how to improve vaccine safety, asserting that the current safety framework is not adequate. Siri then surveys the landscape across federal agencies. He asserts that the absence of liability incentives undermines safety, citing industry-pricing and trial designs, and he presents specific examples of licensure trials for routine vaccines that he claims were inadequate by design. Examples include: - Hepatitis B vaccines (Recombivax HB and Engerix B): five days of safety monitoring in trials with 147 participants, according to package inserts and FDA reports he obtained; he notes a lack of long-term safety data and questions the adequacy of control groups. - Prevnar 7 and Prevnar 13 (pneumococcal vaccines): uses Prevnar 7 as a control for Prevnar 13; safety data show notable serious adverse events but are deemed acceptable for licensure; subsequent trials used Prevnar 13 as control for Prevnar 15 with continued concerns about safety signals. - DTaP vs DTP: claims DTP served as control and that DTP itself was not licensed on placebo-controlled trials; cites a Guinea-Bissau study showing higher mortality with DTP vaccination and other studies suggesting increased overall mortality with DTP. - Dengue vaccine: notes long-term, placebo-controlled data showing increased severe harm and death in certain age groups; argues that non-placebo, ethically problematic trial designs can mask safety issues. Siri asserts a categorical claim based on FDA licensure documents: not a single routine neonatal vaccine on the CDC schedule has been licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial; when another vaccine served as control, that control was never a placebo. He presents this as evidence that safety assessments were compromised, especially for early-life vaccines administered in the first six months. Regarding autism, Siri frames it as a litmus test for vaccine safety studies. He recounts IOM findings that were inconclusive about DTaP (and related vaccines) causing autism, citing the lack of sufficient studies and the absence of unvaccinated comparison groups in many analyses. He describes ICANN’s FOIA drive to obtain CDC studies showing vaccines do not cause autism, asserting that most of the CDC’s own 20-study list did not address the vaccines in question. In deposition clips, Siri indicates that the IOM and CDC have not produced adequate evidence to rule out a causal link for several injuries, and that the only mainstream “no autism” position has come under legal scrutiny when the agencies faced court-ordered settlements and deposition testimony. Siri concludes with reform recommendations across agencies: - FDA: remove conflicted personnel from vaccine safety reviews, require clear licensure standards, mandate proper controls and longer safety monitoring, require practitioner notification of trial details, and post pre-registered study protocols; regain transparency of de-identified health data. - CDC/HRSA: align vaccine injury compensation with statutory requirements; expand the VICP to cover more injuries; ensure the CICP is reformed and funded to reflect safety concerns; reduce conflicts of interest; promote alternative, non-pharmaceutical approaches for root causes of chronic illness. - NIH: limit pharma involvement in vaccine development, focus taxpayer-funded research on root causes and replication, and avoid patent-related partnerships that create conflicts. - CMS/HHS-wide: require automated VAERS reporting and public access to de-identified health data; ensure religious exemptions are preserved; depoliticize vaccines and end mandates as political tools; end chronic disease by addressing vaccines as a contributing factor to immune dysregulation. Siri closes by insisting that mandating vaccines is a political act that undermines informed consent, arguing that safety should be decoupled from politics and that safety and efficacy claims should be grounded in rigorous, transparent science. He emphasizes that informed consent, not mandates, should govern medical decisions.

During COVID-19, the speaker believes the government was authoritarian and imposed a vaccine passport. As an unvaccinated person, the speaker was unable to travel across the country. When asked if they regretted not getting vaccinated, the speaker stated it was the best decision of their life.

The government overreached by mandating vaccines, especially for healthy individuals. Vaccines don't prevent infection but serious illness and death, mainly for those with comorbidities or over 60. Immunity from infection should have been considered valuable, as some lost jobs despite having antibodies from natural infection. Individual choice should have been honored.

Linda from Health Forum NZ shares a bombshell revelation from NZTS0S about a Ministry of Health report showing low transmission risk in schools and healthcare settings. Despite this, the government implemented unnecessary vaccine mandates causing harm. Expert witnesses in court failed to disclose this information, potentially committing perjury. NZTS0S seeks to appeal to the Supreme Court for justice. They urge affected individuals to share this revelation to hold those responsible accountable. Financial support may be needed for the appeal. Take action by contacting MPs and spreading awareness on social media. This urgent message highlights the need for accountability and justice.

Speaker 0 questions if it was Dr. Puert who made the comment that no one was forced to have the vaccination. Dr. Puert confirms that it was indeed him who made the comment. Speaker 0 then challenges Dr. Puert's statement, mentioning that during COVID-19 in Australia, people, including nurses and doctors, were required to get vaccinated to keep their jobs. Dr. Puert maintains his belief that nobody was forced to get vaccinated, stating that mandates or requirements are determined by governments and health authorities. Speaker 0 disagrees, suggesting that many Australians would not agree with Dr. Puert's perspective.

The digital ID system is safe, trustworthy, and voluntary. COVID-19 vaccinations were initially voluntary but are now mandatory for authorized workers in Victoria. The decision to mandate vaccines was made jointly by the Commonwealth and the States. The Queensland Supreme Court ruled mandatory vaccination for police officers and nurses unlawful, citing human rights considerations. Outgoing commissioner Katarina Carroll failed to properly consider human rights. Ultimately, vaccination remains voluntary, and individuals can decide for themselves. No one will be required to be vaccinated by July 18.

In a recently resurfaced interview, it is revealed that the speaker's intention behind COVID mandates was to encourage people to get vaccinated. The speaker believed that once individuals felt legally protected and empowered, schools and universities would require vaccinations for admission. The speaker argued that when vaccination became a practical necessity, people would prioritize it over ideological beliefs.

Four days after ordering a deadly injection, Dr. Picchu allegedly ordered the removal of the COVID-19 vaccination record from the patient's medical file. The speaker claims any doctor would know not to vaccinate an ill patient, especially one recently off a ventilator. The head of the ICU ordered an mRNA injection for COVID-19 for a patient less than a week removed from a mechanical ventilator. The patient died later that week. The speaker states that Dr. Picho, head of the ICU in British Columbia, still has his medical license.

No children died from COVID in 2020, so there is no need for them to be vaccinated. The government's role in this situation cannot be denied, and many Americans are outraged and angered by the lack of accountability. The worst thing to happen to our country and the world, in my opinion, is the ongoing vaccine mandates.

Australia's premiers faced criticism for their COVID-19 pandemic response, particularly regarding vaccine mandates, which some believe reduced vaccination motivation. There's a push for mandates similar to those in France to ensure public safety in stores and restaurants. The federal government is compensating Australians with vaccine-related injuries, including serious health issues. Despite evidence suggesting vaccines are crucial in combating the pandemic, concerns about side effects persist. Some argue that mandates lacked a solid basis, as they did not prevent transmission. The inquiry report criticized vaccine mandates, while others emphasize the need for widespread vaccination to reduce the virus's danger. Ultimately, accountability for past decisions remains elusive, with officials unlikely to admit mistakes.

In a resurfaced interview, it is revealed that the speaker wanted COVID mandates to empower and legally protect individuals. They believed that this would lead to schools and universities requiring vaccinations for admission. The speaker argued that making it difficult for people in their daily lives would help overcome ideological resistance and encourage vaccination.