TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Councilmen were approached with unmarked ballots, claiming they were from confused immigrant voters. One councilman mentioned gathering 43 blank ballots and wanting to ensure they were filled out correctly. Another councilman was warned about allegations of voter fraud, including buying ballots at midnight meetings. The conversation implied one councilman paid for 300 ballots in the past. The councilman did not deny the allegations, leading to suspicions of ballot manipulation. Translation: Councilmen were given unmarked ballots supposedly from confused immigrant voters. One councilman mentioned collecting 43 blank ballots to be filled out correctly. Another councilman was warned about allegations of voter fraud, including buying ballots at midnight meetings. The conversation suggested one councilman paid for 300 ballots in the past. The councilman did not deny the allegations, raising concerns about ballot manipulation.

The speaker describes finding a pattern of voter registrations from a single location. Specifically, they note that more than a thousand people were registered from 201 Washington Street Southwest, which they identify as a church. Upon further investigation, they claim this was part of a well-organized plan by Democrat donors, including George Soros, who allegedly poured millions into an Atlanta organization that went around this area and signed up all the homeless people. The speaker asserts this occurred during the day, when the area is typically filled with homeless individuals, and states that the organization receives money from people like George Soros to register homeless people to be able to vote from one single place. The speaker also points to another location across the Georgia state capital, stating that 48 Martin Luther King Jr Drive Southwest has registered over 2,000 people to vote from one single location. They identify the sign-ups as being conducted by the progressive organization, which they claim is signing up homeless people who are located right across the street. The speaker emphasizes the cold weather, noting it is 35 degrees at 1 PM, and reiterates that the area is normally filled with homeless people. In summary, the speaker asserts that megachurches and surrounding locations have seen extensive, single-location voter registrations, alleging deliberate campaigns funded by Soros-adjacent groups to register homeless individuals to vote from these sites. The locations highlighted include 201 Washington Street Southwest and 48 Martin Luther King Junior Drive Southwest, both described as heavily involved in large-scale registrations from single sites, with the latter attributed to a progressive organization and the former to a group described as aiding Democrats through homeless-voter registration.

The FBI reportedly declared Minnesota's Fifth Congressional District the terrorist recruitment capital of the country. This district is represented by Omar. According to the speaker, this is connected to Obama's importation of 70,000 Somalian immigrants, who all stayed in that district. The speaker believes "we" are inviting immigrants in to destroy the country.

The speaker argues that there are fake NGOs functioning as fake charities and that arrests should be made in relation to them. The claim is that these organizations are predominantly operated by Democrats, with occasional involvement by Republicans who are supposedly kept quiet by those false charitable activities. The speaker describes this pattern as evidence of a broader “uniparty” dynamic, suggesting that both major parties are involved in a system designed to influence politics. According to the speaker, the majority of the money flows to Democrats through these NGOs. They assert that billions of dollars are given to NGOs run by Democrats, and these organizations then channel funds through a large network of additional non-governmental organizations. This network allegedly creates a “giant money laundering scheme,” to the point where the speaker states that the words NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Key claims highlighted include: - Existence of fake NGOs that operate as fake charities. - A call for arrests related to these fake NGOs. - Predominant involvement of Democrats in running these NGOs, with occasional Republican involvement used to quiet concerns. - A description of a uniparty dynamic, implying bipartisan collusion or alignment in this activity. - Large-scale funding (billions of dollars) flowing to NGOs run by Democrats. - A subsequent cascade through a network of additional NGOs, forming a vast money laundering scheme. - The assertion that NGO activity and money laundering are nearly interchangeable in this context. The speaker emphasizes that the overall operation constitutes a substantial financial mechanism linked to political influence, portraying the NGO network as a conduit for laundering money rather than purely charitable activity. The overall framing is that the integrity of NGOs involved in political funding is compromised by this alleged system, tying NGO activity directly to money laundering in a way that equates the two terms in the speaker’s characterization.

The speaker expresses concern over the 4.8 million votes cast in the election and suggests that it could have been manipulated. They believe that the same issues occurred in various communities, regardless of size, and that it was an organized crime involving dirty voter rolls, ballot boxes, and mail-in ballots. The speaker claims to have spent the last 15 months developing these findings and concludes that it was an organized crime committed against Americans.

The speakers tour sites in Atlanta that they say show problems with voter registration and housing. They point to 477 P Street Northeast, where they state that, according to Georgia registration rolls updated less than two weeks ago, over 70 people are actively registered to vote from that location, even though the Peachtree Pine homeless shelter behind them was closed in 2017. They question why those former residents remain on the rolls and propose that there should be automatic purges when a shelter closes. They note the property is private, boarded up, with danger and no trespassing signs, and they attempt to enter entrances but are blocked. They compare the 70-some registrations at that site to the expectation that USPS would drop off mail or voter information for residents, and they express skepticism about how such registrations could occur. They also highlight a UPS store at 2625 Piedmont Road Northeast, where they say 96 people are still registered to vote from that address, again asserting this is a violation of Georgia law because a UPS store, PO box, or virtual mailbox cannot be a place of residence. They say the law specifies that where you vote from is where you live and rest, and they emphasize that this is a clear violation. The discussion shifts to the idea that, in addition to homelessness and voting, welfare fraud could be connected to these registrations. They claim that some churches act with advocacy groups to sign up homeless people for benefits and that this could involve checks sent to addresses used for registration. They allege that an outreach program at services and mail lines at a neighboring center, the central outreach and advocacy center, handles housing needs and mail for thousands of people. They report that the organization took in almost $700,000, with a government grant of $25,000 for homeless activities and a private contractor paid $50,000 to write grant proposals to the government, implying that the county maintains a surplus in election budgets and disperses funds to such groups. The speakers assert that the county is not cleaning voter rolls, thereby inflating the number of registered voters. They speculate that if there were many such sites—perhaps hundreds—with around 100 voters each, it would be easy to influence elections, noting that Georgia uses voter ID while contrasting with states like California. They also reference the 2020 election, suggesting that in Georgia, the state was won by a narrow margin and that widespread irregularities in Fulton County could have impacted the result. They discuss potential political leanings, claiming that donations and grants to these groups likely go to Democrats, and that the same organizations could be targeting homeless people to register them to vote and to receive government assistance. The presenters visit another church area at 201 Washington Street Southwest, identifying two lines: one for services and one for mail, implying that the church’s outreach program is involved in registering people for voting and distributing mail to many individuals. They reiterate their belief that the operation is funded by state and federal grants and private donations, and they reiterate that the aggregate registrations at two churches total over a thousand. They propose a broader pattern of “targeting” vulnerable populations for political and financial gain, suggesting potential corruption and kickbacks linked to government funds and political support. They conclude with a strong assertion that the described situation constitutes corruption.

According to the speaker, there is common knowledge that 15,000 deceased individuals have voted in the election. They claim that people have been using death registers to obtain Social Security numbers and then submitting them as mail-in ballots to check if their votes were counted. Allegedly, 15,000 deceased individuals, including those born in 18/90, have voted for Joe Biden. The speaker believes that the entire process is rigged to ensure Biden's victory through mail-in ballots.

In this video, residents of Hamtramck, Michigan, express concerns about alleged voter fraud within the Bangladeshi and Yemeni communities. They claim that absentee ballots are being filled out in people's homes by candidates, and there are reports of intimidation, coercion, bribery, and ballot harvesting. The Muslim majority city council and mayor are accused of being involved in these illegal activities. The residents fear that their once-welcoming LGBTQ sanctuary is at risk due to the policies of the new all Muslim leadership. Investigations are said to be underway, involving both local authorities and federal agencies.

The speaker questions the organic nature of rallies for figures like AOC and Kamala Harris. They claim that 84% of devices tracked at these rallies also attended nine or more Kamala Harris rallies or Antifa, BLM, pro-Hamas, or pro-Palestinian events, with 31% attending over 20. The speaker suggests this indicates paid attendance due to the travel and time commitment involved. They believe the Democratic party is artificially inflating its popularity by paying people to attend rallies and protests, creating "rally professionals."

Let's talk about Ilhan Omar's people in Minnesota. They brought about seventy, eighty thousand of these Somali Muslims in. They grouped them in one spot, and then they used that to elect her to congress. That's how she got there. Now one thing you need to remember, according to the stats is over 90% of these people have availed themselves of some sort of social service welfare program. Now, the authorities in Minnesota have a huge investigation because these people have come up with all kind of different scams—feeding children, housing, fake marriages, fake divorces, you name it. They came here and they started scamming the system like nobody would believe. And these are her people all grouped together in Minnesota. We're gonna talk about Dearborn, Michigan soon too.

The speakers discuss the numbers related to alleged voter fraud in the 2020 election. They estimate that about 7% of mail-in ballots, which amounts to approximately 4,800,000 votes, were involved in fraudulent activities across states like Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. They claim that this operation is widespread and happening in communities that receive funding from certain foundations. The speakers question who is stopping these fraudulent activities. Overall, they believe that voter fraud was a significant issue in the 2020 election.

The speaker asserts that the election is very important and emphasizes the crucial role of the Somali community in this process. According to the speaker, the Somali community is critical, and the speaker states that in their own election they would not be in office without the help of the Somali community. Somali voters came out in very large numbers and were able to register people to vote. The speaker notes that several thousand Somalis were recently naturalized as US citizens. The Somali community, the speaker claims, can make a huge impact on this election. The influence of Somalis is not limited to Minnesota; the speaker indicates that Somalis also play a significant role in battleground states such as Ohio and in Virginia. Specifically, the speaker mentions Somalis in Columbus, Ohio, and in Virginia, stating that they all have a role and opportunity to play a very big role in this election. The speaker believes that many people are counting on the Somali community to get involved, stay involved, and not just vote but help others vote. On the campaign, there are tremendous leaders. The speaker highlights Hibu Isak as a great leader who is very articulate, very smart, and a young lady who is out gathering Somali voters and other voters to get them to the polls. The speaker also mentions Miriam, who is on the campaign, along with other leaders. The overarching message is that the Somali community is a critical player, not just in Minnesota but also in Ohio and Virginia. The speaker urges listeners to call their relatives in those areas so they can be encouraged to vote. In summary, the speaker argues that Somali voters have demonstrated strong participation and registration efforts, there are newly naturalized Somali citizens, and Somalis’ involvement is pivotal in Minnesota, Ohio, and Virginia. The speaker calls for continued and expanded engagement, including assistance to others in voting, and points to specific community leaders like Hibu Isak and Miriam as examples of effective leadership within the campaign.

Speaker 0: The main group bringing in Somalians is Lutheran Social Services. They are led by this guy, and this is his staff. They get $2,375 for every Somalian they bring over. The question raised is why they are coming over here in the first place. Another surprise is that our government funded a dictatorship in Somalia throughout the Cold War led by Sahid Baare, and this dictatorship led to clan favoritism and overall destabilization that culminated in the country’s collapse in 1991. Troops were over there, which is connected to the movie Black Hawk Down. Overall, Somalians have no right to be in America, especially North Dakota and Minnesota. They don't integrate into our societies. They carry over their clan mentalities. If you have never interacted with Somalian people or don’t believe this, Nick Shirley's video from the other day is recommended. What do you guys think about all this? My name is Jeff Ball.

The speaker discusses a common theme in various locations involving the collection, bundling, and casting of ballots. They compare this pattern to what is happening in Atlanta, San Luis, Arizona, and other places. They emphasize that this is not just a coincidence, but rather an organized crime conspiracy.

The speaker asserts that political influence in the United States comes from foreign and special interests, claiming “They’ve bought our politicians. They’ve thrown their Jewish money at our politicians.” This funding, the speaker says, has sustained “forever wars,” and is tied to a broader pattern of influence that the speaker attributes to a deliberate agenda. In response, the speaker declares an uncompromising stance: “as American Christians, it’s America first. It’s America only.” The speaker emphasizes a resolve to resist what is described as entrenched interference, asserting, “we will have no choice but to declare our country a white Christian country.” A central aim named by the speaker is pushing back against an “immigrant takeover,” which is said to have been brought about by those who have “paid off our politicians.” The speaker expands this claim to a global scope, stating that these forces have “flooded Europe” and “flooded America with all different types of brown people and Middle Eastern Muslims.” This phrasing is used to identify the purported agents of influence as “the head of the snake behind the brownification of America,” and the speaker further alleges that these groups or interests have “bought out hundreds of millions of dollars in politicians in our country.” In naming specific individuals, the speaker cites Joe Biden, Beijing, CCP Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton, and Mary Aladdin, presenting them as part of the described network of influence. The overall message links political funding, immigration, and demographic change to a conspiracy aimed at reorganizing American political and social structure away from the speaker’s asserted vision of America. The speaker’s framing ties national allegiance to a combination of religious identity (white Christian) and ethnic framing, while portraying immigration and non-white population growth as a deliberate strategy by unseen actors. The overall claim centers on the belief that political power in the United States has been captured by financial interests tied to immigration and international actors, necessitating a national repositioning to prioritize “America first” and “America only.”

The report notes that Ahmed Naji Sheikh becomes the seventy-fourth person charged in the $300,000,000 feeding our future meal fraud case. Sheikh is described as the brother of Abi Aziz Farah, who was recently sentenced to twenty-eight years in prison. Farah was convicted with a group of others of stealing $50,000,000 of taxpayer money. Sheikh is accused of helping Farah launder that money. A second segment asserts that in a normal country there would be a major backlash, but liberals allegedly want this, calling it the greatest form of social justice and silencing anyone who speaks out against programs “getting robbed” that are meant to feed hungry children, labeling them bigots, racists, and intolerant. The speaker claims that 25% of Somalia’s GDP comes from remittance—the money sent from the United States to Somalia—and presents a strategy described as stealing money from American taxpayers, giving Somali residents free housing, free food, free school, and free health care. The claim continues that such a lifestyle would encourage four or five children, while the native-born population struggles to have one or two, leading to demographic shifts that purportedly grant Somali residents more political power to enact legislation beneficial to Somali people. The speaker asserts that money not exclusively for Somalis would be stolen through fraud and that, as money increases, it is sent back to Somalia, stated as their goal. This sequence is linked to a claim that someone spoke about it at an Ilhan Omar rally. The broadcast then references Ilhan Omar, describing her as someone who “openly hates America” and declares allegiance to a foreign country, and shows her at a church berating white people for liking Charlie Kirk, who is portrayed as representing American values. The claim attributes to the speakers a claim that viewers should “Thank you” for hearing this, and to describe those who are interested in rewriting this hateful man’s history as “full of shit.” There is a criticism of the church for allowing her to speak, and a rhetorical question about white liberals loving foreigners and telling them how evil they are for caring about their country. It is asserted that Omar’s plan has succeeded, that Minnesotans have adopted a belief that their purpose is to serve Somalia. The narrative then shifts to Charlie Kirk, described as a man who stood up for America and American values, who is characterized as evil and awful, leading to Omar’s appearance on CNN where she mocks Kirk’s death and says he belongs in the dustbin of history. Finally, Speaker 3 reflects on how many people excuse the most reprehensible things, want monuments for him, a day to honor him, and a resolution to produce.

The speaker questions whether the manager of the Quality Learning Center in Minneapolis, Ibrahim Ali, is the same person who appeared in a viral video showing a man dancing in the back of mayor Jacob Frey’s election victory celebrations, and who claimed to speak Somali to supporters for Frey’s re-election. The speaker notes Ibrahim Ali’s assertion that there is no fraud at the Learning Center and considers the possibility that Ali could be a doppelganger living in the same city, or someone from the Somali community who works with local elected officials to sustain fraud schemes. The speaker emphasizes the uniqueness of Ali’s appearance and his messaging about a particular group, suggesting it would be plausible that someone running a fraudulent business would have a vested interest in political control in the city where the business operates. The monologue raises the possibility that the same individual in question could be connected to political dynamics in Minneapolis, including Jacob Frey, who is described as having produced campaign videos in Somali for Frey, with the phrase “Docemagalada, Minneapolis.” The discussion continues with a note that Governor Tim Walz, after a period of radio silence, issued a statement days later, blaming Trump for the situation, specifically alleging that Trump “keeps letting fraudsters out of prison.” The speaker then invites the audience to consider whether this is the same person, concluding with a hypothetical for the audience: if they were the DOJ, they would be getting to know Ibrahim Ali very well at that moment.

Speaker 0 visits a location in California described as “home to a porta john and a giant empty parking lot,” yet inside this empty lot there are “registered voters.” He states that there are “26 registered voters for this exact location. 100 Sunset Avenue in Venice. 26 people registered to a porta john and an empty parking lot. Where do their ballots go exactly? So who's picking up the ballots? Who's voting for the people in this lovely porta john empty lot? Ask the question.” He concludes, “I think you know the answer.”

A series of witnesses describe a large-scale movement of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, claiming that hundreds of thousands of completed ballots were shipped and later disappeared. One witness asserts that “130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared.” The narrative emphasizes that the ballots were transported in a trailer from New York to Pennsylvania and subsequently vanished. Another witness recounts events on October 21, describing “a series of unusual events that cannot be a coincidence.” This person says, “I saw ballots with return addresses filled out, thousands of them, thousands, loaded onto my trailer in New York and headed for Pennsylvania.” While initially believing the task was beneficial for the presidential race and feeling it was “cool,” the witness later reflects, upon things getting weirder, on why they were driving “complete ballots from New York to Pennsylvania,” and states that they decided to speak up about it. A third participant broadens the scope, estimating “It could be a 144 to over, to a quarter million ballots.” This witness adds that the investigation indicates “there was a number, as in like a bunch of different trucks which engaged in this.” Reflecting on the potential impact, they note the magnitude of votes that could appear “the night of the election after midnight,” suggesting that an “artifact” would be necessary to explain this phenomenon. They further state that, when something is impossible to reconcile, “whatever remains must be the truth.” They claim that “the truth is ballot showed up. They were counted. They do not match necessarily the records of who should have voted,” and that “in some instances, the stats don't add up, and we continue to analyze that.” Collectively, the speakers contend they have evidence of “a massive transfer of of completed curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.” The statements emphasize a coordinated movement of completed ballots from New York to Pennsylvania, the disappearance of the ballots and their trailer, and allegations that ballots appeared, were counted, and did not necessarily align with expected voting records, with ongoing analysis indicating a substantial, orchestrated transfer intended to inject ballots into counting centers.

The speaker states that the woman who owns the building housing a child care service recently opened a restaurant there as well. This same woman previously ran Samala Child Care, which was rated in 2015 for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars and had its license revoked. The speaker notes that under a different variation of her name, she also operates the Hu Yu Child Care Center. The speaker then claims that a Google search for the Hu Hu You Child Care Center yields a video featuring the mayor of Minneapolis. In that video, the mayor is playing very loudly Somali music and is wearing a shirt that shows pride in Nicolette Street. The speaker asserts that he is very proud of his community and all of the fraud that they have all committed together.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

The transcript presents a speaker arguing that Gavin Newsom’s welfare fraud problems are far worse than those attributed to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, and that the liberal media is not addressing these issues. The speaker states that Newsom “allowed $30,000,000,000 in fraudulent welfare payments to be issued by the unemployment agency,” and that as a result, small businesses in California must pay off all of that debt through higher payroll taxes. The speaker contrasts this with Walz, who is “accused of allowing $250,000,000 of food stamp fraud to occur to Somali organizations.” The speaker asserts that Newsom’s food stamp fraud is at a multi-billion-dollar level and claims Newsom’s food stamp fraud rate is “thirteen point four percent,” describing it as “three out of every 20 benefits managed by Newsom's administration for food stamps completely fraudulent.” Additionally, the speaker contends that California funds “left wing NGOs,” including various Somali community organizations in Minnesota, and asserts that “a lot of those NGOs are using taxpayer money for politics.” The speaker claims that the liberal media is not covering any of these scandals and asserts that people should know these alleged facts because they are not being discussed by the media. In summary, the speaker asserts: - Newsom’s welfare fraud is exponentially worse than Walz’s, with $30 billion in fraudulent unemployment payments allegedly issued by California’s unemployment agency. - As a consequence, small California businesses must bear the cost via higher payroll taxes. - Walz is accused of allowing $250 million of food stamp fraud targeting Somali organizations. - Newsom’s food stamp fraud is claimed to be multi-billion in scope, with a fraud rate of 13.4% (three of every twenty benefits). - California is funding left-wing NGOs, including Somali-related organizations, with taxpayer money used for political purposes. - The liberal media is not covering these alleged scandals, and the speaker asserts these are important facts that should be known.

Some believe that many millennials, dreamers, and undocumented people, who contribute to the country, are fearful of voting because they worry immigration will find them and deport their families. One speaker claims that this is untrue because voting is confidential and voting rolls are not transferred for investigation. Another speaker expresses disbelief, stating that the President is questioning whether an illegal person is voting, and reminding people that only citizens can vote. The speaker believes the President is saying not to worry about being caught for illegal voting. The speaker emphasizes that undocumented people cannot vote because they are not citizens.

Speaker 0 describes a conversation with a Somali neighbor about what he calls "Somalian fraud" in Minnesota. The neighbor explains that many Somalis come from clan-based and Muslim-majority backgrounds with distinct beliefs about spoils, subjugation, and taxation. He says that, in Somalia, Muslims believe the spoils of war are rightfully theirs and that, when they subjugate non-believers, they impose a tax on them. He asserts that Somalis in Minnesota view their “plunder” as something that non-believers pay to them, effectively framing it as a tax paid by white people to Somalis and Muslims. The neighbor further claims that Somalis “do not comprehend the Western laws” and do not see them as competing with the Sharia law they practice. He explains that the outrage over fraud is hard for them to grasp because, in their belief system, these actions are permitted. He also states that in their religion, they are permitted to lie, and that their behavior in Minnesota—being outraged when fraud is exposed—aligns with teachings that permit lying, taxing non-believers, and plundering because it is viewed as rightfully theirs. The speaker reflects that this perspective might make sense if one is raised under one belief system and moves to another, and notices dissonance with Western norms. He adds a postscript noting that the neighbor suggested people might be upset about issues like marrying very young girls, pointing to cultural practices they say have been happening in Somalia. In sum, the speaker relays a neighbor’s claim that Somalis view Western laws as subordinate to their Sharia-based beliefs, justify exploitation as rightful “plunder” and taxation of non-believers, and may excuse deception as permissible, framing these actions as consistent with their religious and cultural background.

Speaker 0 presents what he calls an explosive piece of tape: a man buys a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, pocketing $200 and expecting to collect the ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the illegality of the act and questioning why it isn’t illegal to do certain things, followed by a line that “We don’t get illegal” and a claim about lions, then attributes responsibility to someone who “came up with all this.” Speaker 0 continues, stating that she started the whole “pay to vote” scheme. He alleges that “the people that work for Ilhan” are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. Speaker 1 adds that they “become a manager in the prison too,” claiming that those people “walk with you to the booth, and then they vote, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.” Speaker 0 introduces James O’Keefe, identifying himself as a truth exposer who holds the corrupt elite accountable, and pivots to messaging about protecting readers’ freedom and finances. The segment shifts to a financial pitch. O’Keefe warns of one of the biggest financial shifts of their lifetime, describing de-dollarization with nations like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia moving away from US dollars. He claims this threatens savings and retirement security and cites Ray Dalio’s warning about skyrocketing debt, relentless money printing, and a weakening dollar as part of a dangerous cycle that could impact Americans. He asserts that more Americans are turning to real assets like physical gold and silver, noting that gold “surged past $3,700 per ounce,” and that momentum is building. He says he has partnered with veteran-owned American Independence Gold to help viewers take action, offering to open a qualifying account with up to $10,000 in bonus gold and a free gold protection guide. He adds that a portion of every sale supports Tunnel to Towers and wounded warriors, and closes with the line, “Freedom isn’t given, it’s secured,” followed by the disclaimer, “This is James O’Keefe. As always, this is not financial advice. Always check with your licensed financial advisor before you invest.”