TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Every day, just the 1% of the cells of your DNA that gets replicated stretches from here to the sun four times. If you're to line it up end by end, that's very hard to conceptualize. But it should give you a little bit of humility before you go and start monkeying with it with these vaccines that can actually alter your DNA. And that's what I'm gonna show you. Is that the vaccines had a DNA contamination in them that didn't tell you about that could in fact alter your genome. Alright? These people are vibe coding your genome. And this is a major attack surface to the human gene pool because if this thing starts to alter the lifespan of people, it's going to part you with your Bitcoin. You're gonna end up spending money in a fiat system that has no controls, has no liability, and ends up oftentimes inducing mandates to get what it wants done. Many people had have peer have gone and replicated this work. It happened on Twitter. It did not happen very quickly in the peer review system. The peer review system kinda kicked it out. Some of these papers have now been peer reviewed, but it took years for them to come to this conclusion. Now, the FDA, the EMA and the TGA have all admitted that this mistake has happened. How did it happen? There's a big bait and switch. Pfizer actually ran the trial of 22,000 people on the process on the left and after they got to the trial, they then switched to the process on the right and didn't retrial the drug. And in doing so, they left a tremendous amount of excess DNA behind in the product. So all of the vaccine efficiency numbers you've heard in the news are flawed. They're not real because that's not what actually went into the trial. What went to the public was actually something that came out of this process too. It's published now in the BMJ that this fraud happened and no one has yet been prosecuted for it. So what did they leave in there? What they left in there was something we know from the polio scandal. If you're not familiar with the polio scandal, that polio vaccines were also contaminated with something known as SV40 and it created a massive cancer wave. Now the whole virus isn't in these vaccines, but there is a very curious part of this called the SV40 region that Pfizer intentionally removed from the disclosure that they gave to the FDA. So the FDA has admitted that this SV40 material is in there. They did not spell this out to the regulators. The regulators did not find them and they're actually running cover for them saying this DNA is too little consequence to matter, it's too small, and it's not functional. But we know it's functional because Dean et al has published that this piece of DNA drives DNA straight to the nucleus. It gets used in gene therapy vectors.

Nach meinem Verständnis ist klar, diese Impfung sei absichtlich als Versuch am Menschen gedacht. Es wird behauptet, mehrere Impfstoffe seien schnell entwickelt; Testungen seien illegal. Relevante Daten würden erst Postmarketing erhoben. Es heiße, Impfstoffchargen seien mit Bakterien-DNA kontaminiert; MWGFD-Labor publiziert peer-reviewed. RNA und DNA seien verpackt und sofort von Zellen aufgenommen; Spike-Protein produziert sich Stunden später; Modifikation der Zelle. Das sei kriminell, Kapitalverbrechen. From my understanding, it is clear this vaccination was intentional as a human trial. It is claimed that several vaccines were developed quickly; testing was illegal. Relevant data would be collected only post-marketing. It says vaccine batches were contaminated with bacterial DNA; MWGFD-Lab publication peer-reviewed. RNA and DNA are packaged and immediately taken up by cells; spike protein is produced hours later; modification of the cell. This is criminal, capital crime.

The video discusses the different processes used to create COVID-19 vaccines, specifically the mRNA vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer. The first process, called Process 1, involved a synthetic PCR method and was tested on 40,000 people. However, a second process, tested on only 252 people, was used to produce vaccines for billions of people. This second process involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the mRNA. It is revealed that this process was not properly tested and resulted in bacterial plasmid DNA contamination in the vaccines. The presence of this contamination raises concerns about potential long-term effects, such as autoimmune diseases and cancers. The video criticizes the fact that contaminated products are still being distributed despite the risks involved.

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a deliberately engineered mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, the trials were conducted using a controlled synthetic process, but the majority of the vaccines administered to billions of people used a less tested method. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a precise mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, the trials were done using a controlled synthetic process, but the majority of the vaccines given to billions of people were made using a less tested method. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Many are surprised to learn that the vaccines did not undergo traditional clinical trials. Initially, they were manufactured using PCR for 44,000 people, but when scaling up, the process was deemed too costly and was replaced with DNA from E. Coli, which also introduced endotoxins. In pharmaceutical manufacturing, the process is crucial; changing it typically requires new trials. The EMA requested a new trial with 252 patients, but the data was never provided, and it was considered too late since vaccinations had already begun. Thus, the rationale for conducting the trial became irrelevant.

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a deliberately engineered mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, the trials were conducted using a controlled synthetic process, but the majority of the vaccines administered to billions of people used a less tested method. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

Nach seinem Verständnis ist diese Impfung absichtlich, mit der Absicht, die Menschen als Versuchskaninchen zu verwenden. Es wird behauptet, dass mehrere Impfstoffe im Schnellverfahren entwickelt und getestet wurden und die Testung nicht legartig gewesen sei, weil BioNTech angeblich keine Versuchstieranlage habe. "Relevante Daten werden erst Postmarketing erhoben." Es wird behauptet, dass Impfstoffchargen kontaminiert sind mit Bakterien-DNA; die Publikation dazu sei vor einer Woche erschienen und stammt aus dem Labor von MWGFD, peer reviewed. Es werde gezeigt, dass sowohl RNA wie auch DNA verpackt sind und von menschlichen Zellen sofort aufgenommen werden; Spike-Produktion beginne nach Stunden und halte über Tage an. Die Aufnahme eines funktionierenden, fremden Gens sei gleichzusetzen mit genetischer Modifikation der Zelle; die Geimpften seien Über Tage, vielleicht Monate, genetisch modifizierte Organismen. Das ist kriminell, ein Kapitalverbrechen. According to his understanding, this vaccination was intentional, with the aim of using people as test subjects. It is alleged that several vaccines were developed and tested in a rapid manner and that the testing could not have been legitimate, because BioNTech allegedly has no animal testing facility. "Relevant data will be collected only postmarketing." It is claimed that vaccine batches are contaminated with bacterial DNA; the publication about this was published a week ago and comes from the MWGFD laboratory, peer reviewed. It is shown that both RNA and DNA are packaged and protected, and that both packages are immediately taken up by human cells; Spike production begins after hours and lasts for days. The uptake of a functioning, foreign gene is to be equated with genetic modification of the cell; the vaccinated would be genetically modified organisms for days, perhaps months. This is criminal, a capital crime.

Many labs, including Medicinal Genomics, found DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Regulators like the FDA and EMA admitted to this, but downplayed its significance. The SP 40 sequences omitted by Pfizer are crucial. DNA contamination can cause insertional mutagenesis, as stated in Moderna's patents. Regulatory agencies were deceived and failed to properly address the issue. This poses a serious risk that cannot be ignored.

Nach seinem Verständnis war die Impfung absichtlich, Menschen als Versuchskaninchen zu verwenden. Protokoll vom 27 April 20 20: mehrere Impfstoffe im Schnellverfahren entwickelt und getestet. Die Tests seien nicht legartig; BioNTech habe keine Versuchstieranlage und habe Wirksamkeit sowie Sicherheit nicht geprüft. Danach kam heraus, dass Impfstoffchargen kontaminiert sind mit Bakterien-DNA. Das ist kriminell, ein Kapitalverbrechen. According to his understanding, the vaccination was intentional to use people as guinea pigs. Protocol from 27 April 20 20: several vaccines in a fast-track development and testing. The tests were not legal; BioNTech had no animal testing facility and did not test efficacy or safety. Afterwards it emerged that vaccine batches are contaminated with bacterial DNA. That is criminal, a capital crime.

- The mRNA on plasmids was produced, and after processing, much DNA from plasmids remained; Kevin MacKinnon found that vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it, and this was published. Authorities claimed it doesn’t matter and that vaccines have saved millions of lives, so why not have some DNA in them. - The DNA in the vaccine vials was packaged in lipid nanoparticles and was shown by colleagues last year (the INMODIA publication) to enter human cells in culture and remain stable in cells for days, as did the mRNA. Despite this, the message given was to poof, never mind, don’t worry, be happy. - A radical change occurred due to a discovery by Kevin MacKinnon three weeks ago: during transcription on the chromosome, byproducts are generated; some mRNA strands do not detach from the DNA where they’re formed, creating hybrids of DNA and RNA that come off together. These hybrids are dangerous. - In cells, an enzyme called RNase H takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately; otherwise they can cause damage to the chromosome, potentially lighting “fires” on the chromosomes. If not extinguished, the fires can cause diverse damage depending on where they occur, potentially leading to illnesses described in medical textbooks, including tumors (neoplastic disease), autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, birth defects, or death. - The speaker asserts these hybrids and their mishandling could lead to a broad range of illnesses, and emphasizes that this situation is not limited to the COVID vaccine but applies to all Moderna RNA vaccines, including new Moderna RNA vaccines entering the market, such as a flu vaccine, and mentions veterinary RNA vaccines as well. - The claim is made that these vaccines will be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids, and it is the duty of authorities and controlling authorities to stop proceeding and not turn away; otherwise they will face court for not fulfilling their duties. The speaker has been giving interviews and asserts this narrative is spreading worldwide, framing it as akin to attempted murder and urging physicians to refuse vaccination.

For Pfizer's trials, a synthetic PCR-type process was used to create the mRNA sequence for the shots, administered to 40,000 people. This was called process one. To manufacture the shots for billions, a second process was implemented, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make mRNA, which would then cause the body to produce the spike protein. The speaker claims the trials used a controlled synthetic process, but the actual rollout employed a barely tested method. The speaker characterizes this as a bait and switch.

The amount of DNA allowed in vaccines was loosened a thousandfold after liability waivers were granted. These limits assumed naked DNA injection, which degrades quickly. However, mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that also coat contaminating DNA, invalidating the old limits. Studies show DNA levels in the shots are 10 to 100 times higher than the already obsolete limits. The LNPs deliver this DNA directly into cells, changing its persistence and biological impact. Pfizer used a different, more purified product in its trials than what was injected into billions of people. The initial process included a PCR amplification step to reduce DNA background, but this was dropped for mass production due to cost. This resulted in higher levels of background plasmid DNA and potentially E. coli components like endotoxin in the shots, possibly causing anaphylactic reactions. The presence of plasmids has been confirmed, and this process change, documented in the BMJ, is a major violation of manufacturing standards. The EMA requested a new trial after the process change, but the data was never delivered, rendering the original trial data irrelevant.

Pfizer conducted trials using a synthetic PCR process called Process 1, which involved giving 40,000 people a precisely engineered mRNA sequence for the shots. However, for mass production, a second process was used, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to make the body produce the spike protein. Essentially, there was a switch from the controlled synthetic process used in trials to a less tested method for the majority of people. This can be seen as a bait and switch.

At the outset, a process was approved by the FDA for emergency use authorization. However, it was later discovered that the approved process was swapped out for one containing contaminants like DNA and a cancer-causing substance. Pfizer redacted 800 pages of the manufacturing process, hiding the fact that a carcinogen was included. This lack of transparency led to no informed consent and potential harm to individuals. The vaccine rollout included a trial with a 2.4 times higher adverse event rate, including the presence of a carcinogen.

In a private laboratory in Magdeburg, Professor Brigitte König investigates COVID-19 vaccines and finds that all samples are contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the recommended limit. The vaccines in question are from BioNTech Pfizer, and five batches were sent to the laboratory due to suspicions of DNA contamination. The concern is that the foreign DNA could enter human cells and cause damage. However, the presence and potential risks of foreign DNA in vaccines are still debated among scientists. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and does not conduct its own DNA analysis. The analysis results from Magdeburg are questioned by authorities, and attempts to independently test the vaccines are unsuccessful. The issue raises questions about the manufacturing process and the potential impact of DNA contamination.

Key points: "the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public." The clinical trial used "process one that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein." After the trial, "they switched" to a production process that "manufactured this DNA in E. Coli," introducing endotoxin risk. "There are these plasmids that have additional DNA that were not present in the actual clinical trial." Sequencing found mixtures, including "expired" and samples that had "been tapped into." Regarding Pfizer, "the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators." "The plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA" with "no mention of the SV40 components" now "inside this DNA sequence." "The plasma on the left is what we actually found," with components not disclosed to regulators nor to patients. Monovalent Pfizer; prior ones were the bivalent vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer.

In a private laboratory in Magdeburg, Professor Brigitte König investigates COVID-19 vaccines and finds that all samples are contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the permissible limit. The vaccines in question are from BioNTech Pfizer, and five batches were sent to the Magdeburg lab due to suspicions of DNA contamination. While the presence of foreign DNA in the human body is common, concerns arise when it enters human cells. Some scientists argue that the lipid nanoparticles in mRNA vaccines could transport foreign DNA into the cell nucleus, potentially causing genetic damage. However, other experts believe the risk is minimal. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and has not independently tested for DNA contamination. The debate continues, with conflicting opinions on the potential dangers of foreign DNA in vaccines.

For Pfizer's trials, a synthetic PCR-type process was used to create the mRNA sequence for the shots, administered to 40,000 people. This was called process one. To manufacture the shots for billions, a second process was implemented, tested on only 252 people. This involved using a complementary DNA sequence to produce mRNA, prompting the body to create the spike protein. The claim is that the initial trials used a controlled synthetic process, but mass production shifted to a barely tested method. This second process was then administered to billions of people. It is described as a bait and switch.

Pfizer and Moderna used two processes to create their vaccines. Initially, they used PCR to amplify and create the DNA for clinical trials. However, when they received approval, they needed to produce billions of copies, so they used circular bacterial DNA plasmids. Unfortunately, this led to contamination with junk DNA. Researchers in Ontario, Canada tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and found billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is considered acceptable.

Die RNA-Impfstoffe enthalten Bakterien-Chromosomen als Verunreinigung, da eine vollständige Entfernung zu teuer wäre. Diese Verunreinigungen sind bei allen RNA-Impfstoffen üblich. Im Gegensatz zur akzeptablen Plasmid-DNA sind diese DNA verpackt und zellbereit. RNA-Impfstoffe können ernsthafte Nebenwirkungen haben und sind wissenschaftlich bewiesen, lebensbedrohlich zu sein. Translation: RNA vaccines contain bacterial chromosomes as contamination, as complete removal would be too costly. These contaminations are common in all RNA vaccines. Unlike acceptable plasmid DNA, this DNA is packaged and cell-ready. RNA vaccines can have serious side effects and are scientifically proven to be life-threatening.

There is significant DNA contamination found in vaccines, with evidence from multiple researchers in Germany, Japan, and the U.S. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA acknowledge this contamination but downplay its significance, relying on Pfizer's assurances. The clinical trials used cleaner DNA, but the mass-produced vaccines did not undergo the same purification, leading to increased background DNA and endotoxin levels. Regulators received a plasmid map missing crucial annotations, suggesting manipulation. Claims about expired vials and PCR methods used to measure contamination have been challenged, with evidence showing that Moderna's vaccines are cleaner. Regulators are allowing different measurement standards for RNA and DNA, raising concerns about transparency and integrity in the regulatory process.

In a private laboratory in Magdeburg, Professor Brigitte König investigates COVID-19 vaccines and finds that all samples are contaminated with foreign DNA, exceeding the permissible limit. The vaccines in question are from BioNTech Pfizer, and five batches were sent to the laboratory due to suspicions of excessive foreign DNA contamination. The concern is that this foreign DNA could enter human cells. The analysis was conducted by a biologist named Dr. Jürgen Kirchner, who is critical of mRNA vaccines. While some scientists express concerns about the presence of foreign DNA, others believe it is unlikely to have negative effects. The Paul Ehrlich Institute, responsible for vaccine safety, relies on manufacturers' test protocols and does not conduct its own DNA analysis. The debate surrounding the issue continues, with independent testing being difficult to obtain.

Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use two processes. The first process involves using PCR to amplify and create DNA for clinical trials. Once approved, they use circular bacterial DNA plasmid to replicate billions of mRNA DNA sample copies. However, this resulted in contaminated vaccines with junk DNA. A study found DNA fragments in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in Ontario, Canada. Researchers tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and discovered billions to 100 billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is acceptable.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, there are three strands attached to the DNA. The enzyme used to remove DNA, called DNase, cannot digest these triple-stranded genetic constructs, resulting in DNA contamination in the shots. Pfizer and Moderna should have addressed this issue during the manufacturing process by using different enzymes. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA used to manufacture the modified RNA was not properly removed, leading to multiple scary aspects of contamination.