reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Two studies are described as disturbing. - Carman and colleagues conducted an animal study in which rats were injected with mRNA shots that destroyed 60% of their primordial follicles, the nonrenewable egg supply in women. The treatment also destroyed all other types of eggs, including those that spawn after the primordial version, effectively decimating the ovarian system. - Manichi and colleagues conducted a large human study, analyzing data from 1.3 million women. They compared vaccinated to unvaccinated women, finding that the vaccinated woman had 33% lower successful conception rates compared to the unvaccinated women. Thus, the information presented indicates fertility effects in both animal data and large human data sets. We do know that, yes, these are indeed fertility destroying injections.

Speaker 0 reports that fertility clinics have observed drastic reproductive issues linked to inoculation: “the sperm of inoculated men does not swim. The eggs of inoculated women do not grow into embryos,” with those conceptions showing “a huge amount of contamination with stuff that's non organic.” They reference a Pfizer safety study in the first New England Journal of Medicine (June 2021), stating that, “if you look at the raw data, it proves that eighty percent of the women who get the shot in this first and second trimester, basically zero to twenty weeks, have an eighty percent miscarriage rate.” The baseline miscarriage rate is described as one in six, and they claim it is now seven to eight times that amount. Doctor James Thorpe is cited: a “seventy nine percent increase in fetal malformations” and “unprecedented numbers of stillbirths,” alleging censorship by the mainstream media. The speaker mentions a publication titled My Cycle Story with many scientists, including Doctor Hooker, presenting a database of “over 6,000 women that came forward because their voices were being silenced.” They note about “20,000 women on Facebook” discussing menstrual experiences, including reports of severe bleeding, not mild symptoms, and that “90 year olds beginning bleeding again.” The speaker describes clots: women calling with clots passing for weeks. They reference “two VAERS cases of little girls, 18 old girls, who hemorrhaged and died,” within the My Cycle Story data. The database included “over 6,000 women,” and they looked at the baseline rate of decidual cast shedding (the uterus shedding its entire inside in one piece, looking like a plaster cast). They report that in their data, it was “like two sixty nine women” who reported this. They note that most of the original database consisted of women who hadn’t even had the shot, implying the phenomenon affects coagulation pathways in the body and is not limited to vaccinated individuals. The speaker emphasizes the impact on fertility and reproductive health, warning of the potential horror for young women who “realize they will never be able to get pregnant because they had that shot.”

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They present two cases showing strong expression of spike protein in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes and sperm production. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and advises women of fertile age to reconsider motherhood with vaccinated men.

The speaker confirms that the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine is produced in the deltoid muscles where it is injected. However, they also found the spike protein expressed in various organs, including the testes. In a 28-year-old man who died 140 days after vaccination, the spike protein was strongly expressed in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. The same was observed in an older man. The speaker personally comments that if they were a woman of fertile age, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to these findings, which they find disturbing.

The speaker outlines a series of alarming claims regarding mRNA vaccination and female fertility. They state that in a study involving rats, mRNA-vaccinated subjects exhibited a 60% reduction in primordial (premortial) follicles. The speaker emphasizes that primordial follicles represent a finite resource with no regenerative capacity, noting that women are born with a limited number of these follicles. The implication drawn is that the mRNA shots can reach the ovaries and instruct the ovarian tissue to produce toxic spike protein. According to the speaker, the body's response to this production is to attack the spike protein, leading to tissue damage and destruction of eggs. The destruction of eggs is presented as irreversible, given that primordial follicles do not regenerate, which the speaker asserts has direct consequences for fertility. Further, the speaker cites human data indicating a 33% lower birth rate among vaccinated women, linking this observation to the ovarian damage described in the animal model. They combine these points to argue that a pattern of reduced reproductive capacity is occurring and that this pattern is supported by both the animal study and the human data referenced. The speaker portrays these findings as extraordinarily worrisome and asserts that regulators have failed to address the issue. They argue that regulatory inaction is contributing to what they describe as an ongoing decline in humanity’s fertility. The overarching message is a call for regulatory attention and intervention in response to what they characterize as significant risks to fertility associated with mRNA vaccination. In summary, the speaker claims: - Rats given mRNA vaccines showed a 60% reduction in primordial follicles. - Women are born with a finite, non-regenerating pool of these follicles. - mRNA vaccines purportedly reach the ovaries and cause production of toxic spike protein, provoking an immune attack that damages ovarian tissue and eggs. - This damage allegedly leads to a 33% lower birth rate in vaccinated women, as suggested by cited human data. - The combination of these factors is described as highly concerning and in need of regulatory action, warned against as contributing to a potential future decline in human fertility.

The mRNA vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer BioNTech use lipid nanoparticles as carriers. These nanoparticles have been found to accumulate in the ovaries of all tested species. This formulation was chosen despite the knowledge that it would accumulate in the ovaries of females. There is a similarity between the spike protein in the vaccines and a protein vital in pregnancy called SYNCITY1. If the immune response attacks this similar protein, it could affect fertility and childbirth. This has led to a global decrease of 10 to 15% in live births.

Speaker claims COVID is a respiratory infection, but Pfizer documents show 'a three sixty degree obsessive focus on ruining human reproduction.' They say researchers studied 'ruining fallopian tubes, ruining ova, ruining placentas, ruining fetuses in utero, ruining the birth process, ruining lactation' and ask, 'Why is that?' They assert lipid nanoparticles 'traverse the placenta' and cause placental calcifications 'which prevent the baby from getting nutrients and oxygen.' They report babies born early because placentas cannot grow normally, and that 'placentas are flat.' They say lipid nanoparticles would go into the baby, 'degrading the Leydig cells and Sertoli cells of baby boys of vaccinated moms,' noting 'Sertoli cells and Leydig cells are the factories of masculinity.' An andrology report allegedly 'confirmed that the injection killed the ants and motility of sperm in men.' Pfizer allegedly warns not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women of childbearing age, 'two reliable forms of contraception.' They state 'two seventy women got pregnant in the study of vaccinated women' and 'two thirty four of them, the records of what happened to that pregnancy were lost,' and 'of the thirty six women who gave birth, over eighty percent of them lost their babies.'

The speaker believes the accumulation of lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries following mRNA product administration was intentional, not accidental. mRNA products from Moderna and Pfizer BioNTech are encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles for structure and slow release. However, these nanoparticles are known to accumulate in the ovaries of every species tested. The speaker claims this formulation was chosen with the full knowledge that it would accumulate in the ovaries of girls and women, and that this has happened to every female administered the material.

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They show a case of a 28-year-old man who died 140 days after vaccination, where the spike protein is strongly expressed in the testes, affecting spermatogenesis. They also mention a similar effect in an older man. The speaker concludes by expressing a personal opinion that if they were a fertile woman, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to the concerning findings.

Speaker 0: We need to investigate irregularities in their menstrual cycle, that’s number one, because that’s a little concerning and the reaction shouldn’t be interfering with that. Speaker 1: You’re a urologist, you must understand what’s going on with it. Speaker 0: It’s weird. I hope we don’t find out that there’s somehow this mRNA losing the body, because it has to be impacting something hormonal. It can impact menstrual cycles. The entire next generation is, like, super fucked up. Speaker 1: So tell me more, what’s developing with the mutation process? Speaker 0: They’re still conducting experiments, they’re optimizing it slowly, they’re very cautious and don’t want to accelerate too much. They’re doing it as exploratory work so you don’t advertise future mutations. Speaker 1: How would the research study be delayed for COVID stuff? Speaker 0: Now we’re focusing on mRNA beyond COVID. Our forward-looking studies must stay on track. Speaker 1: What is RNA going to be used for in the future? Speaker 0: Lots of stuff. Not just for viruses—we’re applying it to oncology, gene editing, and more. The portfolio has moved beyond COVID. There’s a dedicated COVID environment team; the company is asking where they’ll use this technology in the future for investors. Speaker 1: Is Pfizer going to be held liable for vaccine injuries? Speaker 0: I don’t think so. Usually drugs have known side effects. There have been reports like Clozapine being illegal, and Biox with heart issues—though that wasn’t for us, it was another company. They told me to monitor over time. So far, nothing major; we’ll see if anything arises. Speaker 1: Hope nobody grows three legs or the entire next generation is fucked up. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. Or that their menstrual cycles are investigated down the line because that’s concerning. If you think about the science, it shouldn’t interact with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, which links hormones and menstrual cycles. It shouldn’t interfere—yet something might be happening. Speaker 1: The HPG axis. Speaker 0: It goes hypothalamus, pituitary, gonads—signal shingles. The HPG axis is tied to fertility problems. Speaker 1: They decide to pack these hormones somehow. But the signaling into the brain is tricky, and the vaccine doesn’t cross the blood-brain barrier. Speaker 0: If it does come down the line and something bad happens, there’d be substantial criticism given the social pressure and professional consequences. If downstream issues are really serious, the scale would be significant.

Self amplifying mRNA vaccine, which got fast track FDA approval a few months ago for the h five n one influenza. "That's even worse, quote, self replicating. We know Pfizer admits that their COVID shot is self replicating, thus sheds. This is officially sheds." "But now, when these self amplifying mRNA vaccines shed, they are shedding machinery that if you take it into your body, will start producing more mRNA." "There are women who miscarried when they were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine or Moderna vaccine." "Pfizer told their officials that they had to report in the trial if any pregnant woman was exposed to anyone who was vaccinated." So shedding was a problem. So many people, like, didn't take it, but their spouse did. They got sick.

In this video, the speaker discusses a study on the biodistribution of lipid nanoparticles used in mRNA injections. They mention that these nanoparticles tend to concentrate in the ovaries, which are biologically active organs. The speaker also mentions that the Pfizer paperwork states a 16% decrease in fertility in rats. Overall, the video raises concerns about the potential effects of these nanoparticles on fertility.

Speaker 0: This is kind of dark, and I'm sorry. I gotta go there. It's kind of impossible that they didn't know all this shit. We didn't need the foyer requested pharmacokinetic data from Japan, although thank God for Byron Bridal for getting which that to shows clearly in Wistar rats that the lipid nanoparticles in this Pfizer context traffic everywhere in the body and bioaccumulate, including into the ovaries and the adrenals, etcetera. There was a paper published in 2012 that demonstrated exactly this in Wistar Rats, same model, same lipid nanoparticles, they use different kinds of nanoparticles, but it showed the same thing very clearly that one of the main places that these lipid nanoparticles traffic to were the ovaries. And the reason why we use Wistar rat models and mice models before we go to humans is because we're very similar biologically. That's the whole reason. So if something happens in a mouse or a rat, you gotta be careful because it might happen in a human too. Wink, wink. So another thing I wanna throw in here is that we there's this drug pardon me. There's this drug called ONPATTRO, which is utilizing the exact same kinds of lipid nanoparticles, which act as like in the same way that chylomicrons do. It's like these things that we inherently have for fat metabolism that have, proteins absorbed, which is on the surface of the lipid nanoparticle, that traffic these guys, these lipid nanoparticles with their silencing RNA, cargo to the liver via APOE because there are these APOE receptors in the liver in high quantity or they're expressed at high levels. And so these genius biotech guys have discovered and I'm not being sarcastic. They are geniuses for doing this. This shit shouldn't be being used in humans. This stuff traffics directly to the liver. This is all known. They've been studying lipid nanoparticles and trying to make them not toxic for freaking two decades, people. But the thing is that's very suspicious to me and I have no answers to these questions so far is how is it possible that in 2020 or whenever it was they did this, Moderna and Pfizer simultaneously solved the toxicity problem of lipid nanoparticles by coming up with this ionizable cationic lipid? What the hell is that? Speaker 1: It was Operation Warp Speed, because you wave a magic wand from the executive office of the President of The United States and everything, all the checks and balances downstream go away. He's very proud of the fact Speaker 0: that

mRNA vaccinated rats experienced a 60% reduction in primordial follicles, which are essential for life and do not regenerate. mRNA shots are allegedly getting into the ovaries, instructing them to produce toxic spike protein. The body attacks this protein, resulting in tissue damage and egg destruction. This follicle damage allegedly leads to 33% lower birth rates in vaccinated women, as seen in human data. This combination of factors is considered worrisome and demands attention from regulators. It is claimed that humanity's fertility is being run off a cliff.

Speaker 0: The study aimed to investigate the effects of the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine on human granulosa cells and their influence on menstrual patterns. The researchers conducted an in vitro study using human granulosa cells extracted and exposed to the Pfizer vaccine. They found that the vaccine did not have a toxic effect on cell vitality, but it did affect the activity of those cells by altering the mRNA transcripts. In their observations, the granulosa cells produced hormones, including inhibin B and AMH, and the study reported that inhibin B was significantly upregulated—more than 200% increase. Inhibin B is notable for inhibiting the secretion of FSH (follicle-stimulating hormone), which plays a crucial role in stimulating the growth and maturation of ovarian follicles containing the eggs in women. Thus, the finding indicates that inhibin B inhibits FSH. Speaker 1: The reaction emphasizes how shocking this finding is, highlighting the role of FSH in egg release and pregnancy, noting that without FSH, the process leading to ovulation and potential pregnancy is impacted. The speaker reiterates the importance of FSH in the development and release of eggs, underscoring the potential implications of the observed upregulation of inhibin B. Speaker 0: The discussion reiterates that the observed effect was on the activity of granulosa cells rather than their vitality, with a focus on the upregulation of inhibin B and its downstream effect of reducing FSH secretion. The exchange underscores the potential relevance to reproductive physiology by connecting inhibin B’s increase to its function in suppressing FSH, which is essential for follicular growth and egg maturation. The speakers emphasize the implications for fertility processes through the documented in vitro changes in granulosa cell hormone regulation.

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They present two cases showing strong expression of spike protein in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes and sperm production. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and suggests that women of fertile age should reconsider motherhood with vaccinated men.

The spike protein produced by the COVID-19 vaccine is found not only in the deltoid muscles where it is injected, but also in various organs. In a case study of a 28-year-old man who died 140 days after vaccination, the spike protein was strongly expressed in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. Similar findings were observed in an older man. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and suggests that women of childbearing age should avoid planning motherhood with vaccinated men.

The speaker presents findings that show the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine is produced not only in the deltoid muscles where it is injected, but also in various organs. They provide examples of the spike protein being strongly expressed in the testes of a 28-year-old man who died after vaccination, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. They also mention a similar expression in the testes of an older man. The speaker concludes with a personal comment, stating that if they were a woman of fertile age, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to the concerning findings.

The study investigated the Pfizer BioNTech mRNA vaccine's effects on granulosa cells and menstrual patterns. The vaccine didn't harm cell vitality but altered cell activity. In vitro, exposure to the vaccine increased inhibin b production by over 200%, which inhibits FSH secretion crucial for egg maturation. This could impact fertility. The speakers find this shocking and concerning.

- Speaker 0 describes a doctrine where an agent or pathogen works best as a binary weapon if followed by mass exposure with vaccines, noting the insistence on gene transfection technologies to create a peptide with a prion-catalyzing epitope and pointing out that lipid nanoparticles are highly labile and inflammatory, constituting a combination of chemical and biological warfare. - Speaker 0 adds that if this was a weapon release, it may be done and now data will reveal its effects, and expresses doubt about how much trust can be placed in normal scientific methods and institutions to relay data to the public, inviting Speaker 1’s thoughts. - Speaker 1 (Stephanie) says the discussion has been an incredible and difficult ride since things began unfolding, with questions about natural versus lab-based origins, vaccine development versus biowarfare, and concerns about funding by China for bioweapons, acknowledging the impossibility of definitively answering many questions. - Speaker 0 agrees that ambiguity is the point and calls it the strength of the weapon. - Speaker 1 asks why someone would inject something to inflict a bioweapon on the entire population, suggesting population control as a possible motivation. - Speaker 0 notes the need to consider literature from top transnational power structures and corporations, asserting that it is not hidden. - Speaker 1 recalls prior concerns about population-control vaccines, referencing reports about vaccines used in Argentina and Africa that allegedly caused infertility, describing an example where a vaccine given to teenage girls could lead to antibody development to a fetus, making infertility less detectable over time. She mentions a memory of a “benign disease” vaccination program in Argentina that led people to suspect infertility, and notes that it could be a stealth method. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the idea that vaccines may have had effects on fertility and reference terms like human chorionic something, with Speaker 1 acknowledging possible occurrences in India as well as Africa and Argentina. - Speaker 0 refers to bioaccumulation seen in reproductive organs and cites pharmacokinetic studies beginning in Japan, noting the vaccine’s presence in the placenta and testes and recalling reports of harmful effects on male reproductive organs. - Speaker 0 mentions Anna Burkhart’s data as dark regarding spike protein expression in reproductive organs found in autopsies, while acknowledging uncertainty about how much weight to attribute to that data, but maintaining that biowarfare cannot be dismissed. - The discussion returns to the mechanism of biowarfare being distinct from a pathogen, describing a scenario where exposure leads to effects years later due to the disease mechanism being induced, rather than immediate pathogen-driven illness.

The speaker discusses the potential harms of lipid nanoparticles and synthetic RNA used in vaccines. They mention that the nanoparticles can accumulate in various organs, including the ovaries, bone marrow, spleen, and liver. The synthetic RNA can persist in the body for months. The spike protein, found in vaccines, is said to cause harm and can accumulate in the brain, peripheral nerves, and organs like the liver and heart. It can also lead to autoimmune diseases and reproductive issues. Studies have shown abnormal findings in PET scans and decreased sperm counts after vaccination. The speaker suggests that these potential harms should have been known before administering the vaccines.

The speaker presents findings that show the spike protein from the COVID-19 vaccine is produced not only in the deltoid muscles where it is injected, but also in various organs. They provide examples of the spike protein being strongly expressed in the testes of a 28-year-old man who died after vaccination, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes. They also mention a similar expression in the testes of an older man. The speaker concludes with a personal comment, stating that if they were a woman of fertile age, they would be hesitant to plan motherhood with a vaccinated man due to the concerning findings.

The mRNA vaccinated rats had six a 60% reduction in premortial follicles. So this is this is essential, for life. Women are born with a finite amount of these follicles and they do not regenerate. So in other words, these mRNA shots are getting into the ovaries, instructing them to produce toxic spike protein, the body attacks it, then you're gonna get this tissue damage and egg destruction which doesn't regenerate and then you're going to have these this thirty three percent lower birth rates in vaccinated women as we see with the human data. And so all of this combined is extraordinarily worrisome, and it demands attention by regulators who have failed to do anything about this and now we're just running humanity's fertility off a cliff.

The speakers discuss the potential impact of COVID vaccines on reproductive health. One speaker references Naomi Wolf's claim that boys were "neutered in utero" when their mothers were vaccinated, based on Pfizer's reporting. Another speaker claims that female vaccines wipe out about 60% of eggs, which is brutal. For men, the vaccines drop sperm count and motility significantly for about six months, but that rebounds. The vaccines raise the rates of miscarriages, stillbirth, premature delivery. Maternal mortality is at a record high, and it is almost certainly among the vaccinated. A former Danish public health official, Bibiki Managy, found that global fertility plunged around December 2021, about nine months after the vaccines rolled out. The speakers suggest that vaccines may affect the process of forming eggs or oocytes in young girls. Menstrual periods are disturbed, and the whole cycle is thrown off. COVID vaccines actually cause autistic behaviors in mice.

The speaker discusses a paper that confirms the presence of spike protein in various organs, including the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is administered. They present two cases showing strong expression of spike protein in the testes, leading to a decrease in spermatocytes and sperm production. The speaker personally finds these findings disturbing and suggests that women of fertile age should reconsider motherhood with vaccinated men.