TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Families have approached me with concerns about their loved ones being moved from hospitals to care homes during the pandemic. Many elderly patients were not properly cared for and were not given their necessary medications, leading to their deterioration. The NG 163 protocol, similar to the Liverpool pathway, was reinstated, which involved the use of respiratory suppressants like midazolam and morphine. It is questionable why these medications were given to COVID-19 patients, as it worsens their respiratory condition. Many believe that their relatives were put on this pathway unnecessarily, hastening their end. I have received evidence on this matter and anticipate potential court cases.

I am literally telling you that they're murdering these people, and nobody will listen to me. These people aren't dying from COVID. They don't care what is happening to these people. They don't. I'm literally coming here every day and watching them kill them. It's like going in the fucking twilight zone. Like, everyone here is okay with this. The only way I can kind of put this into context for everybody is an extreme example: He's like, if we were in Nazi Germany and they were taking the Jews to go put them in a gas chamber, I'm the one like, they're saying, hey. This is not good. This is bad. We should not be doing this. And then everyone tells me, hang in there. You're doing a great job. You can't save everybody. But these people aren't dying from COVID. Let me give you several examples here. An anesthesiologist intubated the patient’s right bronchus and of a patient, and they couldn't get the stats up. For about five hours, we were waiting on a chest x-ray to confirm that the placement was wrong. In the meantime, while we're waiting for that, and we've told the anesthesiologist that it was placed wrong because, like, literally only one side of his fucking chest is inflating, he dies. A patient had a heart rate of 40, and the resident starts doing chest compressions on him, which is not what you do. You just externally pace them or you give him some atropine. Then I run in there to stop him from doing chest compressions on somebody with the fucking pulse. And then he decides to push epi. He throws some pads on him to defibrillate the guy in bradycardia. Okay? He has a heart rate of 40 and a stable, you know, bradycardic rhythm. We just need to give him, like, somatropine and pace him. He fucking defibrillates him and kills him. I ran out of the patient’s room to get the director of nursing who was standing out there. And I’m like, can you stop him? He’s going to kill that patient. He’s going to kill that patient if he defibrillates him with bradycardia and a heart rate of 40. The director of nursing just shook his head, and I turned around, and he killed the dude. There was a nurse who placed an NG tube into some guy’s lungs and filled his lungs with tube feeding. There was a nurse who confused a long-acting insulin with a short-acting insulin and gave thirty units of a fast-acting insulin and killed the guy. It’s just here they’re just gonna let them rot on the vent. They’re medically mismanaging these patients. And, like, I’m not a doctor, but there’s basic standards of care. When somebody’s low on blood, literally on the brink of a critical low blood level, we should replace the blood. I asked the residents, and they’re like, does he have internal bleeding? And I said, no. Then they’re like, well, we’re not replacing the blood. In these COVID patients, they all eventually need a blood transfusion. Their blood—if you don’t have enough blood to oxygenate your body, the vent settings don’t fucking matter because you have no oxygen carrying capacity of your blood. We have a nurse who fell asleep at the nurses’ station while we were all in rooms, and her norepinephrine ran out. And the guy had no fucking blood pressure and didn’t perfuse his brain, and I’m pretty sure his brain dead. That same nurse is now running a CRRT machine, a dialysis-like machine, that she has never done before. She said she’ll figure it out. I’m pretty fucking smart, and I figure a lot of shit out, but I would never attempt to try and figure out a CRRT machine on the fly. We are adequately staffed. There’s a shit ton of staff in there, like, and we have a nurse who does CRRT in there. She has a different patient load. We told them, swap these nurses so the one that knows how to work this machine can work this machine, but they didn’t wanna do that. So I’m pretty sure that patient will be dead here in a couple hours. Nobody is listening. They don’t care what is happening to these people. They don’t. I’m literally coming here every day and watching them kill them. I mean, we’re not gonna save everybody. That’s fine. Like, come on, guys. We’re not God. Some of these people are just on sedation to keep them on the vents. Nothing else. I have a lady on a tracheostomy on a vent, and she’s not even fucking cognizant. She’s not even on sedation. You know what we give her every day? I give her breathing treatments, albuterol, and she gets insulin. And that’s it. We’re not treating the COVID, guys. For real, we’re not treating the COVID. You know, every day, we try and get these guys off the vents. Right? Because there’s criteria for weaning. Every day, the day shift nurse will wean them down to minimum sedation. Every night, we come in and we get the same two residents and they fucking max out all the sedation again and undo all the work from the day shift. Then the day shift attending will come in, and they’ll all do rounds. And they’ll be like, he wasn’t synchronizing with the vent. So we had to turn all the sedation on. And I’m like, he wasn’t synchronizing with the vent because it’s in the wrong vent mode. I even tried getting a hold of Black advocacy groups here. They just put me on hold or hang up on me. Tried talking to management. Now I got new units. And someone come up with some type of a solution for me because I’m kind of out of ideas. You know, I try and talk with some of the other nurses here, and they’re like, well, you can’t save everybody. And they all know what’s happening. They all agree with me and they all just shake their heads and I’m like, am I the only one who is not a sociopath to think that this is okay? I mean, guys, they literally don’t even know when they’re dead. Like, how many times have I told you they’ve assigned me a dead person? Like, how long have they been dead? Nobody knows. Like, how is anybody assessing anything without a stethoscope? Normally, we have disposable stethoscopes, but I brought my old chunky one. Nobody has listened to anybody’s lungs as long as I’ve been here. Even with disposable stethoscopes. I keep telling them that, you know, the guys are like, my patient’s going acidosis. We need to do something about this before his kidneys shut down. Then they run five liters of bicarb into a person who’s gained 20 pounds of water weight and completely throw him into heart failure, and he dies several hours later. That was one of my patients. So I let them know. They had me start the bicarb before I left one night. And by the time I came back the next shift, he was dead. And they assigned him to me, and he was already in a body bag. Like, guys, they’re not dying of COVID. I am literally telling you that they’re murdering these people, and nobody will listen to me. My lead at the other hospital warned me I’d have a problem and advocate for the patients too. They moved him to a completely different hospital. I tried reaching out, but he hasn’t texted me. I’m going to the unit. Let’s see how they kill him there. Okay? Stay safe. Stay out of NYC for your health care.

Speaker contrasts health care in the US and Italy. They state that 'doctors in The US will prescribe antibiotics at any chance they can,' while noting that their boyfriend in Italy was sick and 'he went to his doctor, and his doctor told him to get rest and drink some milk before bed.' They ask, 'I'm sorry, but where is that information in The US?' and describe the difference as 'crazy to me the difference that we see between health care in America versus health care in Italy,' adding that this is 'one tiny example of how the system works in America versus Italy.' The remarks illustrate a perceived disparity in how health care systems operate across the two countries.

We do not allow refills on medications like Tamiflu or Paxlovid. If a patient needs a refill, we will contact you for approval. Antibiotics also do not have refills unless for specific circumstances like travel. Refill decisions are based on clinical judgment. We will fax you for refill approval when needed. No refills are available for one-time treatments like Tamiflu or Paxlovid. We will prepare the prescription for the patient when necessary.

Health insurance companies, particularly Blue Cross, are becoming more challenging in authorizing treatments. When physicians request authorization, they often face a peer-to-peer review process, where they must speak to an insurance-employed doctor who typically denies requests. Previously, these calls were scheduled to accommodate the physician's availability. Now, Blue Cross has changed its approach: they will only call once, without notice or identification of the number. If a physician is busy with patients or has their phone on do not disturb, they may miss this call, resulting in denied treatment authorization.

We currently only have a single dose available, not the 75 needed. The insurance won't cover the dosing we have. The prescription was canceled without notification, leaving the patient without medication. The other pharmacist was uncomfortable with the dosing issue, and we also lack sufficient medication. When medications are unavailable, it's important to contact another pharmacy, and for dosing issues, reach out to the doctor. Neither of these steps were taken, leaving the patient in a potentially serious situation.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes for ventilator patients. Placing patients on ventilators without feeding tubes led to starvation and death. The focus on ventilators instead of proper care caused harm, with many patients not surviving the treatment. Early intubation was pushed to contain the virus, resulting in high mortality rates for ventilated patients. The situation in hospitals was distressing and poorly managed.

Many people have approached me with concerns about their relatives being moved from hospitals to care homes during the pandemic. It seems that these elderly individuals were not properly cared for and were often not given their necessary medications. This led to their health deteriorating, with limited access to doctors. Additionally, a protocol called MG 163 was authorized, which reinstated the Liverpool pathway and the use of respiratory suppressants like midazolam and morphine. This medication combination worsens respiratory issues, and many believe it was unnecessarily given to their loved ones, hastening their end. I have received a lot of evidence on this matter, and it is likely that there will be court cases about it.

It's frustrating that effective treatments used globally aren't considered here. A doctor mentioned that many treatments don't work, and with a high mortality rate, there's little to lose by trying new options. Patients often present with severe breathing difficulties and thick mucus in their lungs, visible on X-rays. Proven treatments exist, like high-dose IV vitamin C, which has shown success in trials, but these are often dismissed. Instead, patients are frequently sedated and placed on ventilators. Despite the historical skepticism surrounding vitamin C, it has potential benefits that are overlooked, leaving many to question the current medical approach.

Leaving elderly patients alone in hospitals is akin to neglecting a baby; it can lead to serious harm. Hospitals often prioritize vaccinations and medications like antacids and heparin, which can impair nutrient absorption and disrupt sleep. This lack of rest can lead to psychosis, prompting unnecessary psychiatric medication. Broad-spectrum antibiotics are frequently overprescribed, damaging gut health and increasing anxiety and infection risks. Simple interventions like vitamin D, magnesium, and glutathione are often overlooked despite their benefits. Patients need strong advocates to ensure their care and safety in hospitals, as the system can be unresponsive and negligent. Share your hospital experiences to raise awareness.

Key data points highlight UK antibiotic use and global resistance. "In 2020, about 13,000,000 antibiotic prescriptions were given out in The UK." "Children aged zero to 14 made up three point six million of those." "And in 2023, the World Health Organization declared antibiotic resistance one of the top global health threats and estimated that it is responsible for one point two seven million global deaths in 2019 and contributed to almost five million deaths." "That was 2019." "I can tell you that the figures have risen dramatically since then." The statements indicate a marked increase in both UK prescriptions and global deaths related to antibiotic resistance since 2019.

Long queues are a common problem across the country, including in Bristol. It's difficult to find a dentist accepting new patients in the area. The nearest option is 50 miles away, requiring a 2-hour journey each way on public transport. This situation is unacceptable.

I shared a nurse's story about REM medication causing patients to deteriorate rapidly. Patients with high oxygen levels would suddenly crash after receiving REM, leading to organ failure and death. The nurse suspected the combination of multiple medications being administered simultaneously was causing organ failure, not just the virus itself. The nurse raised concerns about the medication's impact on patients' health and the need for further investigation.

It's frustrating that effective treatments aren't being utilized. A conversation with a doctor revealed that many current treatments aren't working, and there's skepticism about trying new methods. Despite the high mortality rate, some believe it's worth exploring alternatives. Patients often present with severe breathing issues and thick mucus in their lungs, which complicates oxygen transfer. Proven treatments, like high-dose IV vitamin C, have shown success in trials but are dismissed here. Instead, patients are often sedated and placed on ventilators. There's a reluctance to accept these treatments, despite their potential benefits.

Hospital deaths from COVID-19 are seen as a failure, as hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there.

This is a report on a nursing home in Texas City that experienced a major COVID-19 outbreak. The nursing home used a treatment approach that included Hydroxychloroquine, a Z Pak, and Zinc for residents showing symptoms. Despite controversy surrounding the use of Hydroxychloroquine, the treatment seemed promising and only one patient has died since. The goal was to treat residents on-site and prevent further spread of the virus. The nursing home staff closely monitored patients and conducted EKG tests to ensure their safety. The decision to pursue this treatment path was made to avoid potential loss of life among residents.

When the speaker returned to rural areas during COVID, they were devastated. Rural areas, such as California's Central Valley, had death rates three to four times higher than urban areas due to a lack of resources like testing and remdesivir. The speaker visited rural community after rural community. The speaker suggests the lack of doctors led to the use of ivermectin, with people turning to vets for medical advice. The speaker believes this situation is a result of neglecting these communities for the last forty years.

there's sort of three things that I've I've been able to ascertain as risks of misuse or overuse or inappropriate use of antibiotics, which is the impact on the gut microbiome, the you're contributing to the rise in antibiotic resistance, and Those are the main things. I guess even with the diseases you get, you'll be slower to heal because you're less if you've got that resistance. That is one of the things that we do see, particularly those who are long term ill. We know that they lose some of the healing capacity. So much of the work I do is to aim to put some of that right. And there's links to colorectal cancers?

Updating anticipatory care plans during the pandemic was challenging due to families wanting hospital treatment for their loved ones, but facing restrictions. There was a push by the NHS to implement DNA CPR in care homes, causing access to care to be limited without much public discussion. Translation: During the pandemic, updating care plans and implementing DNA CPR in care homes faced challenges and restrictions, impacting access to care without widespread public awareness.

I was reprimanded for not intubating a COVID patient immediately despite their improving condition. In the US healthcare system, there is pressure to intubate quickly, even if other reversible causes could be addressed first. In graduate medical education, there is no recourse or defense against such reprimands. Unfortunately, the patient did not wake up and could not be taken off the ventilator. This highlights the challenges of trying to do what is best for the patient in this system.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes alongside ventilators, emphasizing the importance of proper care. Patients were intubated early, leading to high mortality rates. The medical system's focus on COVID treatments caused harm, with nurses bearing the brunt of patient care.

Dr. Miley Trinh, a GP based in Sydney, Australia, joins Jim Ferguson for her first appearance on the show. She explains she has practiced as a GP for nearly thirty years and has been suspended since late 2021 amid a dispute with the health regulator over her license. She describes her suspension as part of a broader fight with regulators and regulators’ attempts to cancel her medical license. Trinh recounts how her concerns about the COVID-19 situation began in 2019, while following global events and studying debt-based economic systems. She states she became alarmed by reports of Wuhan’s lockdown timing, noting that authorities announced a lockdown five days earlier and allowed travel before it commenced, which she found alarming. She observed what she called unusual global coordination in reporting and policy responses to the pandemic, with early treatment being suppressed and a tightly controlled narrative across countries. Regarding ivermectin, she says she concluded after months of research that it was a key medication for treating COVID-19, particularly when given early. She describes participating in doctor groups and Zoom meetings to discuss how to treat patients and notes she treated a patient by telephone during lockdown who was deteriorating. She reports that the patient improved after her treatment but later faced complications requiring hospital care. She says two complaints were filed against her in September 2021—the first from a patient she had helped, and the second from an individual named John Smith who obtained a prescription that belonged to a family member for ivermectin. She asserts John Smith did not belong to her practice, and that the prescription was allegedly handed to an APRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency) agent, a fact she says regulators overlooked when investigating her practice. Trinh emphasizes that she had never before faced a complaint in nearly thirty years of practice and that the suspension hearing concluded with her being deemed a danger to public health, despite her insistence that she saved a life. She has remained suspended for over four years. She describes the regulatory process as involving claims of prescribing ivermectin “below standard” and accusations of professional misconduct for not handing over 20 to 30 patient medical files, which she says she refused to provide because she did not know the patients’ names and because none of the patients had filed complaints against her. She notes that hearings occurred in December, March, and August, with subsequent issues over transcript integrity and requests for recusal of the presiding judge. She says a decision on the main case is imminent, but a cancellation of her license could entail a three to five-year suspension and substantial costs, complicating the possibility of reinstatement. Beyond her case, she argues the fight is about medical autonomy and the right for physicians to tailor treatments to individual patients, not be dictated by politicians or rigid guidelines. She criticizes what she views as a heavily censored environment for doctors who questioned the pandemic narrative or advocated for therapeutics like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, and zinc. She asserts that the COVID-19 Task Force guidelines opposed ivermectin and other therapeutics, and she contends such guidelines restrict doctors’ ability to provide individualized care. Trinh links the censorship and regulatory pressure to broader concerns about global governance, citing media suppression, removal of dissent on platforms like Facebook and YouTube, and increased control over platforms such as X (formerly Twitter). She mentions public support, including her presence on X and Facebook, as important to her ongoing legal battle and the broader struggle over medical autonomy and truth during the pandemic. She concludes by inviting people to follow her on X and Facebook to learn more and to show support as she pursues potential appeals if the judgment does not go in her favor. She frames her case as about more than COVID-19 alone: it is about challenging what she views as a long-standing, disproportionate control of doctors and a fight for fundamental rights, including the right to a hearing before the tribunal and the right to medical decision-making free from political interference.

During COVID, I traveled the country and saw many undiagnosed diseases that could have been treated early, but resulted in COVID deaths. I also witnessed the deterioration of our health system in rural areas, where access to healthcare is limited. The hub and spoke model, designed to get very sick people into regional medical centers, was overwhelmed. COVID highlighted issues with chronic disease management. Similar to early HIV treatment, we initially only treated symptomatic individuals, which was just the tip of the iceberg. When we started finding and treating asymptomatic individuals early, before they showed disease, they could thrive.

The speaker received a phone call saying their dad was feeling unwell. They were told that their dad was agitated and had been shouting for help. They found him on his hands and knees trying to get to the toilet. The care home said they would introduce end-of-life medication, which shocked the speaker. They were allowed to visit their dad, but only at the door while wearing full PPE. They were not sure if their dad was COVID negative or if the restriction was to limit staff exposure. They were only able to see their dad lying on his side in bed.

The inquiry anticipates hearing that people were pressured into DNR notices, were not resuscitated without a notice, and may have been neglected and left to starve. Families may not have been told the truth about the cause of death, and the usual death certification process was altered. A solicitor produced a DNR order with a name printed in block letters, not a normal signature. A witness stated they told the care home categorically that they did not want a DNR order in place for their grandmother. A care home manager said there was a push from the NHS to implement more DNRs. One home received DNR/ACPR forms for all residents who didn't have one. Challenges arose when families wanted their loved ones to receive hospital treatment for non-COVID ailments, but facilities wouldn't accept them. It was stated that GPs were said to have discussed DNR forms with families, but this didn't seem to be the case. The process was rushed, with a focus on who needed a DNR because they wouldn't be able to go to the hospital. There was no individual consideration, and care homes weren't asked about a resident's health when considering DNRs. Access to ambulances and hospitals was limited, leading to DNR decisions.