TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Families have approached me with concerns about their loved ones being moved from hospitals to care homes during the pandemic. Many elderly patients were not properly cared for and were not given their necessary medications, leading to their deterioration. The NG 163 protocol, similar to the Liverpool pathway, was reinstated, which involved the use of respiratory suppressants like midazolam and morphine. It is questionable why these medications were given to COVID-19 patients, as it worsens their respiratory condition. Many believe that their relatives were put on this pathway unnecessarily, hastening their end. I have received evidence on this matter and anticipate potential court cases.

I found out there was a do not resuscitate order for my grandmother after she passed away. The order had my name on it, but it wasn't my signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR with me, but I had clearly stated I did not want one. The DNR form was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of the order was left blank.

Grace's death certificate listed COVID-19 pneumonia as the cause of death, but her family believes she was actually murdered. The hospital increased her medication dosage significantly, refused to resuscitate her, and put a do not resuscitate order in place. Despite pleas from her family, nurses did not intervene, claiming Grace was a do not resuscitate patient. The family suspects foul play due to the sequence of events leading to Grace's death.

Unvaccinated patients entering the hospital reported being treated differently based on their vaccination status. Those who had not received the COVID-19 shot were quickly given treatments like remdesivir and placed on ventilators, leading to a high mortality rate. There are claims that hospitals had financial incentives to classify deaths as COVID-related, with some receiving substantial payments for each case. Whistleblowers from within the healthcare system indicated that staff were pressured to ensure positive COVID tests to secure funding. The financial motives behind these practices raised serious ethical concerns, with one individual stating that their loved one was valued more dead than alive due to these incentives.

Speaker 0 expresses concern about residents in care homes signing DNR forms without proper understanding or capacity. Speaker 1 discusses how COVID patients in hospitals may develop pneumonia due to prolonged bed rest. Speaker 2 warns about confusion between the generic name Remdesivir and the brand name Veclery in hospitals.

Speaker 0 recalls a case: “patient, he was sick. He looked like he was dying, but they just, like, pushed morphine. He had no pain. You know, they do a pain score, so zero to 10. This guy had zero pain.” Then, “they pushed insulin to drop his sugar, and his glucose was fine. And then he died three minutes later.” He says he “turned him into medical board. I reviewed this chart and turned him into medical board. Nothing.” “But, yeah, they definitely that definitely went on during COVID.” Speaker 1: “Jesus. That is such a terrifying thought that someone would just decide so many people are dying. This guy's definitely gonna die. Yep. This is 100% real?” Speaker 0: “Yeah. Definite. Definite.” Speaker 1: “It's It seems like something” Speaker 0: “they would call it tell euthanasia. They don't call it euthanasia.” Speaker 1: “It seems like something I would tell me, and then I would have to ask you. Like, this is something someone told me. I'm sure this” Speaker 0: “is send you the record that I read to you.” Speaker 1: “It seems like something I would be bringing up to you as a ridiculous thing, and you'd shoot it down.”

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes for ventilator patients. Placing patients on ventilators without feeding tubes led to starvation and death. The focus on ventilators instead of proper care caused harm, with many patients not surviving the treatment. Early intubation was pushed to contain the virus, resulting in high mortality rates for ventilated patients. The situation in hospitals was distressing and poorly managed.

Many people have approached me with concerns about their relatives being moved from hospitals to care homes during the pandemic. It seems that these elderly individuals were not properly cared for and were often not given their necessary medications. This led to their health deteriorating, with limited access to doctors. Additionally, a protocol called MG 163 was authorized, which reinstated the Liverpool pathway and the use of respiratory suppressants like midazolam and morphine. This medication combination worsens respiratory issues, and many believe it was unnecessarily given to their loved ones, hastening their end. I have received a lot of evidence on this matter, and it is likely that there will be court cases about it.

Patients are being harmed due to severe medical mismanagement. Despite witnessing numerous instances of negligence, no one seems to care. Examples include incorrect intubations, inappropriate defibrillation of bradycardic patients, and failure to administer necessary blood transfusions. Nurses are overwhelmed, and critical care protocols are ignored, leading to preventable deaths. Even basic assessments, like listening to lung sounds, are neglected. The situation is dire, with patients not receiving proper treatment for COVID and suffering from complications that could have been avoided. Efforts to advocate for better care are met with indifference, and the healthcare environment feels increasingly hopeless. There is a desperate need for intervention to prevent further loss of life.

The inquiry will investigate if the right to life was protected in care homes, including potential pressure for "do not resuscitate" notices, lack of resuscitation, and neglect. Evidence may point to systemic failures in care delivery, regulation, and inspection in Scotland. The bereaved want to know how the virus entered locked-down care homes and spread. The inquiry will hear that people were transferred from hospitals to care homes without testing, potentially ignoring local capacity and patient interests. Blanket bans on visits exacerbated the situation, denying families contact with loved ones. Some staff risked their jobs to inform families, while some management prioritized reputation over resident care. Families faced unanswered calls, were treated with disdain, and witnessed deterioration in health, suspecting neglect. Records were sometimes missing or incomplete. The inquiry must investigate potential violations of the prohibition on torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. The inquiry should consider whether inspection and regulatory regimes were fit for purpose and the impact of restrictions on family life. The group wants to ensure that no family member, no care home resident and no care worker in the future has to go through what they and their loved ones suffered during Covid-nineteen.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

This is wrong. Being in hospitals since 16, I know calling a patient DNR without orders is wrong. Many nurses agree but fear speaking out. Intubating people unnecessarily is a big issue. A patient was fine on oxygen, then intubated, leading to his death. Negative tests shouldn't result in intubation. It's seen as murder.

The speaker explains that they discovered a do not resuscitate (DNR) order in their grandmother's file after her death. They had heard rumors about it but had never seen it until they provided a statement to the inquiry team. The speaker's name was on the DNR order, but it was not their signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR notice with the speaker, but the speaker had explicitly stated that they did not want to authorize it. The DNR order was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of it was left blank.

Hospital deaths from COVID-19 are seen as a failure, as hospitals are meant to save lives. Surprisingly, there were very few deaths at home from COVID-19, raising questions about what went wrong in hospitals that led to so many deaths there.

The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was introduced in the 1990s to provide end-of-life care in hospitals. While it aimed to improve comfort and dignity, there were controversies surrounding its implementation. Families reported treatments being removed too quickly and patients being put on the LCP without consent. In 2013, the LCP was scrapped in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, but concerns remain that similar practices continue under different names. There are allegations that the sedative midazolam, which suppresses the respiratory system, is being used inappropriately on COVID-19 patients, potentially leading to premature deaths. Whistleblowers have raised concerns about the lack of consultation and the normalization of euthanasia in care homes.

A patient who looked like he was dying was given morphine despite having zero pain, according to the pain score. Insulin was also administered even though his glucose was fine, and he died three minutes later. The speaker reported this case to the medical board after reviewing the chart, but they did nothing. The speaker states that this definitely went on during COVID. The speaker refers to this as euthanasia, though it is not called that. The speaker offered to send the record that was reviewed.

In 2014, the livable care pathway was abolished due to its harmful nature. In April 2020, Matt Hancock and the NHS authorized NGINICE guideline 163, which some believe caused the accelerated or induced death of patients through the prescription of midazolam and morphine. A gathering was held in June where bereaved relatives shared their distressing experiences of their loved ones' end-of-life care in hospitals. The government was unresponsive to inquiries about the number of elderly and vulnerable individuals moved from hospitals to care homes during the first wave of COVID-19 and the subsequent deaths within specific time frames. Emma will now share her father's story, adding to the numerous accounts of similar experiences over the past year.

Care Home Relatives Scotland and CHRS Lost loved ones discuss the negative impact of COVID-19 restrictions on care home residents. The restrictions led to reduced quality of life and dignity, affecting residents' well-being and human rights. Many residents were deprived of contact with loved ones, leading to feelings of isolation and confusion. Families shared heartbreaking stories of residents feeling like prisoners due to lack of essential contact. It is crucial to consider the emotional toll on those who died alone and longing for connection.

A lawsuit is in jury trial regarding hospital protocols where a young woman with Down syndrome was allegedly euthanized. According to the speaker, the hospital gave her a DNR order, even though she didn't have one. The speaker claims this is because the hospital needed the bed and believed she was going to die anyway. The patient was in the hospital for COVID. The speaker alleges that hospitals gave patients morphine and insulin to kill them. In this specific case, the hospital gave the patient a DNR, meaning if she appeared to be dying, no action would be taken. The family is suing for battery to circumvent the PREP Act, which protects doctors and hospitals from wrongdoing during COVID. The trial started in Wisconsin.

Updating anticipatory care plans during the pandemic was challenging due to families wanting hospital treatment for their loved ones, but facing restrictions. There was a push by the NHS to implement DNA CPR in care homes, causing access to care to be limited without much public discussion. Translation: During the pandemic, updating care plans and implementing DNA CPR in care homes faced challenges and restrictions, impacting access to care without widespread public awareness.

The speaker received an email from the Department of Health with a link to the CDC. The CDC advised physicians to adjust the way death certificates were completed. The adjustment meant that if COVID-19 was thought to be the contributing condition, it could be listed as the cause of death. However, the speaker disagreed and mentioned that there is a separate box on death certificates for listing contributing conditions such as emphysema, asthma, and influenza. They were being told that with COVID-19, it could be listed as the cause of death.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes alongside ventilators, emphasizing the importance of proper care. Patients were intubated early, leading to high mortality rates. The medical system's focus on COVID treatments caused harm, with nurses bearing the brunt of patient care.

The speaker received a call from a care home stating her father had fallen and was agitated, and would be given morphine. She was shocked he was on an end-of-life path of injecting to stop his issues. She later learned midazolam, one of the medications being used, is considered by some practitioners to be like being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. The speaker was not advised about a specific end-of-life care plan for her father. She expressed concerns to the care home manager about what she had seen and the way end-of-life care was being administered. Despite a DNR in place from the first care home, she learned her father had been mobile and trying to get to the toilet. She felt it was a random decision to keep him quiet, in isolation, in a comatose state.

The speaker's brother, James, died in Ninewells Hospital in May 2021 at age 41. She describes him as a healthy, kind chef. After being taken to the hospital, she believed he was in the best place. However, she later learned from his medical records that doctors tried to put him on a ventilator, which angered her because this wasn't communicated to her. She communicated with her brother via text for the first few days, but then he was given lorazepam and ventilated. The family didn't want him on a ventilator due to low chances of recovery. He developed ventilator-associated pneumonia, which she discovered later in his records. The death certificate cited SARS COVID-2 as the cause of death. She noted a discrepancy in the time of death, raising questions about resuscitation. She requested investigations into his death, focusing on his participation in a trial where the signature on the consent form didn't appear to be his. She questioned whether trial drugs caused an allergic reaction. She also discovered he was prescribed toxomolobab, an immune suppression drug, making him more susceptible to hospital-acquired infections. She claims doctors and nurses lied to her daily.

A lawsuit is in jury trial regarding hospital protocols where a young woman with Down syndrome was allegedly euthanized. According to the speaker, the hospital gave her a DNR order, even though she didn't have one. The speaker claims this is because "they need the bed" and "they're gonna die anyway." The patient was in the hospital for COVID. The speaker alleges that hospitals gave patients morphine and insulin to kill them. In this case, the hospital allegedly gave the patient a DNR (do not resuscitate) order. The family is suing for battery to get around the PREP Act, which protects doctors and hospitals from wrongdoing during COVID. The trial started in Wisconsin.