reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes a genetic bioweapon as a “biological bull in a China shop” that causes extensive damage, noting he has discussed mechanisms of injury and that there are “28 mechanisms” by which it causes cancer alone. He says it was shocking from the moment of inspection of its ingredients before injection, leading him to halt his life’s work to try to stop it. He asserts that people are being genetically modified under the claim of vaccination, causing them to produce a variety of poisons, primarily the spike protein of a man-made-designed SARS-CoV-2 virus, which he says is the most toxic part of it. He claims the body would normally not produce this protein and that a random array of protein junk is triggered, potentially causing autoimmune diseases in many directions. He alleges that what was claimed to be in the vaccine—modified messenger RNA—was modified so it would both disrupt the production of proteins and persist longer, causing the body to produce foreign proteins and attack itself, but with unknown duration because the approach is “completely experimental” using a new 1-methylpseudouridinated version of mRNA. He references Doctor Kernan and others, stating that 30% of the genetic material there is DNA, including plasma DNA, and claims Pfizer hid that it could be present. He accuses the companies of inserting genetic sequences derived from the simian virus, calling these sequences genetic hacking tools. He explains that delivering foreign DNA with a pigylated nanoparticle and SV40 promoter enhancer sequences can move DNA into the nucleus and permanently modify and damage the human genetic code, asserting that there is now evidence of this. He emphasizes that this is not only an attack on people’s health now but also on future fertility and human reproduction. He cites tests on male sperm showing sperm DNA containing the spike protein genetic code, suggesting men’s sperm could pass this genetic flaw to offspring if reproduction occurs, and notes uncertainty about the extent but asserts “many” sperm cells are affected. He claims that about 30% of a woman’s eggs die shortly after injections due to the assault on the ovaries, and that cancers have had their DNA modified by these injections. He characterizes the situation as permanent genetic modification of humans without consent, based on a lie about a safe and effective vaccine for a disease with alleged available treatments, alleging a broader scheme linked to the same individuals. He ends by naming Fauci, Gates, Tedros, and Dashic as responsible for bringing together the virus, the bioweapon, and the “death shot.”

From March 2020 to March 2024, 941 people in the military community were administered remdesivir. Of those, 601 died, representing a death rate of 64%. The speaker questions whether remdesivir directly caused the deaths, or if other factors were involved. They also question whether the Department of Defense has been forthcoming with information about this.

A speaker claims remdesivir, an experimental drug, caused COVID-19 patient deaths in hospitals between days one and nine of a ten-day treatment. The speaker states that Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed in May 2020 that remdesivir was found safe and effective in an African drug trial in February 2019, and he hyperlinked the study in a memo to hospitals. The speaker says that the African trial actually showed a 53% death rate, leading the safety board to suspend remdesivir use and notify funders of its toxicity. The speaker alleges that Dr. Fauci and his NIH department funded the Ebola trial in Africa. The speaker accuses Fauci of lying to Congress and the American people by claiming the drug was safe and effective when the safety board deemed it too deadly and toxic.

Before the pandemic, Dr. Fauci tested Remdesivir in an Ebola trial in Africa alongside four other drugs. However, the institutional review board (IRB), responsible for ensuring safety in clinical trials, intervened and removed Remdesivir from the trial due to its high fatality rate. Ebola typically kills 53% of those infected, but Remdesivir was causing even more deaths. It seems illogical to then administer this drug to individuals with a disease that has a much lower infection fatality rate of 1%. This decision appears questionable, but unfortunately, there is a history of similar actions being taken.

In 2018, remdesivir had a high kill rate in Ebola trials, making it unethical for use in Africa. Despite this, it was chosen in 2020 to treat COVID. The financial interests behind promoting certain drugs during the pandemic raise concerns about justice. The same group linked to eugenics influences these decisions, which is troubling.

In 2011, 2012, and 2014, publications revealed that pseudouridine in mRNA shots could cause rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA for COVID treatment despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to high death rates in Africa. This lethal drug was administered regardless of viral load, resulting in unnecessary deaths.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

I don't speculate on the motives of individuals like Anthony Fauci or Bill Gates; I focus on their actions. The narrative reveals serious immoral behavior linked to government positions. Recently, the FDA's chief attorney acknowledged there was no justification for discouraging the use of Ivermectin, which was an effective treatment for COVID. By withholding it and other existing remedies, millions died unnecessarily. The push for vaccines was prioritized, despite a federal rule preventing emergency use authorization if effective treatments were available. This led to a lack of proper testing for vaccines, resulting in alarming health issues, particularly myocarditis in young athletes. The rising number of athlete deaths on the field is unprecedented, and there remains a need for accountability as the science continues to emerge.

The speaker accuses Dr. Anthony Fauci of knowing that the drug remdesivir would be deadly and deliberately denying effective treatments for COVID-19. They claim that treatments like zinc, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin, which have been shown to reduce the spread of the disease, were not used. They also allege that remdesivir causes kidney and organ failure and that it was responsible for many deaths during the pandemic. The speaker suggests that the pharmaceutical companies and healthcare organizations should be held liable for the damage caused by their products and actions. They mention the deaths of two teenage boys after receiving the Pfizer vaccine and question the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for children. The speaker accuses Dr. Fauci, Ralph Barrick, and Peter Daszak of colluding to create and weaponize the coronavirus. They argue that these actions constitute genocide and crimes against humanity. They call for the prosecution of those involved and the destruction of the system that allows such crimes to occur.

Speaker 0: There were four drugs that were being tested for Ebola. Remdesivir killed more people than placebo, and the data safety monitoring board had actually stopped the study where literally fifty three percent of Speaker 1: the patients died in the failed Ebola trial and was repurposed. It was a failed Ebola drug because it caused more harm than good in Ebola trials. It was still unpatent. It was Tony Fauci's drug of choice. The majority of hospital deaths were actually caused by Anthony Fauci because his NIH put out protocols that if the hospital systems adhered to, they got bonuses, big bonuses, lots of money, $3,000 per for putting an IV in of remdesivir. Boom. $3,000. But guess what? On top of the entire hospital stay, a 20% bonus, that could be hundreds of thousands of dollars. Speaker 0: The data was so overwhelming that remdesivir killed patients more so than placebo. The drug had to be stopped, and this was published in the New England Journal in the 2019. Speaker 2: What happened during COVID could not have happened without propaganda and censorship. And how do we overcome that propaganda and censorship? It's primarily through people not being willing to shut up.

At home, it is recommended to treat viral replication by giving zinc and other zinc-enhancing remedies like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. However, the protocol followed by hospitals was to provide no treatment until admission, and then use ventilators and Remdesivir, which were known to be harmful. Tony Fauci was aware of the dangers of Remdesivir, as it caused lethal side effects in Ebola patients. Despite this, he manipulated a study to make Remdesivir the standard of care, resulting in kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in COVID-19 patients. The deaths attributed to the virus were actually caused by Remdesivir.

In 2018, remdesivir was considered unethical for Ebola clinical trials in Africa due to a 53% kill rate, higher than Ebola's typical mortality. Despite this, it was chosen to treat COVID in April and May 2020, with Anthony Fauci and Deborah Burke advocating for its use despite the World Health Organization's ethical concerns. The speaker claims that a conflict of interest exists because the same entities that financially benefit from promoting certain products are declaring the pandemic. These entities are allegedly linked to the Eugenics office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913 and the establishment of the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker expresses concern about the influence of eugenics on these decisions.

We ended our previous episode with our COVID pyramid, build layer upon layer of lies, deceit, fraud, scandals. Now, by now you’re wondering how so many hospitals, doctors, and health care workers went along with all of the above. We have reached the capstone of our nauseating COVID pyramid. Pyramid. We shall name the capstone M and M, money and murder in hospitals. Shocking as it may sound, we’ve seen it before. Remember the unjust administering the killer drug midazolam in The UK as shown in part 19? Well, The US and many other countries had their own version called remdesivir. Here’s what happened. Hospitals were given incentives, as in money, for each and every COVID casualty. According to whistleblowers, investigative journalists, lawyers, and specialists, Hospitals in The US have been receiving $13,000 for every admitted COVID patient. There have been financial extras for every COVID test, for every positive outcome. If patients were treated with the only prescribed drug, remdesivir, the hospital received yet another bonus: 20% of the entire hospital bill of the patient. Then for every patient put on a ventilator, the hospital received $39,000. And if that patient officially died of COVID nineteen, they got yet another $13,000. That’s a lot of money. According to attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers, the hospitals receive approximately $100,000 per COVID casualty if the above protocol was followed. Now the thing is, the American hospitals received this money in advance based on the COVID predictions, based on the flawed models of people like Brooks. If the hospitals didn’t actually meet those models, they had to pay that money back at a later stage. And we’re talking millions of dollars here. So what happened? Everybody who was admitted to a hospital, for instance because of a car accident or because of cancer or diabetes or kidney failure, everybody got a PCR test to start with. Due to the ridiculous amount of cycles, there was an abundance of false positives. False positives equals positives equals COVID patients equals money. Hence, the sunrise in COVID patients. Then remdesivir left its detrimental mark just like midazolam had done in The UK. You see, remdesivir is not a new drug. It was used in 2018 during the West African Ebola outbreak. It was known to have severe adverse effects such as kidney damage, liver damage, and even death. Yet in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals used to treat COVID nineteen, hence the incentives. So what happened next? Those poor patients only got worse, after which they were put on a ventilator. After all, that was yet another bonus of many thousands of dollars pouring straight into the pockets of the hospitals. Now the problem with ventilators is that the patient is put into an induced coma. His or her breathing is taken over by a machine that puts extra pressure on the lungs called barrow pressure. In the case of damaged lungs due to for instance pneumonia, those lungs will only get worse. The chances of that patient recovering, of being able to be taken off the ventilator and to start breathing by himself are very, very small. Combined with organ failure as a result of remdesivir, the chances of that patient ever leaving the hospital alive are next to nothing.

Speaker 0: The problem they have, like I say, or had, is that they weren't getting enough deaths to really find the population. So they needed a lot of people to die very quickly in the 2020. So what they did in Britain, they did it in other countries too, but I can talk about the British example, is we had a health secretary at the time called Matt Hancock, and he oversaw the ordering, not least two years supply from France, of an end of life drug called midazolam, which is used in by a number of American states in the execution process. It's a sedative, and if you give too much of it, you kill people, and I've seen documented evidence. We've done a documentary about it on Iconic. I've seen documented evidence given to me that shows that the levels of midazolam that were given to people were lethal and would have been known to be lethal. And another effect of midazolam, ironically, is that it suppresses respiration and respiratory, the respiratory process. So if you take midazolam, you start to have breathing problems. And the more midazolam they give you, the more breathing problems you have until it kills you. And these connection to the breathing problems and the suppression of respiration is actually in the regulations of midazolam use. It's all there to be seen. So in Britain, you had this massive, massive delivery of midazolam in the 2020, and they used midazolam in the preparation for operations, but they stopped operations except the most emergency. So all that midazolam that would have been used in operations was now not being used in operations. Suddenly, in the same period, April 2020, the midazolam use went through the fricking roof way beyond anything that's been used before. And this is what they've done, and they did it in America, and they did it in other countries. They said to the hospitals in Britain, this is through Hancock and those that control him, it's the porn, a psychopathic porn, yes, but a porn. We've got to clear the beds for this big influx of COVID people that's coming in this pandemic, which never actually came. That's why you saw all these nurses on TikTok doing their dancing in empty hospitals, nobody bloody there. So we've got to get clear the beds. So what the hospitals did, they did this in America. Mhmm. The same thing happened there with another drug, and they they they put them into the care homes. And if you're in a hospital and you're elderly, your health is in serious trouble. But they put these very seriously ill people into care homes, and they fed them midazolam. At the same time they fed them midazolam, they were putting do not resuscitate orders on them, not only on the elderly, but on people with learning difficulties, people with psychological problems, just like the Nazis. And these people were dying in droves. What will happen is thousands and thousands and thousands of old people in Britain died in this very same period from midazolam. And they said they died of COVID nineteen because it was their respiratory thing that did that did for them. Right? Well, that was caused by the midazolam, you psychopath. And what did they call that? Thousands of people dying. The first wave of COVID, because they didn't have a virus, so they had to make it seem as if they did. In America, they used a drug called Remdesivir that was mandated for use on so called COVID patients. They tested positive with a test not tested with the virus by the psychopath, Antti DiFauci. And what remdesivir does is it stops the kidneys function, stops other organs function, but it stops the kidneys function, it's infamous for it. And so what happens is the abdominal cavity started filling up with water of people, and their lungs filled up with water, and they literally drowned. And they called this the first wave of COVID in America. This is how it was done.

An experimental drug called remdesivir will be responsible for people's deaths. People diagnosed with COVID-19 in the hospital died between day one and day nine, specifically on day nine of a ten-day remdesivir treatment. Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed in May 2020 that remdesivir was found safe and effective in a drug trial in Africa a year earlier (02/2019), and hyperlinked the study in a memo to hospitals. However, in that trial, remdesivir killed 53% of people, and the safety board suspended its use at month six, deeming it too deadly and toxic for Ebola patients. Dr. Anthony Fauci and his department at the NIH funded the Ebola trial in Africa in 02/2019. Therefore, Fauci lied to Congress and the American people by claiming the drug was safe and effective against Ebola, when the safety board had deemed it too deadly and pulled it from the trial.

Fauci, Soros, Gates, Zuckerberg, and others must be held accountable for their involvement in what is claimed to be the largest mass poisoning in human history.

The speakers discuss a broad denial about vaccine injuries and the idea that, despite evidence, the medical establishment and political figures push the narrative that vaccines are safe and effective. They claim that many people who are vaccinated want to move on and avoid acknowledging serious side effects, including turbo cancers, undetected myocarditis, and neurological issues, and that autoimmune disease is being attributed to other causes. They argue that the medical establishment, federal health agencies, and some members of Congress who produce supportive content, such as segments like Steve Colbert’s, advocate for taking the shot. They question how many people were killed or died from the shot, asserting that Bayer’s data shows “close[ly]” to thirty-nine thousand worldwide, and that if only ten percent are reported, the true number would be in the hundreds of thousands. They claim there are millions of adverse events, but that this is denied and covered up. The speakers contend that the shot was not a real vaccine. They describe it as gene therapy rather than a traditional vaccine. They explain a sequence in which a vaccine is typically an attenuated or killed virus that requires adjuvants like aluminum or mercury to stimulate the immune system, because the attenuated or killed virus may not work well on its own. In contrast, they say this shot is mRNA, which is modified so it does not degrade. They describe how it is put into a lipid nanoparticle designed to permeate barriers like the blood-brain barrier, and they assert it would never stay in the arm, distributing all over the body. They claim the lipid nanoparticle allows the mRNA to enter cells, hijack cellular structures, and cause the cells to express spike protein, which the body then attacks as foreign. When asked who is responsible, they reference a “doctor Frankenstein” figure and name Francis Collins, head of the NIH, and Anthony Fauci as possible figures in question. The response indicates that while they consider all of them criminally liable, they would say it is primarily Fauci, with acknowledgment that people like Collins are implicated as well.

Remdesivir, one of four drugs tested for Ebola, allegedly killed more people than the placebo, leading the Data Safety Monitoring Board to halt the study. According to the transcript, 53% of patients died in the failed Ebola trial, but the drug was repurposed. It is claimed that Remdesivir was Anthony Fauci's drug of choice, and that the NIH protocols, which provided hospitals with bonuses for using remdesivir, caused the majority of hospital deaths. Reportedly, hospitals received $3,000 for each remdesivir IV and a potential 20% bonus. The data allegedly showed that remdesivir killed more patients than the placebo, resulting in the drug trial being stopped. One speaker stated that it is inexplicable that remdesivir became the standard of care, and that doctors seemingly shut off their brains and followed directions from above without questioning the use of remdesivir in every hospitalized patient.

In 2018, remdesivir had a high kill rate in Africa, making it unsuitable for Ebola trials. Yet, in 2020, it became the top choice for treating COVID-19. Despite objections from the World Health Organization, Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx endorsed its use. The issue lies in allowing those with financial interests to dictate pandemic responses, potentially influenced by eugenics ideologies.

Remdesivir, also known as "run death is near," played a key role in creating the illusion of a deadly pandemic. Doctors were told COVID-19 causes pneumonia and kidney failure. The hospital protocol involved renal and internal medicine consults, screening patients for kidney issues due to remdesivir's potential kidney damage. They monitored kidney function and were supposed to stop the drug if function declined. Remdesivir-induced kidney injury led to fluid buildup, often misdiagnosed as COVID-19 pneumonia. This, followed by ventilation and more drugs, became a deadly cycle. The increase in acute kidney injury deaths coincided with the rollout of the new tech bonus and later, the vaccine rollout in 2021, with unvaccinated patients possibly targeted for these protocols.

In 2018, remdesivir, described as one of my favorite targets, was deemed too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a fifty-three percent kill rate published in medical journals. The speaker notes that Ebola doesn’t have a fifty-three percent kill rate, yet in April and May 2020 it was chosen to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. The drug was considered too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing fifty-three percent of the people to whom it was given. The speaker asserts that Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx were sitting next to the president advocating the use of remdesivir despite the World Health Organization stating it was unethical to use it. The central problem identified is that, as long as the financial interest that dictates which product is promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, there is no possibility for accountability and no possibility for justice. The speaker argues that the decision-making is influenced by a lineage described as having emerged from the Eugenics office, specifically naming Carnegie Mellon in 1913, the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker claims that this same group is the one making the current decisions. The speaker asks the audience to consider their feelings about Eugenics and concludes by expressing a problem with it, tying these connections to the governance and promotion of pandemic responses.

Pfizer knew their failed coronavirus modifications were dangerous, causing heart issues and death in animals. There is extensive literature, including patents and scientific publications, showing that they knew the heart was the target. The mRNA shots using pseudo uridine were known to generate tumors and rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA as a COVID treatment, despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to its high death rate. The definition of adverse events was changed to exclude any causal link, allowing them to deny any negative effects. Data on these injections won't be published for another four and a half years.

Speaker 0: Remember that in 02/2018, remdesivir, one of my favorite targets, remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a fifty three percent kill rate published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a fifty three percent kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing fifty three percent of the people that it was given to. And we had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the president going, we need to use remdesivir despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. Here's the problem. The problem is as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, We have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the Eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that same group of people that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953, that same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about Eugenics, but I have a problem with it.

I've stated since May 2020 that remdesivir will result in at least 30% death in those who receive it in the hospital. I had data pulled for Medicare patients in New York, and found that 26.9% of those who received remdesivir died. As of October 2020, the cardiovascular toxicology journal found that remdesivir causes death of heart cells and can lead to cardiac arrest. Yet, in December, the NIH decided to update all guidelines for treatment drugs allowed for COVID-19, and remdesivir was the only FDA-approved drug for hospitalized Americans, despite the WHO publishing that it causes increased acute kidney failure. As of January of this year, the FDA extended an emergency use authorization, making remdesivir the only authorized medication that can be administered to newborns to 18-year-olds.

Although I am not a doctor, I’m a nurse. On the front lines we knew what was happening. When we asked for ibuprofen, they said no. When we asked why we weren’t giving steroids, the answer was “we’re just following orders.” Following orders has led to the sheer number of deaths in these hospitals. I didn’t see a single patient die of COVID. I’ve seen a substantial number die of negligence and medical malfeasance. When I was on the front lines of New York, I became globally known as the nurse in the break room sobbing, saying they were murdering my patients. Pharmaceutical companies had gone into those hospitals and decided to practice on the minorities, the disadvantaged, the marginalized populations with no advocates, because the very agencies that should protect them were closed while we were sheltering in place. While I was there, pharmaceutical companies rolled out remdesivir onto a substantial number of patients, which we all saw was killing the patients. And now, it’s the FDA-approved drug that is continuing to kill patients in the United States. As nurses, we’ve collected a descriptive amount of information that you may not get from the doctors. Doctors do quantitative data; we do qualitative data with a humanistic, phenomenological approach in nursing research. We’ve collected data from patients across the country for which we’ve helped patients through the American Front Line Nurses and the advocacy network so nurses could advocate for these patients. This data pool shows that as these patients get remdesivir, they have a less than twenty-five percent chance of survival if they get more than two doses. Now they’re rolling it out on children as well and into nursing homes or skilled nursing facilities as early intervention, even though doctors Pierre Corre and Merrick have demonstrated that there are cost-effective medications out there, and we are going to see the amplification of death across the country. We haven’t even touched on vaccines, which our expert panels have described; I won’t touch on that since many are far superior to me. Two days ago I flew out my first 10-year-old with a heart attack and had to fight the ER doctor because he said, “ten-year-olds don’t have heart attacks.” I argued for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG and found a STEMI; the 12-lead EKG lit up. He said it wasn’t possible, and I said, “was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible.” People contact me and the nurse advocates at American Front Line Nurses to help advocate, because there’s victim shaming—“it’s anxiety,” “it’s this.” But if they acknowledge it as a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic may not get reimbursed, so it’s labeled as anxiety, neuropathy, or Guillain–Barré syndrome, when it’s very realistically a vaccine injury. I’ve traveled to South America, India, and South Africa, working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus and doing early intervention. Nowhere in developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in the United States. I’m a very proud American citizen from a family of immigrants. Our level of health care has deteriorated to substandard third-world-nation health care. You are better off in South America in a field hospital than in level-one trauma designer hospitals in the United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from American frontline nurses about patients not getting food, water, or basic care. How come a patient hasn’t been fed in nine days? Why do I need a court order to force a hospital to feed a person who isn’t intubated and who would like food? If they’re on a ventilator, they’re not given water or basic care. We’re not allowed to take a BiPAP mask off to help someone eat. I’ve had patients who haven’t been bathed, haven’t been fed, and haven’t been given water, or been turned. This isn’t a hospital; this is a concentration camp. Nowhere in the United States do we isolate people for hundreds of hours with no human contact; it’s not allowed even in prisons. In hospitals, we isolate patients from their families for days, and you have to say goodbye over an iPhone, or you have to shuttle people in to see them. I was fired for sneaking a Hispanic family in to say the last rites to their family. Thank you, Senator Johnson, for giving nurses the opportunity to represent our patients, because we’re not often thought of as leading professionals, though we are the missing link between the doctors and the patients. Thank you for this time. Thank you for being a nurse.