reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were to his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, while they were on the far left. The speaker asserts the shots came from the back left of Trump, showing footage of people indicating the shots' origin. They claim something happened on the left side of the event and deny being panicked or unable to remember details. The speaker states the first shot was farther away to the right of Trump, and the second shot was closer. They insist two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. The speaker believes there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another shooter on the left.

The speaker presents audio evidence of at least 2 shooters targeting Trump and the crowd, debunking the lone gunman theory. The first 3 shots were from a different location and weapon than the following 5 or 6 shots. Analysis suggests 2 distinct weapons were used, with echoes indicating shooter positions. The sniper shot was separate. The conclusion is that the lone shooter theory is false, suggesting a coordinated operation. The speaker expresses concern for safety but believes those responsible for the botched operation may face consequences.

We focus on the area where 3 victims were shot in the bleachers. Bullets came from Thomas Crooks' location, grazing President Trump's ear and hitting a spectator. Video evidence shows the first shot coinciding with Trump's speech. Trump is hit, falls, and more shots follow. 7 or 8 shots were fired, injuring spectators unintentionally. The bullets hit near a forklift, causing a hydraulic hose to burst.

Speaker 0: "We still have, basically confirmation he got shot. ... immediate incapacitation." He asserts "the FBI is lying" and that "it's quite literally not possible for the shooter to have been on the roof that they claim he is along with other inconsistencies across the board." Speaker 1: "Keep your eye on this space here... the bullet matches the exit wound, ... the shirt puffing up and the angle of the entry and exit." He adds: "the same what appears to be the bullet coming down and it does line up with the actual gunshot itself." From Google Earth, "the shooter was up here somewhere, that's the angle that the bullet was coming down from." "the shooter was most likely here somewhere." "Somewhere on those stairs would be my tip, and if the FBI aren't looking there, I don't know why."

Welcome back. On July 17, 2024, we're examining Butler Farms and the questionable Secret Service plan surrounding the Thomas shooter incident. Reports claim a sniper team was in a second-story window, but this building has no second story. It's impossible for the Secret Service to have missed a shooter aiming at Trump from the first floor. Initially, they claimed the sniper team was in this building, then changed it to a non-existent second story. The water tower is crucial here, as the shooter on the roof was a distraction. We also observed bullets coming from multiple angles. If the sniper team was in the building below, they should have seen the shooter on the roof. This situation raises serious doubts about the narrative being presented. Share your thoughts below, and I'll provide more updates throughout the day. Take care.

During a Trump rally, there were claims that a person climbed onto a nearby roof with a gun. Witnesses say they alerted Secret Service and police, but shots were still fired. Some speculate that the Secret Service allowed the incident to happen, while others believe it was staged. Video footage shows Trump with blood on his ear, but some question the authenticity of the blood and the angle of the shots. There are also inconsistencies in the amount of blood and the lack of first aid given. The video analysis suggests that the shots may have come from a Secret Service agent's gun, raising doubts about the entire incident.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were on his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, and they were on the far left. The speaker asserts that shots came from behind the bleachers to the left of Trump, and people indicated the shots' origin to Secret Service. The speaker insists something happened on the left side of the event and denies being panicked or unclear about their memory. The first shot sounded farther away to the right of Trump, while the second sounded closer. The speaker believes two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. They claim there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another behind the bleachers to the left.

A dark figure is seen at the top as President Trump speaks. About four seconds after shots are fired, this person steps out. The speaker says they heard one shooter in the water tower and one by the fence. They screamed, "It's the sniper," and states the sniper was firing down toward the water tower. A gentleman behind the speaker, who was one seat to the right, could see the sharpshooter behind Trump. He said the sharpshooter shot to the left and killed the gentleman in the water tower.

I showed Tucker evidence from a reliable source about a missing police post. The media's story about the roof being the issue is false. The Secret Service director was told to stay quiet by the administration. If the missing post led to harm, it could have been disastrous.

I showed Tucker evidence that a police post was supposed to be present, but it didn't show up. The media is spreading a false story about the roof. The Secret Service director was told to stay quiet about this by the administration. If the police post logs show a post was missed, it could have led to a dangerous situation.

The speakers discuss an alleged shooting incident involving Donald Trump, with claims that a gunman was on a nearby roof during a speech. One witness says he saw a man crawling on the roof with a rifle and alerted police and Secret Service before shots rang out, claiming the Secret Service then "blew his head off." Doubts are raised about whether Trump was actually shot in the ear as reported. One speaker suggests the event was staged, pointing to the position of Trump's body and the lack of blood on his hand after he touched his ear. They claim the blood on Trump's face looked like fake blood and that the Secret Service blocked views to apply it. Another speaker claims the shots came from a Secret Service agent, not the alleged shooter on the roof. They analyze video footage, claiming to identify the sound of gunshots originating from the agent's position. They argue that the lack of blood on Trump's collar proves he wasn't shot.

There are claims online that the Trump assassination was an inside job, supported by a video. A Secret Service agent appears to anticipate a shot, prompting people to move. When the shot occurs, instead of protecting the president, the agent stays crouched. This behavior raises suspicions about his foreknowledge of the event.

I showed Tucker evidence that a police post was supposed to be at a location, but it didn't show up. The media is spreading a false story about the roof being the issue. The Secret Service director was told to stay quiet about it. If the post had been there, it could have prevented a dangerous situation.

The speaker presents audio evidence of two shooters targeting Trump and the crowd, contradicting the lone gunman theory. They analyze the sound of shots from different weapons and locations, concluding that the shots were aimed at Trump. The speaker fears for their safety but believes the operation was botched. The analysis suggests multiple shooters were involved, challenging the official narrative.

Colin of Project Constitution sits down with Tyler (the interviewer’s name in the transcript isn’t consistently labeled; the speaker identifying themselves as “Speaker 1”) to discuss an in-depth, ongoing investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination and related events. The conversation covers timeline疑s, weapon analysis, hospital logistics, key individuals (notably Erica Kirk, Tyler Boyer, Terrrell Farnsworth, Candace Owens), and alleged foreign and domestic entanglements, with a focus on unfiltered details the team has uncovered. Key points and claims from the discussion: - Initial reaction and approach to Charlie Kirk’s assassination - The team initially accepted the FBI’s narrative but began seeing inconsistencies as reports alternated about suspect custody. Within days after the shooting, the crime scene was reportedly destroyed and the grass replaced with pavers at the university where Kirk spoke. - Video analysis reportedly shows the ground position of the shooter that the FBI cropped out, leading to questions about whether the shooter’s location and the weapon’s origin were accurately represented. - Weapon and ballistics questions - The team raised red flags about the reported firearm: a 30-odd-six was described, but ballistic experts argued that such a round would likely have killed or severely injured the target differently, prompting the theory that the weapon claim did not match the injuries observed. - The investigative team posits the use of an explosion intended to mimic past assassination patterns (e.g., MLK-era examples) and argues the actual kill injuries do not align with a 30-odd-six. - The team’s conclusion, based on crime scene photos, argues the presence of black shards and shards consistent with a microphone (a Rode wireless mic) that shattered on impact; burn marks on Charlie Kirk, and similar black shard traces observed in Candace Owens’ released SUV photos are cited as corroborating evidence. - They propose that an explosion occurred in proximity to the event, with a separate high-powered rifle shot possibly emitted by a drone—suggesting a drone sniper may have fired, not a ground-based shooter, and that the supersonic crack and potential muzzle flash were not from a conventional rifle fire but from a bullet transitioning from supersonic to subsonic speeds, creating a pressure cone. - Hospital choice and post-event handling - Charlie was taken to Tipanogos Hospital rather than a closer facility. Officials reportedly claimed this was to access a higher-grade trauma center, but the timeline questions why the closer hospital wasn’t used and how the decision was made in real time. - A witness (a landscaper at Tipanogos) described the sequence of events: an SUV delivering Charlie Kirk to the hospital, then a second SUV with Mikey McCoy entering through a doctor entrance and leaving, raising questions about who was picked up and where those individuals went afterward. - The FBI reportedly confiscated hospital security camera footage, which the team views as suspicious in a non-crime-scene context. - Candace Owens’ show highlighted an allegation that a surgeon attempted to access the body before Erica Kirk could see it; the surgeon allegedly faced FBI resistance to re-enter the patient area. There is a contested claim about “Superman neck” and whether the surgeon ever stated such language. - Erica Kirk: background, ties, and credibility - Erica is described as potentially military-trained and highly prepared; the team explored her past, tying her to Liberty University’s Falkirk Center and alleged trafficking connections, and to Romanian networks. They assert a pattern of deception—multiple inconsistent stories about how Erica and Charlie met, and extensive past relationships with multiple former partners. - They accuse Erica of deleting past social media and press content, pressuring photographers, and hiding past associations. - The team claims Erica has ties to a broader “Mormon Mafia” network tied to Mitt Romney, with connections to Utah and Arizona. They assert ties to CIA and other security entities, and claim involvement in trafficking and political influence networks. - Tyler Boyer, Terrell Farnsworth, and family/political entanglements - Tyler Boyer is described as deeply connected to the “Mormon Mafia” and as someone who previously ran Turning Point, with shell companies enabling political and charitable activities. The interview alleges he conducted surveillance on Colin and has conflicts of interest in Charlie Kirk’s case. - Terrell Farnsworth and his family connections are described as deeply entrenched in the network; Farnsworth’s stepfather reportedly held a senior position at Duncan Aviation, connected to alleged assassination logistics; Michael Burke (Farnsworth cousin) is identified as a top prosecutor connected to Tyler Robertson’s defense. - The discussion highlights a potential conflict of interest: Farnsworth’s cousin is the defense attorney for Tyler Robertson, creating a potential conflict, given Farnsworth’s role in the case and as a witness who allegedly handled the crime scene (removing SD cards and contaminating evidence). - Investigative aims and future directions - The team seeks a complete timeline that identifies every participant’s role and actions, both to present to the public and to pursue potential legal recourse. - They propose a documentary or comprehensive public analysis to expose alleged lies and inconsistencies and to push for accountability, either through court proceedings or public discourse. - They anticipate possible outcomes for Tyler Robertson’s case (conviction via public opinion, or a plea deal) and suggest the possibility of deeper CIA involvement in the radicalization and online manipulation processes surrounding the case. - They emphasize the risk to investigators and supporters, including concerns about surveillance, shadow banning, and potential threats or actions against prominent figures involved in the investigation. - Closing sentiment - Colin reiterates the importance of citizen journalism and collaboration with Candace Owens, Sam Parker, Baron Coleman, and others in pursuing truth and accountability. The interview ends with a pledge to continue the investigation and to keep the public informed as new information emerges.

There are at least two different weapons being fired, with the first three shots coming from a different location than the following shots. The sonic cracks indicate all shots were directed towards Trump and the audience, ruling out the lone shooter theory as false. The hypothesis suggests two shooters, possibly three, with the first three shots likely coming from inside the building. Shots 1, 2, 4, and 5 are believed to have been fired by crooks, while shots 3 and 6 remain puzzling. Echoes and timing discrepancies support the theory of multiple shooters.

On January 6th, there were claims of a deadly insurrection at the Capitol, but the video evidence shows otherwise. While some violence occurred, the majority of the chaos was peaceful. The media falsely reported that Officer Brian Sicknick was killed by the mob, but surveillance footage shows him walking in the Capitol unharmed. This contradicts the narrative that he was murdered by Trump supporters. The January 6th committee had access to this footage but chose not to release it, as it would undermine their political agenda. The truth about what happened that day is being concealed for political gain.

The speaker points out a location where they believe a person could not have shot at Trump due to obstructing trees. They explain how the shooter would not have had a clear line of sight to hit the snipers on the roof. They emphasize that the idea of the shooting is a lie.

The video shows blood from Thomas Crooks on a building where an assassin shot at President Trump. The president was very close to the assassin, only 100 yards away. The Secret Service sniper team was far away, leaving the president exposed. The assassin shot Trump in the head, killing an innocent man. Trump was unharmed.

Speaker 0 says they downloaded nearly original footage from the incident and note that reuploads compress the file, referencing “the national file,” and aim to “disprove this or not.” Speaker 1 points to Charlie Kirk: “how many You see him right there? That’s him debating with somebody here right before he gets shot.” “He got shot from his right hand side on that side coming out here.” They discuss a rooftop shooter theory, noting walls, bleachers, and that “you got shot from rooftop.” They show a rooftop trajectory diagram: “count with me… flat surface one, flat surface two, and then flat surface three… almost up on four,” arguing the shooter would have a straight shot at Charlie. They claim “this is 100% the shot” and say “the mic… was the first entry wound” is incorrect; “there is no entry wound on the left side of his neck. He got hit on the right side.” They demand CCTV footage release from Turning Point, noting cameras and a cameraman, and urge campus footage to verify angles, mentioning trees “above the rooftop” and needing to see if the edge of the roof is visible. They conclude the shooter was on the highest point and that multiple cameras likely captured it.

New reports reveal that the Secret Service had eyes on the would-be assassin 62 minutes before the shooting, but did not approach him. They lost sight of him 18 minutes before the incident, yet did not take action to protect Trump. Despite the identified threat, no measures were taken to remove Trump from the stage. This potential scandal in Butler, Pennsylvania, where the assassin was allowed to freely fire shots at Trump, needs further investigation to determine accountability.

Former President Trump began speaking at 6 PM. Neither the Secret Service nor the security team knew there was a man on the AGR building roof with a gun until gunshots were heard.

One person was killed, and two others are critically injured, including former President Trump, who reported being grazed by a bullet. Attention is drawn to the shooter, who was positioned on the edge of a building. Visuals show the shooter and the distance from where he fired. The building's size is emphasized, along with the small scale of the police vehicle and bystanders. A lamp on the building is examined, revealing discrepancies in its appearance from different angles. The claim is made that the lamp seen from the back of the building does not match the original, suggesting something is amiss. This inconsistency raises concerns about the situation.

I showed Tucker evidence that a police post was supposed to be at a certain location, but it wasn't there. The media is spreading a false story about the roof's pitch causing the absence. The Secret Service director was warned to stay quiet by the administration and DHS secretary. Negligence in checking police logs could have led to a dangerous situation.