reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6th attack on the White House. They mention the protection of the president by the Washington DC Police Department and the prevention of help from reaching the White House during the attack. The speaker questions who made the decision and mentions that charges were dropped for those involved in the riots. They highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied and express concern about the politicization of the situation.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1, who identifies as Russia, says: We did not break in. We did not broke shit. They were Antifa. We told the DC police, there's Antifa. Go get them. They did not move. They use on a pepper spray, mace, rubber palette. They treat us like we're animals. From beginning, when we start going down the steps up way before we enter the shit building. And then they start with the pack. They hit two woman in the head. There's three kids, probably 17, 18. They were bleeding in the head. There's two elderly people. One of them in a cave, got maced. So we did not break shit. The woman the police shot her, and then they throw her by the stairs. We did not break shit. We told DC police, those are Antifa. Go get them. We wear mega hat. We don't have much shoes. We don't look like we're in a crack. Those antifa, you tell them, they're in a fucking crack. Filthy disgusting. DC did not do nothing. They just stand up. They just stand up. Speaker 0 asks: So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that that get that... Speaker 1, Russia, responds: It wasn't MAGA inside the city, whatever my brain froze. Capitol all day. The doors are open. There's Antifa has a black chair, folding chair. The cops seen him. Whether it's us or Antifa, you see somebody with a metal chair fold it. That means it's a fucking weapon. You will stop him. We go and tell them. There's probably people were taking video of me telling the police. Go get Antifa. We catch two. And the woman that there was a woman talking to them, and I told her, don't bother the police. Leave the police alone. They need to choose a side. If they lost us, they have no support. And then they start with pushing back back and hitting people. So it's not us. It's not us. Speaker 0 clarifies: Antifa It was... Speaker 1: The DC police saw them with a fucking black metal folding chair. They saw them. We pointed at them. They saw the brat boy following Antifa guy, and they did not do shit. One of Antifa could have a fucking knife to get one of us inside. No one did shit. Don't tell us we broke in. We did not break a glass. So you got in, but it wasn't you guys. The doors are open. The door. And guess what? It's a federal building. The police has no power on us. It's a federal building. It's our building. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. So it wasn't it wasn't the MAGA people that broke in. Speaker 1: Nope. We told DC police, those fucking antifa go get them. Okay. Speaker 0 asks: What's your name? Speaker 1: Russia. Speaker 0: Russia? Where are you from? Speaker 1 explains: I can't. It's a I'm under the state No. No. No. I came from Lebanon. I run from Lebanon because of this shit. And I'm not gonna raise my kids in that shit. Speaker 0 thanks Asha and says: Thank you. You need to do a testimonial of what happened. Put it on Twitter. Put it on every news channel because What? Speaker 1 completes: Fist this off. Black Lives Matter burned the country. Burned the city. They were ordered the police to back back, standby. They were not allowed to use tear gas. They were not allowed to use maze. They were not allowed to use rubber bullets. On us, they're. When they went in the White House and burned the church, all the fucking congress went and told Trump, you let your people pepper spray them. Meanwhile, BLM came there with a fucking weapons. Screw the police. They lost our support. Yes. Amen. They begin they're all gonna follow order. When we stand up in the front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop I'm a woman and I did it numerous time in New Jersey. I didn't ever say we go in a rally and sadness know. But now, if I see a cop get shot, I would kill myself before I save him and mark my words on it. Speaker 0 closes: Thank you, Asha. Good to see you.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The LAPD police chief described the level of violence in Los Angeles as disgusting, prompting a discussion about National Guard involvement. Speaker 1 was surprised at the police chief's description, stating there has been no violence where protesters hit, shot, or threatened anyone. She believes the police chief doesn't know what to do because Los Angeles is a sanctuary city and the police lack authority. She claims the president is purposely initiating this, and that he didn't contact the governor or mayor before potentially sending in the National Guard. She predicts the president will create martial law, alleging he started this by targeting migrants. Speaker 0 noted some violence has occurred, including assaults on police officers and damage to vehicles. Speaker 1 acknowledged that a few people may not conform, but people shouldn't be goaded into confrontation or violence because that's what the president wants so he can send in the military and create martial law. She hasn't heard of anyone being shot, killed, or beaten.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that "The Black Lives Matter organization show up in Washington DC to protest the National Guard being in Washington DC who is currently helping police in Washington DC get crime under control and this crime being black people unalive and other black people. Majority of it that is." They claim "they believe that it is targeting black communities, threatening civil liberties even though the goal is to lower crime." The speaker repeats "Stupid is as stupid does. But are they really stupid? No. They're not stupid." They note "They're getting low on funds, and they need you to, you know, give a little bit." They warn that "If it happens again in Washington DC, then they'll blame Trump for it instead of blaming the black lives they claim to matter who actually burnt up the city." They add that "Since the National Guard has been deployed, there have been no homicides, people can safely walk down the street with ice around their neck and nice watches. Walking"

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I witnessed unprecedented violence against police officers through the media. It was brutal and ugly, but our officers responded as necessary. However, a protester claims that the violence could have been avoided if the police hadn't used concussion grenades and pepper spray. According to the protester, the protest was peaceful, and the officers started firing without any provocation. Tear gas was also used, causing distress and difficulty breathing for the protester.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman states she doesn't think children should be taken away from these girls without her kids present. She asks how white people feel about stopping a Black woman from going to work, pointing out the line of people they are causing. She claims she is not trying to cause problems and that they are just trying to be.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia describes the events at the Capitol as follows: They did not break in and did not break anything; they claim Antifa were the ones responsible for violence. They told DC police, There’s Antifa. Go get them. They say the police used pepper spray, mace, and rubber bullets on them, and they were treated like animals. From the start, as they went down the steps, before entering the building, they say Antifa began with a pack. They claim two women were hit in the head, three kids around 17–18 were bleeding in the head, and two elderly people, one of them, they say, was maced. They assert a woman was shot by the police and then thrown by the stairs, and reiterate, We did not break shit. They claim they wore MAGA hats and did not have good shoes; they say Antifa told them they were in a crack and described Antifa as filthy and disgusting. They state DC did nothing and just stood up. Speaker 0 asks if it wasn’t the MAGA people who got in, and Russia says the doors were open, the Capitol doors were open, and Antifa had a black folding chair; the cops saw it and, whether it was them or Antifa, a metal chair indicates a weapon. They say they told police, There’s probably people taking video of me telling the police, Go get Antifa. They claim they caught two Antifa and that the woman talking to them should not bother the police, Leave the police alone. They say the police need to choose a side, and if they lose us, they have no support. They claim Antifa started pushing back and hitting people, and that it was not them. They insist it was Antifa; the DC police saw Antifa with a black metal folding chair and did not act. They state that one Antifa could have a knife to get one of them inside and again say no one acted. They insist they did not break in; the doors were open; it’s a federal building, and the police have no power there; it’s their building. Russia reiterates that it wasn’t the MAGA people who broke in, and that they told DC police, Those fucking antifa go get them. They identify themselves as from Lebanon, having fled Lebanon because of the situation, and say they run from it and won’t raise their kids in that environment. Speaker 0 thanks Russia and asks for a testimonial to be shared online. Russia says to share it on Twitter and every news channel. They state Black Lives Matter burned the country and the city, and that they were ordered to back up while police stood down, not allowed to use tear gas, mace, or rubber bullets, and that when they went to the White House and burned the church, Congress told Trump to let his people pepper spray them. They claim BLM came with weapons, and that cops lost their support. Speaker 0 agrees, saying it’s unfortunate. Russia adds that when they stood in front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop, they are a woman and did so in New Jersey; they would kill themselves before saving a police officer if they saw one get shot. Speaker 0 concludes by thanking Asha and goodbyes, acknowledging a testament.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Our government is tear-gassing its own people. We were peacefully protesting, but the situation escalated. There were reports of injuries; we saw a man with blood on his head and a woman limping, also covered in blood. It’s important not to believe the fake news about what happened here.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There is nothing wrong with protesting, but burning cars, looting, and throwing bricks at law enforcement officers loses the message. Kylie Perkins is making uneducated videos about compassion, probably to save brand deals. Compassion should be for those who come here the right way, law enforcement officers, and people who can't get ambulances due to blocked freeways. There is no problem with people coming to America, but they need to do it the right way. The claim that we're on stolen land is false; people need to research the difference between a settler and an immigrant. The speaker anticipates losing brand deals and followers for these statements but is not sorry.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Police officers on the west side were arguing near a fountain, with one officer admitting that they were hurting innocent people and making 10 others angry for every one they removed. This suggests that both the officers and the protesters were set up for failure. There is a video of officers saying they were set up, and they repeat this multiple times. The response from the authorities came two hours later.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, identified as Russia, recounts the events at the Capitol, insisting they did not break in: “We did not break in. We did not broke shit. They were Antifa.” He says they told the DC police, “there’s Antifa. Go get them,” but the police “did not move” and treated them “like we’re animals.” He describes the actions of the police as pepper spray, mace, and “rubber palette” used on people, including “two woman in the head,” “three kids, probably 17, 18” who were bleeding, and “two elderly people.” He claims a woman was shot and then thrown “by the stairs.” He repeats, “We did not break shit,” and asserts they identified Antifa to the police, saying, “Go get them.” Russia says it wasn’t MAGA people inside the building; he mentions doors were open and that Antifa had “a black chair, folding chair,” noting that if someone carries a folding chair, it’s a weapon. They say they pointed out Antifa to the cops, catching two people, and a woman talking to them told him not to bother the police and to “Leave the police alone.” He urges the police to choose a side, suggesting that without support they would be alone. He asserts: “The police saw them with a fucking black metal folding chair,” and adds that “They saw the brat boy following Antifa guy, and they did not do shit.” He states, “Don’t tell us we broke in. We did not break a glass.” He emphasizes that the doors were open and that it’s a federal building, implying “The police has no power on us. It’s a federal building. It’s our building.” Russia also reveals personal details: he came from Lebanon and fled because of the situation, intending not to raise his kids in that environment. He urges Asha to post a testimonial on Twitter and news channels. Asha interjects, claiming that “Black Lives Matter burned the country” and “burned the city,” while the police were ordered to back off and were not allowed to use tear gas, mace, or rubber bullets on them. They argue that in contrast, when the White House was entered and a church burned, Congress told Trump to let his people pepper spray them. The speakers express a sentiment of betrayal toward the police, stating, “Screw the police. They lost our support,” and claim that all will follow orders. They recount standing in front of Black Lives Matter to protect a cop, with a vow by Russia that if he sees a cop get shot, he would kill himself before saving him. The conversation ends with thanks to Asha and affirmation of her testimony.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A participant states that tear gas is being used by their own government against people they have employed, and that the government is tear gassing them. They emphasize that the protesters were peacefully protesting and urge others not to be misled by fake news, insisting, “We were peacefully protesting.” A second participant corroborates the scene, noting: “men coming out with blood all over their head.” They express uncertainty about what happened, saying, “We don’t know what happened,” and add that “a man and a woman coming out” were observed, with the woman limping and the man’s ears bleeding, and that the woman “had blood all over her.” The exchange underscores a reported use of force and resulting injuries during the protest.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses concern about the administration’s response to the incident, noting that very quickly, very high up people, including Christine Ohm, Donald Trump himself, and Shady Vance, started calling the killed woman a domestic terrorist and saying she deserved it. The speaker argues that when a relatively young mother of three is killed by a law enforcement officer, government officials should say this was a tragedy, that they will conduct an investigation, and they will see what happened, instead of “running cover for the officer,” because such conduct erodes public trust. The speaker emphasizes that many things about the response freaked people out and describes it as disturbing to have people calling the woman a domestic terrorist. The question is raised: “What the fuck does that even mean?” The speaker notes that even if she did try to run the officer over, it’s not terrorism, and questions what people are talking about when they use that label. There is a critique of how words like “terrorist” are used loosely and how they have “lost meaning,” with the speaker asserting that this is the kind of rhetoric that is used to paint people in certain ways. The speaker draws a comparison, suggesting that labeling someone a terrorist resembles tactics used against Palestinians, where everyone is painted as a terrorist. The rapid labeling is described as part of a broader pattern of invoking terrorism to justify actions or narratives. The speaker concludes with a conditional reflection: if someone is a terrorist, then “actually anything goes,” signaling a perception that the label is being used to bypass normal standards or accountability.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the 2020 riots and the January 6 attack on the White House. They mention the fire at Saint John's Church and the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House. They question who made the decision to prevent the police from defending the White House and highlight the disparity in how justice is being applied. The speaker also mentions that more officers were injured during the riots than on January 6th. They speculate on how things would have been different if Barack Obama had been president. Overall, they find the situation concerning and suggest that Trump may be a key factor in all of this.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Why wasn't there more security? There were only 30 guards out back. It seemed excessive, especially with high-profile figures involved. It felt like they wanted chaos. When things escalated, I was surprised by the lack of arrests or violence. I didn't see anyone attacking cops or being attacked. There was confusion about why one person was shot while others were allowed to breach barriers without consequence. That individual was breaking a window, but in other areas, people were just let through. It raises questions about the decision-making in that moment, especially with so many people behind her. It seemed reckless to use lethal force in that situation.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
You don't want riots or violence, correct? As Dr. King said, riots are the voice of the unheard. If people are oppressed, they may lash out. But do you condemn violence? I believe in self-defense. If a police officer unjustifiably kills someone, I understand why people react. So you won't condemn riots or burning buildings after police incidents? I won't condone it, but I understand the reaction. When Osama bin Laden attacked, did you suggest a peaceful response? I answered your question. People are burning businesses in New York City, and you won't answer. I don't promote it, but I won't condemn it. That's cowardly. No, you're the coward. God bless you, I'm leaving. Yeah, you are.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Original country. Speaker 1 (Asha): I came from Lebanon. I ran from Lebanon because of this shit. And I'm not gonna raise my kids in that shit. Speaker 0: Gotcha. Thank you, Asha. I really appreciate this. You need to do a, you know, a testimonial of what happened. And you need to put it on Twitter. You need to put it on every news channel because Speaker 1 (Asha): it's really off. Mhmm. Black Lives Matter burned the country. Yes. Burned the city. They were ordered the police to back back, standby. They were not allowed to use tear gas. They were not allowed to use mace. They were not allowed to use rubber bullets. Yeah. On us, they're allowed. Yep. That's true. When they went in the White House and burned the church, all the fucking congress went and told Trump, you let your people pepper spray them. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1 (Asha): Meanwhile, BLM came there with a fucking weapons. Speaker 0: Yep. That's true. Speaker 1 (Asha): You know what? Screw the police. They lost our support. Speaker 0: Yes. Amen. Yeah. At least DC. Speaker 1 (Asha): At least all of them begin they're all gonna follow order. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1 (Asha): All gonna follow orders. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's unfortunate.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker described an incident involving 100 black people beating up two white people, stating that if the races were reversed, the situation would be viewed differently. They criticized the lack of law enforcement presence and expressed concern for the injured woman, a single mother, and the perceived lack of accountability for the perpetrators, who they believe will receive lenient treatment in prison. Another speaker questioned whether justice could be served and suggested federal involvement. They lamented the societal trend of filming and posting violent acts on social media instead of helping victims. Another speaker echoed this sentiment, noting that only one person called for help. They criticized the police chief's response, calling it disrespectful, and mentioned a lawsuit against the chief by four white lieutenants alleging discrimination in promotions.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
"The president has been trying to provoke violence here, right here, in the black communities and in the brown communities, having ICE kidnap our neighbors, having black having the black community be harassed and profiled and want, want a response. We say, hell no. We won't go." "Today, we get today today, we gather to speak plainly about policy path that sounds strong, but in truth, it weakens the very safety we see." "Black people are more likely to be stopped, searched, questioned, arrested, and harmed encounters with the law." "When we add the president of federal agents or the national guard to daily life in these neighborhoods, the burden can multiply." "We're fighting for freedom and safety for all people."

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker always wanted to broadcast in their hometown. However, they became bothered by the media's direction, even before George Floyd, due to moral and ethical concerns. After George Floyd's death, mandates required that half of interviewees had to be non-white or from a protected class. CBS News allegedly prohibited using the term "riots" in reporting. The speaker feels blessed to be on the other side now. The other speaker believes the net effect was the death of many people and the destruction of an American city. They are bothered that it's been memory-holed and no one has been held accountable.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is in Washington D.C. at Black Lives Matter Plaza, near the White House. The speaker says the plaza is being torn up, much like BLM allegedly ravaged, murdered, and torched the country. The speaker says the street used to be painted Black Lives Matter, but workers are replacing the yellow lettering with the original bricks. The speaker claims St. John's Episcopal Church was lit on fire by BLM, along with the White House, in an attempt to kill Donald Trump, who had to escape to a security bunker. The speaker says it is time to desecrate BLM's altars and show the country what actual healing looks like. The speaker believes there should never be another time when divisive, terroristic political movements take over the nation's capital and get painted on the streets. The speaker calls for a full investigation of the BLM organization, claiming it defrauded and spent hundreds of millions of dollars on lavish mansions for themselves and didn't help a single Black person.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In a brief, on-the-scene exchange, Speaker 0 asks a woman what happened to her. Speaker 1 responds that she was maced. The conversation reveals that she was attempting to go inside a cafe when the incident occurred: she had made it “like a foot inside,” then was pushed out, and they maced her. Speaker 0 continues by asking for her name and where she is from. In reply, Speaker 1 identifies herself as Elizabeth and states that she is from Knoxville, Tennessee. When asked why she wanted to go inside, Speaker 0 frames the moment by noting the surrounding activity, “We’re storming the Capitol. It’s a revolution. Thank you.” Elizabeth’s answer to the question about her motive is explicit: she says that she and others are involved in actions described as storming the Capitol, and she characterizes the situation as part of a revolution.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm here with Ashley Davitt's mother who believes that the black police officer actor and Ashley Bobbitt should be featured on the show. They question whether the bullet that hit Ashley Bobbitt was actually fired by the black police officer actor. They also point out that the police officers present did not make any effort to save her life after she was shot. They criticize the lack of reaction from bystanders and express their disbelief that people continued to film the incident. They plan to call out this situation and support stophate.com. Ashley's mother asserts that her daughter was exercising her first amendment rights and was unjustly shot by capital police lieutenant Michael Hurd without consequences.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the impact of politics on law enforcement. They mention the 2020 riots and the January 6th attack on the White House. They highlight the Washington DC Police Department's inability to protect the White House during the riots and the dropping of charges against protesters. They express concern about the politicization of justice and speculate on how things might have been different if Barack Obama had been president. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement that hypothetical questions are difficult to answer.

The Megyn Kelly Show

Church Agitators ARRESTED... But is Don Lemon Next? With Allie Beth Stuckey, Henderson, and Holloway
Guests: Allie Beth Stuckey, Henderson, Holloway
reSee.it Podcast Summary
The episode centers on a high-profile confrontation in Minnesota where protesters interrupted a church service, prompting federal charges under the FACE Act and the Ku Klux Klan Act, and drawing scrutiny of media coverage and political responses. The host revisits the incident with a mix of reportage and advocacy, detailing the arrests of Nikima Levy Armstrong and Shantel Allen, the involvement of Don Lemon on the scene, and the subsequent legal debates over whether the actions met the statutory definitions of obstructing religious worship and conspiracy against rights. The discussion expands to assess how the case has been framed by different participants, including live reactions and on-air analysis from allies who insist the arrests represent accountability for disrupting peaceful worship and threatening congregants. Throughout, the conversation emphasizes the political optics surrounding the prosecution, the alleged bias of local authorities, and the role of federal power versus local enforcement in handling street-level protests. Guests weigh in on the broader implications for civil rights enforcement, media credibility, and the boundaries of journalism when covering controversial demonstrations. The dialogue scrutinizes the behavior of protesters, the rhetoric used by organizers, and the perceived double standard in how similar tactics have been treated in different political contexts. The panelists argue that the case could set a benchmark for how aggressively federal statutes are applied to confront protest tactics that target religious spaces, while acknowledging the complexities of prosecutorial discretion and the potential for grand jury pathways if magistrate rulings stall initial charges. The show also canvasses related domestic issues, including governmental responses to immigration policy activism, the influence of political actors on public perception, and the evolving strategies used by both demonstrators and defenders of law enforcement in politically charged confrontations. The program culminates with legal analysis from a criminal defense perspective, contemplating next steps in the Don Lemon matter, potential indictments, and the prospect of further high-profile protesters facing similar charges, all framed within a charged national debate about protest, safety, and the application of federal law to acts of civil disruption.
View Full Interactive Feed