TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker states that they are not saying the organization lost 85,000 children, but that contact was lost with them and their whereabouts are unknown. The speaker asks if that is a fair statement. The speaker asks if, after making three calls on average to check on 85,000 children placed by the organization, there was no response. The speaker then asks if it is fair to say that contact was lost with over 85,000 kids. The speaker asks for a yes or no answer. The speaker states that the organization does not know where 85,000 of the children are. The speaker then says they will move on after receiving no answer.

At Future Leaders Early Learning Center, a parent repeatedly attempts to enroll their child, Joey, but is told nothing is working and cannot obtain paperwork or a business card. The parent asks if Joey can be checked into the daycare and whether there are children present to accompany him. The staff indicates there are no children today and implies that Joey would not be accepted into the daycare, leaving the parent frustrated as they explain they would like to put Joey in the center because they’ve heard great things. Speaker 1 notes that Joey is still homeless, and Speaker 0 reiterates that Joey is still looking for daycare. The scene shifts to an autism center as an alternative option, prompted by the perceived rise of autism in Minnesota and the claim that government funds are contributing to this rise. The parent explains that, since many daycare centers are closed, they are trying to check Joey into an autism center. The staff at the autism center avoids giving a precise number of children, suggesting there are more than five but cannot provide an exact count. Speaker 0 asks the autism center staff what they think about fraud that has been labeled on autism centers in the area and why these centers are popping up. The staff member responds that they cannot answer questions about fraud and asks if the interviewer is a news reporter, identifying themselves as Nick. They emphasize they are trying to determine legitimacy before bringing Joey there, to avoid a non-legitimate business. The interaction continues with a back-and-forth in which the autism center staff denies being a ghost operation and references another phone number, but the main exchange focuses on the difficulty of finding a place for Joey. The closing remark from Speaker 0 underscores that, once again, little Joey cannot get into daycare and cannot be accepted by the autism center either. In summary, the sequence documents a parent’s unsuccessful attempts to place Joey in a daycare (due to no availability and a lack of acceptance for the child on this visit) and then considers enrolling him in an autism center, amid questions about the legitimacy and prevalence of such centers and concerns about fraud, with limited information about the number of children served. The rift between wanting a reliable, enrolling option for Joey and the centers’ unclear capacity or legitimacy is repeatedly highlighted.

The group visits several local daycares and notes security and accessibility observations. At First Choice Child Care LLC, they spot a Kasim Brothers semi truck in the parking lot, which they suggest is notable when dropping a child off for childcare. They observe that doors appear to be locked, and they see security cameras: “Camera up there. Camera over there.” They ring the doorbell but don’t hear anyone, and they note there are no cars in the parking lot at that moment. They mention the facility is open seven days a week, but there is “no signage to say” if it is closed, creating ambiguity about hours. They compare this to the nearby neighborhood and point out a second daycare, Bright Futures, next door. Bright Futures also has cameras, and the overall impression is that “Tons of daycares” either have or lack visibility in different ways, with some locations showing a nice lobby entry and others offering limited visibility into the interior. During their visit, they attempt to engage staff. Mehak asks, “Hi. I was wondering, are you open today? Do you have any paperwork? I just wanted to look up your enrollment for a three year old. My name is Mehak.” The staff response is reported as, “I’m sorry? Am I what? You’re going to send somebody? No. Okay.” The interaction is interrupted by a request to stop recording, and the staff confirm, “Okay. They want us to stop recording for for okay. That’s fine.” The group continues to seek pricing information, repeatedly asking, “how much does it cost?” and “how much does it cost to go to daycare here.” They express confusion about the cost and the application process, with a brief exchange: “Price after we fill the application? So how much does it cost?” and “Is it? Come here. You know, how much does it cost? Woah.” Overall, the footage emphasizes security features (locked doors, cameras), ambiguous operating hours (open seven days a week with no clear closure signage), and direct inquiries about enrollment and pricing, including interactions with staff and a request to cease recording.

Speaker 0 discusses trying to find local daycares while recording at a home. The other party says, "This is a licensed property. If you have a complaint, go to the state," and clarifies that if it is a daycare, there’s no need to go door to door. They explain, "You can go door to door," and suggest calling the childcare check for information. The question about whether the property is a daycare is answered: "So you guys aren't a daycare then?" and "Don't report our property either." The speaker notes that the door-to-door visit was unnecessary if it is not a public daycare, and mentions that the person directing them to contact the state was interesting. The encounter is described as very hostile, with the speaker having knocked on the door to verify if the site is a local daycare listed on websites.

The investigation highlights potential fraud or serious irregularities in Somali daycare operations, based on observed signs such as windows not covered with vinyl and a lack of signage or children visible at purported day care locations. The team questions the existence of many day cares, noting that some places listed as licensed have no identifiable activity or occupants when visited. Speaker 2 argues that even if a daycare were legitimate and serving only two children, there is “no world” where the government should be giving almost a million dollars or three-quarters of a million dollars in subsidies to such a place. The discussion underscores how fraudulent claims can be made easily and points to a lack of visible accountability in the system. The agency responsible for overseeing and funding daycares is identified as the Washington State Department of Children, Youth, and Families, with Secretary Tana Sen named as the head of the agency being discussed. To contact leadership, the team attempts to reach the communications department led by Nancy Gutierrez, noting repeated efforts to obtain comment about suspicious Somali daycares. They report multiple attempts to call and email, with messages indicating that some numbers are unavailable and voicemails are full. Speaker 0 notes the difficulty in getting a response from DCYF’s top communications official, emphasizing that their mailbox is full and no responses have been received. This lack of contact is framed as convenient for avoiding questions about the alleged issues. Speaker 6 states that if fraud is confirmed, a forensic audit should be conducted to trace how much money was actually spent and to recover any funds. Speaker 7 suggests that, even in the best-case scenario, the situation is inefficient and a waste of taxpayer dollars. Speaker 8 adds that there is a prevailing attitude in Olympia that does not recognize the problem.

James O'Keefe reports from Downtown Minneapolis that his team of undercover reporters is still inside the mob scene after covering a shooting this morning. He says they barely escaped alive as several hundred people surrounded them, threw ice bottles at their vehicle, and attempted to rip off his bulletproof vest. They were followed and tailed, and they received a message stating: “we know that you're in Minneapolis. You're with O'Keefe and his crew of Nazis. You're in a white Ford license plate. They actually wrote the license plate down from Florida. You have one hour to leave or you're dead.” They plan to produce their footage from the weekend along with hidden camera footage, while undercover teammates remain in the field. O'Keefe asks for prayers for his team's safety and mentions they have security with them—a former Marine—who said the situation was worse than overseas and worse than anything seen at the cartel border. He states they will contact law enforcement, DHS, and the FBI to try to exit safely and bring the news to viewers. He promises a report coming Tuesday at 01:00.

An individual confronts people allegedly affiliated with MVM, questioning their transportation of children. They claim some children don't know their sponsors. At MVM headquarters, staff decline to comment and hastily leave, abandoning bags. The individual follows a van believed to be transporting children to the airport. They question MVM staff about children not knowing their sponsors and the reason for wearing masks. They allege IDs are not being checked. One person admits children sometimes arrive with fake names, making verification impossible, and acknowledges similarities to the movie "Sound of Freedom," implying potential sex trafficking. They state that they cannot speak on camera due to policies. Later, in Houston, the individual observes children being escorted by police, wearing masks, and hiding their faces. They confront an individual who previously claimed to be on vacation but is now moving a child through the airport, questioning them about missing children they've escorted.

The video documents a visit to what is alleged to be Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington. Speaker 0 asks, “Hi. Is this is this Halauli childcare?,” and is told, “No. No? There’s no childcare here?” They respond, “No childcare. Okay. God. Thank you so much. Have a good one.” The clip repeats, “There’s no childcare,” and notes that they were at Halauli, described as “what’s allegedly Halauli Childcare Center in Kent, Washington,” which is “right behind me right here.” The speaker says they went to the door and mentions that the exact address listed on the state website shows the center receiving over $800,000 in 2023. The closing remark reiterates, “They claim there’s no child care here.”

Nick Shirley initiates the exchange by stating his name and pressing for permission to record, noting that the other person “doesn’t have any permission to record me, period.” He proposes, “Can we talk outside? Permission to record.” The other person counters that there is no permission from either party, saying, “She doesn’t either have she doesn’t have permission or … for me. You cannot stop people on the street and question them.” Nick states, “We can ask them,” and the other person repeats, “Have any permission.” The dialogue shifts to a concern about the whereabouts of children. Nick asks, “Where are the children?” The other person responds, “I will sue you. You don't have any permission. We have nothing to do with this. Okay, sir? And are there … So leave.” Nick persists, asking again, “Are there children here?” The other person repeats, “Please leave.” Nick inquires, “Where are the children?” and the other person insists, “Leave. Leave.” Nick questions, “We’re wondering what's happening. Tell us what's happening here then.” The other person commands, “I said leave.” Nick clarifies, “We're wondering what's happening.” The other person states, “We are not a childcare. We have nothing to do with it. We're the common people walking. Yes. We're not … we're not accusing you. We're asking where the children are at.” The other person repeats, “Don't ask me anything.” Nick emphasizes his intent: “We're not accusing you. We're asking the daycare centers.” The other person refuses to answer, “I am not gonna answer. You have.” Nick presses, “Where are the children … who do you work for? My name is Nick Shirley.” The other person asks, “Who do you work for?” Nick responds, “I work for myself. Nick Shirley.” The other person inquires, “Okay what are you recording?” Nick answers, “We're wondering where are the children $2,660,000 for the Minnesota child care center. You're not talking to the right person. Are there children that come here?” The other person demands, “Answer the question. Are there children?” Nick states, “There's no children inside the building.”

The area was filled with migrants, but they were moved inside when filming began. Signs offer free travel tickets out of New York City in multiple languages. The migrants disappeared when approached for questioning.

Speaker 0: Massive fraud is going on here in the state of Minnesota, especially in Minneapolis. Explain to me what's going on with the day cares. Speaker 1: One of the things I've noticed is there’s an exceptional number of childcare centers set up mostly in Minneapolis, but also in Saint Paul. I wondered how many kids are there in the Twin Cities. I visited facilities near my office and saw there aren’t any kids there. I’d go to another one and there aren’t any kids there either. I spoke with someone outside who said, “We’re all full,” yet when I looked inside the door was open and there was a couch and a table with a couple chairs and no kids. I asked if the kids were outside playing or what kind of place this was, and the staffer said, “You go,” and followed me down the street to my car. That made me think something was going on, and this was maybe five years ago. Speaker 1: This fraud is so massive. When the dust settles on this, it’s going to be found to be the largest fraud in the history of the country and probably the world. The ones I’ve gotten data on average about $2,500,000 a year, and a lot of them will say they have anywhere from 80 to 120 children. Speaker 1: I’ve been to literally 40 or 50 of these childcare centers, and there never has been a single child at any one of them ever. Morning, afternoon, evening. Some say they’re open till 10:00 at night. I go there in the morning, I go there in the afternoon, I go there at 9:00 at night. Nobody. There are no kids there ever.

Chaya from Lives at TikTok explains she investigated an unmarked building in Burnsville, Minnesota, where nine health care companies are operating out of a single location, all with Somali names. She notes there are likely more than the nine discovered. One of the entities is Grace Care Center, run by Saeed Ahmad, which the site claims has a facility for kids with autism. She reports numerous red flags on that site, including slogans like “We cure your chill,” and suggests it is aimed at offering care for children. When contacting the listed numbers for these businesses, many do not work: some ring endlessly, others are disconnected. Most of the companies do not have websites, reviews, or additional information available. One company at the location does have a website, but it contains many spelling errors. The site’s gallery uses stock images that do not lead anywhere. Other links on the site do not function, redirecting back to the homepage. The “About Us” section states it was founded by Omar, accompanied by a stock image of a white woman, even though Saeed Ahmad is the founder. The contact information is described as fake, including a fake address, phone number, and email address. Chaya emphasizes that the situation appears highly suspicious.

The speakers in the video are questioning the individuals who are moving children. They ask where the kids are being taken and if there is paperwork for them. The individuals refuse to answer and tell the speakers not to worry about it. The speakers express concern about the children going missing, and one of them mentions an article from the New York Times stating that one-third of these kids are dropped off at a pond. The speakers question the age of the children and ask if the individuals work for Compass Connections. The individuals remain secretive and refuse to answer. The speakers express curiosity and frustration about the secrecy and ask why the individuals are hiding their faces. They also question if the kids are being told not to talk. The speakers continue to film and express their disapproval of the situation.

Hey, how's it going? I'm just curious about the facilities back here. Are they being used? I noticed there aren't many workers coming in or out. We can't allow recording on-site, but we can answer questions. This area is for rapid response in emergencies, mainly for first responders. They stay here to rest between their duties. People think it's for housing illegals, but it's not. The workers are out doing their jobs during the day, which is why you might not see them. Thanks for the clarification. It's important to get accurate information instead of assumptions. Have a great day!

An individual confronts people allegedly affiliated with MVM, questioning their transportation of children. They claim some children don't know their sponsors. At MVM headquarters, staff decline to comment and hastily leave in a van, abandoning bags. The individual follows the van, suspecting the children are being taken to the airport. The individual questions why staff wear masks and why IDs aren't checked. One person admits some children arrive with fake names, making verification impossible, and acknowledges similarities to the movie "Sound of Freedom," implying potential sex trafficking. They claim they can't speak on camera due to policies aimed at improving the administration's image and fear losing their job if they expose the situation. Upon arriving in Houston, the individual observes children wearing masks and hiding their faces, escorted by police. They question an MVM staff member, who previously claimed to be on vacation, about transporting a child to the airport and about children who have gone missing.

Speaker 0 visits a location in California described as “home to a porta john and a giant empty parking lot,” yet inside this empty lot there are “registered voters.” He states that there are “26 registered voters for this exact location. 100 Sunset Avenue in Venice. 26 people registered to a porta john and an empty parking lot. Where do their ballots go exactly? So who's picking up the ballots? Who's voting for the people in this lovely porta john empty lot? Ask the question.” He concludes, “I think you know the answer.”

We are in contact with hundreds of records departments, officials and the rest, in search for a single blueprint to an old world building. The Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois is said to have been constructed from 1919 to 1921, a 480,000 square foot palace building with 75 foot interior columns, supposedly designed, engineered, and completed in two years. The presenter argues that after today, viewers will understand that this place is different from the mainstream narrative, and that blueprints, framing receipts, and construction details should be on display given Chicago’s early 1900s building codes requiring stamped architectural and structural plans and permanent archival storage. The team has reached out to the Chicago History Museum, which preserves Chicago’s architectural, civic, and engineering history and holds archives from major firms including Graham, Anderson, Probstin White—the firm tied to the Field Museum. The questions posed include blueprints, engineering drawings, ledgers, engineering calculations, documents proving the Field Museum narrative, logs of communication between architect and builder, construction costs, and marble sourcing. The request letters are dated with the aim to verify the building’s construction, procurement, and design records. The Chicago History Museum’s reply notes staffing reductions, limited ability to answer architectural questions, and that they hold renovation drawings from the 1980s; they can only assume they have copies of originals and cannot provide more information. They state they do not have originals for blueprints or engineering calculations, and that their collection is complicated. The team highlights that this implies the Field Museum and the broader mainstream history may lack the expected records for a building of this scale. The team continues by noting that the Chicago History Museum also claimed to have some pictures, but not the full set of originals. They point to a 1915 Chicago Daily News photo labeled “construction of the Field Museum,” which predates the stated 1919 start date by four years, suggesting a major contradiction. They ask for inspection, occupancy, or dedication certificates verifying completion; the museum again replies they do not believe they have these. The presenter emphasizes that the Field Museum is a massive, marble-built palace on the lakefront and notes related architecture like Soldier Field, implying a connected lineage and common building methods, yet lacking the anticipated archival records. They thank supporters and promote their channels and sponsors, while continuing to press for responses from both the Chicago History Museum and the Field Museum. They report that the Field Museum replied on 10/27/2025 asking for a description of the research project and institutional affiliation; the presenter identified as an independent researcher producing a long-form documentary on architectural and engineering history, requesting blueprints, ledgers, and public records. A follow-up on 11/11/2025 produced no reply. The archivist’s awareness of not having the original blueprints is declared evident, and the presenter proclaims that the Field Museum is now exposed. The episode ends with a pledge to continue exposing these buildings worldwide and to uncover more questions and truth.

The investigation into fraud in public daycare subsidies is described as massive and deeply obstructed. "Massive. They don't want a fraud unit to do anything. They want a fraud unit on paper." The discussion centers on Halicki, who was fired in 2013 while in the midst of a large probe. The county’s account of Halicki is that he was an insubordinate bully whose tactics hampered efforts to catch welfare cheats, while supporters call the firing part of a broader effort to suppress accountability. One side frames the situation as a cover up: “They don't wanna point fingers at various organizations and people. This is nothing but a giant cover up.” The reporting highlights deco daycare centers, with evidence that the company collected millions in public subsidies for providing bogus child care services to low income families. The overarching assertion is that, in essence, this scheme was a criminal enterprise. In December, Ramsey County charged the owner of Dico with fraud. The daycares shown are described as billing the county at rates over $100,000 a month. Halicki says that before his dismissal he was tracking a similar scheme in Hennepin County involving multiple child care centers. One building is noted as housing its third daycare center in as many years, with a new license granted despite concerns. The two previous centers had their public subsidies stopped by the county because of billing irregularities. Halicki recounts footage of centers with questionable visibility: “7AM to 6PM. There are no lights on.” He and the team visited centers that had no signs outside and, during posted business hours, no one answered. They checked state inspection records for each center on Halecki's tour, finding licensing violations—the kind that are red flags to the state's Department of Human Services. The core accusation is that this is a deliberate attempt by officials in Hennepin County to deceive taxpayers. Halicki claims to possess emails and documents proving knowledge of the wrongdoing and deliberate inaction. He cites an email to the supervisor of the fraud unit where the stated goal was to stop the bleeding quickly and protect taxpayer money from going out the door; the supervisor replies with a plan to tackle the centers, and Halicki reiterates, “It's nothing but a giant cover up.” Officials emphasize that the focus is on prevention, but they do investigate and take action with the county attorney when fraud occurs. In the two years since Halicki was fired, not one case has been prosecuted by the county. The report notes that most metro counties aren’t actively investigating daycare center fraud; instead, they’re handing those cases off to a DHS special team that was ramped up more than a year ago. Public frustration is voiced: “Nobody is more frustrated with the amount of time it's taking than we are.”

The speaker states that the woman who owns the building housing a child care service recently opened a restaurant there as well. This same woman previously ran Samala Child Care, which was rated in 2015 for stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars and had its license revoked. The speaker notes that under a different variation of her name, she also operates the Hu Yu Child Care Center. The speaker then claims that a Google search for the Hu Hu You Child Care Center yields a video featuring the mayor of Minneapolis. In that video, the mayor is playing very loudly Somali music and is wearing a shirt that shows pride in Nicolette Street. The speaker asserts that he is very proud of his community and all of the fraud that they have all committed together.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

Speaker 0 describes being advised to start attending planning meetings with a task force. Over the next several weeks and months, he attended upwards of three planning meetings with a task force of about 20 personnel from various law enforcement agencies, health and human services, the BCA, Saint Paul PD, Minneapolis PD, all revolving around fraudulent daycares. They were setting up sham daycares, with fake bills, fake students, or enrollments of students who never came—essentially, fake daycares. Over the next several months, they executed several search warrants throughout South Minneapolis, Lake Street, and different areas at these daycares. Not one of the daycares he served warrants on had anyone present; they were never occupied. They were completely empty from his experience, with stacks of invoices and student records of people who surveillance showed never went there. He notes that nobody ever came in and out of these daycares. The operation “worked out” for three to four months. He was assigned as a support person to assist with anything needing financial experience, working with HSI and immigration authorities to pull records and related tasks. Ultimately, he says the task force just kinda went away, and he is not sure whatever happened to it. He mentions the meetings of “you know, I…” but the transcription ends there.

They're taking kids from shelters if they don't have a safe place to go afterward. We confirmed this with a child protective services representative. The shelters are closing by Friday, and if families can't find safe accommodations, the children will be taken. Some shelters are still open, but many are not. We visited a shelter today that provides meals and laundry, but they must leave by noon on Friday. It's a serious situation, and it's hard to believe it's real. Families are in distress, and the implications for the children are concerning.

The speakers are questioning where a group of kids is being moved to, but the person in charge refuses to provide any information. The first speaker expresses concern about the kids going missing, and the third speaker confirms that it happens frequently. Another speaker mentions that the kids are being taken to the airport. The first speaker criticizes the secrecy and tries to film the situation. They ask why the group is hiding their faces and instructing the kids not to talk. The conversation continues with the speakers discussing the questionable nature of the situation.

We are at an undisclosed facility in Tucson, Arizona, investigating the activities of the organization Elitas. They have been accused of using racial slurs and hiding their badges. We encounter resistance from the staff, who refuse to answer our questions. We witness buses transporting migrants to airports and encounter an Uber driver who confirms their involvement. We also speak with a person named Jorge, who denies any connection to Elitas. This investigation sheds light on a facility that operates under the radar, receiving millions in federal funding. Support our independent journalism by visiting okeefeshop.com. (123 words)