reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A speaker asserts that “a dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the agenda 2030.” The claim continues that, “in many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denouncing this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest.” The speaker frames a broad consolidation of power as a totalitarian shift quietly taking hold “in Europe, Canada, Australia, and other vassal nation of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, and World Economic Forum.” A focal point of the message is the case of a private entity founder named in the speech: “all private entity founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial.” The speaker states that Fulmisch’s “crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lies.” The appeal follows to a moral appeal: “I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defense of those persecuted by the globalist regime.” The speaker explicitly shifts responsibility away from Fulmisch, declaring, “It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity.” A list of individuals is named as principal actors behind the alleged crimes: “Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Claus Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burla, and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions.” The statement closes with a direct call: “Free Reinhard Fulmisch.” The language presents a stark framing of persecution, accusing a defined group of leading a globalist operation and portraying Fulmisch as a victim of this alleged regime. The speaker emphasizes the urgency of collective action and solidarity among believers and “people of goodwill” to resist the described oppression and to advocate for Fulmisch’s release.

In Germany, insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially incurring higher fines due to their permanence. Even reposting untrue statements can be considered a crime. Authorities are actively curbing online hate speech, as demonstrated by coordinated raids targeting individuals posting racist content. Despite growing concerns over migration and related issues, there's a lack of political will to address these problems effectively. The focus seems to be on prosecuting opinion crimes rather than deporting criminals. My party, the AFD, faces persecution despite being a major opposition force. We're smeared as Nazis and right-wing extremists, but this isn't true. Free speech is eroding, with new laws targeting online expression. People risk punishment for criticizing mass migration. Even if the AFD performs well in elections, other parties may refuse to cooperate, maintaining a firewall against us. It is time to vote to make Germany great again.

The speaker claims Germany has a profitable "hate speech persecution" industry targeting citizens for online posts. Police raids occur for minor offenses, like a €600 fine for a poop emoji. Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck has filed over 800 criminal reports. Germany makes the most legal demands for user data from X within the EU. The German justice system uses AI surveillance to prosecute benign offenses. A law change in 2021 allows harsher punishment for insulting politicians. The company Soldan, described as a "hate crime persecution mafia," scans posts using AI, files thousands of criminal complaints monthly, and shares profits with politicians, with legal costs borne by taxpayers. Hate Aid, funded by the German government, also works to criminalize hate speech and wants to sue X to allow doxxing. The speaker urges support for free speech and fighting against tyranny.

In the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case, the media portrayed it as extremist right wing groups plotting against the governor. However, it was revealed in court that the FBI had paid an informant to assemble a group for prosecution. Despite their efforts, the informant failed to find willing participants. It was discovered that out of the 18 people recruited, 12 were actually working for the FBI. While not all of the FBI may be involved in such activities, it is important for us as citizens to expose and hold the corrupt accountable. We should question the reality created by the media and think for ourselves.

Germany labeled the AFD a far-right extremist threat and is moving to ban it, prompting criticism from figures like Marco Rubio. Similar actions have occurred elsewhere: Marine Le Pen in France has been barred from seeking office, Bolsonaro in Brazil was banned and silenced, and Donald Trump in the U.S. has faced indictments and media blackouts. The speaker claims this is a pattern of disqualifying opposition and criminalizing dissent, drawing a parallel to actions taken by Adolf Hitler. They assert that censorship and the arrest of political rivals are not about defending democracy, but about global control defending itself. The speaker urges listeners to recognize this pattern and resist division. They state that awareness is the most powerful act of resistance, and encourage listeners to unite and refuse to be branded by the established order.

I'm one of you, and because I love Germany, I vote for the AfD. Despite what the media says, I want what's best for us all. I stand for freedom, individualism, and sovereignty, which requires preserving our cultural roots and being proud of who we are. We shouldn't sacrifice ourselves for the world or let our values be trampled, losing our identity. We don't need to sacrifice for uncontrolled immigration or a global climate goal we can't achieve. There is no catastrophic, man-made climate change. We must protect our children from crime, economic collapse, and tyranny, not an abstract climate crisis. To avoid the AfD, the CDU will likely form a coalition with the left, worsening things. We need a strong AfD opposition, and eventually, government participation. The AfD is inevitable; we will break down the barriers. With over twenty-five percent of the seats in the Bundestag, the AfD can launch investigations into political failures, like the two-tiered system during COVID. I want to fight for a Germany that belongs to the people, not the politicians. As Elon Musk said, only the AfD can save Germany.

The speaker discusses the Alternative for Germany (AFD) party's experiences, claiming the party has faced media labeling, social exclusion, and economic hardship for its members. They state that the AFD's rise in popularity has led to increased institutional measures against them, including being labeled as extremist by the intelligence service. The speaker claims that the EU is a Soviet-style bureaucratic system disturbing free markets and democratic processes. They thank Elon Musk for providing an alternative to mainstream media, which they allege is government-funded and biased. They believe Germany is on the wrong path, particularly regarding energy policy and its stance on the Ukraine conflict. The speaker worries about the possibility of the AFD being banned and its leaders imprisoned, but remains hopeful that the German people will see through what they describe as a facade. They express concern over the undermining of democratic processes and the exclusion of the AFD from parliamentary representation.

The speaker claims AFD members have been victims of violence, including arson. They believe banning AFD is being considered despite it being the leading party in polls, which would set a dangerous precedent for Western democracies. The constitutional court would make the decision, potentially taking years unless they "overthrow everything." The speaker alleges the head of an agency admitted his duty was to diminish AFD's poll numbers, likening it to the Russiagate hoax. AFD was founded in 2014 advocating for direct democracy and opposed open border policies during the migrant crisis. The speaker states AFD members need police protection at conventions due to violence. They claim censorship is already happening, with politicians favoring censorship and individuals facing prison sentences for jokes about ministers.

The German AFD party's rise is linked to geopolitical interests, specifically concerning liquified natural gas (LNG). The 2013-2015 migrant crisis in Europe led to right-wing populist movements, including AFD, which faced accusations of hate speech for advocating border closures. However, the speaker claims the real reason for these accusations was to create a censorship pretext to undermine AFD's online popularity due to their opposition to the US State Department's "grand Ukraine energy play." After Trump's 2016 election win, a US State Department network allegedly pushed for internet censorship in Europe, culminating in Germany's Netzdg law in 2017, requiring AI content moderation. The speaker claims the plan was to privatize Ukraine's gas assets, have Wall Street and London profit, eliminate Gazprom, and force imports of US LNG. AFD opposed this, advocating for cheap Russian gas via the Nord Stream pipeline, threatening the LNG market and the Biden family's interests, including Hunter Biden's involvement with Burisma. The speaker alleges that the focus on AFD is due to Germany's industrial importance in Europe.

This video discusses Germany's AFD party and its connection to internet censorship and the LNG market. It mentions Elon Musk's response to accusations of sympathizing with the party. The rise of right-wing populist movements in Europe, including AFD, is attributed to the migrant crisis. The video suggests that hate speech allegations against AFD are politically motivated and tied to the LNG market. It also mentions the State Department's involvement, the passage of NetzDG in Germany, and the privatization of Ukraine's gas assets. The transcript highlights the importance of Germany's political landscape and the potential impact of AFD's success on the LNG market.

There is a pervasive and dark organization that is well funded and evil. They are willing to kill people, as seen with the aide of Kelly Loeffler in Georgia who was blown up in his car. He was dating Governor Kemp's daughter. Governor Kemp was considering a signature audit, and the lead investigator from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation suddenly died within a week. There is a lot of money and power at stake here, as it involves the leadership and control of the most powerful country in the world.

Last night, it was revealed that Tony Blinken played a significant role in orchestrating a plan involving 51 intelligence operatives. Their objective was to discredit a laptop that is widely known to be genuine. All evidence points to Blinken as the mastermind behind this scheme. It is crucial that he is questioned and held accountable for his actions.

We've seen police raids against citizens suspected of posting anti-feminist comments online, framed as combating misogyny. I must address the US Vice President's speech. Our motto in the Bundeswehr is "We fight for your right to be against us," and it represents our democracy. The Vice President questioned this democracy, not just in Germany, but across Europe, likening Europe's condition to authoritarian regimes. Early Tuesday morning, we accompanied state police as they raided an apartment in Northwest Germany. Six armed officers searched the suspect's home, seizing his laptop and cell phone. Prosecutors allege these electronics were used to post a racist cartoon online. Simultaneously, over 50 similar raids occurred across Germany, part of a coordinated effort to curb online hate speech.

Yesterday, four German AFD candidates who were supposed to sit in the elections died suddenly. Four politicians that are a part of the AFD in Germany, which supports mass deportations, four of them died unexpectedly. By morning, six AFD politicians had died suddenly, and in the last hour the count reached seven—seven from one party. One party in Germany which supports mass deportations. This is before key state elections. To put that into perspective, imagine any party in your country having seven of its politicians die suddenly before an election, especially when they're the opposition. Just before elections, a party that's been gaining a lot of traction in Germany, seven candidates.

Another child and mother were killed by an Afghan refugee. I've warned you this would happen again. Establishment parties reject the AfD's immigration control proposals because they need to gaslight you to extend their control, knowing you'll eventually vote AfD anyway. Why let them prolong the suffering? Be brave and vote AfD now because your family could be next. The AfD would dominate polls without the Nazi stigma created by the media and establishment parties like the CDU, who need it to cover their corruption and treason. Instead of preventing attacks, they avoid working with the AfD, a betrayal of the people. The media brainwashes you into thinking you're a Nazi if you vote AfD. JD Vance was criticized for his speech addressing the threat to German people's safety, a concept the establishment seems unfamiliar with. We must protect the German people whose existence is threatened by this asylum crisis. Only the AfD can save Germany. Overcome your Nazi stigma fears and make the right decision for your family and future generations.

The speaker discusses the Alternative for Germany (AFD) party's experience with media labeling them as right-wing extremists, leading to social exclusion and economic hardship for party members. Despite this, the AFD has grown in popularity, reaching 26% in polls and over 40% in Eastern Germany. The speaker criticizes Germany's intelligence service for labeling the AFD as extremist for holding conservative views. They also express concern over the EU's bureaucratic system and its impact on democratic processes. The speaker thanks Elon Musk for providing an alternative to mainstream media, which they claim is government-funded and biased. They lament Germany's energy policy, particularly the shutdown of nuclear power plants, and criticize Chancellor Merkel's green policies. The speaker believes the AFD represents normal conservative values and offers a perspective of freedom and wealth. They express worry about the possibility of the party being banned and its leaders imprisoned, drawing parallels to situations in Romania and the treatment of Donald Trump. They advocate for peace in Ukraine and criticize Germany's support for the war.

The German parliament is full of left-green traitors and egomaniacs who will virtue signal us to hell to push their ideology. How many more times must we endure Aschaffenburg, Magdeburg, Mannheim, and Zolling? How many more rapes, stabbings, and murders, even of children, must we expect? This could happen to your family; you could be next.

The events of January 6th were not spontaneous; planning began in September involving deep state members and various NGOs. We have identified those involved, and if you're on that list, you should consider leaving the country, as prosecution is likely. We have video evidence of meetings, including one with an infiltrator who recorded them. The planning included participation from groups like the Azov battalion in Ukraine, which is linked to Nazi ideologies. This group is not just labeled as Neo-Nazis; they represent a continuation of Hitler's legacy, marking a troubling resurgence of extremist ideologies.

The FBI is being accused of corruption and targeting politicians, parents, and ordinary citizens. Whistleblowers have bravely come forward, facing retaliation and being blocked from working both inside and outside the FBI. This is a troubling time for the American people.

We will not be working with that right-wing extremist party because they are outside of what Germany needs, in both economic and migration policy. There will be no collaboration with that party. What is missing from this discussion is that it is never about content, but only about outrageous framing towards the Alternative for Germany. They are a liberal conservative party, and the problems in this country would not exist without the three parties standing here.

The transcript centers on a long-form discussion of the Epstein case, the alleged “deep state,” FOIA operations, and political maneuvering around Trump, with frequent calls to aggressively release and pursue Epstein-related documents and other investigations. The speakers assert that the FOIA department is being used to shield deep-state ties and that many federal offices are filled with anti-Trump figures who have prevented full disclosure. - Epstein files and the role of the deep state - The speakers claim the Epstein files are being selectively redacted by FOIA departments to conceal deep-state connections. They state that FOIA personnel are controlled by deep-state actors and that Epstein’s case involves a “fleet of aircraft” and operations linked to major power centers. They argue Epstein’s activities connect to money laundering, information laundering, and a broader set of deep-state assets and operations. - They propose a remedy: appoint Tom Fitton as special counsel on the Epstein files, arguing he “knows how FOIA really works,” understands key personnel, and has litigated Epstein-related cases for years. They assert this would restore public confidence and expedite the exposure of Democratic ties and other actors alleged to be involved. - They advocate for Trump to have executive-privilege-style powers to declassify and release Epstein materials, suggesting a broad interpretation of “Epstein file law” that would allow him to disclose or appoint an ombudsman with power to release materials at will. They emphasize the need to disclose Democratic ties and to hold press conferences when releasing documents, avoiding the use of fake documents or videos. - Specific figures and institutions named - Kash Patel is cited as saying there are “open files on a dozen plus coconspirators” and as someone who has noted alleged misdirections by those handling Epstein-related material. - Kyle Serafin and Phil Kennedy are mentioned as documenting a person at the FBI capacity who is “an anti-Trump advocate,” implying that deep-state appointments control FOIA and related processes. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss replacing FOIA and related personnel who are deeply implicated; they specifically name Tom Fitton as the ideal choice and entertain other high-profile figures like Tulsi Gabbard as potential custodians of the Epstein disclosures. - Tulsi Gabbard is described as being in charge of broader investigations tied to the Epstein files and other major political issues (elections, COVID-19, etc.). They also reference “Epstein files” intersecting with other investigations they attribute to the deep state. - Epstein, Maxwell, and allied networks - Epstein is described as deeply embedded with Western intelligence agencies (French, Israeli, UK, and US) and tied to Robert Maxwell, with Maxwell’s daughter linked to Epstein. Epstein is portrayed as having been “recruited by Bill Barr” and as a central figure in a long-running intelligence and blackmail operation. - The discussion links Epstein to Leslie Wexner (Victoria’s Secret founder) and a French talent agency, portraying these connections as part of a large, interconnected network involved in money laundering, arms trafficking, blackmail, and intelligence work. - The speakers insist that Epstein’s activities extended to the late 1990s and beyond, including alleged involvement in “Shutters” in Santa Monica and other high-profile cases, with a consistent pattern of using underage girls and blackmail to exert influence. - They emphasize a broader motive: exposing the “deep state” to vindicate Trump and indict deep-state actors who allegedly engaged in illicit operations, including foreign intelligence services and Western governments. - The broader political frame and potential indictments - The Epstein files are presented as a potential hinge for indicting a wide array of figures across political lines, including references to Comey, Mueller, Hillary Clinton-era actors, and other “rogue actors” who allegedly hindered investigations. - The conversation ties Epstein to broader themes: the 2020 election, COVID policies, and anti-Trump actions by the “deep state.” They contend that the Epstein disclosures could demonstrate the depth of state interference in political processes and media, making Democrats and their institutions targets of accountability. - They argue the Epstien files could show criminal activity by multiple national actors, including Israeli, UK, and French components, and could reveal coordinated efforts to derail Trump and manipulate media narratives. - The Candace Owens angle and related criticisms - A substantial portion of the dialogue critiques Candace Owens, alleging she is running a “CIA-style” operation that distracts from the true conspiracy around the deep state and Tarantifa, and that she manipulates narratives related to Tyler Robinson and Charlie Kirk. - They accuse Owens of shifting narratives, fabricating alibis, and promoting disinformation, calling her a “SIOP” (psychological operation) and alleging her behind-the-scenes connections to MI6 or other international actors through her husband (George Farmer) and other associates. - They recount multiple incidents where Owens purportedly changed stories about meetings, alibis, and involvement in various investigations, asserting she uses “receipts” selectively and inconsistently to support divergent claims. - The speakers allege that Owens’s public warfare against Trump and TP USA is part of a broader intelligence operation intended to disrupt conservative momentum, link to Royal/MI6 circles, and undermine investigations into the deep state and its networks. - Tyler Robinson case and media dynamics - They describe Tyler Robinson as a Middle American figure whose transformation into a political actor is portrayed as a product of online radicalization and Tarantifa-linked influences. They claim there was a concerted effort to spoon-feed disinformation about Robinson and Candace Owens’ involvement. - They argue this is part of a larger pattern of media manipulation and disinformation designed to distract from real conspiracies and to target Trump and conservative movements. - Strategy and messaging guidance - The speakers advocate for Trump to go on the offensive with Epstein, releasing comprehensive, verified documentation, and pushing accountability for “rogue actors” in the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, and the NSA. - They stress the need for aggressive prosecution and the appointment of trusted figures to lead the Epstein disclosures, arguing that this could restore public confidence and pivot the political conversation toward accountability for the deep state. - They urge addressing the statute of limitations issues in COVID, January 6, and 2020 election-related cases before the window closes in early 2026, warning that delays by Bondi, Blanche, and others could jeopardize prosecutions and political support. - Promotional and logistical notes - The dialogue includes frequent mentions of promoting Alex Jones programs, products, and stores (alexjonesstore.com and infowarsstore.com) to fund operations, along with appeals to listeners to support the broadcasts financially and through purchases, framing financial support as essential to sustaining investigations, media efforts, and broader political action. In sum, the transcript presents an entangled, aggressively conspiratorial narrative: a claim that Epstein’s files illuminate a vast, deeply embedded deep-state apparatus spanning multiple nations and agencies; a call to appoint trusted figures (notably Tom Fitton) to supervise full disclosure; a push for Trump to declassify and publicly prosecute the implicated actors; a harsh critique of Candace Owens as part of a disinformation ecosystem; and a broader strategy to use Epstein, along with related investigations, to dismantle perceived institutional corruption while fueling political narratives and fundraising.

Speaker 0 argues there is a 'Soviet Union type bureaucratic system' that 'disturbs free markets' and 'democratic processes.' He says 'the media are not neutral anymore' and thanks Elon Musk for 'buying x to give people the chance to inform themselves differently than from mainstream media,' claiming 'the mainstream media... are all paid by our government.' He recalls Merkel's remark 'there are no alternatives to my politics' and links it to the party name 'Alternative for Germany.' The party has been labeled 'extremist' 'on probation,' then 'on suspicion,' now 'certified extremist,' with debanking and a possible ban. Polls show AfD rising to '21% almost' then '25, 26%,' 'double as strong as the CDU' in the East, 'over 40%.' He cites energy policy as destroying infrastructure: 'the last six were switched off' and 'gas pipelines... ripped out.' He cites Tocqueville and warns of worst-case bans and imprisonment, urging peaceful democratic renewal.

Elon Musk endorsed the far-right German party Alternative For Germany (AFD), claiming it is the only party that can save Germany. This party has been labeled extremist by the German government, with ties to neo-Nazi ideologies and a history of promoting harmful ideas about citizenship. The endorsement raises concerns, especially given Musk's influence as a key adviser to the U.S. president. If the U.S. were to officially support a neo-Nazi party in Germany, it would have catastrophic implications for Germany, Europe, and the United States.

Germany is facing a troubling situation. A Saudi Arabian man, well-integrated since 2006 as a psychiatrist, went on a rampage, driving into a Christmas market, injuring 200, and killing 5. He had previously announced his intentions on social media and was warned three times by Saudi Arabia about his plans. Despite this, German authorities seemed more focused on hunting down Germans for hate crimes rather than addressing real threats. The media is framing this as linked to the far-right AFD party, but it was an anti-German act, as the perpetrator explicitly stated his intent to harm Germans. There is a call for a proper remigration program to address these issues, rather than the narratives pushed by mainstream media.

I've been warning you this would happen again. As long as nothing changes, the outcome will remain the same. It's a cycle of terror, false promises, and fake apologies from puppet politicians, but no real change. The establishment rejects the AFD's immigration control proposals because they have to gaslight you. They're trying to extend their government control, knowing you'll eventually vote for the AFD. Why let them extend the suffering? Why let them gaslight you? Be brave and vote for the AFD now while we still have a chance. You need to realize that you could be next. Your family, your children, your sister, your mother—they could be next.