reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There were problems with the 2020 election, and I have been clear about that. I forwarded an email that presented an argument from a former inspector general for Donald Rumsfeld, who is an accomplished lawyer. The argument was based on the Federalist Papers.

Speaker 1 discusses Christopher Krebs, former head of CISA, claiming: Krebs weaponized his position against free speech in the election context and in the context of the COVID-19 presidential memorandum, and that he might have instructed the Department of Justice and other parts of government to investigate what Krebs participated in while head of CISA. Speaker 1 asserts they did not know Krebs personally, but that he came out right after the election, which was a “rigged election, badly rigged election.” He claims the country’s outcomes included open borders and millions entering the country, and asserts that “Russia and Ukraine, that would have never happened,” and that “October 7 would have never happened,” followed by the Afghanistan withdrawal with “13 dead, but so many killed, actually. I mean, so many so many killed outside of the 13 soldiers, hundreds of people killed.” He says, “and maybe, I don’t know, never,” but mentions it, that Krebs was saying the election was great, adding that “it’s been proven that it was not only not great.” He cites lawyers and law firms signing on, “giving us hundreds of millions of dollars,” and claims the election was proven by legislatures not approving, and other forms from “the all of the different, scamming operations,” describing it as a very corrupt election in which COVID was used to cheat. Speaker 1 contends Krebs claimed, “we’ve proved this is the most secure election in the history of our country,” describing the result as a disaster. He insists they should adopt “paper ballots, same day voting, voter ID,” and proposes adding a certificate showing citizenship before voting—“a citizen piece of paper that says you’re a citizen before you can vote.” He reiterates support for voter ID, paper ballots, and same-day voting. He describes events: if you don’t have same-day voting, they change the air, move boxes, and then don’t bring the boxes back, implying a lack of safety in elections. He asserts that elections must have borders and, ideally, a free press, which he claims we do not have, calling the press dishonest. Speaker 1 concludes that Krebs is a “fraud” and a “disgrace,” and says, “We’ll find out whether or not he was right,” promising that Krebs “has a big price to pay” if the election wasn’t safe, labeling Krebs as “a bad guy.” He also states he has no idea who Krebs is, though acknowledges Krebs “was in the room at some point,” and ends by noting that the last two points are important for the country.

Speaker 1 respects the right of people to vote for the president. However, it is questioned why, for the first time in American history, a president won every swing state while also being best friends with and having their largest donation from a man who owns and runs the Internet. It is hoped that this will be investigated to determine if it was an anomaly. It is curious, especially since Kamala Harris was filling up stadiums with supporters, while Donald Trump was not. As an American and believer in democracy, Speaker 1 hopes to look at all the reasons why this happened in the country.

The speaker questions the evidence presented by elections officials, stating that it has been repeatedly debunked. They suggest inviting the officials back in to provide further evidence. Senator Tillery agrees with the suggestion.

A bill exists that would require states to upgrade their elections infrastructure. The best and most secure way to conduct voting is with paper ballots. Russia can't hack a piece of paper. It would be beneficial if the Republican leader would put these bills on the floor for a vote.

Just 36 Republican electors can make a difference by voting their conscience on December 19. The speaker is not asking them to vote for Hillary Clinton, but rather for any eligible person they consider competent to serve as president. The constitution grants electors the right to vote for any eligible person, regardless of party affiliation. This vote has the power to shape the future of our nation.

The speaker denies changing their mind about wanting an open primary if Joe Biden stepped down. They state they had an open primary, and Kamala Harris won. The speaker claims nobody else entered the race because Harris was politically astute.

Do you have any doubts that Joe Biden had the necessary electoral votes to be elected president in 2020? I accept the results and acknowledge Joe Biden as president. However, from my experience as an advocate in Pennsylvania, I witnessed various issues. While I accept the outcome, I believe we should all prioritize election integrity and ensure our elections are free and fair, adhering to the rules and laws. I think that question deserves a simple yes or no, and your lengthy response suggests you weren't prepared to answer directly.

The president and his lawyers asked me to reject votes, which would have caused chaos by turning the issue over to the House of Representatives. I hope the government can prove criminal charges beyond reasonable doubt, but it's important for the American people to know that they didn't just ask me to pause. They wanted me to overturn the election by returning and rejecting votes.

I have 36 years of experience in the senate and have confirmed many judges appointed by the president. We can't act as a national election board. Past elections were closer, so we should accept the results.

I do not concede the election. Many believe there were issues on election day. The president claims the election was rigged, with lawsuits having merit. Legal remedies must be pursued. Georgia was rigged in favor of Biden.

I have never denied the outcome of the election, and I want to make it clear that we won. While I may not have gotten the job, I did get the votes, although the exact number is uncertain due to cheating. I believe we were robbed of the election, and when I say "rigged" or "stolen," I have evidence to back it up. I'm not saying they stole it from me, but from the voters of Georgia. In the ten days following the election, before what we call my "non-concession day," I made it clear that I will never concede because it was not a free and fair election. Thousands of Georgians were unable to cast ballots, effectively having their voices stolen. We must ensure this never happens again, and that all votes are counted in future elections.

The speaker believes some amount of cheating takes place in elections, particularly with mail-in ballots and lack of proof of citizenship, making it hard to prove. Statistically unlikely events occurred, such as the use of Dominion Voting Machines in specific locations like Philadelphia and Maricopa County. The speaker advocates for paper ballots, hand-counted, citing the ease of hacking computer programs. They also support in-person voting with voter ID, which they claim is standard in almost every country with democratic elections. To effectively address fraud, the speaker suggests in-person voting with ID. Given the current situation, they believe a very large margin of victory is needed to overcome potential cheating.

On January 6th, there were different opinions on what should happen. Some believed that Vice President Pence had the power to reject electors whose certification was still pending. However, others, including myself, disagreed with this idea. I advised Vice President Pence to instead grant a week to the state legislators in swing states to address the alleged election irregularities. Not everyone agreed that there were irregularities significant enough to change the election outcome without legal proceedings. Ultimately, this led to the situation we find ourselves in now.

Tomorrow is January 6th, an important constitutional date. The speaker expresses frustration that the United States does not have a clear election outcome yet. They mention their experience in other countries, where they have helped run elections and encouraged those countries to follow their example. The speaker finds it embarrassing that their own country is facing election challenges. Another speaker agrees and mentions that according to U.S. law, if there are no poll watchers, the election should be redone. They ask for suggestions on what President Trump and the people should do. The first speaker suggests a 10-day pause to allow for recounts in select states, ensuring that the ballots are constitutional and not fraudulent. They mention issues like backdated ballots, phony ballots, and dead voters.

Elizabeth Warren believes we should eliminate the electoral college. I am open to discussing this because the popular vote's importance in choosing the president has been reduced.

I'm embarrassed that the US can't get its presidential election right. We should not accept this. In some states, there are more dead voters than soldiers buried on historic battlefields. We did not have a free, fair, and transparent vote on November 3rd. Everyone knows who won the election: Donald Trump.

The speaker states that the best investigators are pursuing election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and can be exploited to manipulate vote results. This vulnerability allegedly drives the mandate to implement paper ballots across the country, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

I believe today is a sad day for America. I think it's important to be able to challenge an election if you believe it was rigged or stolen. Many others, like Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams, have done the same. What's happening here is a travesty of justice and election interference. We did nothing wrong, and we have the right to challenge an election we believe is dishonest. Thank you all for being here, and I'll see you soon.

The speaker was asked if they would have done anything differently than President Biden during the past 4 years. The speaker responded that there is one thing that comes to mind. They added that they have been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact.

I demand that Congress only counts the lawfully slated electors. We will peacefully march to the Capitol to make our voices heard. Today will determine if Republicans stand for election integrity and for us.

I'm embarrassed that the US presidential election wasn't conducted properly. We had more dead voters than soldiers buried in historic battlefields. The election on November 3rd was not free, fair, or transparent. Everyone knows that Donald Trump won.

The speaker denies changing their mind about wanting an open primary if Joe Biden stepped down. They state they had an open primary, and Kamala Harris won. The speaker claims nobody else entered the race because Harris was politically astute.

The speaker states that the "best of the best" are investigating election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers and exploitation, allowing for the manipulation of vote results. This allegedly supports the mandate to implement paper ballots nationwide, with the goal of restoring voters' faith in election integrity.

Are you prepared to say under oath that Donald Trump lost the presidential contest to Joe Biden in 2020? President Biden is the president of the United States, having been duly sworn in after a peaceful transition of power. Trump left office and was overwhelmingly elected in 2024. Do you have any doubts that Joe Biden had the necessary electoral votes to be elected president in 2020? As a prosecutor, I accept that Joe Biden is the president. I witnessed many things during my time in Pennsylvania as an advocate for the campaign. While I accept the results, I believe we should all want election integrity and ensure our elections are free and fair, following the rules and laws. I think that question deserves a yes or no, and your lengthy answer suggests you weren't prepared to answer yes.