TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In June 2021, we informed them about 25,000+ suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite having over a year to address the issue, they failed to prevent it from happening again in 2022. The GOP spread propaganda to discredit our findings, but everyone knew about it beforehand.

I discovered the source of how ineligible individuals are being added to voter rolls. It's an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access sensitive DMV records protected under privacy laws. Their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status, allowing them to add names to voter rolls without confirming eligibility. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding from Zuckerbucks in 2020.

The speaker claims the Pritzker family, Ukrainians, and UNESCO stole the Wisconsin Supreme Court justice race. They connect this to a previous stolen election in Wisconsin. Robert Pressler Junior, brother of Scott Pressler, is said to live in Madison and conducts CRISPR gene editing research, allegedly related to calibrating COVID. A Republican woman, described as a Scott Pressler supporter and arbiter of official data, was the director of engineering at Snapchat from 2018 to 2022. Snapchat is linked to Facebook, the Center for Election Innovation and Research, and the ERIC voter registration system, which are accused of destroying voter rolls to create pools of low-propensity voters for mail-in ballots. Miles Pressler is identified as an engineering director at Snapchat, suggesting a family connection involving Miles, Robert Junior, Robert, and Scott Pressler.

In this video, the speaker discusses allegations of voter fraud in Michigan during the 2020 elections. They claim that fraudulent voter registrations were dumped in a small city in Western Michigan, which led to an investigation. The investigation revealed that a woman working for a group called GBI Strategies was dropping off completed voter registration forms that had the same handwriting, fake addresses, and phone numbers. The group was funded by a dark money super PAC called Blackpac. When the police investigated the old eyeglass store where the group operated, they found prepaid cash cards, rental cars, burner phones, and guns, including semi-automatic rifles and customized pistols. The speaker suggests that this is evidence of organized voter fraud by the Democratic Party on a national scale.

Speaker 0 outlines a controversy over data mining and privatized spying. He says the data mine is owned by a company called ChoicePoint, created by Republicans. He asserts they built the database that “knocked off the black voters,” and claims they did so to help elect the president of the United States, with “no bid contracts” totaling over $1,000,000,000 to maintain databases on people. He alleges that after talking with insiders at the ChoicePoint Corporation, executives, they are “matching your phone numbers, your billing medical records, your voting registration records, your driver's licenses, and their latest thing, your DNA.” He notes that spying on Americans is illegal under the Constitution, and emphasizes that the trick is privatizing the spy function. He argues they set up a private company—describing it as a private FBI, but calling it a private KGB—and that this private company has a large database, “16,000,000,000 records,” believed to be at least double that since then, which would be illegal for the United States government to keep. According to the speaker, ChoicePoint supposedly keeps the records and then sells that information to the U.S. government secretly. He asserts that when they were supposedly hunting illegal voters in Florida, their list was “97% wrong.” He repeats, “Let me repeat that. 97% wrong.” Yet he claims the list “was perfect for Jeb Bush because what it did get right is it identified black voters, which they could knock off.” The speaker also alleges problems with DNA evidence: “25% of the DNA evidence in rape cases in Illinois until the police caught them faking the evidence in rape cases,” after which they were fired. He emphasizes that this is not about Mouthis getting their man, but about the Mouthis getting the political targets for their men. Speaker 1 adds a closing line, saying, “I took over George Orwell's old power. He'd appreciate all this, you know. He'd love it.”

There have been mistakes in your office that have harmed voter confidence, such as sending mailers to 30,000 noncitizens inviting them to register in 2022, and using the ballot tracking system to send voting reminders to individuals who had already voted, which caused confusion. Now, there’s also a leak of voting system passwords. Given these repeated errors, will you resign? Absolutely not. You are mischaracterizing the situation and omitting crucial information.

Nicole Shanahan and Harmeet Dhillon discuss a broad critique of how culture, law, and politics are shaping America today, focusing on cancel culture, political power, and the fight over election integrity, free speech, and American ideals. - On cancel culture and authenticity: The conversation opens with a claim that pursuing political or cultural conformity reduces genuine individuality, with examples of how people are judged or pressured to parroting “woke” messaging. They argue that this dynamic reduces people to boxes—race, gender, or immigrant status—rather than evaluating merit or character, and they describe a climate in which disagreement is met with denunciation rather than dialogue. They stress the importance of being able to be oneself and to engage across differences without being canceled. - Personal backgrounds and the RNC moment: Nicole Shanahan describes an impression of Harmeet Dhillon speaking at the RNC, highlighting the sense of inclusion across faiths, races, and women in the party. Dhillon emphasizes that this is not about a monolith “white Christian nationalist” stereotype, recounting her own experiences from Dartmouth, where she encountered hostility to stereotypes and where merit-based evaluation (writing, argumentation) defined advancement rather than identity. - Experiences with California and liberal intolerance: Dhillon notes a pervasive intolerance in California toward dissent on topics like religious liberty and climate justice, describing a glass ceiling in big law for pro-liberty work and a culture of signaling rather than substantive engagement. Shanahan adds that moving away from the Democratic Party to independence has induced personal and professional consequences, such as colleagues asking to be removed from her website due to investor concerns, reflecting broader fears about association in liberal enclaves. - Diversity, identity, and national identity: They contrast the freedom to define oneself with the coercive “bucket” approach to identity. They argue that outside liberal coastal enclaves, people feel freer to articulate individual identities and values, while California’s increasingly prescriptive DEI training is criticized as artificial and limiting. - The state of discourse and the danger of intellectual conformity: The speakers warn of a culture where questioning past work or adopting new ideas triggers denouncement and self-censorship. They cite anecdotal experiences—loss of board members, fundraising constraints, and professional risk for those who diverge from prevailing views—claiming this suppresses valuable work in fields such as climate science, criminal justice reform, and energy policy. - Reform efforts and the political landscape: They discuss the clash between incremental, evidence-based policy and a disruptive, progressivist impulse. Shanahan describes attempts to fix infrastructure of the criminal justice system through technology and data (e.g., Recidiviz) that were undermined by political dynamics. They emphasize the importance of practical, measured reform and cross-partisan cooperation, the need to focus on American integrity and governance, and the risks of pursuing “disruption” as an end in itself. - Election integrity and lawfare: A central theme is concern about how elections are conducted and contested. Dhillon outlines a view of targeted irregularities in swing counties and cites concerns about ballot counting, observation, and legal rulings. She argues that left-wing funders have built a sophisticated, twenty-year, lawfare apparatus, using nonprofits and strategic lawsuits to influence outcomes, notably pointing to the Georgia ballot-transfer activities funded by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. She asserts that there is a broader pattern of using C3s and C4s to push political objectives while leveraging the law to contest elections. - The role of money and influence: They discuss the influence of wealthy donors, political consultants, and media in shaping party dynamics, suggesting Republicans should invest more in district attorney races, state-level prosecutions, and Supreme Court races to counterbalance the left’s long-running investment in the electoral apparatus and litigation strategy. They acknowledge that big donors and activist networks can coordinate to advance policy goals, sometimes at the expense of on-the-ground, local accountability. - Tech, media, and corporate power: The dialogue covers the Silicon Valley environment, James Damore’s case at Google, and the broader issue of woke corporate culture. Dhillon highlights the disproportionate power of HR in big tech and how employee activism around identity politics can influence careers and policy. Shanahan notes that Google’s founders are no longer central decision-makers, and argues for antitrust and shareholder-rights actions to challenge what they see as woke monopolies that do not serve shareholders or society. - The path forward: Both speakers advocate for courage to cross party lines, work for principled governance, and engage in issue-focused collaboration. They emphasize the need to reform infrastructure—electoral, health, educational, and economic—through competency, transparency, and bipartisan cooperation, rather than through dogmatic, identity-driven politics. They close with a mutual commitment to continuing the conversation, finding common ground where possible, and preserving the core American ideal that individuals should be free to define themselves and contribute to the country’s future.

The speaker discusses the involvement of the Office of Special Counsel and the actions taken by David Plouffe and CTCL. They highlight how Plouffe allocated funds from Zuckerberg to select cities without any applications. Additionally, they mention the $28 million in grants given to five cities in Wisconsin. The speaker suggests that this money was used to influence the African American vote in Milwaukee, as stated by Plouffe in a 2016 editorial. They argue that these actions were part of a partisan effort, supported by contracts that bound the cities to follow the directives of CTCL and Plouffe.

The source of ineligible voters being added to voter rolls is the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access protected DMV records to identify unregistered voters. However, their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status. This means they receive information without knowing who is a citizen, leading to ineligible names being added to voter rolls. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding in 2020.

Some voter rolls in swing states contain illegal aliens because they register their address as the processing center. Software integrating property tax records with voting files reveals voters not living at legal residences. These new illegal voters are inundating voting roles, especially in swing states. In 2022, 40,000 phantom voters were exposed in Wisconsin and removed. These are people who were dead, moved out of state, don't exist, or don't live at a legal address. Challenging the address is the most efficient way to get an illegal voter off the voting roll. Certain NGO groups, such as Catholic Charities, are helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These groups don't believe in borders and feel fine registering people to vote. Dark money, evading campaign rules, tends to go to NGOs and other groups. Evidence suggests a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese-controlled groups and is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign and the RNC need to dedicate time, money, and energy to analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states to find voters using illegal addresses and have those addresses removed.

The speaker claims to have found the source of ineligible voters being added to voter rolls: an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker. Becker was allegedly involved in a scandal as a US attorney and later worked for left-leaning organizations. The speaker alleges that with George Soros' money, Becker created ERIC, which contracts with states to access DMV records and other sensitive data. According to the speaker, ERIC's membership agreement prohibits disclosing citizenship status, yet they add names to voter rolls and circulate the information. The speaker further claims that this information is then given to the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received funding from Mark Zuckerberg.

The speaker raises concerns about the Center for Tech and Civic Life's involvement in election administration processes. They mention an email where an employee from the center suggests embedding a middle management staff member in the Milwaukee Election Commission. The speaker believes this is going too far and emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in elections. They also mention the director of the Wisconsin Elections Commission discussing the grants provided by the CTCL.

The speaker claims that illegal voter registration originates from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), founded by David Becker with George Soros' money. Becker allegedly had a past scandal involving the DOJ and the city of Boston. ERIC contracts with states to access DMV records, including sensitive data protected under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, to identify unregistered individuals. The speaker alleges that ERIC's membership agreement prohibits disclosing citizenship status, leading to ineligible voters being added to voter rolls. This information is then circulated back to states and shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received funding from Mark Zuckerberg.

The attorney general, Dana Nessel, claims that none of the 16 people who signed the document as Michigan electors for the 2020 presidential election were legally elected or qualified. The speaker denies this, stating that they were duly elected Trump 2020 electors and followed instructions to submit documentation. They believe Nessel is working with Jack Smith to dismantle Trump's campaign and that this is a personal attack. The speaker suggests that the Democrats are using lawfare to target Trump and his supporters. They question whether Nessel will imprison elderly Republicans involved in this. Overall, the speaker sees this as a show and a performance to go after Trump and his supporters.

There's a significant issue in Michigan regarding voting machines that allegedly flip Republican votes to Kamala Harris when voting straight party line. Secretary of State Benson announced a need to patch these machines, raising questions about their prior federal certification. The patch is viewed as a method to manipulate results remotely. An attorney, Stephanie Lambert, is working with local officials to prevent this patch and instead advocate for a hand count of ballots, emphasizing the importance of maintaining constitutional order. They filed a lawsuit to stop the patching process, arguing it poses a threat to election integrity. The Secretary of State is attempting to move the case to a court she controls, highlighting concerns of corruption in the process. Support for grassroots efforts to combat this issue is encouraged.

The speaker claims voter rolls in swing states are full of illegal aliens and others who shouldn't be on them, alleging some register using processing center addresses. They use software integrating property tax records with voting files to identify voters not living at legal residences. In 2022, Ron Johnson and Jay Valentine exposed and removed 40,000 phantom voters in Wisconsin. The speaker advocates challenging addresses to remove illegal voters from rolls, preventing mail-in ballots from reaching them. They claim the removal of these phantom voters led to Ron Johnson's reelection. Certain NGO groups, like Catholic Charities, are allegedly helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These liberal Christian charities purportedly don't believe in borders and register people to vote. The speaker alleges dark money, potentially from Chinese-controlled groups, is influencing elections in favor of Kamala Harris. They urge the Trump campaign and RNC to analyze voting files in swing states, identify voters using illegal addresses, and remove those addresses before the upcoming election.

The discussion centers on allegations of foreign and domestic interference in the 2020 U.S. election and related vulnerabilities in mail-in voting. - A 2020 FBI intelligence memo warned that China might have been sending fake driver’s licenses into the U.S. to create fake mail-in ballots intended to help Joe Biden win. The memo, reportedly corroborated by licenses intercepted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Chicago, was allegedly dismissed and not investigated because it would reflect badly on Trump. There are claims that intelligence reports were requested to be destroyed under federal records rules to prevent leaks before the election, as the memo allegedly indicated China preferred Joe Biden over Donald Trump. - A 60 Minutes segment quoted the head of Homeland Security’s cyber security division stating there were no foreign intrusions in the 2020 election, which is asserted as false by the speakers, citing later indictments of Iranians in Manhattan in 2021 for interfering in the election by hacking a state database to obtain voter IDs used in a malinformation operation. - In Colorado, it is claimed that 670 Dominion passwords from 63 out of 64 counties were exposed on the secretary of state’s public website since June, and that these passwords were known to Secretary of State Jenna Griswold during a trial but not disclosed to clerks. There are accusations that this could imply compromised elections, referencing fraudulent activity in Mesa County and asserting that passwords beyond Colorado were involved with Dominion machines. Dominion’s Colorado base is noted, with a claim that Dominion also has ties to Serbia. A video referenced by Gary Brunson is suggested to support these claims about the origins of the electoral manipulation. - A video and related claims allege a connection to a 30-year CIA whistleblower and trace the origins of the alleged election manipulation to Venezuela and Hugo Chávez, tying in references to Patrick Byrne and broader alleged corruption. - The speakers assert there was a second country deeply involved in meddling in the election, with FBI involvement in August 2020 in recognizing a Chinese operation to mass-produce fake U.S. driver’s licenses and mail-in ballots to influence the election in favor of Biden, describing the operation as designed to help Biden beat Trump. Customs and Border Protection reportedly intercepted 20,000 fake driver’s licenses, corroborating the intelligence, while the Biden administration and the Chris Wray-led FBI allegedly covered this up for five years until the document was provided to Chuck Grassley by Kash Patel. - It is claimed that China viewed mail-in ballots as an enormous vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploiting the weakness in the system, and that this concern remains for states lacking strong mail-in voting security. - Additional notes include a claim that there were tightened voting laws in several states post-2020, with increased confidence in the system where tightened; an arrest by HSI Miami and partners of a permanent resident Haitian national for unlawful voting and casting a false ballot; and estimates that 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with the trailer disappearing. - The final claim references tens of thousands of fake voters having illegally cast ballots in the November election, implying broad down-ballot effects across Senate, Congress, and local elections.

I've discovered how ineligible voters are being added to voter rolls. The source is the Electronic Registration Information Center, or ERIC, led by David Becker. Becker was involved in a scandal as a US attorney, worked for the far-left organization People for the American Way, and then Pew. With funding from George Soros, Becker created ERIC. ERIC contracts with states to access DMV records, which are normally protected. They use this data to identify unregistered individuals but the agreement prohibits states from telling ERIC who is or isn't a citizen. ERIC then puts these names on voter rolls and shares the data with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, the group that received Zuckerbucks in 2020.

Speaker 0: I want to ask about what if you've changed position on what happened in the twenty twenty election. Speaker 1: Oh, I think it was rigged. Speaker 0: You think it was rigged? Speaker 1: Yeah. I know more now than I did then. What you'd have to do is in February 2021, was a Time Magazine article that was published, it was about Mark Zuckerberg investing $500,000,000 in a get out the Democrat vote campaign. And they focused on the swing states, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona. And they focused in what they did is they basically did what I would refer to as agency capture. And they went in and they captured the, the county clerks and the secretaries of states in these states. They basically said, we have a get out the vote campaign program, and if you will implement it exactly the way that we say that you must implement it, we will give you massive amounts of money to run your elections. But if you do not run it the way that we say, then we can claw all that money back. Well, think about it. If you're a small county in Wisconsin and you get $300,000 from Mark Zuckerberg's foundation to make sure that there are drop boxes in your, in your Democrat heavy areas, that there are, that you've got a, an RV going around and hauling people into the, into the polling places to vote. When you do that, if, if you do not carry out, you take that money, you sign that contract and you do not do exactly what that foundation said, you were gonna have to use public money to pay it back. You most likely would have ended up in prison. I mean, that's just one example of the way that the election was rigged. The Mark Zuckerberg money was huge. $500,000,000 concentrated in Democrat counties for the purpose of getting out the Democrat vote. Speaker 0: How do you know it was to get the Democrat vote out? Because how does exactly do what are the mechanics of that? Of how it was You Speaker 1: I have to read the article. And what the article does is it lays it out, and the title is something along the lines of how a secret group of people were able to save the twenty twenty election, meaning how were they able to get Joe Biden elected.

I've discovered how ineligible voters are added to voter rolls. The source is the Electronic Registration Information Center, or ERIC, led by David Becker. Becker was previously involved in a scandal as a US attorney. With funding from George Soros, Becker created ERIC, which contracts with states to access DMV records. This sensitive data, protected under the Driver's Privacy Protection Act, is used to identify unregistered individuals. ERIC's membership agreement forbids disclosing citizenship status, so they add these names to voter rolls and circulate the data. This information is then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, another organization founded by Becker, which received funding from Zuckerburg in 2020.

Becker, a character of interest, received $1 million from George Soros and used it to establish ERIC, the electronic registration information center. The state of Wisconsin pays $100,000 to ERIC and David Becker. Kevin Kennedy, a disgraced former head of the Government Accountability Board, is still involved in Wisconsin and sits on the 5-man board of directors of the Center For Election Innovation and Research, alongside David Becker. Becker, a former lawyer at the Department of Justice, founded ERIC with seed money from Soros. Megan Wolf, the administrator of the state elections commission, is also a board member of ERIC. There is a connection between Becker, ERIC, and the CTCL grants.

Senator Jim Rutstead warns of Democrats' election fraud enabling plan in Michigan. Despite a bill not taking effect until 2025, Secretary of State Joycelyn Benson aims to implement changes for the upcoming election. The Republican National Committee's legal team sent a letter urging Benson to stop her unconstitutional actions. They vow to take legal action if she continues. View the full letter for more information. Stay informed and join the fight against election fraud.

The speaker claims the mainstream media is lying about Vance Luther Bolter's party affiliation. According to the speaker, some states, like Minnesota, do not register voters by party affiliation and have open primary systems. The speaker states that despite serving under Democratic governors, news outlets reported Bolter last registered to vote in 2022 as a Republican. The speaker questions why a registered Republican would work under Tim Walz until 2023. The speaker provides voter information showing Bolter registered as a Republican in Oklahoma in 2004. However, Minnesota voter registration only provides name, birth year, and registration status, not party affiliation. The speaker insists the mainstream media is lying about Bolter's affiliation.

The speaker claims Scott Pressler's father is a retired Navy captain working with Michelle Flournoy's husband. Flournoy is linked to WestExec, CNAS, Booz Allen Hamilton, and the Carlyle Group, which has a stake in Dominion Voting Systems. Flournoy's brother is allegedly a Chinese spy involved with Tumisomo Bank and SoftBank, an early investor in Alibaba, which obtained US voter registration data. The speaker alleges that ERIC voter registration data was sent to Beijing, China, and that the Center for Election Integrity and Research (CEIR), which administers ERIC, defends corrupt elections officials. WestExec helped establish the relationship with Alibaba, Tencent, and Huawei for election fraud. Robert Pressler allegedly works with Flournoy. The speaker claims that during Carrie Lake's election lawsuit, Maricopa's elections network was illegally accessed, with the hack originating in Kansas. Thomas Liddy, son of G. Gordon Liddy, stopped the trial. Michael Salim from Rackspace and Data Republican, Jenna aka Jenica Pounds, are allegedly involved. Pounds, formerly with Snapchat, partnered with CEIR to allow voter registration on social channels using compromised data. The speaker alleges ActBlue is a subsidiary in the arena domain, used to defraud elections. Columbia University and Michael Crow of In-Q-Tel are also implicated. Scott Pressler is accused of ignoring the data/cyber side of election fraud. WinRed and ActBlue are two sides of the same coin. WinRed was allegedly hacked from British Columbia.

Speaker 0 presents what he calls an explosive piece of tape: a man buys a registration form for an absentee ballot from a voter, pocketing $200 and expecting to collect the ballot when the voter receives it. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the illegality of the act and questioning why it isn’t illegal to do certain things, followed by a line that “We don’t get illegal” and a claim about lions, then attributes responsibility to someone who “came up with all this.” Speaker 0 continues, stating that she started the whole “pay to vote” scheme. He alleges that “the people that work for Ilhan” are actually counting the ballots, counting the vote. Speaker 1 adds that they “become a manager in the prison too,” claiming that those people “walk with you to the booth, and then they vote, oh, vote this guy. Vote this guy. Vote even if you speak English.” Speaker 0 introduces James O’Keefe, identifying himself as a truth exposer who holds the corrupt elite accountable, and pivots to messaging about protecting readers’ freedom and finances. The segment shifts to a financial pitch. O’Keefe warns of one of the biggest financial shifts of their lifetime, describing de-dollarization with nations like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia moving away from US dollars. He claims this threatens savings and retirement security and cites Ray Dalio’s warning about skyrocketing debt, relentless money printing, and a weakening dollar as part of a dangerous cycle that could impact Americans. He asserts that more Americans are turning to real assets like physical gold and silver, noting that gold “surged past $3,700 per ounce,” and that momentum is building. He says he has partnered with veteran-owned American Independence Gold to help viewers take action, offering to open a qualifying account with up to $10,000 in bonus gold and a free gold protection guide. He adds that a portion of every sale supports Tunnel to Towers and wounded warriors, and closes with the line, “Freedom isn’t given, it’s secured,” followed by the disclaimer, “This is James O’Keefe. As always, this is not financial advice. Always check with your licensed financial advisor before you invest.”