reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker repeats the word "babies" and asks, "What babies?" The speaker states, "Maybe I kill a girl who was 12, but I'm looking for a baby." The speaker also says, "We were looking for babies, but there is no babies left."

The speaker asserts there's a point to stop tolerating unacceptable behavior, comparing it to a teenage girl's rebellious phase that becomes destructive. They claim this "phase" has lasted for years and involves destroying major cities and allowing the country to be invaded by millions of foreigners with unclear purposes, which they believe is threatening. They state "they" are crushing families, making it impossible for kids to buy houses, and getting involved in children's sex lives. The speaker concludes that "they" need to lose and that when "they" claim victory, the appropriate response is to declare, "Dad's home and he's pissed."

The speaker mentions the catchy chorus of a video and questions its meaning, comparing it to other nonsensical phrases. They notice something strange about the video, specifically that the girls in it haven't had three kids. They then mention hearing the phrase "Yvonne etnoyage" and become curious. Upon playing the video backwards, they discover the subliminal message "Join the Navy" and speculate that the Navy is recruiting people using these hidden messages.

The speaker expresses frustration with the state of the world and personal financial struggles, stating that bills increase monthly, leading to stress and a lack of social life. They feel isolated, working and staying home. The speaker is upset that the country is "ran by a guy that talks to people that ain't even there." They are also angry that "society's trying to tell me it's okay for my son to be my daughter" and "society's trying to tell me that it's okay for a grown man to date a child." The speaker advocates for burning the world down, stating, "Let's burn this motherfucker completely down."

The speaker threads through aggressive, chaotic lines: "The big boy. Fucking rip and tear. That's the big one." They urge to "live, laugh, and love" and declare readiness with gear and patches—"I got my Minnesota patch In the fucking FSP"—and speculates about appearance preventing confrontation, "Maybe I look like a cop, and I won't get rushed or something." They express violent intent and sensory focus: "I got my new headphones so I can hear them scream." A key claim is stated plainly: "That dude raped someone." The sequence ends with preparations and a sense of impending action: "But, shit, let's fucking do this before things are in the kitchen. Ew. Ew. Oh. Scavity. Oh, yeah. Checking this out."

Speaker 0 presents a disturbing set of preferences expressed as a personal viewpoint. The speaker rejects any idea of waiting or gradual enjoyment, insisting, “No, bitch. I wanna drink it straight from the tap. I want it raw. I don't wanna wait a moment. Right when the milk is good, I wanna start drinking the milk.” This metaphor is used to describe a desire for immediacy and immediacy in relationships. The speaker then extends the metaphor to women, arguing against aging in a traditional, patient way. They state, “Same thing goes with women. I don't wanna turn 30 and find some 20 year old, 29 year old woman that I have something in common with and it's like, hey, properly aged like wine. Women don't age like wine, they age like milk. They don't age like wine. That's not how their hormones work.” The claim asserts that women do not age gracefully like wine, but rather age like milk, contradicting the notion of aging well. Continuing, the speaker proposes a specific, controversial timeline for marriage and reproduction. They say, “I gotta find my 16 year old wife. Probably when I turn 30 or something.” They justify this with calculations about age differences: “Here's the thing, I don't wanna be like, let's say I get married to an 18 year old now. Six year age difference. When I turn 40, she's gonna be 34. Ew. Well, if I'm 30 and she's 16, fourteen year age difference. When I'm 50, she'll be 36. When I'm 40, she'll be 26.” The speaker draws a progressive, increasingly favorable age difference for themselves as they age. The speaker amplifies their stance with an explicit age preference, saying, “Now we're talking here. Now we're cooking with gas. Now you can see an alternative vision for how things could be. I want a 16 year old who's untouched. Untouched, pristine. Untouched, uncorrupted, innocent.” They further claim, “That's what we all want. And all 16 year olds want an older guy who's like capable and strong and everything to sweep them off their feet. That's what everybody wants. That's what everybody wants.” Overall, the transcript centers on a provocative, highly problematic set of beliefs about age, consent, and the supposed desirability of a 16-year-old partner, framed through aggressive metaphors and explicit preferences.

The speaker makes inappropriate comments about someone's kiss and body. They also make crude remarks about a 12-year-old girl and suggest she dance on a table. The speaker then asks someone to breastfeed and comments on the amount of milk. They request someone to breastfeed with another person named Shauna.

Speaker 0 expresses extreme alarm about revelations described as “coming out from these vials” and questions whether everyone is paying attention to what is being revealed. They fear they may have to explain to others what they are hearing and seeing, and worry they will sound like they are experiencing psychosis because they cannot sleep and feel “so fucking angry.” They declare they are “petrified” and describe the material as “some of the most vile, most demonic shit I have ever even fathomed” and “unfathomable.” They feel that people are not paying attention and that there is under reaction to these distressing revelations. They worry that, when exposed to such distressing information, people may become numb, a response they acknowledge as a valid human experience, but they believe it is unacceptable in this context: “we numb ourselves and we block it out because it's too much.” They speculate about others who are reading or observing the revelations, asking if “these fucking fucked up freaks” are sitting there laughing and saying that “everything's out and nothing's gonna happen,” noting that “we got away with the most horrifying stuff” and insisting that it’s “not even humanly possible to believe that this is happening.” The speaker repeats their inability to wrap their mind around “the fact that these things happened,” labeling it “unconscionable.” They ask, “what the fuck are we supposed to do? Genuinely, what the fuck are we supposed to do?”, conveying a sense of urgent seeking for guidance or action in response to the perceived revelations and their emotional impact.

Bob Saget is falsely accused of raping and killing a girl in 1990. The speaker jokes about Saget's sense of humor and his interactions with Mary Kate Olsen. They also make inappropriate comments about Saget's personal life, mentioning his two daughters in college and three girlfriends in high school. The speaker mentions Saget's dream of performing in Las Vegas and Hannah Montana.

The speaker starts by pointing out someone who looks like the cook from Texas Chainsaw Massacre. They comment on the beautiful night and ask why the person they are talking to is wearing a girl's purse. The person clarifies that it is actually a Louis Vuitton backpack that is unisex. The speaker then asks about the devil and makes a comment about the person's right foot. They reassure the person that they just want to go on some adventures.

The speaker shares a disturbing experience involving Robyn and Ray. Robyn would sometimes be incoherent due to medication. The speaker recalls two specific incidents. In one, Ray made the speaker strip in front of him while thinking Robyn was asleep. The speaker felt embarrassed and uncomfortable, especially since they were only 14 and hadn't started using tampons yet. Ray then made the speaker sleep outside, even though it was cold. The speaker had to snuggle up with their dog for warmth. Ray threatened the speaker, saying he would hunt them down if they tried to run away or seek help. The next day, the speaker was allowed back inside. The speaker also expresses their disdain for Robyn, calling them a piece of shit.

Speaker 0 cites Henry Kissinger’s book Kiss the Boys Goodbye, urging viewers to get the book. In the book, Kissinger allegedly says United States military people are “a bunch of dogs” and “dogs” because they wear dog tags, implying nobody cares if they get killed. They also reference George Bush’s mother, described as “incredibly ugly” and “scary,” who allegedly said on national television about Americans being killed in the Middle East: “why should I waste my mind, my beautiful mind on people dying? Hell, I like what the hell do I care? Man, I’m dying.” This quote is presented as the president’s mother stating that America doesn’t care about its soldiers, reinforcing the claim that soldiers are expendable. The speaker explains the term GI as “government issue,” noting that the government issues pants, shoes, car, underwear, food, and everything else. Therefore, soldiers are “government issue,” like an oil can, a tire, or any other item the government issues. The point is made that after a war ends, the United States Corporation does not go back to Vietnam (or other theaters) to collect trash—oil cans, tires, jeeps, tanks—because the trash and junk are blown up; the war is over, so it’s all “government issue.” Consequently, soldiers are left behind, in what the speaker describes as a concentration camp in Cambodia, and the refrain repeats: “leave him, he’s just a GI, a government issue.” The speaker then shifts to a personal confession: at seventy-one years old, he has spent fifty-three years in the world of the occult. The word occult is defined as Latin for “hidden,” asserting that what is important has been hidden and that those at the top know things others don’t. He emphasizes that this realization has astounding him about how much people don’t know about the world they live in. He urges young people watching to wake up and “get a life” and start figuring out who owns them. He questions “all this crap about people owning your body on this New York Stock Exchange,” implying ownership or control by powerful entities. In sum, the speaker presents a sequence of provocative claims linking Kissinger’s alleged statements, the Bush family quote about indifference to soldiers’ deaths, a harsh critique of the GI concept and postwar neglect, a long personal claim about occult knowledge, and a warning to wake up to hidden powers allegedly controlling people.

The speaker asserts there's a point to stop tolerating destructive behavior, comparing it to a teenage girl's prolonged "bitch" phase. This phase, lasting nine years, involves destroying major cities and allowing the country to be invaded by millions of foreigners with unclear purposes. The speaker questions why people shouldn't feel threatened by this. They claim "they" are crushing families, making homeownership impossible for kids, and getting involved in children's sex lives. The speaker declares that "they" need to lose and that when "they" claim victory, one should respond with defiance, stating, "Dad's home and he's pissed."

The speaker states they had many children because they wanted a big family, but only one child was planned. The rest "just happened" because they "like to fuck." They chose to keep their children rather than have abortions or "unalive them." The speaker believes that if you "lay down to make them," you should "lay down to take care" and "stand up and take care" of your kids.

The speaker states they are waiting for law enforcement after exiting a residence, the home of their "last victim." They claim to have obtained the names and addresses of those who "did this" to their 11-year-old son and went to each of their homes, where they "unalived them in the most graphic and horrific way possible." The speaker acknowledges their life is over and expresses indifference to the potential consequences, including a prison sentence or the death penalty. They hope their actions will spark a conversation about the consequences for teenagers and parents involved in stripping and raping an 11-year-old. The speaker then notes the arrival of the police.

"Say something, I'm giving up on you." The speaker expresses a willingness to be with someone, stating, "I'll be the one if you want me to," and "Anywhere I would have followed you." They admit to "feeling so small" and that "it was over my head," confessing, "I know nothing at all." The speaker repeats, "Say something." They then claim, "Our children. They are not really our children."

Speaker 0 expresses a desire to protect someone from experiencing hardships they've faced. Speaker 0 then states feeling violated. Speaker 1 compliments Speaker 0's scent and asks their age. Speaker 0 is 16, turning 17 in two weeks. Speaker 1 says they never smelled that good at 16. Speaker 0 asks if the other would rather be naked on stage during a song or drink blended worms. Speaker 0 says they have young fans and can't give a sex talk, noting they never received one. Speaker 0 asks why a 15-year-old boy would want a sex talk from them, expressing discomfort. Speaker 0 suggests discussing the album, noting the other person hasn't been calling or hanging out like before, and has tried contacting them through partners.

Speaker 0 talks about Hunter being in the basement with a silver spoon, anticipating the arrival of hookers and drugs. Speaker 1 expresses uncertainty about when their dad will come home, while mentioning their involvement with drugs and their admiration for their father's behavior. The speaker concludes by mentioning that Hunter is still in the basement with the silver spoon.

When you turn 16, you can have this. And when you turn 18, you'll get a mansion. You smell great. How old are you? What music do you listen to? I feel violated. Can you say it again? You have nice lips. Can you give me the sex talk? Why are you involving me in this? It's a 15-year-old's dream. I have temporary custody of Usher for the next 48 hours. We're going crazy.

Speaker expresses panic and intent to text his leftist trans lover with every detail of what he did, claiming he’d planned for a week. "Engrave the bullets." He narrates: "Disassemble the rifle. Reassemble the rifle. Disassemble the rifle. Disassemble the rifle. Reassemble the rifle without a screwdriver while running." He says, "Put it in the woods. Covered it in a towel. I did this for you, and send." He ends with: "Alright. It's a good thing that I, Tyler Robinson, someone who has a four point o GPA and a 34 on the ACT, is smart enough to know that there is no way that the FBI could ever get ahold of my text messages."

- The speaker asserts that Lincoln Park was a military base in Canada where they experimented on children as part of a top secret government project called MK Ultra. - The speaker claims Chester Bennington, the lead singer of Lincoln Park, was working on a documentary about child trafficking and happened to encounter it in the middle of that production. - The speaker also claims Avicii and Anthony Bourdain were working on the same project. - The speaker asks whether this is fate or whether he knew what he would do with his fame, and questions whether band names can be tied to future work in the world. - The speaker concludes that it’s “too weird to say it was just mental.”

The speaker alerts someone, referred to as "Holmes," that their "crack is out." The speaker then addresses "Ma," urging her to look away from something. The speaker questions someone's actions, stating there are kids and the speaker's mother present. The speaker calls someone "sickos."

The speaker acknowledges the topic “with children,” then says “they're hotter,” follows with “Let's fucking go,” and asserts, “That's why we love them. That's why we love this guy.”

In Washington, the speaker, a young person, observes the sexual perversion among older politicians. They are shocked when invited to a sexual gathering that turns out to be an orgy. The speaker also witnesses hypocrisy among leaders who advocate against addiction, as they openly use cocaine. The speaker finds these experiences to be wild and unexpected.

Taylor Swift is the topic of discussion between two individuals. One person claims to have seen her at parties, while the other asks what she was doing. The first person responds by saying she was dancing with the devil and acting crazy. The second person asks if she is on drugs, to which the first person suggests she had cocaine. The second person then asks if there is anything that made them believe she is part of a satanic cult, but the first person avoids answering and simply states that she is satanic. The second person asks if they find her attractive, but the first person dismisses the question, saying they don't see her like that.