reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the relationship between profits and cancer treatment in the United States. They mention a study that found chemotherapy to be ineffective 97% of the time, but it is still used because doctors profit from it. The speaker explains how doctors receive financial incentives for prescribing chemotherapy drugs. They argue that the pharmaceutical industry has control over cancer treatment and that the medical system prioritizes drugs and surgery over alternative approaches. The speaker suggests that funding for cancer research should also go towards nutritional, homeopathic, acupuncture, and naturopathic research. They criticize the for-profit nature of the medical industry and its impact on patient outcomes.

This is a particularly interesting one; 'X rays are known to cause look at that. Not solve it.' They also claim, 'Also, they weaken the patient, and the patient often dies from the X-ray damage rather than from the statistics show that the patient who no longer receives the treatments live just as long or longer than those who subject themselves to all of this.' The approach proposed is to 'Treat the symptom of the tumor rather than the actual addressing the root cause.' The speaker concludes: 'This is a very powerful book that I highly recommend everybody look into.'

There's no such thing as biopsy spreading cancer. They say that out loud, but they have not even one scientific study to show for that, whereas I have 50 to show that they do spread cancer. They just believe so strongly and so blindly what they were told, and they're afraid of the truth because it means that for years and years and years, doctors have been killing people through biopsies. Be very careful. Never do a prostate biopsy. Never do a breast biopsy. There are better ways. You don't need the mammogram with its own radiation. You don't need biopsy to tell you if it's cancer or not. You can be 99% sure just by doing an ultrasound with a technician who knows what she is doing.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the focus shifted to chemotherapy and radiation instead of finding a cure. The current approach to cancer involves managing the disease and maintaining symptoms, which is where the money lies. The profit is not in healthy or deceased individuals, but in those who can be convinced they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

Every early cancer detection is customer creation and fraud, with no proof that it cures anyone. The cancer industry is a $300,000,000,000 industry driven by money, with each patient bringing in between $3,000,000 and $7,000,000. If a patient doesn't have cancer, they may be given it. Cancer is not an illness but an accumulation of symptoms. Cancer rates have increased from seven percent in 1900 to fifty-six percent today, and including "the thing we cannot talk about," it's ninety-two percent. The speaker claims to have cured 66,000 cancer patients.

The mitochondria, not the nucleus, is the center of cancer. Cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease. Realizing this will massively drop death rates in just a few years. We may never completely get rid of cancer, but we can learn to live with it and keep it at bay. If we restrict the fuels that cancer needs through diet and lifestyle, and keep our mitochondria healthy, we can manage it. If we don't focus on the mitochondria, then almost 50% of people will continue to get cancer.

- Chemotherapy prolongs life about two to three months. Two to three months. That's the sum benefit. - For some cancers such as gastric cancer, it actually reduces life expectancy. - Chemotherapy is a hoax. - It's a hoax perpetuated by big pharma to make money at the expense of, people who suffer. - There are a few cancers, maybe five to eight percent in which chemotherapy actually cures the cancer. - But the vast majority of cancers, know, the common cancers, breast cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer. - The performance of chemotherapy is appalling, but it generates billions of dollars.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the medical community shifted towards chemotherapy and radiation treatments instead of focusing on sugar's role in cancer. As a result, there is no cure for cancer, only disease management and symptom maintenance. This approach is financially beneficial as it targets individuals with chronic conditions who require ongoing treatment. The money lies in this middle ground, not in dead or healthy individuals.

The speaker challenges the idea that cancer is solely genetic, pointing out flaws in current research and treatments. They emphasize the importance of healthy mitochondria in cancer prevention, criticizing society's focus on treatment over prevention. The speaker highlights the rise of cancer cases and the detrimental effects of current treatments, calling for a shift towards a more holistic approach to cancer care.

Speaker 0: Medicine follows a chain from diagnosis to prognosis. If the diagnosis is misdiagnosed as a genetic disease, the prognosis won’t match what’s actually happening. Speaker 1: The ultimate approach is to look under the microscope at a biopsy. People rely on staging—stage one, two, three, four—a system used for over a hundred years. There are also stage zero ideas where there might be something or nothing. Then they remove breasts, use toxins, and do aggressive treatments to some patients. They define stage four, but what does that really mean? We look at tissue removed from the body, examine it under a microscope, and assess how many mitotic figures there are and how crowded the cells are. The pathologist makes a decision, which is passed to the surgeon or oncologist to tell the patient they have this kind of disease, stage three or stage four, depending on cell crowding and mitotic figures. The problem, which has persisted for decades, is that we take a biopsy of a tumor—a section of it—and the pathologist quickly decides. Then we stick the patient with something that can actually make things worse and spread the disease. I have dozens of articles showing that biopsies from breast, colon, liver, and lung can spread the tumor through the body, creating medicine. Why? I say: don’t do anything. Don’t poke the bear. Shrink it down, make it weak, then come in and take the whole thing out. Why stick it for nothing? Just remove the whole thing after you shrink it with metabolic therapy. Then what they say is, this is not an aggressive tumor. Yes, because we shrunk it a lot. If you had stabbed it initially, it might have said it would kill you. But you have to know the biology: you don’t poke the bear; you take the food away from it. It becomes docile, you can cut it out, then follow with non-invasive imaging. We have non-invasive imaging—CT, PET, MRIs—and you can start looking at things before you poke them. If it goes away, why poke it in the first place? So we have all these tools available, but they aren’t used in the correct order or way. Once the knowledge comes out, people will realize what I’m saying and start doing things the right way.

The problem with a biopsy is this. Now it spreads all over the place. So you do spread it. But what they're not telling you is that the research is showing that if you take these drugs, you're almost guaranteeing metastasis. If you did a biopsy and or a surgery, you're gonna get metastasis. Now if you add high dose chemo, you're get metastasis. If you do radiation, you're gonna get metastasis. What they're looking at is giving you a short term reduction of the primary, and then you think, oh, I'm in remission. Nine months later, it would came back. The federal, the FDA will have approved it. Your insurance will pay for it. It's the right thing to do. And you're gonna do that. It's also part of the sales team. It's part of the sales technique.

Therapeutic drugs are the only drugs doctors profit directly from. Chemotherapy is used because it's profitable, not effective. The pharmaceutical industry controls us. Funds raised for breast cancer don't support alternative treatments, only drugs and surgery that don't work.

Cancer is a symptom and a tumor for example is nothing else in the approach of the body to keep us alive. We have so many toxins in our system that would kill us so the body builds a bubble, a bucket, a tumor, and collects all these poisons and basically keeps the poisons on one spot where they don't do harm. That's a tumor. So the cancer is basically your friend. The tumor is working on keeping you alive. This view warns that a needle biopsy can pinch into this tumor and release the toxins into the system and suddenly you have a very fast growing, very aggressive cancer that you didn't have before the needle biopsy. The same problem occurs with mammography. They put 50 pounds of pressure on the breast. If the lymph node is ready to burst, that cannot be a good thing. Usually it bursts and that's what causes cancer. Not just two percent; "mammography's can cause cancer just by the pressure that's applied."

Some people claim that vaccines are a way to poison us, but that doesn't make sense. Many cancer patients have been vaccinated, and if vaccines were poisonous, we would have noticed. Billions of people have been vaccinated and are healthy, so the idea that vaccines cause an unusually high number of cancers is unfounded.

Biopsy is the only way to diagnose cancer, but it has its drawbacks. Breaking the fibrin sheath around a tumor during a biopsy can cause it to spread. A ballerina who had a biopsy experienced the growth of little tumors around the biopsy site. A histological diagnosis is needed, where a pathologist examines the slide to determine the type of cancer. However, this diagnosis doesn't provide much help. It is also a sales technique to justify specific drugs for treatment. Research shows that biopsies, surgeries, high dose chemo, and radiation can all lead to metastasis. These treatments may provide short-term reduction of the primary tumor, but the cancer often returns later.

The majority of cancers are often misdiagnosed parasite infections, such as uterine fibroids, ovarian cysts, and various masses. Despite the CDC acknowledging the prevalence of parasites in America, medical education largely ignores this topic. Parasites are considered a leading cause of cancer, alongside snake venom, which has been known to induce cancer since 1956. Researchers who discovered this link were awarded a Nobel Prize. Interestingly, nicotine has been shown to dissolve venom-related tumors, including brain tumors, in under three days. This information is often overlooked, leading to discomfort around discussing nicotine's potential benefits.

If you suspect a small tumor, immediately put your body on a detox and cleanse your bowels. Biopsies and radiation can temporarily shrink tumors, but they also damage surrounding tissue and can cause the tumor to grow back. Cancer cells are simply damaged cells caused by extreme acidosis. To cool down acidosis, hydration is key. The term "cancer" is misleading and belongs to the medical community. Autoimmune conditions should be avoided as they weaken the body. Relying on toxic chemicals from uninformed doctors is not the solution.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer, as it operates on a fermentation system driven by sugar. Despite this knowledge, the medical field has shifted towards chemotherapy and radiation, which we know do not cure cancer. Instead, we have disease management and symptom maintenance, as that is where the money lies. The focus is on the people in the middle who can be convinced that they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

A tumor is a bubble the body builds to collect toxins and keep them in one spot, preventing harm. Cancer is a symptom, not an illness, and is essentially your friend. A needle biopsy can release toxins into the system, causing a fast-growing, aggressive cancer that wasn't present before. Similarly, mammography, which applies 50 pounds of pressure to the breast, can cause a lymph node full of toxins to burst, leading to cancer. Each mammography raises cancer risk by two percent and can directly cause cancer due to the applied pressure.

Biopsies spread cancer, and there are 50 scientific studies to prove it. Doctors have been killing people for years through biopsies, but they blame the cancer instead of the metastasis caused by the biopsy. Therefore, one should never do a prostate or breast biopsy. There are better ways to determine if it's cancer. Mammograms are unnecessary because of their radiation. An ultrasound with a skilled technician can provide 99% certainty.

Sugar is the main fuel for cancer because it operates on fermentation. Despite this, the medical community has shifted focus away from this knowledge and towards chemotherapy and radiation, which are not effective in curing cancer. Instead, they focus on managing the disease and maintaining symptoms. This approach is financially beneficial as it targets those who can be convinced they have a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment.

The only definitive way to diagnose cancer is through a biopsy. However, biopsies can disrupt the tumor's protective sheath, potentially causing it to spread. A patient experienced this firsthand after a biopsy led to the emergence of multiple tumors. While a histological diagnosis from a pathologist identifies the cancer type, it often serves as a justification for specific drug treatments, which are approved by the FDA and covered by insurance. Unfortunately, research indicates that these treatments, including chemotherapy and radiation, often lead to metastasis. Patients may initially feel a sense of remission, but cancer frequently returns within months.

The speaker asserts that cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not a nuclear one, and that recognizing this will drastically reduce cancer death rates. While cancer may never be completely eradicated, it can be managed by restricting the fuels that cancer cells need and optimizing mitochondrial health through diet and lifestyle. If the focus remains on the nucleus instead of the mitochondria, cancer rates will continue to rise, affecting one out of two people.

Chemotherapy can kill any cell, not just cancer cells. If those handling chemotherapy must wear hazmat suits because it's toxic, why give it to someone already sick? It's like using napalm for an ant problem; you might kill the ants, but you'll destroy everything else, including the healthy cells. Radiation, like chemotherapy, is dangerous. X-rays have warning signs because radiation damages DNA, which can potentially cause cancer. The speaker questions why a therapy known to create cancer is used to treat cancer.

Speaker 0 argues that medical procedures can cause death or spread disease: - A colonoscopy in elderly people (60–70, completely healthy and fit) can lead to death three days later because “they poke a hole in the colon, the bacteria goes in and they are dead.” - In mammography, when something is found, the medical profession proceeds with a needle biopsy, and “pokes into something that's there to save your life.” A tumor is described as there to save your life, yet the procedure is claimed to spread illness. - The body builds a bag to store toxins in its lymph nodes; “so now they come and poke into the lymph node and what will happen is they now spread the poison that the body is collecting for ten-twenty years in the entire body and twelve days later these women are dead.” - Mammography is described as applying “50 pounds of pressure on a woman's breast.” The analogy is made: if you have a lymph node or a pimple ready to burst, applying that pressure would “burst it to give the patient the cancer.”