TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 describes a genetic bioweapon as a “biological bull in a China shop” that causes extensive damage, noting he has discussed mechanisms of injury and that there are “28 mechanisms” by which it causes cancer alone. He says it was shocking from the moment of inspection of its ingredients before injection, leading him to halt his life’s work to try to stop it. He asserts that people are being genetically modified under the claim of vaccination, causing them to produce a variety of poisons, primarily the spike protein of a man-made-designed SARS-CoV-2 virus, which he says is the most toxic part of it. He claims the body would normally not produce this protein and that a random array of protein junk is triggered, potentially causing autoimmune diseases in many directions. He alleges that what was claimed to be in the vaccine—modified messenger RNA—was modified so it would both disrupt the production of proteins and persist longer, causing the body to produce foreign proteins and attack itself, but with unknown duration because the approach is “completely experimental” using a new 1-methylpseudouridinated version of mRNA. He references Doctor Kernan and others, stating that 30% of the genetic material there is DNA, including plasma DNA, and claims Pfizer hid that it could be present. He accuses the companies of inserting genetic sequences derived from the simian virus, calling these sequences genetic hacking tools. He explains that delivering foreign DNA with a pigylated nanoparticle and SV40 promoter enhancer sequences can move DNA into the nucleus and permanently modify and damage the human genetic code, asserting that there is now evidence of this. He emphasizes that this is not only an attack on people’s health now but also on future fertility and human reproduction. He cites tests on male sperm showing sperm DNA containing the spike protein genetic code, suggesting men’s sperm could pass this genetic flaw to offspring if reproduction occurs, and notes uncertainty about the extent but asserts “many” sperm cells are affected. He claims that about 30% of a woman’s eggs die shortly after injections due to the assault on the ovaries, and that cancers have had their DNA modified by these injections. He characterizes the situation as permanent genetic modification of humans without consent, based on a lie about a safe and effective vaccine for a disease with alleged available treatments, alleging a broader scheme linked to the same individuals. He ends by naming Fauci, Gates, Tedros, and Dashic as responsible for bringing together the virus, the bioweapon, and the “death shot.”

Bonjour à tous, Anaïs Bloqué, docteur en biologie santé, explique les impacts de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur le système immunitaire inné, basés sur son article récent. La Spike seule n'active pas complètement le TLR 4, un récepteur immunitaire, et ne permet pas la production d'interférons de type 1, essentiels pour lutter contre le virus. Pour une activation complète, la Spike doit s'associer au LPS (des bactéries gram négatifs). L'activation des interférons 1 augmente l'expression d'ACE2, le récepteur du virus, sensibilisant l'organisme à l'infection. Les interférons 1 peuvent aussi être activés par les RLR, notamment MDA5, qui détecte l'ARN messager modifié des vaccins anti-COVID. De plus, la Spike, protéine amyloïde, peut déclencher le TLR 4 en s'associant aux fibres amyloïdes A bêta 42, créant un "double effet amyloïde". L'augmentation de NF-κB par les interférons 1 peut bloquer la p53, un suppresseur de tumeur, et induire l'expression du MIR-29b, qui bloque ACE2. Chez les personnes avec comorbidités, ayant déjà de faibles niveaux d'ACE2, cette interaction Spike-LPS devient dangereuse, créant une boucle d'amplification inflammatoire. La Spike persiste longtemps dans l'organisme, et avec ses propriétés amyloïdes, pourrait entraîner des pathologies dégénératives à long terme. --- Hello everyone, Anaïs Bloqué, Doctor of Philosophy in Health Biology, explains the impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on the innate immune system, based on her recent article. The Spike alone does not fully activate TLR 4, an immune receptor, and does not allow the production of type 1 interferons, which are essential for fighting the virus. For complete activation, the Spike must associate with LPS (from gram-negative bacteria). Activation of interferon 1 increases the expression of ACE2, the virus's receptor, sensitizing the body to infection. Interferons 1 can also be activated by RLRs, in particular MDA5, which detects the modified messenger RNA of anti-COVID vaccines. In addition, Spike, an amyloid protein, can trigger TLR 4 by associating with amyloid A beta 42 fibers, creating a "double amyloid effect". The increase in NF-κB by interferons 1 can block p53, a tumor suppressor, and induce the expression of MIR-29b, which blocks ACE2. In people with comorbidities, who already have low levels of ACE2, this Spike-LPS interaction becomes dangerous, creating an inflammatory amplification loop. Spike persists in the body for a long time, and with its amyloid properties, could lead to long-term degenerative pathologies.

The oncologist discusses concerns about COVID vaccines, emphasizing the spike protein's potential risks and the negative impact of boosters. He highlights cases of cancer relapse and deaths post-booster. Despite pushback from medical authorities, oncologists worldwide share similar worries but fear repercussions for speaking out. The speaker stresses the importance of open debate in science and urges for immediate action to prevent further harm.

The symposium covers the potential safety and threat of “replicating” vaccines, especially LepriCon (leprecon) vaccines, in the context of Covid-19 vaccines and genome‑editing concepts. The speakers present a chain of claims and concerns, some drawing on reports and others presenting theories about how these next‑generation vaccines could behave in humans and populations. Key points and claims presented - Emerging mechanisms and risks: The panel notes that blood vessel inflammation and thrombosis mechanisms are increasingly observed, including in vaccine contexts, with examples from individuals who needed limb amputation and others who developed severe vascular events after vaccination. One case involved a 70‑year‑old man who, after a third dose, developed embolic events necessitating shoulder joint surgery, and another where a 60‑year‑old man developed acute limb ischemia and died; both are presented as suggesting a serious vascular mechanism linked to vaccination, though causal connections are not established. - Replicating/vector vaccines and their concerns:荒川博士 and others discuss LepiCon vaccines as vaccines that replicate inside the body. The concept involves “replicating viral vectors” where the genome can mutate and evolve during replication. The green‑highlighted segment in a slide (the antigen gene) plus a blue/orange segment (replicating gene cassette) is used to describe how LepriCon vaccines are designed to carry viral genes and replicate, with the assertion that replication, mutation, and recombination can occur, potentially generating new variants inside the host. - Differences from conventional vaccines: The discussion contrasts LepriCon vaccines with standard mRNA vaccines. In conventional mRNA vaccines, messenger RNA is delivered and translated into antigen proteins, then degraded; in LepriCon vaccines, replicating RNA/DNA can persist and continue producing antigen, with mutation and recombination possible. The panel emphasizes that LepriCon vaccines use replicating/copying mechanisms and that the genetic material can be copied in ways that differ from natural human biology, potentially creating unpredictable variants. - Central dogma and exceptions: The speakers reference the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) but note exceptions in viruses, including RNA viruses that can reverse‑transcribe to DNA (retroviruses) and RNA viruses that replicate RNA directly. They discuss how LepriCon vaccines would rely on replicative processes that do not follow the usual linear flow and why this could complicate predictions about safety and behavior in humans. - Potential for unintended spread and environmental impact: A major concern raised is that self‑replicating vectors could spread beyond the vaccinated individual, via exosomes or other intercellular transport, creating secondary infections or non‑target spread. Exosomes could ferry replicating genetic material, raising fears of new infection chains or “outbreaks” stemming from the vaccine itself, and even suggesting the possibility of vaccination‑induced spread akin to an attenuated or modified pathogen. - Safety signals and immunology concerns: The discussion touches on immune system risks, including immune dysregulation, autoimmune phenomena, and unexpected inflammatory responses. IGG4‑related disease is highlighted as a potential adverse outcome post‑vaccination, with descriptions of glandular and systemic involvement and the idea that high IGG4 levels could have immunosuppressive effects that alter responses to infection or vaccination. The panel notes observed increases in certain immunoglobulin subclasses after multiple LepriCon doses and discusses the possibility of immune tolerance or enhanced immune responses that could be harmful. - Historical and theoretical context: References are made to past epidemics and speculative pandemics caused by misused or dangerous vaccine platforms, drawing on central molecular biology concepts and historical anecdotes about how vaccines can be designed and misused. The discussion frames LepriCon vaccines as a high‑risk platform that could, in theory, generate recombinants, escape mutations, or cause unintended immune and inflammatory consequences. - Clinical and regulatory implications: The speakers call for caution, arguing that more evidence is needed before approving or widespread use of LepriCon vaccines. They emphasize the need for long‑term observation and transparent communication about risks, and criticize the potential for insufficient understanding among healthcare workers and the public. They also urge that any future vaccine development should consider the possibility of genome editing, recombination, and exosome‑mediated spread, and stress the importance of not underestimating possible adverse effects. - Real‑world observations and skepticism about hype: Several speakers underscore that the danger is not merely hypothetical; there are reports of adverse events, including stroke‑like conditions, inflammatory diseases, and immune dysregulation in vaccinated individuals. They stress that the evolution and mutation of replicating vaccines could outpace current surveillance methods, and that “information manipulation” or lack of transparent reporting could mislead the public about risks. - Final reflections and call to action: The concluding messages advocate recognizing the potential failures of messenger RNA vaccines and acknowledging that both conventional and replicating platforms may carry risks. The speakers urge ongoing critical analysis, cautious progression, and robust verification of claims through transparent, independent investigation. They close with thanks to the organizers and a hope that the discussion may contribute to broader public awareness and informed decision‑making. Notable emphasis and unique considerations - The core concern centers on LepriCon vaccines’ replication, mutation, and potential to spread beyond the vaccinated person; exosome transport and genomic/cellular integration are highlighted as mechanisms that could generate new risks not present with non‑replicating vaccines. - The discussion stresses that IGG4 responses could become alarmingly high after certain doses, potentially leading to immunosuppressive effects or autoimmune phenomena, and presents IGG4‑related disease as a potential complication to monitor. - The speakers insist that safety and transparency are paramount, and that misinformation or optimistic narratives about rapid vaccine development could lead to harm if new platforms are adopted without comprehensive evaluation. Overall, the symposium foregrounds cautious scrutiny of replicating vaccine platforms, frames potential biological and regulatory risks, and calls for careful, evidence‑based assessment before broader deployment.

The speaker discusses a hypothesis regarding the connection between COVID-19 and the vaccines. They mention that SARS-CoV-2 was a product of dual-use research and that the spike protein in the vaccines is also from SARS-CoV-2. They explain that some people who received multiple vaccine shots experienced an interesting effect called IgG 4, which turns down the immune response. The speaker suggests that if the vaccines induce this attenuation signal, it could potentially make a population less reactive to a pathogen. They note that the Chinese did not use mRNA vaccines like other countries, which could mean that populations are now different in terms of their immune response. The speaker acknowledges that this is only a hypothesis and lacks evidence. They also express concerns about the widespread vaccination efforts and the unknown long-term impacts.

Professor Jean-Marc Sabatier's recent study sheds light on the toxicity of the Spike protein produced by mRNA vaccines. This protein disrupts the renin-angiotensin system in our organs, leading to numerous side effects. The Spike protein also affects the anti-oncogenic protein p53, which repairs damaged DNA. By inhibiting DNA repair, the Spike protein can contribute to the development of autoimmune diseases and cancers, even years after vaccination. The proposed remedy, the vaccine, is deemed more dangerous than the potential harm it aims to prevent, especially since it does not protect against reinfection or transmission. Despite personal convictions, the speaker remains in their position as a doctor and parent to protect their children and patients from complications and allow them to continue their education and work.

The transcript argues that deflating a “parasitic system” is necessary because oversized states and corporations cause decay, corruption, and injustice to the people, including workers, creatives, and the maimed and dying under elite rule. It cites examples such as Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, and Crimes Against Humanity to illustrate this destruction. On the mortality and harm claims related to Covid-19, the speaker estimates thirty-six million excess deaths from 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024, totaling forty-five million excess deaths for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. They add nine million deaths from Covid killing protocols in 2020, arguing these figures reflect the impact of what they term “SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons.” The speaker contends that terms like bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced, and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of mass propaganda, corrupted science, lack of truthful science, and censorship in mainstream media and on tech platforms. They claim that elites and many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus, while “Truthful science” supposedly proves beyond any doubt that SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab, pointing to the genetic code of SARS CoV-two as containing several lab-made inserts (PRRA, HIVGP120) that are described as too large and numerous and only appearing in other natural viruses that are genetically very different, making natural mutation or recombination “quasi zero.” They assert a substantial trail of documents and testimonies before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes, the existing biochemical technology to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, and patents. The speaker claims that GenTech Covid vaccines cause human cells to produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two in all organs and tissues, implying greater production than typical mucosal infection in unvaccinated people, which they say would cause only cold-like illness. They describe these vaccines as “GenTech covid vaccines” and label them as bio weapons, allegedly worse than the virus itself. Finally, they claim that not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines cause serious health damage. The source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to like and follow.

Je suis Anaïs Bloqué, docteur en biologie, expliquant les impacts de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur le système immunitaire. La Spike seule ne déclenche pas la production d'interférons de type 1, nécessitant une association avec le LPS pour activer le TLR4. Cette interaction peut augmenter l'expression d'ACE2, favorisant l'infection virale. Des boucles inflammatoires complexes peuvent se former, menant à des conséquences potentiellement dangereuses, surtout chez les individus avec des comorbidités. La persistance de la protéine Spike dans l'organisme peut entraîner des problèmes dégénératifs à long terme.

My name is Robert Malone, a physician and scientist. I want to share the scientific facts about the genetic vaccine for children. This vaccine injects a viral gene that forces the body to produce harmful spike proteins, leading to permanent damage in critical organs like the brain, nervous system, heart, blood vessels, and reproductive system. It can also cause irreversible changes to the immune system. These damages cannot be reversed. Before making the irreversible decision to vaccinate your child, consider these facts.

Mars 2021, un grand nombre de personnes ont réalisé que les individus vaccinés devenaient quasiment tous électromagnétiques au point d'injection. En Espagne, le docteur Pablo Compra a découvert la présence de nanoparticules d'oxyde de graphène dans les flacons de Pfizer. En Italie, les docteurs Gati Montanari ont découvert les mêmes composants inorganiques. Ils ont également découvert plusieurs dizaines d'autres composants qui ne figuraient pas dans la liste officielle. En Argentine, Lorena Diblasi et Marcella Songorine ont fait les mêmes découvertes, mais en pire s'agissant des métaux lourds et des composants non déclarés, dont certains sont mortels. En Allemagne, en Angleterre, en Corée ou encore en Australie, même recherche, même résultat, même constat. En août 2021, au Japon, le ministère de la Santé a fait retirer tous les lots des vaccins Moderna en raison d'une contamination. Les chercheurs affirment qu'il s'agit d'un crime contre l'humanité, organisé et planifié. Ces photos représentent les nanoparticules disposées aux nano réseau auto assemblées, présents dans tous les vaccins anti covid-19. *** In March 2021, many people realized that vaccinated individuals were becoming almost all electromagnetic at the point of injection. In Spain, Dr. Pablo Compra discovered the presence of graphene oxide nanoparticles in Pfizer vials. In Italy, Doctors Gati Montanari discovered the same inorganic components. They also discovered several dozen other components that were not on the official list. In Argentina, Lorena Diblasi and Marcella Songorine made the same discoveries, but worse in terms of heavy metals and undeclared components, some of which are deadly. In Germany, England, Korea and Australia, same research, same result, same observation. In August 2021, in Japan, the Ministry of Health withdrew all batches of Moderna vaccines due to contamination. Researchers claim that this is a crime against humanity, organized and planned. These photos represent the nanoparticles arranged in self-assembled nano-networks, present in all anti-covid-19 vaccines.

The speaker discusses the harmful effects of the spike protein found in COVID-19 vaccines. They mention a study showing that almost a third of patients experienced neurological issues from the spike protein. They express concern about the lack of an off switch for this gene and the potential for autoimmune and neurological harm. The speaker also addresses criticism of fearmongering and highlights the connection between the spike protein and HIV. They mention studies linking COVID-19 vaccines to autism in rats and discuss the use of edible vaccines in plants. The speaker emphasizes the importance of sharing information and concludes by promoting their video game.

Speaker: Humanity was hit with dual biological weapons. When I say dual, I mean by the manufactured SARS CoV two virus that was manufactured in collaboration with UNC Chapel Hill and Wuhan. So we have that that has exposed basically the entire population to the spike protein. But then we also had the second biological weapon, was the mRNA injections, which installed about 7x more spike into people and those who received it per injection. And now we do understand that this can indeed shed onto others, particularly when you're freshly vaccinated and you're producing high levels of spike protein. We do believe this can shed via what's called exosomes, either through your breath or through your bodily fluids. So, yes, humanity has been hit by these weapons.

Je suis Anaïs Bocquet, biologiste et enseignante. La protéine Spike active les récepteurs TLR 4 et 2, déclenchant des réponses inflammatoires. L'IL-10 régule l'immunité, tandis que les alarmines activent les cellules mdsc pour inhiber la réponse immunitaire. L'IL-10 favorise la surexpression de ACE2 et la production d'IgG4 anti-inflammatoires. L'activation de TLR 2 inhibe les TLR 7 et 9, stoppant la réponse aux interférons de type 1. La persistance de Spike favorise la tolérance immunitaire, augmentant la sensibilité aux infections virales. Le TLR 4 est crucial dans la bascule entre inflammation et tolérance. En résumé, Spike manipule l'immunité pour favoriser la pathogénèse virale.

"Now, when these genes, packages, enter the cells, then the cells will start making this damn virus protein which is called the spike." "This is going to happen to any mRNA or gene based vaccine." "Those packages are going to cause your cells in the blood vessels to create this protein and this protein is going to be a foreign non self protein that is going to be recognised by any antibodies that you have and these antibodies are going to be there after the first injection." "If any of these vessels is clogged because of a thrombus or because it's injured, the cells that are being supplied by oxygen are going to die." "So if these tiny vessels in the brain or the heart are damaged, you are damaged for life. You will never be the same again."

Cette vidéo résume: selon Nakaoota et al. (3 avril 2025), « l’expression de la protéine Spike chez 43.8 pour 100 des personnes vaccinées anti Covid » persiste « au niveau des artères coronaires » jusqu’à 17 mois après l’injection, avec « l’ARN messager, du vaccin, mais également du virus » détecté. Il y a « persistance de la protéine Spike » et « persistance du SARS-CoV-2 » possiblement malgré les traitements précoces. L’auteure mentionne aussi « Crüssfeld Jacob, 14 mois après infection » et une étude sur des « AVC 17 mois après injections ». L’interaction de la nucléocapside (protéine N) avec TRIM28 pourrait retarder la réponse immunitaire innée, renforçant la tolérance immunitaire via TLR2/RAGE et IgG4. Conséquences: infection potentiellement asymptomatique et dégâts cumulatifs; Spike persistante pourrait entraîner « spike viral plus spike vaccinal ». Des spycopathies neurologiques sont évoquées; dépistage de Spike et traque du virus recommandés; traitements personnalisés et soutien par curcumine, quercétine, vitamine D; approche individuelle. This video summarizes: according to Nakaoota et al. (April 3, 2025), « the expression of the spike protein in 43.8 per 100 of vaccinated people » persists « at the level of the coronary arteries » for up to 17 months after injection, with « mRNA from the vaccine, but also the virus » detected. There is « persistence of the Spike protein » and « persistence of SARS-CoV-2 » possibly despite early treatments. The author also cites « Crüssfeld Jacob, 14 months after infection » and a study on « strokes 17 months after injections ». The interaction of the nucleocapsid protein (N) with TRIM28 could delay the innate antiviral response, reinforcing immune tolerance via TLR2/RAGE and IgG4. Consequences: potentially asymptomatic infection and cumulative damage; persistent Spike could lead to « spike viral plus spike vaccinal ». Neurological spycopathies are discussed; diagnostics to detect Spike and tracking the virus are recommended; therapies to block/remove Spike and personalized approaches, with supports like curcumin, quercetin, vitamin D.

**French Summary:** Anaïs Bloqué explique l'impact de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur le système immunitaire inné, en se concentrant sur le TLR 4. La Spike seule n'active pas complètement le TLR 4 pour induire une réponse antivirale complète (interférons de type 1). L'association Spike-LPS (lipopolysaccharide bactérien) est nécessaire. L'activation des interférons 1 augmente l'expression d'ACE2, récepteur du virus, via les ISG, sensibilisant l'organisme à l'infection. Les ARN messagers des vaccins peuvent aussi activer les interférons 1 via MDA5. La Spike, protéine amyloïde, peut induire la production de fibres A bêta 42, aggravant l'inflammation. L'augmentation de NF-κB par les ISG peut bloquer p53 (suppresseur de tumeur) et induire le micro-ARN MIR-200c, diminuant l'expression d'ACE2. Chez les personnes avec comorbidités (diabète, obésité), une boucle d'amplification inflammatoire Spike-LPS-TLR4 réduit l'ACE2 disponible, menant à une suractivation de l'angiotensine 2. La Spike persistante pourrait causer des pathologies dégénératives à long terme. **English Translation:** Anaïs Bloqué explains the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on the innate immune system, focusing on TLR 4. Spike alone does not fully activate TLR 4 to induce a complete antiviral response (type 1 interferons). The Spike-LPS (bacterial lipopolysaccharide) association is necessary. Activation of interferon 1 increases ACE2 expression, the virus receptor, via ISGs, sensitizing the body to infection. Vaccine mRNAs can also activate interferon 1 via MDA5. Spike, an amyloid protein, can induce the production of A beta 42 fibers, worsening inflammation. Increased NF-κB by ISGs can block p53 (tumor suppressor) and induce microRNA MIR-200c, decreasing ACE2 expression. In people with comorbidities (diabetes, obesity), a Spike-LPS-TLR4 inflammatory amplification loop reduces available ACE2, leading to overactivation of angiotensin 2. Persistent Spike could cause long-term degenerative pathologies.

Speaker 0 presents the statement of Joseph Sanson, based on the sworn statement of the late professor doctor Francis Boyle, described as the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation and the author of it. Boyle is asserted to have concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon, and that he knew this “like no other” before his death, which occurred shortly after he declared willingness to testify under oath in court. The core of Boyle’s argument, as presented, is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and therefore qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system—a bioweapon. This bioweapon is said to consist of two integrated components: a pathogenic load and a delivery mechanism. It is asserted that the pathogenic load results from illegal gene or function research. Boyle is described as referring to an article in Nature Medicine, with a link included in the plea note. If opened, the article is claimed to warn that true scientists believe an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that what is called the “new normal” are not scientists but faith fanatics. The 2015 Nature Medicine article is summarized as reporting that, based on findings, researchers synthetically created an infectious fully SHC014 recombinant virus with robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, a SARS-like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. The article is attributed to researchers including those affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, implying that the spike protein and pathogenic payload were the result of illegal gain-of-function research. The spike protein mRNA is described as providing instructions to human cells to produce this pathogenic spike protein, emphasized as not being a natural spike protein but an illegally developed, synthetically made pathogen optimized for human infection. The delivery system is identified as nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into cells. The rhetoric labels these as fat globules, and Boyle is said to declare that this is actually a nanotechnology-enhanced delivery platform. This technology is described as being paid for, developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA, with the claim that the virus was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the beginning, indicating a long-term program for advanced delivery systems. The claim is made that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections, with the NLP delivery system described as the result of a specific teacher-sponsored program for nanotechnological biological weapons. The presentation by Samsung is cited for further legal implications, and it is argued that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

The speaker discusses the inflammatory and amyloidogenic effects of small sequences called epitopes, which can cause memory dysfunction in mice. They also mention a study that found the introduction of gene transfection technologies containing the spike protein can induce amyloidogenic cascades. The speaker highlights a 200% increase in the diagnosis of CJD in France after the rollout of vaccination programs, suggesting a potential link. They discuss the loss of cognitive function associated with exposure to the spike protein and propose that amyloidogenic disease processes may underlie long-haul COVID-19 symptoms. The speaker mentions the role of viral infections in facilitating intercellular aggregate dissemination and shares examples of misfolding prion amyloidogenic diseases.

Il y a eu une manipulation du virus, avec des séquences ajoutées, notamment du VIH. Ce n'est pas un processus naturel, mais le résultat d'un travail minutieux de biologistes moléculaires. Les raisons de cette manipulation ne sont pas claires, mais il est possible qu'il s'agisse d'une tentative de créer un vaccin contre le sida en intégrant des séquences du VIH dans le coronavirus. Le matériel génétique du virus contient des segments de VIH qui pourraient modifier des sites antigéniques, permettant ainsi de modifier la protéine pour un vaccin. Bien que des rumeurs sur une origine humaine aient circulé, elles ont été largement réfutées, mais il existe une volonté d'étouffer ces recherches, comme l'a montré un groupe de chercheurs indiens qui a été contraint de se rétracter. --- There has been manipulation of the virus, with sequences added, including from HIV. This is not a natural process but the result of meticulous work by molecular biologists. The reasons for this manipulation are unclear, but it may involve an attempt to create an AIDS vaccine by integrating HIV sequences into the coronavirus. The virus's genetic material contains segments of HIV that could modify antigenic sites, allowing for changes to the protein for a vaccine. Although rumors of a human origin circulated, they have been largely refuted, yet there is a desire to suppress this research, as evidenced by a group of Indian researchers who were forced to retract their findings.

I'm Philippe Boucalt, a cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina. I've sequenced the DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and found that it contains fragments of DNA. This DNA could potentially cause rare but serious side effects, such as cardiac arrest and future cancer risks. The regulatory process that allowed this contamination is concerning. The DNA could integrate into long-lived somatic cells and potentially cause autoimmune attacks or disrupt tumor suppressors. To produce the vaccine, they cloned the PCR product into a plasmid vector, which led to the contamination. We can easily measure the amount of this substance in the vaccine and should conduct further studies to understand its implications. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from the vaccine.

The speaker, a viral immunologist, discusses the presence of bacterial plasma DNA in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. They explain that the DNA is not supposed to be there and that its presence indicates improper manufacturing. The speaker highlights the potential dangers of bacterial DNA, including its ability to activate the immune system and promote inflammation. They also suggest that the DNA could lead to prolonged expression of the spike protein and raise concerns about legal immunity for the manufacturers. The speaker calls for a worldwide moratorium on the technology until further research is conducted.

The spike protein from the COVID-19 virus circulates in the body and can land in multiple organs, causing various diseases. Lab studies have shown that even without the virus, just injecting the spike protein can induce the same lung, vascular, heart, and brain diseases as COVID-19. The spike protein is considered the toxin responsible for causing the disease. This raises questions about why we are injecting something that is essentially a toxin into the human body, as it is not a traditional vaccine.

Dr. Yeason presents three principal assertions about the vaccines. 1) The first principle: we were told these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called the spike protein. The spike protein is described as on the outside of the virus, and vaccines were said to encode the protein to train the immune system. Dr. Yeason explains that the immune system treats anything foreign as a threat and will attack cells that manufacture a foreign protein, leading to tissue damage. He notes that this principle of “self, non self” and tissue targeting is fundamental to organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases, and says this was designed into every company’s molecule (Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca). He asserts that by 2020 he knew these were designed to cause injury. 2) The second principle: what was encoded is the spike protein. He states he did not know what spike protein was at first, but describes spikes on the outside of the virus and claims they are known toxins (neurotoxins, cardiotoxins) that prompt blood coagulation. He questions why a medicinal product would encode something that would harm the body when expressed. 3) The third principle: lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to formulate two of the Pfizer and Moderna products. He explains that lipid nanoparticles are toxic in general and are known to promote uptake of their payload into visceral organs, especially the liver and ovaries. He asserts that when injected into women and girls, these materials would travel through the body, concentrate in reproductive organs, be expressed, be recognized as foreign, and kill those cells. He asks what possible motivation there could be for using that formulation when other options exist. This, he says, confirms that the first two observations were not mere risks but intentional design. Dr. Yeason concludes that these three points together indicate that someone in a room designed injections to injure, kill, and reduce fertility in the people given them, aiming to lower fertility and reduce the population over time. He states he has observed this “all around me for five years since that moment.”

Bonjour à tous, Anaïs Bloqué, docteur en biologie santé, explique les impacts de la protéine Spike du SARS-CoV-2 sur le système immunitaire inné, basés sur son article récent. La Spike seule n'active pas complètement le TLR 4, un récepteur immunitaire, et ne produit pas d'interférons de type 1, essentiels pour la réponse antivirale. Pour une activation complète, la Spike doit s'associer au LPS (des bactéries Gram négatif). L'activation des interférons 1 augmente l'expression d'ACE2, le récepteur du virus, via les ISG, sensibilisant l'organisme à l'infection. Les ARN messagers des vaccins peuvent aussi lancer la production d'interférons 1 via MDA5. La Spike, protéine amyloïde, peut aussi déclencher le TLR 4 avec des fibres amyloïdes, entraînant un "double effet amyloïde". L'augmentation de NF-κB par les ISG peut bloquer la p53, potentiellement cancérigène. De plus, NF-κB induit le MIR-200c, qui bloque l'ACE2. Chez les individus avec comorbidités, une boucle d'amplification inflammatoire se crée : Spike-LPS-TLR4 induit interférons 1, ISG, surexpression d'ACE2, augmentation de NF-κB, MIR-200c, diminution d'ACE2 et augmentation d'angiotensine 2. La Spike persiste longtemps, et ses propriétés amyloïdes font craindre des pathologies dégénératives à long terme. --- Hello everyone, Anaïs Bloqué, PhD in health biology, explains the impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein on the innate immune system, based on her recent article. Spike alone does not fully activate TLR 4, an immune receptor, and does not produce type 1 interferons, which are essential for the antiviral response. For complete activation, Spike must associate with LPS (from Gram-negative bacteria). Activation of interferon 1 increases the expression of ACE2, the virus's receptor, via ISGs, sensitizing the body to infection. Vaccine mRNAs can also trigger the production of interferon 1 via MDA5. Spike, an amyloid protein, can also trigger TLR 4 with amyloid fibers, leading to a "double amyloid effect." The increase in NF-κB by ISGs can block p53, which is potentially carcinogenic. In addition, NF-κB induces MIR-200c, which blocks ACE2. In individuals with comorbidities, an inflammatory amplification loop is created: Spike-LPS-TLR4 induces interferon 1, ISG, ACE2 overexpression, increased NF-κB, MIR-200c, decreased ACE2 and increased angiotensin 2. Spike persists for a long time, and its amyloid properties raise concerns about long-term degenerative pathologies.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these materials. They explain how the immune system normally distinguishes between self and foreign substances, but when mRNA is used to make a piece of a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode. The speaker argues that these vaccines cannot be safe for mass market use as they may cause the immune system to attack its own cells. They also claim that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic.