reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Dominion Systems, the owner of Sequoia and Premier, has a customer portal called dominion.dominionvoting/portal. This portal can be easily accessed and manipulated, allowing customers to view and modify data, including election results. It doesn't require a nation state's level of sophistication to manipulate these sites or gain unauthorized access. Even with limited resources, someone could potentially manipulate the election using these systems.

A Georgia election official, who is a Democrat, discovered that none of the straight party Republican tickets in the recent runoff were being scanned. She contacted Dominion, the company responsible for the voting machines, and expressed her concern about the ballots going to adjudication instead of being counted. Dominion insisted that she just push the green button. Frustrated, she threatened to contact the local media. Dominion quickly sent someone to fix the issue. The Dominion representative acknowledged the problem and made a phone call. Ten minutes later, he returned and assured her that everything was fixed. It is important to note that the voting machines were not connected to the internet.

In general, would you say that Smartmatic software was designed with two principles in mind? Number one, it's easy to rig elections. Number two, it's hard to audit. That is correct. And is the same true for Dominion software? It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit. That is correct.

Dominion machines are certified and sealed, but vulnerabilities exist. Before elections, a supposed glitch prompts an emergency patch that opens backdoor access from a Serbian office, which is the true operational center of Dominion. This office, despite being presented as a U.S. company, has connections to Chinese nationals and operates on Huawei machines. Using virtual machines, they manipulate election results by creating a hidden environment within the county election equipment. After altering the data, they collapse the virtual machine, leaving no trace unless a forensic audit is conducted. This manipulation is facilitated through connections to China, raising concerns about the integrity of the election process. For more information, visit Stolen Elections Facts.

Dominion machines are certified and sealed, but vulnerabilities exist. Just before elections, a "glitch" prompts an emergency patch that opens a backdoor for remote access from a Serbian office, which is the real operational center of Dominion, despite claims of being a US company. This office has Chinese nationals who manipulate election results using Huawei machines. They create virtual machines within the election equipment, allowing them to alter data undetected. Once the manipulation is complete, they collapse the virtual machine, leaving no trace unless a forensic audit is conducted. For more information, visit Stolen Elections Facts.

In the 2020 Maricopa General Election, 120,867 ballots, or 6% of the total, were compromised through forced adjudication. This represents 9 times the deciding outcome of the election. The compromise was an intentional and avoidable paper and ink hack, where control over the ballot stock was necessary. The use of Sharpie pens, which were encouraged for the first time in history, combined with inferior ballot paper, caused bleed-through votes that confused the scanning machine. This allowed for extra votes to be counted, leading to potential election manipulation. The net effect of this hack in Maricopa County was approximately 120,867 compromised ballots.

Linda McLaughlin and her colleagues present a data-focused argument alleging election fraud in Georgia, supported by multiple data analyses and demonstrations. - Linda McLaughlin introduces the data integrity group and states that data is numerical and non-partisan; she aims to remedy a lack of presented data in the discussion. - Dave Labou, a lead data scientist, explains that their analysis across precincts, counties, and the state identified over 40 data points of negative voting or vote switching across candidates totaling over 200,000 votes. Separately, machine learning algorithms used for anomaly detection in fraud detection flagged over 500 precincts with over 1,000,000 corresponding votes showing suspicious activity. He emphasizes that the process is scientific and not tied to political affiliations. - Labou uses a banking analogy to illustrate data integrity concerns: in hypothetical online banking, deposits or withdrawals being redirected or split would indicate fraudulent activity. He applies this concept to voting data, arguing that the voting system data aligns with the Secretary of State data used to certify results, yet exhibits patterns akin to transfers and reallocation not authorized by voters. - He states that the data are publicly available but require advanced programming to extract, parse, and join datasets. Their independent team has made all analysis, programs, and data public to allow replication and has produced videos to translate the analysis for broader understanding. - A key claim is that receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud; in Fulton County, more than 150 precincts voted 90% or more for Biden, and in the statewide race (decided by less than 13,000 votes), these 150 Fulton precincts accounted for 152,000 Biden votes, described as a clear indicator of suspicious or fraudulent activity. - Labou and team present a series of visuals and explanations indicating explicit vote count switching, e.g., in Dodge County, where Trump’s votes appear to be subtracted while Biden’s counts increase in tandem with county updates, leading to a shift in totals that would not appear in state totals due to timing of updates. - They reference adjudication as the review of ballots flagged during scanning, noting that only ballots with a contest causing questions about how the computer reads them are adjudicated. - In DeKalb County, they assert it is statistically impossible for nine out of ten voters to vote for Biden in 94 precincts. - They describe a data flow in Fulton County: poll pad check-in, ballot image saved on the machine, SD cards transported to drop-off locations, escorted to a warehouse, run through Democracy Suite, exported to a Dominion server, and inserted into a SQL Server database before transmission to the Secretary of State and data aggregators. - A critical point is the vulnerability within the county update data-entry process: the square box detailing data-entry options in the election software allows updating vote batches, projecting batches, and generating new or temporary batches that can be injected directly into the tally; these options can be validated and published, enabling potential manipulation before server upload. - They pose questions about validation: whether two observers from both parties were present during SD card transmissions and drop-off transmissions, and whether there is a public log of exchanges at drop-off points. They challenge why elected officials have not pursued these questions about voting integrity. - Labou notes the process is machine-to-machine and, by design, should not decrement sums; any decrement requires a robust explanation, and their data suggest negative drops are inconsistent with normal sequential processes. Speaker 2 clarifies the data sources (CITL election night data and Edison/New York Times data) and asserts that the process from poll pads to secretary of state is machine-driven, with no human entry of totals, thereby removing human entry error as an explanation for observed negative changes. Speaker 4 adds emphasis on the validation and potential vulnerabilities in the software options used for election administration, underscoring the need for transparency and inquiry into the electoral process.

3% of pre-election voting ballots were altered using HAMR and ScoreCard software, potentially impacting the national vote. An algorithm was used to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, like Michigan where a glitch favored Trump by 55100 votes in one district. Similar issues are suspected in other states with thousands of ballots appearing for Biden, statistically implausible.

The Texas Secretary of State found that Dominion voting machines had issues, including voters being unable to check and retain a straight party ballot while no voting erased. The Dominion election management system was described as error-prone and nonintuitive. The scanner and tabulator were subject to paper jams, and clearing these jams required breaking protective seals, potentially exposing voter choices to poll workers. As a result, the Texas Secretary of State's office denied certification of Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite 5.5 for use in Texas elections.

The 2020 election had 9,000 updates, with 4 extreme updates that had a less than 1 tenth of one percent chance of happening. These updates were argued to be human errors, but if they were corrected, where is the evidence? Some claim that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts, but California doesn't show similar spikes. The strangest anomaly is a consistent ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which seems theoretically impossible. This pattern appears in many states, suggesting a computer algorithm called weighted race distribution is involved. Diebold voting machines, known for giving values to votes, have been linked to vote switching in past elections. Dominion Voting Systems acquired Diebold's software. Eyewitness and video evidence in Georgia shows a poll worker named Ruby in a backroom filled with absentee ballots.

The speaker expresses frustration about a blank ballot that was not voted on. They mention being able to stop adjudication and scan and adjudicate all ballots, including the blank one. Misty asks if a ballot can be scanned more than once, and the speaker confirms that they have done it. They explain that they kept scanning the same batches of ballots. The speaker mentions that they have set the system to handle ambiguous marks and overvotes, but it should also handle blank ballots. They scan a blank ballot and accept it into the system, noting that the system does not know who touched the ballots during adjudication.

Speaker 0 asserts that there was direct access to the Antrim County election management system (EMS). They claim that on November 5, an anonymous user logged on to the EMS remotely with escalated privileges and made changes to the database while attempting to retabulate the election. This, they say, constitutes a significant development, proving that the machines were remotely accessed and that access was by an anonymous user with elevated system privileges. Speaker 0 also discusses ballots, referring to black boxes on the side of the ballot, noting that there are 59 such black boxes. They state that forensic images show that in Antrim County, blocks 15, 18, 28, 41, and 44 were intentionally modified. The modification involved altering the height, width, and shape of those blocks with the intention of generating errors. They describe the consequence of such modifications: by modding these specific blocks, they were able to cause rejections for Republican ballots. Specifically, they claim that if a ballot voted for Donald Trump and was fed into the machine, that ballot was rejected at a rate 20% higher than for Joe Biden ballots.

Vote totals were altered through digital pre-election ballots using a program called Hammer and software named Scorecard, leading to significant nationwide changes. An algorithm was employed to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, which explains a computer glitch in Michigan that resulted in a 55,100 vote shift in favor of Trump in one district. This raises concerns that similar software glitches could affect other districts in Michigan. Additionally, there have been reports of hundreds of thousands of ballots appearing exclusively for Biden, which seems statistically improbable.

Dominion machines are certified and sealed, but vulnerabilities exist. Before elections, a supposed glitch prompts an emergency patch that opens a backdoor for remote access from a Serbian office, which is the true operational hub of Dominion. This office, staffed by Chinese nationals, manipulates election results using virtual machines created within the election equipment. The manipulation is done through software, leaving no trace unless a detailed forensic audit is conducted. This process involves using Huawei servers, linking back to China. For more information, visit Stolen Elections Facts for documentation.

In this video, the speaker discusses the issue of Dominion machines and their accuracy in counting ballots. They question why in heavily Democratic areas, the mail-in ballots are always on target and within 1 mic, while in Republican areas, the mail-in ballots are often out of calibration. The speaker suggests that the machines allow human intervention, where a person can interpret the ballot if the machine is unsure. This raises concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the voting process.

Speaker 0: Totals being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name. Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. So is it certified? It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are. You can see Biden has 31,000. Trump has 56,000. K. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that to a two? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a one. Okay. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun the port. And there you go. Biden, 56,000. Trump, 31,000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged. There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained. Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1,690,589 votes, while Biden had 1,252,537 votes. The time was approximately 11:08 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1,670,631 and Biden's votes increasing to 1,272,495. The time is approximately 11:09PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19,958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden. This means Trump lost 39,916 votes.

There was fraud in the election, including dead people voting. The machines played a role in this fraud. Instead of having hidden ballots, they stored them in a secret folder. After the polls closed, the machines matched unvoted ballots with unvoted voters. This was evident when the vote percentage reached 99% but the votes kept coming in. The denominator, which represents the remaining ballots, started increasing, indicating that they were unloading the hidden ballots and matching them to unvoted voters. This allowed them to barely cross the finish line with enough votes.

In Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch thousands of votes from Trump to Biden using a backdoor utility in the Dominion election management system. The tool allows them to change the results without leaving a trace. In Pennsylvania, live TV footage shows nearly 20,000 votes being switched from Trump to Biden, resulting in Trump losing almost 40,000 votes. The manipulation occurs within minutes, highlighting vulnerabilities in the voting system.

The election supervisor wants to vote for Jason Shaw. During adjudication, the supervisor states they want to vote for Biden, overriding the original marks on a ballot. The supervisor decides someone "don't deserve no votes" and chooses not to count votes on that ballot. The supervisor then declares another ballot should be blank. The supervisor admits to scanning the same batches of ballots repeatedly.

In 2020, Maricopa, Arizona, experienced an unusually high adjudication rate, with one out of every eight ballots cast being modified. This is almost 12 times the historical average for ballot modifications in the county. Overall, there were 235,367 individual ballots that were changed either by a human or machine after they were initially cast.

According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is alleged to have intentional errors that can lead to fraud and influence election results. The system allows election workers to decide votes without oversight or transparency. Experts found an error rate of 68.05%, much higher than the recommended rate. Suspiciously, all vote adjudication logs for the 2020 election and security logs before November 4th are missing. The Dominion Image cast prison cards were also reprogrammed, violating election laws. Despite calls for transparency through forensic audits, skeptics have attacked attempts to review logs. In Maricopa County, Arizona, election officials have ignored subpoenas for election data and machine audits until after the inauguration.

I'm calling out the recent news story as a setup for a time hack. In Maricopa County during the 2020 election, they had 10 tally machines counting over 140,000 ballots daily. Yet, on election day, they claimed they needed 10 extra days to count, processing only 89,000 ballots the day after and then dropping to just a few thousand. A month later, they counted 140,000 ballots again. This indicates they are creating excuses and using various hacks to interfere with the election. It's crucial to maintain chain of custody for forensic audits, which is costly but necessary to prevent disqualification of evidence. We learned from 2020, and it's vital to preserve this information for future legal actions. Barcodes are scanned using a laser that checks columns for light reflection, translating them into binary code for computers.

The Dominion system has two buckets: the regular bucket and the adjudication bucket. In the regular bucket, votes are treated one way, while in the adjudication bucket, the operator has discretion to do anything they want or apply the ranked choice voting algorithm. Adjudication can be preprogrammed with commands like casting a certain percentage of ballots for specific candidates. The system takes votes and apportions them, rather than counting whole votes. Adjudication can be manual or determined by an algorithm. It's important to understand these two buckets and how they function.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.

Dominion machines are certified and sealed, but vulnerabilities allow for manipulation. Just before elections, a supposed "glitch" prompts an emergency patch that opens a backdoor for remote access from a Serbian office, which is the true operational center of Dominion. This office, staffed by Chinese nationals, allows them to log into U.S. election machines and alter results. They use virtual machines to manipulate data without leaving traces. After the manipulation, they collapse the virtual server, making detection difficult unless a thorough forensic audit is conducted. This entire operation relies on Huawei equipment, linking back to China. For more information, visit Stolen Elections Facts.