reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the challenges of dealing with government actions and the time it takes to resolve them. They mention a lesser-known aspect of their case, where an FBI agent allegedly planned to plant child pornography on their husband's computer. Although this was not carried out in their situation, they express concern about the potential consequences and the fact that they have a young daughter at home.

The FBI's involvement in the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case revealed that out of 14 people, 12 were informants. These informants allegedly convinced two individuals to attempt to kidnap the governor, resembling a misguided role-playing game. The situation highlights a saying that suggests the FBI often targets individuals they have a hand in creating.

In December 2020, federal agents approached Jeremy Brown to be an informant, but he exposed them instead. He later got arrested, and his legal team is presenting evidence that the grenades and national defense documents found in his home were planted by the agents. The agents turned off all recording devices during the search, and none of them had body cameras. DNA tests on the grenades did not match Jeremy's DNA, and a dog hair and carpet fiber found on the grenades did not match his dogs or carpet. Criminal counts found on a CD were proven to not be in Jeremy's possession. The government is now targeting people who were in Washington DC on January 6th. Jeremy is fighting for his freedom.

I was part of the group arrested for the Whitmer kidnap plot, which was set up by the FBI. I was acquitted. I thought I was doing security work, but it turned out to be targeting Whitmer's cottage. I got charged for material support terrorism and felony firearm possession. The government lied about the situation. I urge people to take action to ensure real justice in the face of government overreach.

In the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case, the media portrayed it as extremist right wing groups plotting against the governor. However, it was revealed in court that the FBI had paid an informant to assemble a group for prosecution. Despite their efforts, the informant failed to find willing participants. It was discovered that out of the 18 people recruited, 12 were actually working for the FBI. While not all of the FBI may be involved in such activities, it is important for us as citizens to expose and hold the corrupt accountable. We should question the reality created by the media and think for ourselves.

The speaker, a former FBI agent, discusses their career and involvement in various cases, including counterterrorism and investigating the Oklahoma City bombing. They express their belief that the government had advanced knowledge of the 9/11 attacks and that the World Trade Center buildings were intentionally imploded. They also mention the existence of a covert CIA child kidnapping operation and the involvement of the Finders, a group engaged in international trafficking of children. The speaker claims to have provided evidence to the FBI multiple times but has been ignored. They emphasize the need for further investigation into these matters.

In the Missouri v Biden litigation, it was revealed that FBI agent Elvis Chan testified under oath that the FBI's online censorship program had a 50% success rate in getting social media platforms to take down content they deemed disfavored speech. There is a wealth of evidence, including 82 pages of factual findings, thousands of pages of emails and documents, and six full-length depositions. During oral arguments, a U.S. Department of Justice attorney acknowledged that they couldn't guarantee this wouldn't happen again.

I was an FBI agent from 1951 to 1979, in charge of Southern California with 700 personnel and a $22.5 million budget. Unfortunately, the FBI has been infiltrated by the Illuminati Movement, satanic cults, and other agencies like the NSA and CIA. I worked on the Franklin cover-up case, involving illegal government drug operations and satanic cults. Children were taken from Boys Town and flown to Washington DC for sex orgies with politicians. I also discovered the Finders, a CIA covert operation. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reports that 85-90% of those who disappear are children. We are in a spiritual war against the Illuminati.

The speaker discusses how they can potentially entrap individuals, including pro-lifers, through manipulation and social media tactics. They mention targeting political commentator Alex Jones and causing financial harm to him. Additionally, they reveal that FBI agents were present undercover at the January 6th Capitol riot. The speaker implies that the FBI's involvement in such events is kept secretive.

In the 1970s, the FBI discovered the CIA running a satanic cult that kidnapped and abused children, selling them as sex slaves. The FBI covered it up for 50 years until forced to release files in 2018. The CIA operated tunnels to preschools, traumatized children with satanic rituals, and kept them in cages. The finders cult members were involved in child abuse, but the FBI and CIA conspired to hide it. Source: FBI.gov.

You can set people up to act on their impulses, which can be seen as a form of entrapment. The bureau gets close to this without officially crossing the line. For instance, they might create social media posts to provoke reactions. Gavin O'Glenis, a CIA contracting officer, discussed his past work with the FBI and involvement in monitoring figures like Alex Jones. The goal was to undermine Jones financially through civil lawsuits, which the bureau can encourage without direct involvement. Additionally, O'Glenis acknowledged that FBI agents were undercover during the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating around 20 agents were present to monitor the situation, but they were not involved in any violence. The bureau prefers to keep their presence discreet to avoid overstepping boundaries.

The speaker mentions government delays in resolving cases. Another aspect is an FBI agent's plan to frame the speaker's husband with child pornography, although it wasn't carried out. The agent allegedly conspired to do this despite the speaker having a young daughter at home.

FBI agents arrested my husband in Coachella. This nightmare unfolded as we were simply trying to run errands. I want everyone to know that my family has been separated. According to my account, eight FBI agents surrounded us and stated that they had a deportation order for my husband, but they didn't show it to us. We have been married for 20 years, and he has lived in the United States for 30 years. He has lived in this country longer than his own. He wasn't perfect, but he paid for whatever he did.

I bribed Hillary Clinton $18,000,000 on behalf of the FBI in 2016. The FBI wanted to set her up in a sting operation. They told me to facilitate a bribe from another government. I did this on January 14, 2016. The FBI later told me to forget about it because Hillary was going to win the election. They said Obama's people were controlling things. This was part of a plan called Operation Snow Globe to control Hillary for 8 years. I realized I was being used to manipulate her. The whole situation was a coup against Hillary that turned into the Russian collusion delusion when Trump won. I knew in 2018 they were planning to hijack the 2020 election.

My kids were pulled out of our house at gunpoint, left in the street in their underwear while a SWAT team laid siege to our home. I was locked in a room, unaware of the chaos outside. My youngest son saw armed agents approaching and alerted my oldest, who was confused and scared. The agents told my kids I was a murderer, which was shocking. My wife, alerted by a neighbor, rushed home but was immediately interrogated. They raided our house, taking electronics and even mistaking a dummy grenade for a live one. My wife confronted the agents about their incompetence. After hours, I was released but had no idea of the extent of the situation until I got home, where my family was in shock. This ordeal made it clear that things had escalated dramatically.

In December 2020, federal agents approached Jeremy Brown to be a paid informant, but he refused and exposed their request to the media. As a result, he was arrested in September 2021 after an illegal search at his home. Jeremy's legal team is presenting evidence that the explosive grenades and national defense documents found in his home were planted by government agents. The agents turned off all recording devices and had no functioning body cameras during the search. DNA tests on the grenades did not match Jeremy's DNA, and a dog hair and carpet fiber found on the grenades did not match his dogs or carpet. The evidence suggests that the CD and grenades were planted. Jeremy is fighting for his freedom and American freedom.

The government raided my property in 2012, so I retaliated by donating laptops with spyware to government secretaries. I took control of the government's computer system to find evidence of their setup, but instead discovered the minister of national defense was a drug trafficker and the minister of immigration was a human trafficker. Despite the danger, I'm okay with not pursuing further action.

I joined the FBI in 2014, focusing on violent crimes on Indian reservations and later on child pornography and human trafficking in Florida. In 2021, I was reassigned to domestic terrorism, where I became concerned about the January 6 investigations. I noticed the FBI was straying from its guidelines, which I believed jeopardized important cases and public safety. After raising my concerns, my security clearance was suspended, and I was placed in an unpaid position indefinitely. The FBI pressured me to lie to charge me with a crime and denied my requests for outside employment. If the FBI treats its own agents this way, what might they do to ordinary citizens?

Gary Melton (Gary) and Mitch have a lengthy, meandering exchange that centers on veterans’ histories, alleged government manipulation, personal trauma, and the pursuit of truth around high-profile political cases. The core thread is an effort to verify Mitch’s claims about his SF background and to explore broader claims about political interference, media narratives, and potential conspiracies. Key points and exchanges: - Identity, background, and verification: - Gary identifies himself as a former SF soldier seeking to verify Mitch’s SF history after seeing his Candace Owens interview. - Mitch provides his SF timeline: he was in group from February/March 1993 until November 1996; MOS 18 Charlie (medic). He mentions attending the 300F1 course and a severe on-duty accident at Guadalupe River, involving a 60-foot fall that caused multiple injuries (spine, feet, knee, lumbar, dislocations, torn labrum, etc.). - Mitch describes his treatment (brace, three-week leave, then recycled into the next class and internship at Brookhaven Army Medical Center Burn Ward). He mentions ODA +1 63166/ +1 63/ +1 66 and places himself on +183 and +185 in the old numbering system; later, he notes the transition to the newer numeric system circa 2002-2006. - Gary asks for Mitch’s DD214 to verify the story; Mitch agrees and offers to share it. He references being in “Lake Baja” and knowing Nate (Nate Chapman), whom he spoke with the day before. - Personal stakes, trauma, and family: - Mitch explains a long, difficult divorce and custody battle that spanned many years. He says he was a stay-at-home dad for his son, who is now 13, and describes persistent, aggressive accusations against him (PTSD, abuse, murder) by courts and media figures. - He recounts a prior incident involving a coworker or classmate, Jimmy Walker, and notes that Walker later claimed PTSD and discrimination in SF contexts. Mitch frames this as part of broader patterns of how SF status can be weaponized in custody and legal battles. - Mitch and Gary discuss how the SF environment can foster suspicion, paranoia, and intra-community politics (e.g., clashes with SF Brothers, admin actions, and the difficulty of maintaining contact with peers after leaving the teams). - Candace Owens, TPUSA, and broader conspiratorial discussions: - The callers discuss Candace Owens’ involvement, the TPUSA circle, and the believability of various claims. Mitch says he has wanted to vet the claims through Candace and Joe Kent, and he’s offered to supply documents to verify stories. He notes that Candace has reportedly pulled threads about various shooters and narratives and that this has caused friction with TPUSA. - Mitch argues that Candace might be exploited by political or foreign adversaries and that her narratives sometimes lack corroborating evidence, distracting from “the truth.” He insists on corroborating Mitch’s own story with documents (DD214, other records) before airing anything publicly. - Gary responds with skepticism about online personas but agrees to vet Mitch’s materials, emphasizing integrity and a desire to verify truth. Both acknowledge the risk of backend manipulation, bot attacks, and the use of media figures to push narratives. - Ballistics and the Charlie Kirk incident: - A substantial portion of the discussion turns to ballistics surrounding Tyler Robinson and the Charlie Kirk incident. Mitch (the ballistics expert) explains that many variables affect ballistic outcomes (ammo type, grain, bullet construction, handloads vs. factory ammo, barrel condition, yaw, stabilization). He argues that the 30-06 round’s behavior can be highly variable and that an “atypical” (non-normative) wound could occur for many reasons. - He compares Martin Luther King’s assassination (65-yard shot, 30-06, open casket) to Charlie Kirk’s wound, noting similarities in the trajectory and lack of an exit wound in some high-profile cases. He cites Chuck Ritter (Green Beret) who was shot multiple times with 7.62x54R and survived, and uses these examples to illustrate the complexity of interpreting ballistic evidence. - Mitch asserts that multiple plausible explanations exist for Kirk’s wounds and stresses that the exact ammunition type, projectile, and ballistic conditions are unknown at present. He emphasizes that investigators possess DNA and surveillance records (DNA on the firearm, trigger, cartridge, towel used by Tyler Robinson) and text messages; he notes that Mitch is not claiming to know the entire truth but wants to see corroborating evidence. - The two discuss the possibility of government involvement or manipulation, while acknowledging that ballistics alone cannot prove a broader conspiracy. They note the challenges of obtaining complete ballistic data before trials, and they express openness to future verification once more information becomes available (e.g., during trial proceedings). - Custody, investigations, and accountability: - Mitch recounts the broader pattern of SF members being targeted by legal systems when in contentious custody situations, with accusations and judgments influenced by SF status. He cites examples of coercion, character assassination, and the weaponization of families in court battles. - They discuss how the FBI and other agencies have handled high-profile cases, noting distrust in narratives presented by authorities and media. They acknowledge that public transparency is essential, even as prosecutions proceed. - Platform, vetting, and next steps: - The two plan to continue the vetting process: Mitch will provide DD214 and related documents to Gary, who promises to verify and not disclose sensitive information without Mitch’s consent. They discuss sending further documents via email or text (Gary’s Paramount Tactical contact). - Mitch expresses a desire to appear on Gary’s show and to connect with Nate (Nate Chapman) for collaborative vetting. Gary commits to facilitating, offering to act as an advocate if Mitch’s story is verified and to help set up communications with Nate and Candace as appropriate. - The conversation closes with both agreeing on the importance of truth, corroboration, and accountability. They acknowledge the risk and the emotional toll of revealing sensitive histories but emphasize their commitment to pursuing the truth and preventing misinformation or manipulation. Overall, the transcript captures a tense, exploratory exchange between two veterans and affiliates about verifying SF credentials, the personal toll of custody and legal battles, the influence of political narratives, and the complexities of ballistics and forensics in high-profile incidents. The participants stress verification through documents, corroboration of anecdotes, and cautious, integrity-driven engagement with media figures and audiences.

Former FBI special agent Mike Jorman reveals in this documentary that the FBI fabricates cases to maintain fear in the public and gain power and funding. He explains that before 9/11, if he wanted to investigate individuals for terrorism, he would need to provide evidence of their affiliation with terrorist organizations, possession of weapons, and resources to acquire them. However, in recent cases, when he stated that the individuals had no affiliation, weapons, or resources, the FBI would initiate undercover operations, providing them with weapons, money, and the idea of an attack. Jorman believes this is a fabrication of cases to create a sense of seriousness and gain support.

The Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case from fall 2020 revealed troubling details about the FBI's involvement. Initially, Governor Whitmer announced that militia groups were plotting to kidnap her. However, testimony during the trial indicated that the FBI orchestrated much of the plot. An informant, Dan Chappell, was paid over $60,000 to recruit individuals for a fabricated conspiracy. Despite the FBI's efforts, many alleged plotters, including Adam Fox, rejected violent ideas and refused to take money for weapons. The FBI continued to push the narrative, even staging meetings and introducing undercover agents. Ultimately, the case raised serious questions about the FBI's tactics and the legitimacy of the charges against the defendants.

An individual, identified as a CIA contracting officer who formerly worked for the FBI, discussed tactics employed by the Bureau, including near-entrapment, which they call "a nudge," to provoke targeted individuals into acting on impulse. They admitted to using fake social media posts to anger people. The speaker claimed the FBI was "after" Alex Jones and aimed to bankrupt him by encouraging civil lawsuits from the Sandy Hook families. They monitored Jones' followers, looking for potential leads, and were satisfied when the families "shot his legs off" via civil suits. The speaker stated there were approximately 20 undercover FBI agents present at the January 6th Capitol riot to gather information, but their presence was not publicly acknowledged to avoid overstepping bounds.

The speaker mentions a little-known aspect of their case involving FBI agents planning to plant child porn on their husband's computer. Another FBI agent in a separate case admitted to doing this. Fortunately, it was not carried out in their situation, but the thought of it happening is disturbing, especially considering they have a young daughter at home.

The speaker, a former FBI agent, discusses their career and involvement in various cases, including counterterrorism and investigating the Oklahoma City bombing. They express their belief that the government had advanced knowledge of the 9/11 attacks and that the World Trade Center buildings were intentionally imploded. They also mention the existence of a covert CIA child kidnapping operation and the involvement of the Finders, a group engaged in international trafficking of children. The speaker claims to have provided evidence to the FBI multiple times but has been ignored. They emphasize the need for further investigation into these matters.

A father posted a photo of his child in the bathtub, leading to disturbing comments about the child's safety. The speaker, who had access to the server, consulted an attorney who warned about the risk of reporting the incident due to breaking federal law. However, the speaker decided to take their chances and reached out to news stations and attorneys. Despite the interest in the story, no one posted it when it reached the legal stage. Later, the speaker learned about the arrest of Nathaniel Larson, who had kidnapped and raped a 12-year-old girl. The speaker had evidence of Larson's activities and those of 3,000 others, but nothing was done about it.