reSee.it - Related Video Feed

There were very fine people on both sides of a white supremacist rally. I’m not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. However, there were many individuals in that group who were not neo-Nazis or white nationalists.

Many in the Jewish community and communities of color—targeted by Nazis and neo-Nazis—see swastikas and flags on Parliament Hill, not just a few malcontents. This convoy seeded the worst display of Nazi propaganda I have seen in this country, and they are marching in the shoes of neo Nazis, giving support to racists and bullies. People may disagree on health issues, but they have the democratic right to protest; however, extremists have taken over the agenda. We have seen a statue of Terry Fox basically defaced and we've seen people urinate on the war memorial. What have they accomplished? Angering Canadians. Let them protest health issues, but by doing so they have walked in the shoes of bullies, racists, bigots, and Nazis. Enough is enough—no swastikas on Ottawa streets or urinating on memorials or destroying Terry Fox.

In Germany, insulting someone in public or online is a crime, with online insults potentially incurring higher fines due to their permanence. Even reposting untrue statements can be considered a crime. Authorities are actively curbing online hate speech, as demonstrated by coordinated raids targeting individuals posting racist content. Despite growing concerns over migration and related issues, there's a lack of political will to address these problems effectively. The focus seems to be on prosecuting opinion crimes rather than deporting criminals. My party, the AFD, faces persecution despite being a major opposition force. We're smeared as Nazis and right-wing extremists, but this isn't true. Free speech is eroding, with new laws targeting online expression. People risk punishment for criticizing mass migration. Even if the AFD performs well in elections, other parties may refuse to cooperate, maintaining a firewall against us. It is time to vote to make Germany great again.

There is a campaign to erase our history, defame our heroes, and indoctrinate our children. Angry mobs are tearing down statues, defacing memorials, and causing violent crime. Some people don't understand why they are doing this, but others do. They believe Americans are weak, but we are strong and proud. Far-left fascism is spreading in our schools, newsrooms, and corporate boardrooms, demanding absolute allegiance. If you don't comply, you will be punished. To protect our monuments, arrest rioters, and prosecute offenders, federal law enforcement will be deployed.

There is an alarming situation in Ottawa, with reports of severe vandalism and criminal behavior. The streets are filled with protesters, honking their horns incessantly. Some residents feel terrorized and intimidated, describing themselves as hostages. The so-called freedom convoy of anti-COVID truckers has imposed a lockdown on the area. There have been instances of harassment, including taking food from a soup kitchen. While there haven't been violent outbursts, there are disturbing symbols like swastikas and Confederate flags present. Responsible leaders need to carefully consider their stance on this threat to democracy.

Henry, as a Holocaust survivor from Germany, it is troubling to see Arabs in Berlin openly celebrating attacks on Israel and sharing sweets. Allowing in people with different beliefs creates internal pressure groups within countries.

Conservative party members stand with Canadians needing to get back to work, not those waving swastikas or the confederate flag. Elite protests must end.

Earlier this year, there was Nazi imagery in our nation's capital, which was disturbing for the Jewish community and Canadians. Antisemitism is increasing online and in person, and must be addressed.

Young people are drawn to this particular place for various reasons. One factor is their dislike for Trump, who failed to condemn those with tiki torches, including anti-Semitic individuals. Now, it seems that some of these young people themselves are the ones holding tiki torches.

Significant, sustained disorder occurred in Balamena last night. The violence was racially motivated, targeting the minority ethnic community and the police. The speaker characterized the events as racist thuggery. Attempts to justify or explain the disorder as anything else are considered misplaced.

There were individuals on both sides that night, including some Americans chanting Nazi slogans. It's important to clarify that I'm not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be completely condemned.

Yesterday, during a 3-hour show, we spoke with people in Washington DC who were heading to the Capitol to make their presence known. However, their efforts were disrupted by Antifa and Black Lives Matter members who went ahead of them and caused damage. These individuals are responsible for the violence. We have important decisions to make moving forward.

Some members of parliament are pushing to nullify existing laws. This action would send a toxic message to the New South Wales community. Advocates for these changes need to explain what type of racist abuse they want people to have the right to say and be able to lawfully see on the streets of Sydney. Australia does not have the same freedom of speech laws as the United States because it aims to maintain a multicultural community where people can live in peace, free from vilification and hatred seen elsewhere.

The speaker questions the number of guns that should be confiscated and the amount of hateful content, including references to Hitler, being shared by protesters on social media.

There were very fine people on both sides of a white supremacist rally. I'm not referring to the neo-Nazis and white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely. However, there were many individuals in that group who were not neo-Nazis or white nationalists.

If you want to defend things like Sig Hales and Nazi salutes, that's your choice. But I'm against all of that. I'm not with the Nazis.

"A human being with a soul, a free man, has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express his views." "that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it's okay to shoot people you disagree with, to kill Nazis for saying things they don't like." "Well, there's free speech which of course we all acknowledge is important so so important." "But then there's this thing called hate speech." "Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate, but they don't define it that way." "They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence." "And we punish violence, don't we? Of course, we do."

Canada is committed to defending freedom of expression, conscience, and peaceful protest. We also stand against violence and hatred. It's crucial to remember that the actions of a few individuals do not reflect the entire community or Canada as a whole.

Jonathan (Speaker 0) and Michael (Speaker 2) along with Jonathan Conricus (Speaker 1) discuss the Australia Hanukkah attack, antisemitism, and the political context surrounding Palestinian statehood and Islamist extremism. They also touch on free speech, protests, and potential international implications. - Jonathan’s initial reaction to the Australian shooting: He was not surprised, framing it as part of a broader pattern he terms “globalize the Intifada.” He cites experiences in Australia, including Bondi Beach visits and conversations with the Jewish community, who he says feel betrayed by legislators and exposed by law enforcement. He argues the atmosphere in Australia has allowed antisemitic attacks, with radicals allowed to shout antisemitic slogans and attack synagogues. He accuses the Australian government of being weak and cowed, quick to side with Hamas and Palestinians while demonizing Israel, and contends this climate enabled violence against 2,000 Australian Jews celebrating Hanukkah. He calls for full support and protection for Jews in Australia and for leadership to change its stance toward global affairs. - Netanyahu connection and limiting principle: Michael notes Netanyahu’s August letter to Australian Prime Minister Albanese warning that support for a Palestinian state fuels antisemitic violence and benefits Hamas. Conricus is asked about a limiting principle: could endorsing Palestinian statehood by various figures (Ehud Barak, the UN Security Council’s Oslo-era blueprint, etc.) be linked to such attacks, potentially implicating many figures including Donald Trump? Conricus responds that the situation in Australia goes beyond a mere recognition of a Palestinian state and highlights the disquiet in Israel across political spectrum about linking Israel’s actions to global support for Palestinian statehood, especially after October 7 atrocities. - Protests and incitement: Jonathan argues the protests in Australia, including chants like “gas the Jews,” reflect incitement and a broader systemic failure by authorities who allowed Hamas supporters to dominate public spaces and harass Jews. He recounts encounters with Hamas supporters in Melbourne and claims police and local government enabled harassment against Jews, including demands Jews remove kippahs to avoid incitement. He says hate crimes against synagogues have gone unsolved and that this atmosphere of violence and antisemitism needs to change. - Pro-Palestinian vs pro-Hamas distinction: Michael asks where to draw the line between pro-Palestinian and pro-Hamas protesters. Conricus argues the distinction is artificial and notes that polls show Hamas is the most popular Palestinian political group, suggesting that many demonstrators imply support for Hamas even if they do not explicitly say so. He believes the dominant sentiment among protesters on October 7-8 was supportive of Hamas, even if framed as pro-Palestinian nationalism. He also mentions paid protesters, particularly in US/UK campus contexts, but emphasizes ideologically driven protesters. - Free speech and incitement: Michael insists that if protests include chants and actions that incite violence, this becomes a free-speech issue, citing First Amendment protections in the US and contrasting with other countries. Jonathan counters that incitement can justify restriction when it explicitly calls for violence against a protected group, noting that “gas the Jews” crosses lines beyond free speech, and criticizes Australian authorities’ tolerance of violent incitement. - Chronology and retaliation: The participants discuss the October 7 Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent response. Jonathan clarifies that Hamas conducted an unprecedented, unprovoked attack killing 1,200 Israelis, with later identification of missing and abducted individuals. He describes Israel’s border closure and subsequent major offensive in Gaza. Michael points out debates around whether attackers’ motives included broader geopolitical narratives, while Jonathan underscores the gravity and scale of the October 7 killings and the need to acknowledge the initial atrocity. - Islam and Western integration: Jonathan addresses Islam as a monotheistic faith with nearly 2 billion followers, expressing no issue with Islam as a religion but concern about Islamist ideology and an imperialistic mindset. He cites Sweden’s immigration policy as an example of perceived societal strain and argues for cautions about cultural integration, border policies, and governance standards in Western societies. - Acknowledgment of individual bravery: They remark on Ahmed Ben Ahmed, a Muslim shop owner who helped defend Jews during the Australian attack, acknowledging his bravery and suggesting he should be recognized for valor. - Iran, Israel, and alleged blame: The discussion covers claims about Iran or Israel behind the attack. Michael asserts there is no evidence linking Mossad or Iran to the attack, while Jonathan suggests Iranian involvement is possible but not proven, noting Iranian propaganda and the potential for blowback, while maintaining that the attackers’ exact affiliations remain unclear. They note Iranian condemnation of the attacks, with skepticism about Iranian statements.

The speaker discusses the importance of freedoms in New Zealand, referencing Germany's history. They ask for their name to be stated, question the law being broken, and request a photo be deleted.

Last night, I attended a demonstration against fascism because I was upset about the election results. Many of my colleagues were also in tears, feeling unrepresented. Some disagreed, calling it ridiculous and accusing others of demonizing. We live in a democracy, but with the need for security around Wilders, it's a complex issue. Despite differences, we are fortunate to have the freedom to protest. I attended to show solidarity with those who feel threatened by the election outcome and to address the problem that has been exposed. It's important to connect and not dismiss each other's concerns.

We see too much hate online with protesters using "honk honk," which stands for hail Hitler.

There were fine people on both sides of the protest over a statue being taken down and a park being renamed from Robert E. Lee.

I don't just lack understanding, but we must also take a clear stance on what is happening when state deniers, democracy enemies, neo-Nazis, and neo-fascists walk around in our cities. Yes, that's right. Why are you getting upset about it now?

Consider the shooter, who came from an affluent background and displayed signs of hatred in his manifesto. Our children are being radicalized to hate the very country that has provided for them. Despite having everything, he resorted to violence. We must address the radicalization of young people, as I see a growing animosity among them. Celebrating someone's death, like having dance parties in response to violence, is not something I support. It's crucial to acknowledge and focus on these issues.