reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I have an internal Pfizer document from a source who reverse-engineered the BioNTech Pfizer SARS COVID-2 vaccine. This document reveals the precise chemical and biological processes used to create an mRNA that contains graphene oxide, a dangerous toxin. Each vaccine contains 15 billion nanoparticles or lipid carrier particles within the mRNA sequence. Once injected, the spike protein binds to blood cells, and graphene oxide begins building a structure, leading to blood clots and heart failure. Patent databases and recovered, deleted Wuhan databases prove that COVID-19 and its vaccines are bioweapons.

mRNA vaccines code for a small part of viral proteins, usually a single antigen. A single mutation can make the vaccine ineffective. This drives antigenic shift, where the vaccine encourages new mutations, prolonging pandemics as the virus mutates to escape the vaccine's protection. Millions caught the Omicron variant despite vaccination because a single mutation can render mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies to the flu.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is superior to DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of any issues, but Moderna's own patent raises the same concerns about DNA. It appears that DNA is present in the RNA preparation as a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists revealed large numbers of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences that are not normally allowed in human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments can potentially lead to DNA damage, birth defects, and cancer.

The presence of DNA plasmids and undisclosed proteins in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine has raised concerns. The DNA plasmids, originating from E. Coli, were not properly removed during manufacturing, resulting in contamination. Additionally, two proteins from the simian virus 40 (SV40) were found in the vaccine, which is associated with certain cancers. SV40 was present in polio vaccines administered to millions of Americans in the past. Injecting these proteins and DNA into the body can potentially lead to mutations and increased risk of cancer. This discovery suggests a higher chance of mutation from the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

Moderna holds a patent for using RNA in vaccines, acknowledging that RNA is better than DNA due to concerns about DNA-related problems like insertional immunogenesis and genotoxicity. The FDA claims to be unaware of these concerns, but Moderna's own patent highlights them. The presence of DNA in the vaccines is considered a contaminant, as it is used in the process of making RNA. Recent findings by scientists in the US and Canada revealed large amounts of DNA fragments in the RNA preparation, including sequences not allowed for human use, such as an antibiotic resistance gene and sequences from simian virus 40. These DNA fragments pose risks of DNA damage, including birth defects and cancer.

The mRNA in vaccines can replicate, including the replication engine, leading to potential spread from person to person. Concerns exist about the inability to stop this replication, with unknown consequences for humanity. The spike protein in these vaccines can be toxic, affecting various tissues. Deployment of this technology in vaccines for humans is already happening, with over 4,000 people injected in Japan.

The spike protein may inhibit tumor suppressor genes like MHS 3p53 and BRCA2, potentially leading to cancer. The mRNA vaccine contains a base that allows the spike protein to be produced for longer, possibly further inhibiting tumor suppressor genes. Concerns are raised about the long-term effects of these vaccines, with a call for them to be banned for general use and reserved for gene therapy in advanced cancer cases.

Many labs, including Medicinal Genomics, found DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Regulators like the FDA and EMA admitted to this, but downplayed its significance. The SP 40 sequences omitted by Pfizer are crucial. DNA contamination can cause insertional mutagenesis, as stated in Moderna's patents. Regulatory agencies were deceived and failed to properly address the issue. This poses a serious risk that cannot be ignored.

The mRNA technology used in vaccines may have hidden gene sequences intentionally designed to create harmful proteins like spider silk, leading to blood clotting. Plasmid contamination in Pfizer's injections could be intentional, allowing for the creation of functional proteins when read backwards. This intentional design raises concerns about nefarious intent behind the vaccine development. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of potential harm caused by these hidden genes. The delayed discovery of these issues highlights the importance of transparency in medical technologies.

There is no question that the inclusion of DNA was not an accident, and the 1/3 DNA, 2/3 RNA ratio was intentional. The long-term effects of both DNA and RNA are influencing the ability to fight cancer. The key question is what effect the DNA has on the cell nucleus, and how to differentiate its damage from that of mRNA. mRNA is connected to ACE 2 receptors and causes damage throughout the reproductive and cardio systems. mRNA creates a spike protein flag, which the immune system attacks, leading to organ damage. The presence of DNA makes the process last longer. While mRNA would create spike for 8-12 months, DNA can influence the nucleus for years, producing mRNA near the nucleus. This extends the process from months to 8-10 years due to the decision to include DNA.

Moderna's patents acknowledge that DNA integration is a risk, necessitating the invention of new methods to remove DNA. According to the speaker, Moderna is approximately tenfold more effective than Pfizer at removing DNA. The speaker claims that the manufacturers' patents indicate that the vaccines pose an oncogenic risk. The speaker suggests that one need not consult external papers to recognize this risk, as it is evident from the manufacturers' own patents.

Source tomia.org April 2024. Why deflate the parasitic system? Because the parasitic destructiveness oversized states and corporations always leads to decay, corruption, injustice to the destruction of its many hosts, the people, the working and creative people, the maimed and dying slaves of the elites. See examples below. Tanks for Kidneys RT Documentary, Organ Harvesting, Black Market Transplants, Crimes Against Humanity. If I extrapolate my estimate for 2022 to 2023 plus half of 2024 I get in total thirty six million excess deaths since the Covid Vax rollout. Adding the nine million from the Covid killing protocols in 2020 gives a total of forty five million for four point five years of Covid killing protocols. SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons Considering the estimated forty five million extra deaths and estimated one point nine billion serious adverse effects for four point five years of Covid killing protocols and deployed SARS CoV-two virus and vaccine bio weapons the words bio weaponized, propagandized, lured, coerced and mandated depopulation and genocide should not be taboo because of the mass propaganda corrupted science lack of truthful science and censorship in the mainstream media and on tech platforms thus the elites many people still think SARS CoV-two is a naturally evolved virus. Truthful science though proves beyond any doubt SARS CoV-two is designed and made by humans in a bio lab. After all and first of all, science shows the genetic code of SARS CoV-two contains several lab made inserts, not natural mutations or recombinations of natural viruses. Because these inserted codes, PRRA, HIVGP120 are much too large and too many and because these genetic codes only appear in other natural viruses that are genetically much too different from SARS CoV-two the probability that SARS CoV-two has naturally mutated or recombined from other natural viruses is quasi zero. Furthermore there exists a substantial trail of documents and testimonies years before and after the release of SARS CoV-two about these genetic codes and the existing biochemical technology needed to insert them, financing of the research, scientific documents, patents. Since the GenTech covid vaccines make the human body cells produce during months up to years huge amounts of the toxic spike protein of SARS CoV-two. In fact in all organs and tissues much greater amounts than the average, dominantly only mucosal, infection with SARS CoV-two itself which for the majority of healthy unvaccinated people causes hardly any illness just cold like symptoms. These Gentech covid vaccines are of course themselves bio weapons and much worse than the virus itself. Furthermore not only the produced toxic spike protein but also other components and contaminations of these vaccines are cause of serious health damage. Source2mia.org, please like and follow.

Pfizer's use of the RiboGreen technique to measure DNA in their vaccines has raised concerns about deceptive practices. The presence of billions of DNA fragments in each dose, some of which are small and more likely to integrate into the genome, is worrying. Preliminary data suggests a correlation between adverse events and contaminated Pfizer vaccines, but more research is needed. The DNA in the vaccines is different from previous contamination and carries a higher risk of integration. The FDA acknowledges the integration risk and the need for lower limits on DNA when copy numbers are high. The DNA is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, making it prothrombotic and potentially oncogenic. The presence of endotoxin and the spike protein in the vaccines further complicates the situation. The vaccines have been found in various tissues and can lead to prolonged expression of the spike protein. Insertional mutagenesis and cancer risk are concerns, especially for individuals with weakened immune systems. Regulatory bodies have confirmed the presence of the SV40 sequence in the vaccines, but the clinical implications are still unclear.

The mRNA platform is effective but has a flaw: it can cause autoimmune disorders by producing foreign proteins in cells. The challenge is to target only specific cells and avoid damage to vital organs. The pandemic allowed the emergency use authorization of mRNA vaccines, bypassing safety measures. However, a large portion of the population has already accepted this technology. To address the issue, a solution could be to replace the spike protein with a different protein that doesn't have flaws. But if the problem lies in any foreign protein transcribed by cells, the immune system may still target vital organs.

The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a scientist who sequenced the vaccine in his lab. He obtained empty vials from a colleague and found DNA in them. This DNA could potentially cause serious side effects and integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to long-term effects. The scientist is concerned about the regulatory process that allowed this to happen and warns of the risks of genome modification and autoimmune attacks. While the risk of cancer is believed to be rare, it is not zero. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of these risks.

Dr. Yeason presents three principal assertions about the vaccines. 1) The first principle: we were told these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called the spike protein. The spike protein is described as on the outside of the virus, and vaccines were said to encode the protein to train the immune system. Dr. Yeason explains that the immune system treats anything foreign as a threat and will attack cells that manufacture a foreign protein, leading to tissue damage. He notes that this principle of “self, non self” and tissue targeting is fundamental to organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases, and says this was designed into every company’s molecule (Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca). He asserts that by 2020 he knew these were designed to cause injury. 2) The second principle: what was encoded is the spike protein. He states he did not know what spike protein was at first, but describes spikes on the outside of the virus and claims they are known toxins (neurotoxins, cardiotoxins) that prompt blood coagulation. He questions why a medicinal product would encode something that would harm the body when expressed. 3) The third principle: lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to formulate two of the Pfizer and Moderna products. He explains that lipid nanoparticles are toxic in general and are known to promote uptake of their payload into visceral organs, especially the liver and ovaries. He asserts that when injected into women and girls, these materials would travel through the body, concentrate in reproductive organs, be expressed, be recognized as foreign, and kill those cells. He asks what possible motivation there could be for using that formulation when other options exist. This, he says, confirms that the first two observations were not mere risks but intentional design. Dr. Yeason concludes that these three points together indicate that someone in a room designed injections to injure, kill, and reduce fertility in the people given them, aiming to lower fertility and reduce the population over time. He states he has observed this “all around me for five years since that moment.”

Pfizer and Moderna used two processes to create their vaccines. Initially, they used PCR to amplify and create the DNA for clinical trials. However, when they received approval, they needed to produce billions of copies, so they used circular bacterial DNA plasmids. Unfortunately, this led to contamination with junk DNA. Researchers in Ontario, Canada tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and found billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is considered acceptable.

Alden and colleagues found that Pfizer's genetic code can be integrated into the human genome within an hour in a cancerous cell line. This suggests that Pfizer and Moderna's genetic material might become a permanent part of human DNA. There is no study confirming or denying this possibility. The concern is that if eggs or sperm incorporate this genetic code, it could be passed on to future generations. This lack of research is seen as reckless and worrisome.

The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.

The panel discusses replication (replicon) vaccines and their potential dangers, focusing on how they differ from conventional messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines and what new risks might emerge as this technology develops. Key points and concerns raised - Replicon vaccines concept and fundamental differences - Replicon vaccines use replication-capable genetic material, so the embedded genetic information not only makes antigen proteins but also multiplies inside the cell. They are described as having both constitutive function (the ability to make proteins) and, crucially, the capacity to replicate, which distinguishes them from traditional, non-replicating mRNA vaccines. - It is explained that replication introduces additional mutation and recombination opportunities, because the RNA genome is copied more than once, and the process can produce variants that differ from the original design. - Central dogma exceptions and viral biology - The speakers explain that while the central dogma (DNA → RNA → protein) generally governs biology, some viruses violate this, with RNA viruses that replicate via RNA-dependent replication and even some reverse-transcribing retroviruses that convert RNA to DNA and integrate into genomes. This context is used to frame why replicon vaccines could behave unpredictably. - Potential risks of replication and spread - A core concern is that the replicon approach might allow the vaccine genome to spread beyond the initial target cells, potentially reaching other cells and tissues, or even spreading to other people via exosomes or other means. Exosomes can transport DNA, RNA, and proteins between cells; thus, the replicon genome could in theory be disseminated. - The possibility of homologous or heterologous recombination between replicon genomes and wild-type viruses could yield new variants. The panel emphasizes the difficulty of controlling such recombination in a living system. - Specific material and design considerations - The use of viral components like spike protein genes in replicon vaccines raises concerns about how these proteins might mutate or recombine during replication, potentially altering antigen presentation or safety. - A concern is raised about the lack of repair mechanisms in RNA replication (as opposed to DNA replication), which could make error rates higher and lead to unpredictable changes. - The panel notes that current replicon vaccine designs (including those using alphavirus backbones) inherently carry high mutation and recombination risk, and that the replicating systems may encounter unpredictable evolutionary dynamics inside the human body. - Safety signals and clinical anecdotes - The speakers cite cases of adverse events temporally associated with vaccines, including vascular inflammation and thrombosis, stroke-like events, and myocarditis, to illustrate that immune responses to vaccines can be complex and occasionally severe. They emphasize that such observations do not establish causality, but argue they warrant careful scrutiny. - There are references to cases of acute vascular and neural complications following repeated vaccination, and to broader immune dysregulation phenomena, including IGG4-related disease and immune dysregulation syndromes that can involve multiple organs. - One example concerns a patient who developed sudden limb problems after the third dose, requiring surgery; another describes myocardial involvement after multiple doses and subsequent inflammatory sequelae. - DNA contamination and analytical findings - Kevin McKernan’s analysis of certain Japanese CoronaVac vaccines is cited: both DNA contamination and the presence of SV40 promoter elements were detected in some vaccine lots, with DNA amounts exceeding some regulatory benchmarks in at least one case. The concern is that DNA contamination, or the presence of promoter sequences, could influence integration or expression in unintended ways. - It is noted that vaccines using lipid nanoparticles can potentially deliver nucleic acids into cells; in the presence of exons or promoter sequences, there could be unintended cellular uptake and expression. - Implications for public health and policy - The panel underscores the need for caution, thorough investigation, and long-term observation of any replication-based vaccine platform before broad deployment. There is a call to evaluate risks, monitor long-term outcomes, and consider the possibility that replication-competent constructs could drive unforeseen evolutionary dynamics within hosts or communities. - There is contention about how information is communicated to the public, with particular emphasis on avoiding misinformation while ensuring that scientific uncertainties are transparently discussed. - Broader scientific context and forward-looking stance - The speakers discuss how the field’s approach to gene-based vaccines is evolving rapidly, and they stress that the compatibility of replicon systems with human biology is not yet fully understood. - They frame their discussion as not merely about current vaccines but about the trajectory of vaccine platforms: if replication-based or self-dispersing systems prove too risky or unpredictable, the prudent path might be to favor conventional, non-replicating strategies until safety, efficacy, and containment of unintended spread are more firmly established. Closing and takeaways - The session closes with emphasis on careful evaluation of replicon vaccines, awareness that viral genetics can behave differently in humans than in theory, and a call for continued discussion, independent verification, and transparent communication as the technology develops. - Throughout, speakers acknowledge the complexity of immune responses to vaccines, the potential for unexpected adverse events, and the importance of safeguarding public health while advancing vaccine science.

Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use two processes. The first process involves using PCR to amplify and create DNA for clinical trials. Once approved, they use circular bacterial DNA plasmid to replicate billions of mRNA DNA sample copies. However, this resulted in contaminated vaccines with junk DNA. A study found DNA fragments in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines in Ontario, Canada. Researchers tested 27 mRNA vials from 12 different lots and discovered billions to 100 billions of DNA molecules per dose, exceeding FDA and WHO guidelines by 188 to 509 times. This is a significant amount, far beyond what is acceptable.

Kevin discovered that the vials used for vaccines are contaminated with bacterial DNA. This is concerning because the modified RNA used in these vaccines creates unusual genetic structures that don't occur naturally. Normally, DNA is in a double helix form, but with modified RNA, there are three strands attached to the DNA. The enzyme used to remove DNA, called DNase, cannot digest these triple-stranded genetic constructs, resulting in DNA contamination in the shots. Pfizer and Moderna should have addressed this issue during the manufacturing process by using different enzymes. This shows that assumptions cannot be made when working with new, unnatural products. The DNA used to manufacture the modified RNA was not properly removed, leading to multiple scary aspects of contamination.

The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a researcher who sequenced the vaccine in their lab. The DNA is a vector used in the production of the mRNA. The researcher expressed concern about the potential consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. The DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells and become a permanent part of them, posing a risk of genome modification and autoimmune attacks. There is also a theoretical risk of future cancer depending on where the foreign DNA lands in the genome. The researcher believes further investigation is needed to determine if these risks are occurring.

The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.

The speaker believes mRNA vaccines are producing an abnormal spike protein that doesn't enter the membrane, potentially leading to prion problems. Prion proteins misfold into beta sheets in the cytoplasm, forming crystals that attract other proteins and create fibrils like Alzheimer's plaque. The speaker claims the vaccines produce many spike proteins that cannot enter the membrane, increasing the likelihood of becoming problematic prion proteins. This is described as a setup for Parkinson's disease, potentially causing earlier onset or new cases in vaccinated individuals. The speaker suggests annual boosters may accelerate the development of Parkinson's.