reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th and suggests that it was not an inside job. They claim that the government has systematically lied to the public about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. They argue that there were federal law enforcement agents present during the Capitol riot, although the interviewer disputes this. The speaker also brings up the concept of entrapment and mentions a case involving alleged kidnapping plots and FBI involvement. They criticize the government for exploiting individuals and misleading the public. The interviewer attempts to challenge the speaker's claims.

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had been told about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They argue that the government has systematically lied to the public about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal law enforcement agents present during the Capitol riot, but the interviewer challenges this claim. The speaker also brings up the concept of entrapment and gives examples of alleged government involvement in criminal activities. They argue that the government cannot incite individuals to commit crimes and then charge them for it. The interviewer attempts to counter the speaker's arguments.

The speakers discuss the possibility of someone setting up the police on January 6th. They mention that this has happened before and question if the same people also set up the rally attendees. They believe that there is a cover-up and wonder if that's why there has been a delay in releasing footage from January 6th.

This video discusses the events of January 6th and raises questions about the government's involvement and potential setup. It features interviews with individuals affected by the aftermath of the Capitol breach, including Matthew Perna's family and the Brunson brothers. The Brunson brothers, who are not lawyers, filed lawsuits against Congress for failing to investigate election fraud allegations. The video also highlights the presence of undercover agents and informants during the Capitol breach. The committee investigating security failures on January 6th has identified an undercover officer, Nicholas Thomasula, who can be heard urging the crowd to advance. The video ends with a discussion about the potential cover-ups and the need for the truth to be revealed.

The speakers discuss the events of January 6th and the theory of it being an inside job. Speaker 1 believes there is evidence of entrapment and points to video footage showing Capitol police allowing people into the Capitol and shooting at peaceful crowds. They also mention a case of entrapment in the Gretchen Whitner kidnapping plot. Speaker 0 questions the lack of evidence for an inside job and mentions that people have been convicted of crimes related to the events. Speaker 1 suggests that the government has systematically lied and both parties are to blame. They also mention the Brady rule and the DOJ's handling of evidence.

The speaker discusses their belief that the events of January 6th were not an inside job, but rather a result of government entrapment. They claim that the government has systematically lied to the public about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. They argue that there is evidence of federal law enforcement agents being present during the Capitol riot, although the interviewer disputes this. The speaker also mentions cases of alleged entrapment by the government, including the plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. They criticize the government for cherry-picking footage and argue that the actions of some individuals were influenced by FBI agents. The interview ends with the interviewer expressing concern about misleading the audience.

The video discusses whether the FBI had confidential human sources among the January 6th protesters. Speaker 1 denies this claim. Speaker 3, the former chief of the Capitol Police, suggests that the crowd on January 6th included federal agents. Speaker 1 questions the seriousness of conspiring to defraud America, comparing it to past instances like the weapons of mass destruction claim and financial collapses. They argue that many others have defrauded America without facing trial. Speaker 3 criticizes the Jan 6th committee, stating that if intelligence had been reported correctly, the situation could have been prevented. Speaker 1 believes that everyone involved in the committee should be on trial themselves.

The discussion centers on whether January 6 violence was an FBI operation. Speaker 0 denies that the violence at the Capitol was part of any operation orchestrated by FBI sources or agents. Speaker 1 asks if the FBI had an engagement with embedded agents; Speaker 0 repeats denial. Several speakers challenge the lack of answers about how many agents were present, suggesting informants were involved. Speaker 5 says "attorneys for the Proud Boys revealed at least 40 undercover informants were doing surveillance on the defendants that day, including 13 working in the DC Metro Police." Plainclothes MPD officers on Capitol Grounds are referenced. Speaker 6 says he provided high-definition video to lawmakers and accuses the FBI/DOJ of ignoring it; he describes an open window and an operative pulling it. Speaker 7 concludes: "it was the FBI and not Trump supporters who led the insurrection of the Capitol on January 6."

The speaker claims that on January 6th, men dressed as Trump supporters were walking around inside the Capitol, seemingly unconcerned by police. He describes closed doors, police positioned between them, and then Trump supporters walking around inside. He alleges videos show doors being opened, police allowing Trump supporters to enter without violence, and people inside directing them further in. The speaker believes this was a coordinated effort by law enforcement, possibly the FBI, and that some officers entered the Capitol in uniform and emerged dressed as Trump supporters or construction workers. He suggests that individuals familiar with the Capitol led groups of citizens, implying that Trump supporters already inside were working with FBI agents embedded in the crowd, possibly for months. He asserts the American people deserve to know the truth.

During an interview, Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about their use of the term "inside job" to describe the events of January 6th. Speaker 0 brings up the case of a Capitol rioter who highlighted Speaker 1's comments during his sentencing. Speaker 1 expresses concern about the government's history of lying and cover-ups, citing examples like the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's claim that there were federal agents present on January 6th, to which Speaker 1 responds with informants and suppressed footage as evidence. The conversation becomes heated as Speaker 0 accuses Speaker 1 of cherry-picking examples, and Speaker 1 argues that the government's actions amount to entrapment.

The speaker believes the events at the Capitol on January 6th were a setup, pointing to men dressed as Trump supporters inside the building before doors were opened. They question if there were confidential human sources involved. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and denies having such sources present. Additionally, they mention police officers seen changing attire from uniform to Trump supporter clothing.

This video discusses the events of January 6th and raises questions about the government's involvement and potential setup. It features interviews with individuals affected by the aftermath, including the family of Matthew Perna, who took his own life after being implicated in the Capitol breach. The video also highlights the Brunson brothers, who filed lawsuits against Congress for failing to investigate election fraud allegations. The presence of undercover agents and informants during the Capitol breach is mentioned, as well as the possibility of a cover-up. The video ends with a discussion about the need for truth and accountability.

The speaker argues that the events of January 6th were a setup. They claim that despite having informants embedded within the groups involved, law enforcement did not anticipate the events. They also mention video footage showing the doors being opened for the protesters. The speaker alleges that the protesters were peaceful until law enforcement used concussive grenades and rubber bullets, which led to violence. They criticize the authorities for using these events to label a large portion of the country as domestic terrorists and to target Donald Trump. The speaker addresses Dana Bash, implying that she is aware of this setup.

Discussion centers on alleged agent provocateur involvement in January 6. Speakers describe a theory that "federal agents ... instigating the violence, instigating the entering into the capital," and point to "this one guy" who is isolated on video yet faced no legal consequences. They discuss "Ray Epps, the Fed protected provocateur who appears to have led the very first one six attack January 6 attack on The US capital," and contrast him with others prosecuted. They debate whether the provocateur acted under government direction, was radicalized, or acted independently as a psycho, noting "this guy's doing this, like, over and over again." They reference the World Trade Organization in Seattle as a precedent for provocateurs, and note "100,000 different cameras" enabled scrutiny. A concern is raised about "an autocratic government that controls all aspects of society so none of this ever happens."

The speakers discuss the need for transparency regarding the January 6th events at the Capitol. They express concern about withheld videos showing violence and call for their release to the public. They believe the government is hiding the truth, comparing it to the Kennedy assassination. They mention instances of police brutality and the deaths of Roseanne Boylan and Ashley Babbitt. They argue that the truth will eventually emerge and emphasize the importance of allowing the public and media to objectively assess the evidence. They assert that democracy requires knowing what happened and appreciate efforts to uncover the truth.

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had heard about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They highlight the government's history of lying and cover-ups, including the origins of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal agents present during the Capitol attack and questions why footage of law enforcement's actions was suppressed. They also mention a case of entrapment involving the FBI and argue that the government cannot manipulate individuals into committing crimes and then charge them for it.

Let's discuss January 6th. There’s no evidence it was an inside job; that’s a fringe theory. However, the released video footage raises questions about the number of federal agents present that day. It shows Capitol Police allowing people in, some of whom are now facing severe consequences, including suicide. This could be seen as entrapment, where authorities provoke individuals into actions they wouldn't normally take, then arrest them. Many were convicted before this evidence emerged. If law enforcement hadn't used forceful measures like concussion grenades and pepper spray, the situation may have remained peaceful.

A friend involved in the January 6th events has been in jail for hundreds of days without trial, raising concerns about due process. Footage shows police opening doors and guiding protesters, suggesting a lack of intent for insurrection. The idea of an armed insurrection without weapons is questioned, and misinformation about police deaths is discussed. There’s a recognition that government agents may have incited actions that day, complicating the narrative. While acknowledging the poor decisions made, there's a call for accountability and a push for the January 6th prisoners to receive trials. The conversation emphasizes the need for transparency and standing against injustices.

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had been told about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They argue that the government has systematically lied about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal law enforcement agents present during the Capitol riot, but the interviewer challenges this claim. The speaker also brings up the concept of entrapment and cites examples of alleged government involvement in criminal activities. They argue that the government cannot incite individuals to commit crimes and then charge them for it. The interviewer attempts to refute some of the speaker's claims.

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had been told about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They argue that the government has lied to the public about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal law enforcement agents present during the Capitol riot and questions why footage of their actions was suppressed. They also mention a case of alleged entrapment by the FBI in a kidnapping plot. The interviewer challenges the speaker's claims, but the speaker maintains their position.

Speaker 0: "What I'm saying is a reasonable suspicion is that there were agents. There's a video showing a guy with an earpiece pulling people into the building. Alright? Mhmm. You combine that with the evidence of Ray Epps, and it looks like you have a preponderance of evidence suggesting there may have been federal law enforcement involved in making that thing happen." Speaker 1: "I'll get you beyond a reasonable doubt. Two pieces of information. Ray Epps was on FBI's most wanted list one day, and the next day, he was off of the FBI's most wanted list. There are only two ways that happens. You die or your informant." Speaker 1: "Put that aside. Under congressional testimony, Jill Sanborn, who I used to work with, the head of the FBI counterintelligence division in charge of all these investigations, testified under oath when senator Cruz asked her, flat out, were there federal agents involved with January 6? And she said, quote, senator, I can't answer that at this time." Speaker 1: "The reason she said I can't answer that is because of the same stonewalling they gave us during Russergate with Christopher Steelehauper and everybody else. It's the same narrative, and and I'm telling you they were there." Speaker 0: "You're so you're saying that she said I can't answer that because the answer is yes Yeah. And that would compromise whatever their operation was. Exactly."

The speaker discusses their belief that the events of January 6th were not an inside job or government entrapment, contrary to their previous opinion. They claim that the government has systematically lied to the public about various issues, such as the origin of COVID-19 and the Hunter Biden laptop. They argue that there is evidence of federal law enforcement agents being present during the Capitol riot, but the interviewer challenges this claim. The speaker also brings up the concept of entrapment and gives examples of alleged government involvement in criminal activities. They criticize the selective release of footage and argue that the government cannot incite individuals to commit crimes and then charge them for it. The interviewer attempts to counter the speaker's arguments.

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th and suggests that it was not an inside job. They argue that the government has a history of lying to the public and suppressing information. They mention the presence of federal agents during the Capitol riot and claim that there is evidence of entrapment. They also bring up a case of alleged entrapment involving the FBI and a kidnapping plot. The speaker believes that the government should not be able to manipulate individuals into committing crimes and then charge them for it. They criticize the mainstream media for misleading the public.

During a town hall with CNN, the speaker discussed the January 6th incident and the possibility of FBI entrapment. They questioned why footage of police using rubber bullets and tear gas on the crowd had been suppressed. The speaker believed that the violence was instigated by the Capitol Police, who threw munitions and injured people outside the Capitol. They mentioned instances of police brutality, including a man who suffered a heart attack and died after being hit by a concussion grenade. The speaker expressed concern about the lack of coverage and video evidence of these events. They emphasized the importance of transparency to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The speaker expresses concern about the events of January 6th, stating that if they had been told about it three years ago, they would have dismissed it as a conspiracy theory. They argue that the government has systematically lied about various issues, such as COVID-19 origins and the Hunter Biden laptop. The speaker suggests that there were federal law enforcement agents present during the Capitol riot, but the interviewer challenges this claim. The speaker also mentions instances of entrapment by the government, including the alleged plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer. They argue that the government cannot incite individuals to commit crimes and then charge them for it. The interviewer attempts to correct the speaker's statements.