reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker conducted a study on the impact of vaccines on the microbiome. They found a decrease in Bifidobacteria in patients post-vaccination, suggesting a potential link to the vaccine. Further research showed persistent damage to the microbiome even months later. Additionally, newborns of vaccinated mothers had no Bifidobacteria in their microbiome, raising concerns about the transfer of spike proteins through breast milk.

The speaker discusses the Vaxelis vaccine, a six-in-one vaccine for children aged six weeks to four years, protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus B, and hepatitis B. The speaker references the package insert, noting epinephrine and other agents should be available during administration. The speaker highlights a review by the Institute of Medicine that found a causal relationship between tetanus toxoid and both brachial neuritis and Guillain Barre syndrome, a type of paralysis. Apnea following intramuscular vaccination has been observed in some infants. The speaker claims there were no randomized controlled studies with an inert placebo during the vaccine's development, only tests against other vaccinations. Ingredients include aluminum, formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin, neomycin, Streptomycin, and Polymyxin B. The speaker points out that Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.

A 2008 Swedish study examined infants after they received diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, polio, and Hib vaccines at 3 and 5 months. Researchers extracted blood and exposed it to the whooping cough toxin, then observed genetic changes after 12 hours. The study reported the activation of 33 allergy-related genes, 66 asthma genes, 67 cancer genes, and 25 immunological genes. The speaker notes that while these genes were activated, it doesn't mean everyone immediately develops these diseases. The speaker concludes by stating that the long-term effects of this genetic activation are unknown unless something intervenes to shut them down.

Speaker 0 argues that to determine whether smoking causes lung cancer, you must compare smokers to non-smokers. They recount a sequence of flawed study designs that would falsely conclude no link: comparing two smokers with different consumption levels and finding the same cancer rates; comparing different cigarette brands among smokers and again finding no difference; comparing people in different towns who all smoke and finding no difference. The point is that all these comparisons fail because they do not include a non-smoker control group; thus they cannot establish causation. They then contrast this with vaccine studies, asserting that studies claiming vaccines don’t cause chronic diseases or autism do not compare vaccinated to unvaccinated children. Instead, such studies compare vaccinated children to other vaccinated children, with variations in vaccines received (e.g., MMR, DTaP, multiple vaccines in one visit) and with differing aluminum exposures (e.g., four milligrams vs two milligrams). They emphasize that these studies never examine the actual outcome of interest by comparing vaccinated against unvaccinated children. The speaker maintains that this flaw in vaccine studies mirrors the earlier tobacco example. The essential argument is that the only way to determine causation is to compare the exposure group (vaccinated children) to an appropriate control group (unvaccinated children). They reference the Henry Ford trial as an example of an unvaccinated-versus-vaccinated comparison, but note that no one has published or accessible data from it. They call for someone brave enough to conduct and publish a vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated study to settle the issue. Finally, they challenge proponents of vaccination to conduct such a study to prove their position, insisting that if vaccines are truly safe and non-causal for chronic diseases or autism, the study should be done and the data published to demonstrate that the claim is correct. The overall message is a insistence on direct, unambiguous vaccinated-versus-unvaccinated comparisons to establish causality, highlighting perceived gaps in current vaccine research and urging transparent data publication.

A speaker is sharing information about the Vaxelis vaccine, referencing the package insert. The vaccine is a six-in-one shot for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, haemophilus b, and hepatitis b, indicated for children six weeks to four years old. The speaker notes epinephrine and other equipment must be available during vaccination. The Institute of Medicine found a causal relationship between tetanus toxoid and brachial neuritis and Guillain Barre syndrome. Apnea has been observed in some infants after intramuscular vaccination. The speaker claims there were no randomized controlled studies with an inert placebo, only tests against other vaccines. Ingredients include 319 micrograms of aluminum, formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin, neomycin, streptomycin, and polymyxin b. The speaker points out that Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.

Pediatricians recommend getting both the valent and neococcal vaccines within the first three months of a baby's life. However, there are concerns about potential neurological damage and permanent effects. The incidence of these issues is not clear, as reactions are often not recognized or attributed to something else. Some children have experienced serious problems, including autism, which some believe is correlated with vaccines. However, the scientific community has dismissed this correlation. Vaccines have been crucial in eradicating diseases like polio, and without them, these diseases could resurface. The safety and effectiveness of vaccines are supported by numerous studies, although some claim they can cause tumors and other health issues.

A study used a monitor to track infant breathing and apnea events (pauses in breathing). Before vaccination, infants experienced a small number of apnea events nightly. On the night of vaccination, apnea events spiked. Day two after vaccination showed double the apnea events of day one, aligning with death data. Apnea events continued for weeks, with another peak around day seven, though not as high as day two. A case report documented the simultaneous deaths of twin infants, previously healthy, recorded as SIDS. The author of the report stated that the likelihood of twins dying simultaneously of SIDS is not credible.

The speaker described observing a growing trend of patients choosing not to vaccinate over the next decade and sought to determine if he could prove differences. He collected data from his practice, examining every baby born there, and published the findings in an international journal of public health. The study, described as peer reviewed and robust, reported massive increases in several health outcomes among the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, including four to five hundred percent more allergies, autoimmune conditions, and neurodevelopmental issues, as well as infections of all kinds. Following the online publication of the study, he received a call from his attorney instructing him not to see any patients, not to write any prescriptions, and not to enter the office. He was told, “Your license has been emergently suspended. You are a threat to public health.” He stated, “Today is the last time I will be doing clinical medicine in Oregon.” He added, “Knowing that you guys are keeping it going, the heart of this place lives on.”

Epidemiological studies are easily manipulated, and studies comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated groups are lacking. The CDC conducted such a study in 1999 under Thomas Verstraten, examining children who received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life compared to those vaccinated later or not at all. The study found a 1,135 percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. This result was shocking, so the study was kept secret and manipulated through five iterations to bury the link.

The speaker conducted a study on the effects of vaccines on the microbiome. They found that the bifidobacteria, an important microbe for immunity, decreased in patients after vaccination. This led them to suspect that the vaccine may be causing the loss of bifidobacteria. They also discovered that newborns born to vaccinated mothers had no bifidobacteria in their microbiome, which raised concerns about the spike protein in breast milk. The speaker connected this research to their work on autism, where a loss of bifidobacteria is common. They emphasized the importance of studying the microbiome in various diseases and published posters on the loss of bifidobacteria in Crohn's and Lyme patients. The speaker hopes for further research to prove their hypothesis.

The speaker discusses the Vaxelis vaccine, a six-in-one vaccine for children aged six weeks to four years, protecting against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus B, and hepatitis B. The speaker notes the package insert states epinephrine and other agents must be available during vaccination. They highlight a review by the Institute of Medicine found a causal relationship between tetanus toxoid and both brachial neuritis and Guillain Barre syndrome, a type of paralysis. Apnea following intramuscular vaccination has been observed in some infants. The speaker claims there were no randomized controlled studies with an inert placebo, only tests against other vaccines. Ingredients include aluminum, formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin, neomycin, Streptomycin, and Polymyxin B. The speaker points out Vaxelis has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or impairment of fertility.

A Swedish study from 2008 examined infants after they received their routine vaccinations, including diphtheria, pertussis, polio, and Hib. Blood samples were taken from these babies and exposed to the whooping cough toxin found in the vaccine. The results showed activation of 33 allergy-related genes, 66 asthma genes, 67 cancer genes, and 25 immunological genes after 12 hours. This indicates a genetic response triggered by the vaccines. However, it remains unclear whether these activated genes lead to diseases, as not everyone will experience these outcomes. The long-term effects depend on whether these gene activations are suppressed or not.

Rats can be given food allergies by administering aluminum adjuvant from the hepatitis B vaccine along with a specific protein like peanut or dairy. This induces a permanent allergy to that protein. Vaccines not only contain aluminum adjuvant but also peanut oil excipients, potentially contributing to peanut allergies in a generation. The aluminum adjuvant can also trigger allergies to substances in the environment at the time of vaccination, such as Timothy weed. A study by Mawson indicates that vaccinated children have 30 times the rate of allergic rhinitis compared to unvaccinated children. The speaker claims that the prevalence of allergies in children is linked to the aluminum in vaccines.

A Swedish study from 2008 examined infants after they received their routine vaccinations, including diphtheria, pertussis, polio, and Hib, at 3 and 5 months. Researchers analyzed blood samples exposed to the whooping cough toxin, which is part of the vaccine, and observed genetic changes 12 hours later. They found that 33 allergy-related genes, 66 asthma genes, 67 cancer genes, and 25 immunological genes were activated. While these genetic changes were noted, it remains uncertain whether they lead to diseases in all individuals. The long-term effects depend on whether these activated genes are subsequently suppressed.

We couldn't find any prelicensing safety trials for the 72 vaccines doses that are recommended for American children. Unlike other medications, vaccines were exempt from conducting safety trials that compare health outcomes between a placebo group and a vaccine group. This lack of safety trials is concerning considering the widespread use of these vaccines.

A birth cohort study on the impact of childhood vaccination on short- and long-term chronic health outcomes reports results from a large sample (18,468 subjects). The discussion surrounding the study emphasizes that, if results showed vaccines were associated with chronic diseases, the findings would be highly compelling and valuable. The reported outcomes from the vaccinated group include: - Asthma diagnosis: vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis. - Acute and chronic ear infections: six hundred percent more. - Speech disorders: four point four seven times the amount in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. - Learning issues and related developmental concerns: a six hundred and sixteen percent increase in learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, and language delays. In contrast, the unvaccinated group is described as having zero occurrences in several categories, including dysfunction, diabetes, behavioral problems, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, tics, and other psychological disabilities. The discussion highlights the magnitude of the differences as a major point of emphasis, with statements such as “It’s a big difference” and “This is devastating.” There is strong advocacy for the study’s publication, including claims that “This paper should have been rushed to publication on an emergency basis.” The speakers assert, “We are systematically making kids sick and not just a little bit sick, very sick.” They describe the study as potentially “the most important study that has ever been done,” insisting that it needs to be published, and noting that if a particular researcher “puts his name on this, his career is over.” Emotional reactions are evident, with admissions like “I mean, obviously, like, really emotional.” There is a specific mention that “Zervos probably gonna lose his job over this.”

The childhood vaccine schedule is under scrutiny, with the World Council For Health calling for a moratorium on childhood vaccines due to safety concerns. Vaccines given in multiple rounds may contribute to neuropsychiatric disorders like ADHD, autism, and seizures. Studies suggest that children who receive no vaccines have better outcomes.

We couldn't find a prelicensing safety trial for any of the 72 vaccines doses recommended for American children. Unlike other medications, vaccines were exempt from conducting safety trials that compare health outcomes between a placebo group and a vaccine group.

The speaker conducted a study on the effects of vaccines on the microbiome. They found that the Bifidobacteria, an important microbe for immunity, decreased in patients after vaccination. This led them to believe that the vaccine may be creating a bacteriophage or bifidophage that kills off certain microbes. They also noticed a lack of bifidobacteria in newborns born to vaccinated mothers, which could potentially be linked to conditions like autism. The speaker emphasized the importance of studying the microbiome in various diseases and highlighted the need to investigate what is causing the loss of bifidobacteria. They conducted their own research and discovered that some products claiming to contain bifidobacteria did not actually have it. Research is ongoing to further explore these findings.

Mainstream media claims that the link between autism and vaccines has been debunked through studies. However, these studies only examined the MMR vaccine and thimerosal. The Institute of Medicine stated that vaccines administered during the first six months of life have never been studied for a link to autism. The vaccines given in the first six months include DTaP, hep B, and pneumococcal. The only vaccine studied was DTaP, and the study showed a link to autism. However, the Institute of Medicine discounted the study because it was based on the CDC's VAERS system, which they deemed too unreliable for studying vaccine injury. They stated that the CDC's only surveillance system is inadequate for conducting reliable studies.

In a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children, it was found that those who received vaccines in their first year of life were 2.48 times more likely to be diagnosed with gastrointestinal disorders. The study also showed that receiving just one vaccine or more during the first year of life led to twice as many developmental delays, 4.5 times more asthma cases, and twice as many ear infections. The study grouped partially and fully vaccinated children together and compared them to the unvaccinated group.

Researchers monitoring babies noticed alarms going off after vaccinations, specifically with the DPT vaccine. They found a pattern: within 48 hours post-vaccination, every child experienced respiratory issues and was more likely to stop breathing. Data analysis revealed recurring spikes in these episodes, not only within the initial 48 hours but also at five to seven days and again at sixteen days following vaccination. This data indicates that respiratory issues following vaccination are not limited to the first 48 hours, as is commonly believed.

A study compared vaccinated and unvaccinated children and found that nasal allergy, allergic rhinitis, and autism were significantly higher in the vaccinated group. The risk of nasal allergy was 30 times higher, while autism was 4.2 times higher in vaccinated children. Additionally, vaccinated children were four times more likely to be diagnosed with pneumonia compared to the unvaccinated group. This study highlights the potential risks associated with childhood vaccinations.

The DTP vaccine, which protects against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis, was discontinued in the U.S. due to severe adverse effects, including brain injuries and deaths in 1 in 300 children. While it is still administered to millions of children in Africa, a Danish government inquiry into its efficacy revealed alarming findings. Studies conducted over 30 years showed that vaccinated girls were dying at ten times the rate of unvaccinated girls from diseases like anemia and pneumonia, which had never been linked to the vaccine. Although the DTP vaccine protected against its targeted diseases, it compromised the immune systems of these girls, leaving them vulnerable to other minor illnesses. This highlights the necessity for long-term studies on vaccine impacts, a concern not adequately addressed in the U.S.

Study: Impact of childhood vaccination on short and long term chronic health outcomes in children, a birth cohort study. 18,468 subjects. 'The vaccinated subjects were over four times more likely to have an asthma diagnosis.' 'Six hundred percent more acute and chronic ear infections.' 'Four point four seven times the amount of speech disorders in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.' 'Five and a half times risk. Six hundred and sixteen percent increase.' 'Learning issues, developmental delays, speech delays, language delays.' 'Amongst the unvaccinated group, there were zero. There was zero brain dysfunction, zero diabetes, zero behavioral problems, zero learning disabilities, zero intellectual disabilities.' 'This is devastating.' 'This is an inconvenient study for the entire vaccine agenda.'