reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We found that the government was essentially sending untraceable blank checks. If a public company did this, they'd be delisted and executives would go to prison, but it's normal in the government. We recommended to the Treasury and Federal Reserve that payment categorization codes be mandatory, not optional, and that every payment need some explanation, even if we don't judge the quality of it. This is a radical change that's now being implemented. I'm guessing it probably saves about $100 billion a year. Where was that money going? It's hard to say if it was waste or fraud. Many payments were just approved and kept going even after the approving officer changed jobs, retired, or died. It's like forgetting to cancel a gym membership, but instead of $20 a month, it's $20 billion a year.

The discussion describes live activity at the White House North Portico on the North Lawn, where scaffolding and renovation work were said to be “standard renovations,” but large sheets have been hung over the structure. The question raised is whether more than routine architectural upkeep is being done. The second speaker claims the sheets are effectively a printed cover of the White House that preserves the appearance of the building from Lafayette Park while work continues out of view. They argue this is connected to construction they say is occurring in the East Wing, including ballroom construction and an underground military facility center, rather than merely column restoration. They contrast the North and South porticos: the South portico is described as the prominent scenic entrance where Marine One helicopters land; the North portico is described as the covered motorcade entrance on Pennsylvania Avenue for vehicles to unload and enter directly. The speaker says the North portico is the one covered over and alleges that a chandelier was taken down during restorations, suggesting workspace for infrastructure “underneath the ballroom,” including “technology” installed below. A third statement is introduced: “The ballroom essentially becomes a shed for what's being built under the military, including from drones.” The speaker then portrays the covered area as holding physical tools for a classified military facility, including “GPU racks, server racks” and “secure communication skills.” They connect this to concerns about sensitive data and a supposed rush to place it “under the executive office of the president” before legal processes like subpoena or FOIA could occur. The transcript cites claims involving “Doge” and unauthorized handling of sensitive government data, including an assertion that Social Security Administration confidential data was sent through unauthorized servers and that the SSA could not confirm what was taken or where it ended up. The speaker further claims a unified database is being built under the East Wing, framed as dangerous because it unifies information that has historically been kept in separate agencies and databases, creating access rules and safeguards. They also list related developments they say support the unified-database idea: a “modified version of the SAVE Act” described as narrowing immigration status and fusing social security identity records and citizenship information with bulk searches of state voter rolls into a single lookup. They reference the “Genesis Mission” as training and deploying AI using sensitive federal data, and they state that on June 4 Trump ordered multiple agencies and the NSA to share AI models and data and expand secure computing infrastructure. They add that three weeks later the White House Office of Administration signed a long-term data storage agreement and funded a building alteration contract with minimal public description, and then sheets went up at the North Portico. Finally, the speaker predicts that around July 22, when “Genesis Mission Awards” are announced, journalists should watch the North Portico because the sheets may come down, and they suggest that any “GPU” entry would be consequential.

Replica case folders are used when government employees retire. Compiling these folders is done by hand and takes six months. The process involves moving the folders around on carts through a mine for storage. Calculations are also done by hand. The speaker states that processing these folders is more difficult than doing taxes in the dark. They are bringing this retirement process online with modern software. As of tonight, 25 retirees are going through an entirely online retirement process for the first time. This is a collaboration with retirement services inside OPM. The record for one retiree is a whole pallet with 27 boxes of paper.

The transcript claims that Eris Labs, described as the company holding “all of TikTok’s user data,” partnered with an AI company that converts user-generated content into “searchable military intelligence.” The transcript says Eris Labs and this partnership were described in a June 4 post on Oracle’s blog, and that Oracle is “the other company” involved. It further states that Eris Labs and Oracle began working together “a little over a year ago,” and that Eris Labs has been operating “in stealth for a little over two and a half years,” making the exact start date of any work with Larry Ellison or the American government unclear. The transcript says Eris Labs is operating out of Washington, DC. It describes Eris Labs as headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, with “most of their team and all of their R&D out of there,” and notes that “three of their founders are veterans of Israeli intelligence.” The transcript says Amos Lahav spent “nineteen years running operations out of the Israeli Prime Minister's office,” and that the year he left that job he started Eris. The transcript says Eris Labs markets itself as a military software company that “processes battlefield footage,” which Oracle’s blog calls “Accelerating Media Exploitation.” It asserts that this same technology could be used to identify individuals in TikTok videos taken from a protest live stream, stating that the tool could produce identification of “every- single person in it,” depending on the query. The transcript says Oracle’s blog post includes content about domestic threats, claiming “Domestic terriers pose a significant threat to the US according to the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security,” and that domestic terriers “often use online platforms such as social media and gaming to communicate radical ideas” and “mobilize” people. It then quotes a separate Israeli newspaper interview in which Eris Labs’ CEO is said to have stated that after the October 7th attacks, they began “extracting intelligence from even TikTok videos.” The transcript emphasizes timing, stating that the White House signed an executive order giving Oracle custody of TikTok on September 25, 2025, and that “18 days later,” on October 13, 2025, Oracle added Harris Labs to their defense ecosystem. It claims this supports the view that Oracle is a “national security threat,” adding that defense contractors of Oracle’s size “shouldn't be allowed to invest in media properties,” while stating that a law is not in place. The transcript also references statements attributed to Larry Ellison about citizens being on “their best behavior” because they are “constantly recording and reporting,” and links Ellison’s investments to control of media outlets via “Oracle stocks” to buy CNN and CBS, then concluding by describing a scenario where one family holds “one hand on the surveillance infrastructure” and another holds a social media platform. It ends by claiming that “so is Eris” and instructs viewers on TikTok to “share accordingly.”

A basic search of the Social Security database revealed 20 million dead people marked as alive. While it's unclear if they're directly receiving Social Security payments, their "alive" status allows them to fraudulently obtain disability, unemployment, and fake medical payments. The fraud occurs because government databases don't communicate well. For example, the Treasury's main payments computer, PAM, handles $5 trillion in payments annually, roughly a billion dollars an hour. We discovered payments lacked categorization codes and descriptions, essentially untraceable blank checks. If a public company operated this way, it would be delisted, and executives would face imprisonment.

A federal consulting group within the Department of Interior managed contracts for various agencies. One contract was for $830 million to conduct surveys. The surveys were simple, consisting of 10 questions on an 8.5 x 11 sheet of paper, easily created by a child or AI. This contract was stopped after the inauguration. The speaker stated that the contract was a fraud.

The speaker was asked to help fix retirement in the government and discovered that all paper documents for the retirement process are housed in a mine in Pennsylvania. This mine contains 22,000 filing cabinets stacked 10 high, holding 400 million pieces of paper. The retirement process, largely unchanged since the 1950s, involves physical paperwork and can take many months. Currently, the government can only process about 8,000 retirements a month, with processing times taking six to nine months, and calculations are often incorrect. The goal is to digitize the process, creating an online system that takes only a few days. The speaker believes civil servants are subjected to outdated processes and aims to provide a modern, user-friendly experience. The overhaul is expected to be completed in the next couple of months.

Speaker 0: Trump is not building a ballroom. Andrew Kerr, an architect with over twenty years of federal project experience, posted on Facebook and walked through step by step why this ballroom makes no sense. He did the math: $300,000,000 at 90,000 square feet would be about $3,333 per square foot, and he said that even luxury federal construction doesn’t usually approach $1,000 per square foot. The geometry of the renderings is nearly impossible, showing a building with a 380 by 235 foot footprint, but interior views show maybe 200 by 100 feet, which is 20,000 square feet, so that can’t exist in the same building. Construction drawings look like they were thrown together in about a week, and he suggested they were probably thrown together by Grock, or whoever’s still wandering around the White House from Doge. So the million dollar question is what is he building? The answer, he suggests, is an underground data center. Think about where they’re building. It’s not random. It’s the East Wing, where the PEOC bunker is, the tunnel systems that connect the White House to the Treasury to other federal buildings, and where all of the secure communications infrastructure lives. That’s prime underground real estate. It reminds me of Larry Ellison’s Oracle data centers in underground Jerusalem: nine stories deep, 160 feet below ground, 460,000 square feet, costing $319,000,000 per bunker. The White House is already at $300,000,000 for this “ballroom,” and it’s only climbing. Fiscally, it feels like a more apt comparison to those. Outside of architecture anomalies, the fact that this is privately funded should have been the first red flag. This is Donald Trump, the man who has spent taxpayer money on stuff that benefits him. He spent over $3,900,000,000 in taxpayer money just to make over Air Force One. Didn’t he also have Secret Service pay room bills at Mar-a-Lago? This suggests it isn’t serving him; it’s serving someone else specifically. Look at the donor list: defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Booz Allen Hamilton, tech giants like Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft, Palantir, crypto companies like Coinbase, Ripple, and Tether, and telecoms like T-Mobile and Comcast. These aren’t people funding a party space; these are companies with interests in government infrastructure, data, and operations. They’re funding infrastructure that directly serves them. Also, about Larry Ellison’s vision to automate the government: many tech pros talk about automating federal operations or creating a single digital platform for the government, which would require a supremely secure physical home for that system. Placing it directly under the White House would eliminate latency problems and ensure the President has direct physical control over the system’s core. Centralizing control and securing the brain of the government. It’s dystopian in many ways, and these are real developments happening worldwide. The companies funding this are buying access to integrate their systems with how the government operates, and that’s what $300,000,000 will get you. I guess.

Donald Trump suggested Elon Musk audit the federal government. One speaker believes AI can democratize government and increase transparency, or enslave citizens to the government and intelligence agencies, and that Musk understands this best. The Pentagon has failed every audit for the last 20 years and lost $4.3 trillion in the last audit. This money was primarily lost on equipment purchases whose locations are unknown, forcing the Pentagon to repurchase them. These problems are solvable with AI, which could track stockpiles and warehouses to identify the location of equipment.

Before Elon Musk, no one knew about the unnamed bureaucrats in our government. Now, Musk is being scrutinized for the transparency and access he's providing. We're happy to provide the receipts, showing contracts that DOGE found across our government. For example, there's a $36,000 DEI contract for US citizenship and immigration services, and a $3.4 million contract for inclusive innovation at the US Patent and Trademark Office. There's also $57,000 for climate change in Sri Lanka. DOGE is identifying these line items daily and moving very fast. This administration is transparent about what DOGE is doing. We're providing transparency and accessibility daily. We also have a DOGE daily report available with all of their findings, and we're happy to provide this information.

Trump's bill contains a clause barring all 50 states from regulating AI for the next decade. The Trump administration granted Palantir Technology contracts to develop a federal platform powered by its AI-driven foundry software, consolidating sensitive personal data from multiple agencies. Palantir was founded by Alex Karp and Peter Thiel, and a significant portion is owned by BlackRock. This follows Elon's resignation from DOGE, which cut less than $100 billion in spending. DOGE employees worked for and lobbied for Palantir, raising questions about whether DOGE's purpose was to access classified data while creating the illusion of bureaucratic reform. This may have been an effort to expand the surveillance state and provide Palantir with backdoor access. Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene were the only members of congress to speak out against this. Greene voted for the bill and claimed she didn't see the clause.

Daniel, while doing metrics review, noticed indicators of compromise, including a 200-300% increase in data being moved out of the NLRB system, specifically 10 gigabytes worth of data from an internal record-keeping device containing private information about union organizers and privileged business data. The White House stated this was part of an effort to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse. However, within fifteen minutes of Doge engineers creating accounts, someone from Russia allegedly tried to log in with the credentials. There are also claims that data is being exfiltrated using Starlink, potentially funneling information directly into Russia. Internal databases throughout the government, including those at the Department of Treasury, Energy, and Defense, have reportedly been opened to the internet. Logs and records of what the Doge team accessed are missing specifically after the data spike incident, including whether they accessed information related to cases about Elon Musk, whose companies have faced complaints at the NLRB.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obfuscation because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, a first for any administration. They bypassed gatekeepers and uncovered shocking data. We're talking payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to $100 billion. Funds were also traced to entities like Internews Network, pushing a specific viewpoint globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about it; we accessed the data directly and exposed it. It's only been twenty days, and we're already releasing a lot. People are trying to slow us down, but the main question is can we stop their grift?

Speaker 0 visited a mine used for storing physical media, specifically filing cabinets dating back to the 1960s, containing retirement paperwork. The speaker questions why paper is still used in 2025, showing an example of a retiree's case folder, which is compiled by hand and moved through the mine. Speaker 1 adds that the retirement process can take over six months due to the manual compilation and storage of paper documents, with calculations also done by hand. Speaker 0 states that the paperwork is extensive and difficult to process. They are implementing modern software to bring the retirement process online, and currently have 25 retirees going through an entirely online retirement process for the first time.

Speaker 0 discusses The New York Times piece about Trump tapping Palantir to compile data on Americans, noting mixed reactions online and outlining the background. In March, President Trump signed an executive order calling for the federal government to share data across agencies, raising questions about a potential master list of personal information and untold surveillance power. Behind the scenes, officials have quietly placed technological building blocks to enable the plan, with Palantir—the data analysis and technology firm—playing a central role. Palantir is described as more than a data firm. The Trump administration has expanded Palantir’s work across the federal government in recent months. The company has received more than 113,000,000 in federal government spending since Trump took office, including new contracts with the Department of Homeland Security and the Pentagon, plus existing contracts. A separate note mentions a $795,000,000 Department of Defense contract awarded last week that has not yet been spent. Representatives of Palantir are said to be in discussions with at least two other agencies—the Social Security Administration and the Internal Revenue Service—about buying its technology, according to six government officials and Palantir employees. A key Palantir product, Foundry, is used in at least four federal agencies, including DHS and the HHS, widely adopted to organize and analyze data and to pave the way for merging information from different agencies. This is linked to the ability to create detailed portraits of Americans based on government data. Government officials say the administration has sought access to hundreds of data points on citizens and others through government databases, including bank account numbers, student debt amounts, medical claims, and disability status. Critics say such data access could be used to advance political agendas, policing immigrants, and punishing critics; privacy advocates, student unions, and labor rights organizations have filed lawsuits to block data access. A notable point in the piece is that Palantir’s selection as a chief vendor was driven by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, with at least three Doge members formerly at Palantir and two others who had worked at Peter Thiel-funded companies. Some current and former Palantir employees have expressed unease, with 13 former employees signing a letter urging Palantir to stop its endeavors with President Trump, including Linda Shah, a Palantir engineer who left last year, who said the concern was not the technology but how the administration planned to use it. The article also notes Palantir’s main products: Foundry and Gotham, the latter described as helping organize and draw conclusions from data and tailored for security and defense purposes. Gotham is interpreted by some as precrime software. Palantir was founded with initial funding from the CIA’s venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel, and Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, and In-Q-Tel also funded Founders Fund. Speaker 1 interjects with a quote from Palantir’s Alex Karp claiming Palantir built PG to stop the rise of the far right in Europe and to distribute the COVID vaccine with Foundry, and to create a “digital kill chain.” Speaker 0 questions the desirability of a technology that compiles banking data, social security information, online presence, and other personal data for precrime analysis across government, especially under an administration associated with claims of stopping a far-right rise. The discussion continues with concerns about the potential weaponization of data and the implications for speech, political ideology, and dissent.

The discussion centers on why data centers are expanding so rapidly despite the claim that existing phone and television usage already relies on server storage. Participants cite large-scale developments such as Loudoun County, Virginia’s “never-ending” complexes and a proposed 40,000-acre AI data center campus in Utah described as “two and a half times larger than Manhattan,” with claims that Utah lacks water and that the data center would require more than double the current energy consumption of the entire state of Utah. The question raised is what is really happening behind this scale and where the collected information goes. One participant links the projects to “intel” involvement, pointing to companies said to include Palantir, Nvidia, and Abraxas, and to allegations that some of these firms received CIA investments to start, including staffing by retired senior CIA officers. This leads to questions about whether “the CIA [is] spying on our own people,” referencing Edward Snowden’s revelations and mentioning NSA’s and CIA’s surveillance of Americans. The conversation states that NSA’s charter includes a restriction that it may not spy on Americans, and notes that Snowden’s disclosures are described as the reason people “wouldn’t have any idea” without them. The Utah compound is described with a claim that it has enough memory storage for every phone call, every email, and every text message from every American for the next 500 years, prompting questions about why that amount of storage exists and why such facilities are “everywhere,” and what information they are collecting. The conversation shifts to personal protection, with a suggestion that it is “almost impossible now” and a recommendation that the only way to protect yourself is to “own no technology at all,” referencing Eric Rudolph or the Unabomber as examples. The participant further claims that governments and intelligence agencies are “scooping up” data and holding it, and contrasts earlier post-9/11 practices—where obtaining information required federal judges to approve warrants—with newer methods. The transcript claims that instead of warrants, the government can use “national security letters” to require providers to turn over all information on a named person, or can query the data centers directly by inputting a name so that information “pops up,” describing a lack of legal protections and stating that these actions are “legal now.” It concludes by naming the National Defense Authorization Act of 2016 (and National Defense Act of 2016 as referenced in the transcript) as the change that made this legal.

My Reagan administration mentors couldn't penetrate bureaucratic obstacles because they lacked technical expertise. Elon Musk's team gained direct access to tech systems, something unprecedented for any president. They bypassed the usual obstruction and uncovered shocking data. They saw payments to individuals with duplicate or missing social security numbers, totaling billions. Money flowed to entities like Internews Network, pushing a left-leaning agenda globally, and even to protesters worldwide. We're being transparent about accessing the data and revealing these findings. Despite facing resistance and attempts to slow us down, we're actively releasing information, and more is coming soon. The real question is whether we will be stopped from continuing this process.

Sam Altman, Elon Musk, and Jeff Bezos did not build AI, according to the speaker. In 1956, scientists at Dartmouth College—math professor John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, Nathaniel Rochester, and Claude Shannon—coined the term “artificial intelligence” and received a $7,500 private grant to study whether machines could think. The speaker says subsequent AI research funding came for decades from DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), which the speaker describes as using American taxpayers’ money; the speaker claims AI was “born” in classrooms and government labs rather than a Silicon Valley garage. The speaker then contrasts this with Altman, Bezos, and Musk, saying they “scraped” vast amounts of existing human work—“every book ever written,” “every photo ever taken,” “every song,” “every story,” and “every medical record”—“without asking, without paying, without telling you,” and then built a subscription model around users’ history. The speaker describes this as theft rather than innovation. The speaker also references DARPA’s role in inventing the internet in the 1960s using tax dollars, and says Google later built a search engine on top of it while keeping access free and funding itself through ads, resulting in a data exchange. The speaker claims the courts are “catching up,” citing “half of a million authors” suing Anthropic (backed by Jeff Bezos) for downloading millions of “pirated books” to train AI, and says a settlement totaled $1.5 billion. The speaker adds that Bezos did not write those books but funded a company that stole them. The speaker shifts to Andrew Carnegie, described as the richest man in the world who arrived in America with nothing, built a steel empire, and gave away 90% of his fortune. The speaker says Carnegie built a partnership in which communities provided land, books, and staff while Carnegie provided the building, leading to 2,509 free public libraries. The speaker quotes Carnegie: “The man who dies rich, dies in disgrace,” and says his foundation still gives millions to libraries a century after his death. The speaker contrasts Carnegie’s giving with a claim that Jeff Bezos said on national television that doubling his taxes “isn’t going to help that teacher in Queens.” The speaker concludes by saying AI systems are using accumulated human knowledge to replace the humans who process it, characterizing this as a takeover built on what society created without permission or payment, and ends by asking what Carnegie would say if he saw what the speaker describes as today’s actions.

Total Information Awareness (TIA) was defunded by Congress not long after it launched because mainstream media and organizations like the ACLU said it would end privacy for Americans and was unconstitutional. It was described as something that would spy on all Americans and decide who would commit a crime before it happened, including terror attacks and bioterror, and even pandemics before they happen. The policies behind TIA resurfaced during the Trump administration during COVID, with Palantir as the contractor for those efforts. TIA originated related to MAINCORE. The claim is that they would use every telephone call, every text, every Google search, and every website visited, collecting all of that data and putting it into a database on an individual. After the invention, organizations pushed back, and the government said they wouldn’t pursue it anymore. Palantir then stepped in, arguing they could do it, even though Palantir did not exist yet at that time. It is claimed that Palantir was created by Peter Thiel as TIA faced public backlash, and that in the setup they used Richard Pearl to connect with Poindexter, who was running TIA, to privatize the program and have Palantir do what TIA had intended to do. TIA, although housed in DARPA, was intimately pushed and developed with CIA involvement, specifically by the CIA’s chief information officer at the time, Alan Wade, who is described as a business partner of Ghislain Maxwell’s sister Christine. A broader scope is highlighted to show the ominousness of these efforts, noting that Poindexter and a DARPA program manager were involved in LifeLog, a project seeking to build a database tracking a person’s entire existence. LifeLog aimed to collect an individual’s relationships and communications (phone calls, mail, email), plus media consumption, purchases, and more to build a digital record of everything a person says, sees, or does. LifeLog would then take unstructured data and organize it into discrete episodes or snapshots while mapping relationships, memories, events, and experiences. This context is tied to Peter Thiel’s current influence, with Thiel described as the person pushing these private-sector efforts and now being responsible for J. D. Vance’s funding and for connecting J. D. Vance with Donald Trump, including funding of Vance’s campaign. The discussion concludes with the claim that Palantir is really a CIA front.

According to the Brookings Institution's analysis of carbon tax timing, high fossil fuel prices are the worst time to impose a carbon tax, but are the best time to build the underlying market architecture. The transcript says that infrastructure is rapidly being built and deployed by the biggest multinational corporations, governments and states, and the United Nations, especially in the past few months. Announced at Davos in January 2026, EcoGuard is described as a carbon market platform that automates the full carbon credit life cycle. The carbon market is expected to reach $5,000,000,000,000 by 2035, and the infrastructure is described as designed to be invisible and ubiquitous—managing every transaction, settlement, and data point behind the scenes so the user is not aware of it. Also at Davos last January, Palantir CEO Alex Karp said that AI will destroy humanity's jobs and described a future where high school students train for factory jobs, no one goes to college, or immigrates, and black box software run by major government contractors determines whether society is being run properly. The transcript links “smart city” models—described as the fifteen minute city, smart city and freedom city models—to the incorporation of digital ID, carbon tracking, and population monitoring. It states that where a person lives, how far they travel, and their carbon footprint are already being tracked in multiple countries and several US cities. It contrasts this with “non compliant” people, saying that the prison business is booming. The transcript claims federal and state governments announced over $2,000,000,000 in new prison construction in the past year alone, and that the private sector dwarfs that amount. It says ICE’s detention budget quadrupled after a bill signed in July 2025, adding nearly $11,250,000,000 to ICE’s coffers every year through 2029. It quotes an ICE director saying he wanted a detention center that runs like Prime, but for human beings. It also says Palantir received a no bid contract from the USDA to track federal employees’ return to office compliance using real time analysis and continuous compliance monitoring, and that the contract includes the One Farmer, One File initiative to provide a unified database of land holdings, conservation practices, insurance claims, and financial data for every farmer who interacts with the USDA. The transcript then states that Palantir is assisting the United States and Israel in targeting operations against civilians across The Middle East. It notes that Palantir CEO Alex Karp published The Technological Republic in February 2025, described as an AI manifesto that inspired Keir Starmer’s government. It presents Karp’s central argument as merging state power with big tech, compared to the Manhattan Project, to save western civilization. It says Palantir is deployed by the Department of Homeland Security, Health and Human Services, the FDA, the CDC, and the NIH, and is in discussions with the IRS and the Social Security Administration. It further claims the Bank for International Settlements has published frameworks for CBDC interoperability enabling national digital currencies to communicate under a unified settlement layer, and that WorldCoin is building a worldwide biometric identity system intended to distinguish humans from AI agents at scale, operating in dozens of countries. The transcript concludes by describing a combined system of digital ID, stablecoin payments, carbon tracking, and AI-driven government efficiency, asserting that a driver’s license becomes a digital wallet and that compliance level determines access.

The speakers discuss the government's outdated paper-based retirement process, which involves storing physical files in a mine. One speaker recounts visiting the mine filled with filing cabinets from the 1960s, emphasizing its security and climate control, but questioning the continued use of paper in 2025. The process requires compiling retirement papers by hand, moving them on carts, and can take over six months, with calculations also done manually. They are implementing a new online retirement process, with 25 retirees currently using it. They mention cases of single retirees having entire pallets or shopping carts of documents. They want to free up the thousands of people who are carrying paper into a mine. They compare the government's technology to the "Flintstones" era. The conversation shifts to the postal service, which is legally required to have a balanced budget but has been losing money since 2007 due to additional regulations. The postal service lost $9.5 billion last year. They believe they can modernize it and help them become profitable.

A discussion introduces the National Design Studio (NDS) as an office described as “one of the most dangerous offices in the White House,” characterized as building “a parallel federal government inside the executive branch on private infrastructure,” and staffed by people previously linked to legal action involving federal data. The speaker notes that the TrumpRx federal prescription drug pricing website contains a footer line stating “designed and engineered in DC by National Design Studio” above the privacy policy. The speaker contrasts this with other federal websites, claiming they do not credit external design studios, and adds that the NDS name is hyperlinked to NDS’s website. The speaker says the TrumpRx site appears to have been created with Wix and widgets, and that the byline is “pretty weird because federal websites don’t have design bylines.” The speaker describes the NDS website as startup-like, with mainly mission-statement language and recruiting copy, and no page listing team members or leadership. During “digging,” the speaker says they found Joe Gebbia as the key name associated with NDS and identifies him as the chief design officer of the United States working with NDS. The speaker states that Joe Gebbia is the co-founder of Airbnb, stepped back from Airbnb in 2022, and that in September 2022 Tesla appointed him to its board of directors to fill a seat vacated by Larry Ellison, founder and chairman of Oracle. The speaker then ties Gebbia to a federal role: the speaker says that in August 2025 Donald Trump signed an executive order creating the National Design Studio and created the federal title “Chief Design Officer of the United States.” According to the speaker, Gebbia was named to that title on day one, and he reports directly to the White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles. The speaker says this reporting structure is unusual. The speaker claims NDS is staffed under a federal hiring authority called Section 3161, originally written for temporary advising bodies. The speaker asserts this means many people at NDS are “part-time advisor[s] or … volunteer[s],” which would result in them not appearing on the White House salary report and not filing financial disclosures. The speaker further claims NDS staff were not confirmed by the Senate and that they answer to no Inspector General because the Executive Office of the President does not have one. The speaker compares this setup to “DOGE,” stating DOGE gutted federal agencies, fired tens of thousands of career civil servants, and is currently a defendant in multiple federal lawsuits. The speaker specifically mentions lawsuits alleging engineers gained access to Social Security data and Department of Homeland Security data and shared sensitive federal data with outside parties attempting to overturn elections. The speaker then claims personal connection: the speaker says they found Joe Gebbia was a member of DOGE, that he spent six months there before his current position, and that one of the initiatives he personally led at DOGE was digitizing federal retirement paperwork. The speaker indicates this connects to “East Wing ballroom underground bunker stuff.”

I know people who worked in the Reagan administration. When they asked the bureaucracy questions, they were often blocked and deterred because they weren't technical. Elon Musk's team bypassed this by directly accessing the tech systems. No president has ever done this. They found crazy things like payments to people with duplicate or no social security numbers, totaling up to a hundred billion dollars. Payments were also going to organizations like Internews Network, which promotes a left-leaning point of view, and to protesters worldwide. My team is being transparent about it. We went to the data, we found it. We've only been at this for twenty days, so give us a chance. We're already releasing a lot of information. People are trying to slow us down, but the biggest question is whether we can stop their grift.

The discussion centers on Palantir Technologies and a proposed March 2025 executive order that would require federal agencies to share and control data, aiming to centralize government data using Palantir’s Foundry platform. It is claimed that Palantir has already deployed Foundry in at least four agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services, and that the company has received over $113 million in federal contracts since Trump took office, with a recent $795 million Department of Defense contract. The speakers allege that the initiative could enable a comprehensive database on all Americans—“light years beyond Real ID, the Patriot Act, and Prism”—and that those who control it seek “complete power over you and everyone else.” They warn of mass surveillance and privacy violations, lack of oversight, and potential political abuse. Key concerns include the breadth of data that Palantir’s system could merge, such as bank accounts, medical records, driving records, student debt, disability status, political affiliation, credit card expenditures, online purchases, tax filings, and travel and phone records, creating “detailed profiles on every single American.” The speakers argue this centralization would enable unchecked monitoring with “zero oversight,” increasing data security risks and the potential for breaches, leaks, or mismanagement. They emphasize a history of opaqueness in Palantir’s operations and tie the company’s AI tools to predictive policing and military applications lacking public accountability. They cite Palantir’s CEO Alex Karp as having controversial views and describe the firm as aligned with a profit-driven push for technomilitarism. The talk links Palantir to broader power dynamics, including ties to Elon Musk’s and Peter Thiel’s spheres, and suggests a technocratic oligarchy could emerge that prioritizes corporate and political agendas over public interest. While acknowledging stated goals like fraud detection and national security, the speakers assert the lack of checks and balances, and fear that the surveillance infrastructure would be embedded to be expanded by future governments. The “kill chain” terminology is discussed both in military and cyber contexts, with Palantir’s Gotham platform described as designed to shorten the kill chain by fusing large datasets into actionable intelligence, enabling faster targeting decisions. They provide examples like the use of Palantir to improve the accuracy and speed of Ukraine’s artillery strikes and, publicly, the Israeli Defense Forces’ use for striking targets in Gaza. The segment also mentions Palantir’s use in predictive policing, including tools used by the Los Angeles Police Department, and argues that Palantir aims to track “everybody, not just immigrants.” The speakers conclude that this centralized system is “light years beyond Real ID, the Patriot Act, or Prism” and advocate resisting it and “thinking of ways we can break the links in the kill chain.”