TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

There are concerns about the security of electronic voting machines, as they can potentially be hacked without detection. While there is no evidence of this happening, it cannot be proven that it hasn't or won't happen in the future. Instances of machine errors have been reported, such as recording extra votes for a candidate or subtracting votes instead of adding them. It is unknown how many instances went unnoticed and what impact they had on elections. Legislation is being proposed to require a paper trail for every electronic machine, similar to ATM receipts, to ensure transparency and allow for verification. An investigation is also being requested to assess the effectiveness of voting machines and improve election systems.

A senate report revealed that voting machines are aging and vulnerable to exploitation. A hacker demonstrated how easy it is to gain full admin access to a model used in 18 states. Professor Ed Felton documented how unattended voting machines can be manipulated by anyone. Additionally, some machines that claim not to be connected to the internet actually are, while others use cards programmed on internet-connected computers. In summary, all voting machines can be tampered with in some way. As an axe murderer once said, "pretty much everything is hackable."

A Georgia election official, who is a Democrat, discovered that none of the straight party Republican tickets in the recent runoff were being scanned. She contacted Dominion, the company responsible for the voting machines, and expressed her concern about the ballots going to adjudication instead of being counted. Dominion insisted that she just push the green button. Frustrated, she threatened to contact the local media. Dominion quickly sent someone to fix the issue. The Dominion representative acknowledged the problem and made a phone call. Ten minutes later, he returned and assured her that everything was fixed. It is important to note that the voting machines were not connected to the internet.

In general, would you say that Smartmatic software was designed with two principles in mind? Number one, it's easy to rig elections. Number two, it's hard to audit. That is correct. And is the same true for Dominion software? It's easy to rig an election with it, and it's hard to audit. That is correct.

We need to address issues with computer voting, as seen in Antrim County, Michigan. Despite a programming error, it was caught and corrected the same day. There is no evidence of a statewide software glitch affecting other elections. Let's focus on winning elections instead of worrying about false claims.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines even violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in the US. Antiquated machines in many states are particularly vulnerable. Demonstrations have shown how easily these machines can be hacked, with workers switching votes. Approximately 43% of American voters use machines with serious security flaws. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them even more susceptible to cyberattacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could significantly impact a close presidential election.

The outcome of elections is often influenced by the mechanics of the election process and access to communication channels. Republicans face challenges in getting their message across as they have limited media outlets compared to Democrats. This affects their ability to win elections. Democrats have more control over the election machinery and the American media, giving them an advantage. It's not about ideology, but about who holds power. Republicans need to address these issues by investing in communication channels and advocating for fair election rules. The recent election in Pennsylvania highlighted the impact of early voting, with a majority of Democrats voting early compared to Republicans. These problems can be fixed, but first, they need to be acknowledged.

In Antrim County, there was a software glitch that caused a miscalculation of votes, resulting in a 6,000 vote swing against Republican candidates. The county clerk admitted to the error and stated that 47 other counties use the same software. Antrim County had to manually count all the ballots, and it is important for the other counties using this software to carefully review their results for similar discrepancies. Transparency and openness are crucial for the people of Michigan.

The machines used in the election are tested by Maricopa County and the Secretary of State's office to ensure there is no tampering. If the machines fail these tests, they cannot be used.

In Antrim County, a software glitch caused a 6,000 vote swing from Republicans to Democrats. The county clerk admitted to the error, leading to a manual recount of all ballots. It was discovered that 47 other counties in Michigan use the same software and should review their results for discrepancies. Transparency and openness are essential for the people of Michigan.

Speaker 0 asks for reassurance that the upcoming election won't be rigged or stolen. Speaker 1 responds by mentioning that having Democrats in charge of the voting machines in Ohio is helpful. However, they also acknowledge that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past. Speaker 1 explains that those in power tend to try to tilt things in their favor.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. Even with limited knowledge and resources, hackers can breach these machines within minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates basic cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. Three companies control the majority of voting machines, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines. Researchers have found serious security flaws in 43% of American voting machines. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could impact a close presidential election. Concerns about the possibility of a successful hack are high.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

There was fraud in the election, including dead people voting. The machines played a role in this fraud. Instead of having hidden ballots, they stored them in a secret folder. After the polls closed, the machines matched unvoted ballots with unvoted voters. This was evident when the vote percentage reached 99% but the votes kept coming in. The denominator, which represents the remaining ballots, started increasing, indicating that they were unloading the hidden ballots and matching them to unvoted voters. This allowed them to barely cross the finish line with enough votes.

If an election is close, Commonwealth will win by cheating, fortifying, and stealing ballots. Elections are not perfectly clean, but changes were done in plain daylight. To improve elections, run them like other Western democracies: one-day voting, practically no absentee ballots, and stronger voter ID. This used to be more common in the U.S., but has decayed over the last 20-30 years. Results were available on election day 30-40 years ago, which no longer happens.

Democrats have long criticized the vulnerability of voting machines and the potential for hacking. They argue that all voting machines need to be examined to ensure they are secure. They specifically mention Dominion voting machines as being susceptible to hacking. They claim that these machines can be easily hacked and that the results of elections have been questioned for a long time. They also highlight the issue of outdated and vulnerable machines in some states. However, they are accused of only raising these concerns when they lose elections. Republicans have also challenged election results in the past. The overall message is that there are doubts about the integrity of elections and the influence of powerful interests.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. A computing error in Franklin County gave extra votes to George Bush. This raises questions about the accuracy and integrity of our election system, not just in Ohio but also in other states. It is important to address these issues to maintain the legitimacy of our elections, especially when promoting democracy in other countries. The objection is raised in Ohio, but similar situations have occurred in Michigan and Arizona. This debate should continue to shed light on the irregularities observed. The golden rule of politics, treating others as you would like to be treated, should guide our actions regardless of the election outcome.

All votes in The United States Of America are counted in The United States Of America. There is no evidence that any machine has been manipulated by a foreign power. Recounts are consistent with the initial count, confirming that the systems used in the twenty twenty election performed as expected. The American people should have 100% confidence in their vote. A lawyer representing the president claimed that Dominion voting machines ran an algorithm to take votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden. Votes in Georgia were cast on paper, counted by a machine, and recounted by hand, with consistent outcomes. If there was an algorithm flipping votes, it didn't work. The more likely explanation is that there was no algorithm and that security controls protected the systems from misbehavior.

Speaker 0 welcomes George Soros, emphasizing the need for active participation in America's future. Speaker 1 acknowledges that both Republicans and Democrats have manipulated elections in the past, highlighting the tendency of those in power to tilt things in their favor. Speaker 0 adds that voter fraud organizations have been extensive and inclusive in American politics.

In Ohio, having Democrats in charge of the voting machines is seen as an advantage. However, it's important to acknowledge that election manipulation has occurred in the past, not just by Republicans but also by Democrats. When people hold power, they often try to influence things in their favor. This has been observed in my hometown of Chicago as well.

Votes in Michigan were miscounted due to software errors, favoring Democrats over Republicans. This affected 47 counties using the same software. Antrim County had to manually count all ballots. Other counties should review their results for discrepancies. Michigan residents deserve transparency in the election process.

Up to 13 states' Board of Elections voter registration roles are coded with secret algorithms that allow for hidden, unreal votes. This coding system is like a national security coding system. In Ohio, there is a mathematical formula embedded within the state board of election voter role that permits someone within the board of election to vote as many mail-in votes as they want to rig and steal an election without it being known. The speaker is in Ohio demanding a proof of concept.

Four years ago, there were concerns about uncounted votes in Illinois. The senator from New York commended the senator from California for raising objections and allowing the discussion of these issues. A computing error in Franklin County awarded extra votes to George Bush, raising questions about the accuracy and integrity of the election system. These issues were not limited to Ohio, as other states also faced similar situations. The legitimacy of our elections is being challenged, which is concerning given our efforts to promote democracy worldwide. The objection raised in Ohio is just one example of the irregularities observed. The debate will continue thanks to the objection from California. The golden rule in politics is emphasized, regardless of the election outcome.

In a close election, it's likely that the Commonwealth will manipulate the outcome through tactics like ballot harvesting. While there are rule changes that seem transparent, elections are not entirely clean. To improve the system, elections should be conducted like in other Western democracies: one-day voting with minimal absentee ballots, stronger voter ID requirements, and making Election Day a national holiday. This approach would ensure that only eligible voters participate and restore the integrity of the electoral process, which has significantly declined over the past few decades.

Voting machines have been proven to be vulnerable to tampering and hacking. Even with limited knowledge and resources, hackers can breach these machines in minutes. In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted or switched votes. The biggest seller of voting machines violates cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. Three companies control the majority of voting machines in different states, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines. Researchers have found serious security flaws in 43% of voting machines used by American voters. Aging systems rely on unsupported software, making them more vulnerable to cyber attacks. A hack in just one swing state or a few counties could impact a close election.