reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The ice core surveys in Antarctica show a correlation between carbon dioxide (CO2) and temperature, but the relationship is more complex than Al Gore suggests. The data reveals that temperature increases precede rises in CO2 levels by about 800 years. This indicates that temperature changes drive CO2 changes, not the other way around. Furthermore, carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things, and humans contribute only a small fraction of it compared to sources like volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and the oceans. The oceans, in particular, play a significant role in CO2 emissions and absorption, with warmer temperatures leading to more CO2 production. Earth's long climate history does not support the idea that CO2 determines global temperatures.

No evidence has been shown to prove that human emissions of carbon dioxide cause global warming. If it could be proven, it would also need to be shown that the natural emissions, which make up 97% of the total, do not drive global warming. This is a scientific fraud. The idea that increased levels of carbon dioxide will lead to disastrous global warming is not supported by chemistry or historical data from ice cores. The inverse solubility of carbon dioxide has been known for 200 years, and ice core samples show that carbon dioxide levels increased after natural warming periods. Temperature drives carbon dioxide levels, not the other way around.

Former vice president Al Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth," presents the theory of man-made global warming based on ice core surveys. These surveys show a correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature, but fail to mention that temperature actually leads carbon dioxide by 800 years. Ice core records consistently demonstrate that temperature changes precede carbon dioxide changes. Carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things, and humans contribute only a small fraction of it compared to volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and dying vegetation. The oceans are the largest source of carbon dioxide, with warmer temperatures leading to increased emissions. The time lag between temperature changes and carbon dioxide levels is due to the oceans' slow warming and cooling process. Earth's long climate history does not support the idea that carbon dioxide determines global temperatures.

The video discusses the relationship between temperature and carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in ice cores. Professor Ian Clark, a paleoclimatologist, explains that ice cores can provide data on past temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels. Surprisingly, the research shows that changes in temperature precede changes in CO2 levels by about 800 years. This suggests that CO2 is not the cause of temperature changes, but rather a product of them. Multiple studies support this finding, indicating that temperature fluctuations lead to changes in CO2 levels, not the other way around. These findings challenge the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the level of CO2 in the atmosphere. Speaker 0 questions the consensus on parts per million of CO2, stating that it has been over 1,000 ppm throughout history. Speaker 1 argues that in the past 800,000 years, CO2 levels have not been as high as they are today. Speaker 0 counters by saying that geologic events have influenced CO2 levels, and questions why humans are blamed for the increase. Speaker 1 dismisses the conversation as not serious. Both speakers agree on this point.

- Climate change is a fact. - Humans are not causing it. - The cow farts. It's not the cows. - NASA knows this. - Over 90% of the c o two, there is an increase in c o two. - Is there more c o two in the atmosphere now than there was ten years, twenty, fifty, a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. - Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. - Is it the most we've ever had? We're right about four forty parts per million right now. - The oceans are warming from underneath, not from the top. Warm water holds less gas.

Climate change is a fact, but humans are not causing it. NASA knows that over 90% of the CO2 is coming from the oceans. Is there more CO2 now than ten, twenty, fifty, or a hundred years ago? The answer is absolutely yes. Is it a bad thing? The answer is no. We're right about 440 parts per million right now. In geologic history, Cretaceous and Jurassic were over a thousand parts per million; Triassic, 2,000 parts per million. The earth was lush. CO2 levels and temperatures are not always one-to-one. Where's the CO2 coming from? NASA knows: the CO2 is coming from the oceans warming from underneath. Warm water holds less gas. The oceans are warming from underneath from tectonic processes every twelve thousand five hundred years, beginning in the core and causing more tectonic and volcanic activity, which is exactly what we're seeing.

The speaker argues that life on Earth is in crisis due to crop failure, social and ecological collapse, and mass extinction, framing these as part of Extinction Rebellion’s climate alarmist narrative and a broader political and financial “climate industrial complex” that aims to control purchases, diet, and travel in the name of sustainability and net-zero emissions. They contend that people rely on governments and the media rather than data, and promise to show that temperatures fluctuate, are not unprecedented, and that natural disasters are not getting worse. They claim climate data is unreliable and that CO2 plays a small role in climate, while presenting scientific evidence that we are not in a climate crisis. Using a 65-million-year temperature graph, the speaker states the Earth today is in a cool period and is coming out of an ice age, noting that life thrived in much warmer times without human CO2 emissions. They assert that over the last two thousand years there have been two warm periods and two cold periods, including the Roman warm period, the cold Dark Ages, the medieval warm period, and the Little Ice Age, with current warming described as a recovery from the Little Ice Age. The three degrees Fahrenheit of warming cited by scientists and the media is described as not unprecedented and not cause for alarm due to ongoing fluctuations. The speaker argues that warming and CO2 emissions have not made natural disasters more frequent or violent, citing hurricane and wildfire data. They reference a graph from the Bulletin of the American Urological Society showing a slight downward trend in US hurricanes per year since 1900, and a North Atlantic hurricane intensity graph from 1920 to 2016 showing no trend. They claim the 2014 US National Climate Assessment presents an illusory upward trend by focusing on a red-highlighted portion. They also claim that US and global acres burned by wildfires have been decreasing since 1900. Regarding data reliability, the speaker highlights a gap between climate model predictions and observed data, noting that temperature measurements from weather balloons align with satellite data, while climate models over-predict warming. They discuss the urban heat island effect, giving Paris as an example where city temperatures are much higher than surrounding rural areas, suggesting data can be biased to frighten the public. The speaker argues CO2 is not the climate control knob, as it is only 0.04% of the atmosphere, and that historical CO2 levels have been far higher than today. They cite MIT oceanographer Carl Wunsch (spelled as Karl Wench) to claim that when oceans warm, more CO2 is released, and when oceans are cold, CO2 is absorbed. A graph is described showing CO2 rising centuries after temperature increases, implying temperature drives CO2 more than the reverse. They acknowledge CO2 may have some small influence but emphasize many other factors—volcanic activity, cosmic rays, and the sun—and claim limiting CO2 would largely stunt biodiversity with little effect on temperature. The speaker argues CO2 is essential for photosynthesis and that farmers use high CO2 in greenhouses to boost crop yields, illustrating CO2 as a life-giving gas and stating it would green the planet and increase food supply if CO2 increases. They conclude that climate change is an existential threat in Western discourse but offer this as historical context from Aztecs to the Salem witch trials. They mention carbon taxes and individual CO2 budgets as signs of climate issues infiltrating daily life and frame their conclusion as pursuing truth by examining data themselves. In summary, the speaker presents historical temperature variability, critiques of data and models, downplays CO2’s role, highlights CO2’s benefits to plant growth, and asserts that the climate crisis is a hoax to be opposed by scrutinizing data personally.

Climate is always changing, with measurable changes in temperature and rainfall. The planet has been warming and cooling for 4.567 billion years, and for most of that time, it has been warmer and wetter with higher sea levels than now. Warmings and coolings are driven by the Earth's distance from the sun, which changes due to its orbit shifting from circular to elliptical, its axis changing, and its wobbling. Unless you can change the magnetic fields of the sun or the Earth's orbit, you cannot change the climate. Throughout Earth's history, there have been millions of climate changes, none of which have been identified as driven by changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide. There is no record of carbon dioxide driving climate in the past, so there is no logical reason to think that current climate change is driven by changes in carbon dioxide. The past is the key to the present.

Over the past 400,000 years, there have been four interglacial periods and four glacial maximums. It takes 80,000 years to transition from an interglacial period to a glacial maximum, but only 10,000 years to come back out of it. The Milankovitch cycle, influenced by the gravity of Jupiter, affects the tilt of the Earth and the shape of its orbit, which in turn impacts temperature. Contrary to Al Gore's claim, CO2 does not cause temperature increase; rather, temperature warming the oceans leads to the release of CO2, while cooling oceans absorb it. The Vostok ice core record shows an 800-year lag between temperature and CO2 changes. Currently, CO2 levels are rising due to human emissions, but it is not causing a corresponding increase in temperature.

CO2, a small part of the atmosphere, is one of many greenhouse gases. Ice core data shows temperature changes before CO2 levels, contradicting the idea that CO2 drives climate. Historical CO2 levels did not cause temperature changes. Recent industrial CO2 output does not align with temperature records, with most warming occurring before the 1940s. The 1930s and 1940s were unusually warm, despite lower human influences. After World War 2, CO2 increased while temperatures decreased, leading to concerns about a possible ice age.

200 years ago, the temperature was only 1.5 degrees Celsius cooler than now, so claiming a 1.5-degree increase will be catastrophic is ridiculous. In the past, temperatures were much higher, yet CO2 levels were decreasing. There is no clear relationship between temperature and CO2 levels based on historical data.

Professor Yann Clark, a renowned paleoclimatologist, studies temperature variations in the Arctic over hundreds of thousands of years. By analyzing ice cores, they have discovered a surprising relationship between CO2 levels and temperature. The temperature increases first, followed by a rise in CO2 levels, with an 800-year delay. This suggests that temperature changes lead to CO2 increases, rather than the other way around. Multiple studies on ice cores support this finding, contradicting the belief that CO2 causes global warming. These findings challenge the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

The speaker, Professor Ian Clark, is a paleoclimatologist who studies Earth's temperatures in the Arctic over hundreds of thousands of years. He explains that ice cores contain data on climate variations and CO2 levels. Surprisingly, the research shows that temperature changes precede CO2 changes by about 800 years. This suggests that temperature drives CO2 levels, not the other way around. Multiple studies confirm this pattern, contradicting the belief that CO2 is the cause of global warming. The evidence from ice core drilling disproves the fundamental hypothesis of human-induced climate change.

The speaker discusses the relationship between atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels and temperature. They present evidence showing that, contrary to popular belief, temperature increase actually leads to a rise in CO2 levels, not the other way around. They explain that factors such as thawing permafrost in Siberia and gas emissions from ocean clathrates contribute to this phenomenon. They refer to a recent article that states human activities have a minimal impact on CO2 increase, with temperature being responsible for over 85% of atmospheric CO2 rise since the industrial revolution. The speaker argues that this finding challenges the claims made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and emphasizes the significant influence of temperature on the planet's climate.

For the past 10,000 years, it has been warmer than today for about 95% of the time. Throughout the Earth's history of 4.65 billion years, there has been substantial ice on the planet for only about 5-10% of that time. Currently, we have low levels of CO2 compared to Earth's history. The carbon dioxide in the room is around 900, but there is nothing bad about it. In fact, the more carbon dioxide, the better.

The speakers discuss the consensus on the parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere, with the current level being 406. They mention that scientists consider 350 to be a dangerous level. Speaker 0 points out that the average CO2 level has been over 1000 parts per million since mammals have existed. Speaker 1 argues that in the past 800,000 years, CO2 levels have not been as high as they are today. Speaker 0 questions how CO2 levels reached 2000 parts per million if humans weren't present. Speaker 1 explains that geological events contributed to CO2 levels in the past. Speaker 0 dismisses the conversation as not serious.

The ice core surveys in Vostok, Antarctica, show a correlation between carbon dioxide (CO2) and temperature, but the relationship is more complex than Al Gore suggests. The data reveals that temperature increases first, followed by a rise in CO2, with an 800-year lag. This pattern is consistent across multiple ice core surveys. CO2 is not the cause of warming; rather, it is a product of temperature changes. Additionally, humans contribute only a small fraction of CO2 emissions compared to natural sources like volcanoes and the oceans. The oceans, in particular, have a memory of temperature changes and release or absorb CO2 accordingly. Earth's long climate history provides no evidence that CO2 has ever determined global temperatures.

Scientists have found a link between temperature and CO2, but it's the opposite of what many believe. In the past, temperature has risen first, followed by a rise in CO2 levels. Ice ages start when CO2 is at its maximum and end when it's at its minimum, contradicting the idea that CO2 controls temperature. Looking back over millions of years, CO2 levels have changed drastically, but they have never driven temperature changes.

According to the transcript, Al Gore correctly stated that there is a link between carbon dioxide and temperature, but he got the direction of the link wrong. Ice core records from Vostok and other major surveys show temperature increases preceding rises in CO2 levels by approximately 800 years. Therefore, CO2 cannot be the cause of warming; rather, warming produces increases in carbon dioxide. This evidence contradicts the fundamental assumption that human-caused CO2 increases drive climate change. Carbon dioxide is a natural gas produced by all living things, and humans only produce a small fraction of it.

Glacial ice studies are often used to support the theory of human-induced global warming. These ice cores contain data that goes back hundreds of thousands of years. By analyzing the ice, scientists can determine past temperatures and the CO2 levels trapped within. Professor Clark and other researchers have found a correlation between CO2 variation and air temperature, but not in the expected way. The temperature changes occur first, followed by CO2 changes with an 800-year delay. This suggests that temperature leads CO2 changes, rather than the other way around. Multiple studies have shown this pattern, contradicting the hypothesis that CO2 is the primary cause of climate change. Ice core drilling provides evidence that challenges the fundamental assumption of human-induced climate change.

Carbon dioxide absorbs energy from the sun, creating a greenhouse effect necessary for life on Earth; without it, the average temperature would be -18 Celsius. Carbon dioxide acts as a thermostat; a slight increase can significantly raise temperatures. Data shows that since 1950, the Earth's temperature has risen at a constant rate, correlating with the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Burning fossil fuels seems to lead to a temperature rise, making this the hottest the planet has been in 200,000 years. A common argument suggests that concerns about burning fossil fuels are unnecessary because they will eventually run out, negating the need to change our behavior. For a long time, we've been told that we have twenty five years worth of oil and we've reached peak oil and we're gonna run out.

The ice core surveys in Vostok, Antarctica, show a correlation between carbon dioxide (CO2) and temperature, but the relationship is more complex than Al Gore suggests. The ice core data reveals that temperature increases precede rises in CO2 levels by about 800 years. This indicates that temperature changes lead to CO2 increases, not the other way around. Furthermore, humans are not the main source of CO2 emissions; volcanoes, animals, bacteria, and the oceans contribute significantly more. The oceans, in particular, have a memory of temperature changes and release or absorb CO2 accordingly. Earth's long climate history does not support the idea that CO2 determines global temperatures.

A 1.5 degrees Celsius increase in global atmospheric temperature is not a disaster. It's less than the temperature difference between breakfast and lunch and will open up vast areas of farmland. During the Eocene thermal maximum, the temperature was at least 5 to 7 degrees Celsius warmer than now, maybe even more. At the same time, CO2 was going in the exact opposite direction of the temperature. There is no clear relationship between CO2 and temperature.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about the consensus on CO2 levels in the atmosphere. Speaker 1 states that it is currently at 406 parts per million, while scientists consider 350 parts per million dangerous. Speaker 0 argues that CO2 levels have been higher in the past, even before humans existed. Speaker 1 counters that the past 800,000 years have not seen CO2 levels as high as they are today. Speaker 0 dismisses the conversation as not serious, and Speaker 1 agrees.