TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

The United Nations approved a declaration on pandemic prevention. The WHO will vote on international agreements in May 2020. The process is secretive and not widely discussed. The WHO seeks leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Their role is to provide guidance and support to governments. The pandemic agreement was created by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement, which focuses on countries working together to prevent pandemics.

These new pandemic agreements involve 194 member states and the World Health Organization. They ignore scientific evidence on collateral damages and give WHO unprecedented power to declare emergencies without clear standards. The agreements allow mandates, including experimental injections, on a global scale. WHO can declare any public health emergency under the concept of "one health," from fighting influenza to addressing climate change, potentially leading to future pandemics.

The WHO is set to have a final vote on two international agreements involving pandemic prevention and preparedness. This process is conducted privately and is not widely reported or discussed in the media, national parliaments, universities, or society. The WHO asserts its unquestionable leadership in all health matters through these legal instruments.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, and eroded trust. Misinformation and inequality worsened the impact on vulnerable communities. A new pandemic accord and amendments to international health regulations are being negotiated by WHO member states to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to a cycle of panic and neglect. Together, we are stronger.

The speaker introduces the plan and documents for negotiation, which include a new pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. They express concern over the World Health Organization's push to increase its powers and control over countries and individuals. The reform process began in 2021, with two separate legal instruments being prepared: a new treaty and amendments to existing regulations. These drafts will be negotiated and finalized, with member states voting on them in May 2024. The process is happening quickly and behind closed doors, without public reporting.

The minister discussed ongoing negotiations on the World Health Organization pandemic agreement and international health regulations. He emphasized that the UK will only accept measures in its national interest and will not allow the WHO to mandate lockdowns. Concerns were raised about the WHO's proposed powers over member states, including surveillance, funding commitments, and compulsory vaccination. The government will not sign the current text and will involve Parliament in the ratification process if an agreement is reached.

WHO cannot order lockdowns or mask mandates, countries decide based on their own assessment. Negotiating countries added a statement saying WHO and the director general will not have this power, ensuring sovereignty is not affected. This agreement clarifies the truth.

The UN general assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, eroded trust, and highlighted inequalities. The next pandemic is inevitable, so WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to the cycle of panic and neglect. Our world needs to be stronger for future generations.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, emphasizing the need for a collective approach. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immense damage, affecting lives, economies, and societies. It has exposed political divisions and worsened inequalities, hitting the most vulnerable communities the hardest. It is not a matter of if, but when the next pandemic will occur. To address this, WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to international health regulations. However, it is crucial to go beyond negotiations and ensure national ratification and accountable implementation. We must break the cycle of panic and neglect to protect future generations. Together, we are stronger.

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention and response. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for its push to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to review pandemic preparedness and response. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty and international health regulations have raised concerns about its authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and surveillance. The treaty could impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without respecting human rights. The WHO claims absolute leadership in all health matters, but some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before. Supporters argue that these measures are necessary to protect the global population. The final vote on these agreements will take place in May 2024.

In May 2024, 194 member states of the WHO will vote on international agreements regarding pandemic prevention. The process is secretive and not publicly discussed. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during the pandemic. Our role is to provide guidance and support to governments. The pandemic agreement is written by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement, only governments are. The agreement emphasizes working together to keep each other safe from pandemics.

The speakers discuss the achievements of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past two years. They mention that the WHO is passing amendments to international health regulations, which member countries must actively opt out of to avoid accepting them. They express concern about the power given to the WHO's director general during a pandemic, as they can decide what actions to take. The speakers also mention that the definition of a pandemic has been changed, potentially leading to a situation where even a small number of cases in different countries could be classified as a pandemic. This would allow the WHO to seize governing powers of member states.

WHO did not impose lockdowns, mask mandates, or vaccine mandates during COVID-19. Their role is to provide guidance and support to governments, not to make decisions for them. The pandemic agreement is written by countries for countries, affirming national sovereignty and responsibility. WHO is not a party to the agreement; only governments are. The agreement emphasizes countries working together to keep each other safe from pandemics. Translation: WHO no impuso bloqueos, mandatos de mascarillas o vacunas durante COVID-19. Su papel es brindar orientación y apoyo a los gobiernos, no tomar decisiones por ellos. El acuerdo pandémico es redactado por países para países, afirmando la soberanía y responsabilidad nacional. WHO no es parte del acuerdo; solo los gobiernos lo son. El acuerdo enfatiza que los países trabajen juntos para mantenerse seguros de las pandemias.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all 194 member states. They are proposing a pandemic treaty that would give them authority over health decisions and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in the past and should not be granted more power. The treaty is set to be voted on in May 2024, and citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose it.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

The WHO will have a final vote on two international legal instruments. These instruments give the WHO complete authority over health matters, specifically in pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The vote will involve 94 member states, but these instruments have not been widely discussed in newspapers, national parliaments, universities, or society.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has released its pandemic agreement, but a key issue remains unresolved: the pathogen access and benefit sharing (PABSS) system. This system focuses on how countries profit from sharing pathogen information, like South Africa and Botswana's experience with the Omicron variant. Despite nearly reaching an agreement, negotiators failed to finalize the PABSS annex, which is central to the agreement's purpose. The WHO wants the World Health Assembly to adopt the agreement, even without the PABSS terms settled. The agreement aims to ensure equitable profit from pandemics, allowing poorer nations to benefit from their biological diversity. Concerns exist that wealthy nations and pharmaceutical companies will exploit the system for financial gain by creating and profiting from potential pandemic threats. The US has until July 19, 2025, to reject amendments to the international health regulations. Critics urge complete withdrawal from the WHO and its regulations, viewing them as a corrupt, fear-mongering organization.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, and eroded trust. The next pandemic is inevitable, so WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to the cycle of panic and neglect. Together, we are stronger.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism over its proposed pandemic treaty, which would grant the organization significant power over health decisions and impose restrictions on countries. The treaty would cover areas such as vaccines, medical devices, and experimental treatments. Supporters argue that it is necessary to protect the global population, while opponents fear a loss of sovereignty and individual liberties. The WHO's authority would extend to declaring recommendations and imposing restrictions, including lockdowns and surveillance. The treaty is set to be voted on by the 194 member states of the WHO in May 2024. Critics urge citizens to contact their politicians to voice their concerns and potentially stop the treaty.

This morning, the United Nations approved a political declaration on pandemic prevention. In May 2024, the WHO will have a final vote on international agreements behind closed doors. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism over its proposed pandemic treaty, which would give it more power over global health decisions. The treaty would allow the WHO to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without question. Some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before and raises concerns about individual liberties. Supporters argue that it is necessary to protect the world's population. The treaty is set to be voted on by the 194 member states of the WHO in May 2024. Critics are urging citizens to contact their politicians to voice their opposition and potentially stop the treaty from being ratified.