TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Critics raised concerns about the lack of testing before the COVID-19 vaccine was rolled out. Katie Lees, a fit and healthy 34-year-old, decided to get the AstraZeneca vaccine after the guidelines changed. Unfortunately, she suffered a fatal blood clotting disorder and passed away. Her parents faced backlash for speaking out about her death. The panel discusses the rushed vaccine rollout and the need for acknowledgment and compensation for vaccine injuries. Professor Kieran Phelps and her wife, Jacqui, share their own adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. They highlight the lack of medical curiosity and the need for better support and compensation for those who experience vaccine injuries.

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They highlight a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they emphasize the safety of the COVID vaccine and assure viewers that it is safe. They also compare the number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand, which is typically around 1500 a year, with the low number of deaths reported following vaccination.

Speaker 0 states that one of their three children experienced health issues, including heart inflammation, after receiving the vaccine and subsequently lost their job for refusing further vaccination. This adverse reaction is officially registered. The speaker recounts a doctor advising their son against further vaccination outside a hospital setting, but later denying having said so. Speaker 1 says there is a good system for reporting side effects in New Zealand and finds no clear evidence of suppression of medical side effects of the Pfizer vaccine. Speaker 0 questions why the vaccine is still in use given the side effects. Speaker 1 responds that society decided to tolerate a certain number of adverse effects for the greater good, characterizing the speaker's family member's reaction as "taking one for the team."

A 52-year-old woman regrets getting the vaccine because she believes she didn't need it. She had already contracted COVID multiple times before getting vaccinated. During her annual physical, she tested positive for an autoimmune issue and wondered if it was related to receiving the booster shot and subsequently getting COVID within three weeks. The woman consulted a top rheumatologist in New York who confirmed that she wasn't the only one experiencing this issue.

Speaker 0 is pleased about vaccination effectiveness in preventing severe COVID and long-term effects. They mention rare side effects from vaccines and emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring. Speaker 1 questions the safety of products on the market without complete testing. The TGA lacks data on adverse events due to underreporting, leading to audience frustration.

Many patients are experiencing adverse reactions to vaccines, filling up hospitals. New Zealand has not adopted alternative treatments from other countries due to emergency vaccine rollout. Government focus is on vaccination rather than promoting overall health. People with COVID are often only treated with Panadol, with many recovering at home. Hospitalizations include both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. Some vaccinated individuals are experiencing severe reactions with doctors unable to provide answers or help.

A 52-year-old woman regrets getting the vaccine as she believes she didn't need it. She had already contracted COVID multiple times before getting vaccinated. During her annual physical, she tested positive for an autoimmune issue and wondered if it was related to receiving the booster shot and subsequently getting COVID within three weeks. The woman consulted a top rheumatologist in New York who confirmed that she wasn't the only patient experiencing this.

In November 2022, Medsafe discontinued regular reports on adverse events following COVID injections in New Zealand. They acknowledged that the reporting system captures only a small fraction of the actual number of adverse events. By that time, Medsafe had received 65,000 adverse event reports, suggesting that around 1.3 million New Zealanders experienced adverse events. Among these reports, there were 3,688 serious cases, nearly 6,000 for young people aged 5 to 19, and 184 deaths. The numbers of adverse events and deaths following COVID injections far exceed those from other vaccines. Similar trends are observed globally, with thousands of deaths and millions of adverse event reports for COVID vaccines. The impact on individuals and families is significant and unprecedented.

Science Magazine recently published articles about long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines, referred to as "long vaxx." The speaker acknowledges the importance of these stories and highlights the robust post-licensure monitoring systems in place, such as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink. However, the speaker emphasizes that VAERS is a preliminary system and does not establish cause and effect. They mention that there are other parallel systems, including those operated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which thoroughly investigate such concerns. The speaker clarifies that they have never dismissed people's concerns and encourages listening to them, but also emphasizes the existing mechanisms for investigation.

Multiple individuals share their experiences of adverse reactions and health issues following COVID-19 vaccination. Some report paralysis, loss of feeling, chronic pain, blood clots, heart problems, and other severe symptoms. Concerns are raised about the safety of vaccines, while others emphasize the overall effectiveness and rarity of serious adverse reactions. The CDC investigates deaths potentially linked to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. A mother shares her daughter's debilitating condition after participating in the Pfizer vaccine trial. These personal accounts highlight the need for further examination and open discussion regarding vaccine-related injuries.

They discuss the number of people who have experienced long-term health issues after receiving the vaccine. The speaker asks if it's hundreds or thousands, and Helen responds that it's actually around 10. She mentions a report from April 2023, which states that there were 11,289 medically significant or serious reports. Out of those, 1,062 were listed as disabled, 118 were considered life-threatening, and 184 resulted in death. Helen clarifies that the long-term consequences are not in the hundreds or thousands, but rather around 10.

In this New Zealand post-election update, Liz Gunn discusses shocking revelations regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. A clinician mathematician has reviewed the data and confirms that there are tens of thousands of deaths linked to the jabs. The data shows clusters of deaths among people who received the vaccine on the same day at the same location. This statistical evidence calls for a full-blown criminal investigation, with all associated individuals' computers, phones, and information seized. The government had prior knowledge of the side effects, contradicting the narrative of the vaccine's safety and effectiveness. Liz Gunn urges the public to demand an end to the vaccine rollout to prevent further harm.

The speaker expresses concern that only 5% of adverse reactions are reported in the database, suggesting it's just the tip of the iceberg. Another speaker reassures that the vaccine is safe and there is no evidence of it causing deaths. Prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received annually for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths per year.

Laura Logan hosts a discussion with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny on vaccines, public health policy, and what they see as failures and harms within the system. The conversation weaves together personal history, policy details, scientific debates, and broader social concerns, intercut with promotional content for GiveSendGo. Key points and claims raised by Dr. Tenpenny - Vaccine ingredients and aluminum exposure: Tenpenny asserts that if someone receives every vaccine on the schedule, they would be injected with a total of about twelve thousand micrograms of aluminum, which she says is inflammatory to every organ system and can be stored in bones (60% of aluminum exposure). She notes aluminum is present in vaccines in order to replace mercury, which she describes as also a poison. - Early vaccine industry liability and the 1986 Act: The discussion explains that prior to 1986 there were liability concerns for vaccine makers due to injury lawsuits. Tenpenny recounts that in 1986 Congress passed a law giving the pharmaceutical industry liability immunity for vaccines, creating what she describes as a ramp in the vaccine schedule. She cites that by 1991 additional vaccines were introduced (Hep B at birth, Hib, chickenpox, Prevnar, Gardasil, Hep A, and more) and alleges this resulted in a rising autism incidence aligned with new vaccines. - The vaccine injury system: Tenpenny explains the Injury Compensation Act and the existence of VAERS as a tracking system, along with a separate pathway created under the PREP Act (the Preparedness and Readiness Act). She states that during the COVID era a separate program, the Covered Countermeasure Program (CICP), existed under the PREP Act, but it had no funding and a one-year statute of limitations, leading to under-compensation and very few adjudicated cases; she contrasts this with the earlier 1986 act, which funded vaccine injury compensation through the Federal Court of Claims and VAERS. - Perceived safety and effectiveness concerns: The speakers discuss studies suggesting that the flu shot might not prevent flu and that some studies indicate vaccines including pneumonia vaccines may be associated with higher risk of the conditions they aim to prevent. Tenpenny frames this as evidence of cracks in the vaccine program and argues that vaccines are linked to a broad spectrum of health issues, including autoimmune diseases, infertility, and cancers, which she says have been increasing. - Pediatric vaccination schedule and “pediatric poisoning program”: Tenpenny asserts that infants receive multiple injections early in life, with claims that by age two they will have thousands of micrograms of aluminum and other compounds that remain in the body, including in the brain. She characterizes the pediatric schedule as a systematic poisoning program for children and a parallel “adult assault program” for adults receiving vaccines. - COVID-19 vaccine controversy and health impacts: The conversation covers the COVID vaccines, including assertions about adverse effects such as myocarditis, strokes, kidney injury, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and cancers. Tenpenny describes long-term concerns (long COVID, autoimmune diseases) and claims of widespread injury and death, contending that the pandemic revealed how the health-care and pharmaceutical systems operate, including alleged corruption and profit motives. She discusses the difficult experiences of families during the pandemic, including restrictions on care and the use of alternate treatments like ivermectin in some cases. - The claim that COVID vaccines were not properly evaluated and that mandated vaccination reflected coercion: The speakers discuss mandates and the experiences of individuals in workplaces and educational institutions who faced pressure to receive vaccines, including religious exemptions and disputes about mandates. Tenpenny suggests a broader pattern of overreach in public health policy and questions about the balance between individual rights and mandates. - History and philosophy of public health programs: They discuss the Healthy People initiatives, arguing that the program’s goals have expanded in scope (from 15 goals to 1,200 for Healthy People 2030) and that the expansion is associated with greater surveillance and control over personal lives. Tenpenny claims that this is part of a broader trend toward data collection and governance of individual health and behavior. - The economics and incentives around vaccines: The conversation notes how physicians are compensated in part through vaccine administration, implying financial incentives influence clinical decisions. Tenpenny emphasizes the profit motive behind vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry’s financial interests, citing extreme examples like the one boy in a photo who allegedly became heavily medicated due to vaccines. - The role of media and information control: They discuss the influence of advertising in media since the 1990s and the difficulty of reporting critically on vaccines when major advertisers are pharmaceutical companies. They also mention AI and misinformation concerns, including examples of AI fabricating sources and the need to verify information. - Personal stakes, accountability, and political possibilities: Tenpenny discusses personal cost for challenging the vaccine paradigm, including an earlier period of potential licensing scrutiny and professional pushback. She names figures such as Fauci and Birx, argues that accountability has not yet occurred, and expresses hope that public interest in accountability could shift through advocacy and political leadership, citing RFK Jr. as a potential ally though acknowledging political and institutional obstacles. - Treatment and detoxification approaches: For those who have already received vaccines, Tenpenny outlines two separate tracks: detoxification for childhood vaccines and detox for COVID vaccines. For detox, she mentions products such as PureBody Extra (PBX), a zeolite-based supplement she says helps remove metals like aluminum and mercury from the body. She notes it is usable across age groups and even for pets, and she personally uses it. She also discusses non-specific detox approaches such as vitamin D optimization, lymphatic stimulation, exercise, and a diet focusing on avoiding white foods and reducing inflammation. She cautions that there is no proven blood or urine test to quantify spike protein after a COVID vaccine, and that detox strategies aim to support overall health rather than remove embedded spike protein from tissues. - The role of faith and resilience: The interview includes discussions of faith as a guiding force for Tenpenny, including her personal journey toward Christian faith in 2020. They reflect on fear, hope, forgiveness, and the idea that one can act with integrity and do the right thing even when faced with controversy or personal cost. They discuss existential questions about meaning, purpose, and moral responsibility, including the belief that life has a spiritual dimension that informs how to respond to public-health challenges. - Community and parenting: The conversation emphasizes the importance of community networks for new parents, including seeking mentorship from experienced parents and trusted health advocates, and maintaining parental agency in decisions about vaccines, medical interventions, and child-rearing. They discuss the value of critical thinking, asking questions, and avoiding blind trust in professionals or institutions. - Closing notes and resources: Tenpenny provides her websites and a Substack for ongoing information, including dr10penny.com, dr10penny.substack.com, and 10pennywalkwithgod.substack.com, as well as her X profile busy doctor t. The episode closes with a call to viewers to stay informed and to seek second opinions, while thanking the audience for supporting independent journalism. Overall, the dialogue centers on a critical, conspiratorial framing of vaccines, public-health policy, and the medical establishment; it weaves together testimonies about personal experience, policy history (notably the 1986 Act and the PREP Act), alleged systemic failures in compensation for vaccine injuries, criticisms of COVID-19 responses and vaccine mandates, and practical detoxification and faith-based guidance. The promotional content for GiveSendGo lightly interrupts the core discussion, but the majority of the exchange remains an extended argument about vaccine safety, accountability, and the perceived influence of big pharma on health care and public policy.

Linda from Health Forum NZ shares a bombshell revelation from NZTS0S about a Ministry of Health report showing low transmission risk in schools and healthcare settings. Despite this, the government implemented unnecessary vaccine mandates causing harm. Expert witnesses in court failed to disclose this information, potentially committing perjury. NZTS0S seeks to appeal to the Supreme Court for justice. They urge affected individuals to share this revelation to hold those responsible accountable. Financial support may be needed for the appeal. Take action by contacting MPs and spreading awareness on social media. This urgent message highlights the need for accountability and justice.

The speaker describes a severe post-vaccination experience, saying the vaccine “took my immune system and just shook it around again,” and noting that “that’s still going on.” They reference reading evidence about adverse reactions, including “damage to the immune system,” and acknowledge they were not made aware of these risks beforehand. They recount losing the use of their hands for about three weeks and realizing they were “in real trouble.” The speaker was invited by Robin Monarchy to discuss the experience, and by that time they realized they “weren’t the only one that was suffering.” They contrast this personal ordeal with a sense of media over-saturation, saying they have “stopped watching TV.” They share a cartoon memory of a guy interviewing two Quakers who ask, “How come none of your community has got COVID?” and the Quakers respond, “Well, we don’t watch TV,” remarking, “It’s so true, man,” and noting that “so much of the sickness is in our heads now.” They describe feeling trapped between trusting what “your heart tells you is right” and what appears to be the prevailing narrative, and they emphasize the difficulty of communicating their feelings to family. The speaker mentions taking a risk by speaking out, noting they were “pleased to see that it went around without too much of flack,” but they did experience some backlash, particularly from people they least wanted to upset. A central concern expressed is fear about what vaccination could do to their children, describing it as perhaps “the biggest part of the reason” for speaking out and talking to their daughters about the possibility that they “may not be able to have kids.” They acknowledge that at that point in life, their daughters “don’t probably care,” implying a tension between present concerns and future implications. The speaker concludes with that vaccination remains a source of personal risk and disclosure within their family discussions.

In this New Zealand post-election update, Liz Gunn discusses shocking revelations regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. A clinician mathematician has reviewed the data and confirms that there are tens of thousands of deaths linked to the jabs. The data shows clusters of deaths among individuals who received the vaccine on the same day at the same location. Gunn calls for a full-blown criminal investigation, stating that New Zealand is a crime scene. She urges the public to demand an end to the vaccine rollout and highlights the difference between an inquiry and a criminal investigation. Gunn expresses her willingness to share any new information with Winston Peters for further exposure. She hopes that this issue unites the people of New Zealand.

A 52-year-old woman regrets getting the vaccine as she believes she didn't need it. She had already contracted COVID multiple times before getting vaccinated. During her annual physical, she tested positive for an autoimmune issue and wondered if it was related to receiving the booster shot and subsequently getting COVID within three weeks. The woman consulted a top rheumatologist in New York who confirmed that she wasn't the only patient experiencing this.

The speakers express concern that only a small percentage of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received each year for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths annually.

In this New Zealand post-election update, Liz Gunn discusses shocking revelations regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. A whistleblower claims that there are tens of thousands of deaths linked to the jabs, with clusters of deaths occurring among individuals who received the vaccine on the same day. The evidence suggests that the government knew about the side effects before administering any jabs. Gunn calls for a full criminal investigation and urges the public to demand an end to the vaccine rollout. She emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between an inquiry and a criminal investigation, and expresses her willingness to share the information with Winston Peters. Gunn hopes that this issue will unite the people of New Zealand and lead to the exposure of the truth.

They received texts claiming extraordinary lives, but the speaker asks how many people have suffered long-term health consequences from the vaccine. The other person, Helen, responds that there have been 10 cases of long-term consequences. In March 2023, MedSafe received 11,289 reports, with 1,062 listed as disabled, 118 as life-threatening, and 184 as deaths. The speaker clarifies if it's 100 or 1,000 cases, but Helen confirms it's around 10 for long-term effects.

The speaker expresses concern about claims of excess deaths in New Zealand due to the COVID-19 vaccine. They bring in Helen Petosas Harris, an associate professor at Auckland University and co-director of the Global Vaccine Data Network, to provide expert answers. Helen states that there are 4 probable deaths attributed to the vaccine in New Zealand. The speaker mentions specific cases of individuals who died after receiving the vaccine. They discuss the lack of investigation into these deaths and the number of adverse events reported. Helen reassures that the vaccine is safe based on scientific information and data. The conversation ends with a mention of the Global Vaccine Data Network's purpose to combat vaccine hesitancy.

Dr. Paul Oosterhuis and whistleblower Winston discuss the lack of transparency and data surrounding COVID-19 vaccines in New Zealand. They express concern about the government's handling of the vaccine rollout and the potential risks associated with the vaccines. The speakers highlight the high number of deaths and clusters of deaths in certain areas, particularly in the South Island. They call for further investigations, accountability, and a reevaluation of medical ethics. The video emphasizes the importance of transparency, truth, and informed consent in analyzing the data and rebuilding the medical profession.

Linda Wharton, an accomplished author and holistic health professional, discusses the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in New Zealand. She highlights the lack of informed consent and the significant number of adverse events reported, including deaths and serious health conditions. Wharton emphasizes that the injections do not prevent infection or transmission and warns about the long-term effects on fertility and overall health. She calls for individuals to strengthen their convictions, seek truth, and be the change they want to see in the world.

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They mention a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, the average number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand was 1500 per year, with one or fewer deaths reported annually.