TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We saw a man crawling on a roof with a rifle while Trump was speaking. We alerted the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. Eventually, the man was shot by the Secret Service. The speaker is certain the shots came from the man on the roof.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were to his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, while they were on the far left. The speaker asserts the shots came from the back left of Trump, showing footage of people indicating the shots' origin. They claim something happened on the left side of the event and deny being panicked or unable to remember details. The speaker states the first shot was farther away to the right of Trump, and the second shot was closer. They insist two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. The speaker believes there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another shooter on the left.

We focus on the area where 3 victims were shot in the bleachers. Bullets came from Thomas Crooks' location, grazing President Trump's ear and hitting a spectator. Video evidence shows the first shot coinciding with Trump's speech. Trump is hit, falls, and more shots follow. 7 or 8 shots were fired, injuring spectators unintentionally. The bullets hit near a forklift, causing a hydraulic hose to burst.

Gunfire erupted during a Trump rally, prompting a swift response from the Secret Service. Snipers were seen on a nearby building, aiming towards the trees where the shots appeared to originate. Breaking news confirmed that shots had been fired at the event.

The gunfire is coming from the trees in the distance to the left of the podium.

Trump arrived at an event, and a person on a motorcycle with a "Don't Tread on Me" flag disappeared. Gunshots were heard, and confusion arose about the shooter's identity. Security was tight, but some items were allowed in. Witnesses saw a person on the roof, questioning the angle of the shots. Unarmed civilians were reportedly shot.

Welcome back. On July 17, 2024, we're examining Butler Farms and the questionable Secret Service plan surrounding the Thomas shooter incident. Reports claim a sniper team was in a second-story window, but this building has no second story. It's impossible for the Secret Service to have missed a shooter aiming at Trump from the first floor. Initially, they claimed the sniper team was in this building, then changed it to a non-existent second story. The water tower is crucial here, as the shooter on the roof was a distraction. We also observed bullets coming from multiple angles. If the sniper team was in the building below, they should have seen the shooter on the roof. This situation raises serious doubts about the narrative being presented. Share your thoughts below, and I'll provide more updates throughout the day. Take care.

The speaker describes their location relative to Trump, stating they were on his left. They then describe bleachers to Trump's left, which were to the speaker's right. The speaker claims the "unaliving" happened on the far right side of Trump, and they were on the far left. The speaker asserts that shots came from behind the bleachers to the left of Trump, and people indicated the shots' origin to Secret Service. The speaker insists something happened on the left side of the event and denies being panicked or unclear about their memory. The first shot sounded farther away to the right of Trump, while the second sounded closer. The speaker believes two men were shot from behind the left side of the bleachers to the left of Trump. They claim there was more than one shooter, including someone on the roof to the right of Trump and another behind the bleachers to the left.

Aiming at the trees, you can see the snipers on the building behind the podium. Gunfire appears to be coming from the trees in the distance to our left.

A dark figure is seen at the top as President Trump speaks. About four seconds after shots are fired, this person steps out. The speaker says they heard one shooter in the water tower and one by the fence. They screamed, "It's the sniper," and states the sniper was firing down toward the water tower. A gentleman behind the speaker, who was one seat to the right, could see the sharpshooter behind Trump. He said the sharpshooter shot to the left and killed the gentleman in the water tower.

The gunfire is coming from the trees in the distance, located to the left of the podium.

They point to the Pacific, noticing someone on a roof. The speaker discusses improving America's border security, showing a chart with a decrease in illegal immigration during his term. Suddenly, there are reports of shots fired at a Trump rally, causing panic and confusion. The Secret Service reacts swiftly, and there are concerns about the president being hit by gunfire.

I'm on the building where the sniper supposedly shot from. It's not steep. Secret Service should've been on the water tower behind me to prevent this. There were questions in Butler about why they didn't act. We'll investigate to ensure it doesn't happen again.

Colin of Project Constitution sits down with Tyler (the interviewer’s name in the transcript isn’t consistently labeled; the speaker identifying themselves as “Speaker 1”) to discuss an in-depth, ongoing investigation into Charlie Kirk’s assassination and related events. The conversation covers timeline疑s, weapon analysis, hospital logistics, key individuals (notably Erica Kirk, Tyler Boyer, Terrrell Farnsworth, Candace Owens), and alleged foreign and domestic entanglements, with a focus on unfiltered details the team has uncovered. Key points and claims from the discussion: - Initial reaction and approach to Charlie Kirk’s assassination - The team initially accepted the FBI’s narrative but began seeing inconsistencies as reports alternated about suspect custody. Within days after the shooting, the crime scene was reportedly destroyed and the grass replaced with pavers at the university where Kirk spoke. - Video analysis reportedly shows the ground position of the shooter that the FBI cropped out, leading to questions about whether the shooter’s location and the weapon’s origin were accurately represented. - Weapon and ballistics questions - The team raised red flags about the reported firearm: a 30-odd-six was described, but ballistic experts argued that such a round would likely have killed or severely injured the target differently, prompting the theory that the weapon claim did not match the injuries observed. - The investigative team posits the use of an explosion intended to mimic past assassination patterns (e.g., MLK-era examples) and argues the actual kill injuries do not align with a 30-odd-six. - The team’s conclusion, based on crime scene photos, argues the presence of black shards and shards consistent with a microphone (a Rode wireless mic) that shattered on impact; burn marks on Charlie Kirk, and similar black shard traces observed in Candace Owens’ released SUV photos are cited as corroborating evidence. - They propose that an explosion occurred in proximity to the event, with a separate high-powered rifle shot possibly emitted by a drone—suggesting a drone sniper may have fired, not a ground-based shooter, and that the supersonic crack and potential muzzle flash were not from a conventional rifle fire but from a bullet transitioning from supersonic to subsonic speeds, creating a pressure cone. - Hospital choice and post-event handling - Charlie was taken to Tipanogos Hospital rather than a closer facility. Officials reportedly claimed this was to access a higher-grade trauma center, but the timeline questions why the closer hospital wasn’t used and how the decision was made in real time. - A witness (a landscaper at Tipanogos) described the sequence of events: an SUV delivering Charlie Kirk to the hospital, then a second SUV with Mikey McCoy entering through a doctor entrance and leaving, raising questions about who was picked up and where those individuals went afterward. - The FBI reportedly confiscated hospital security camera footage, which the team views as suspicious in a non-crime-scene context. - Candace Owens’ show highlighted an allegation that a surgeon attempted to access the body before Erica Kirk could see it; the surgeon allegedly faced FBI resistance to re-enter the patient area. There is a contested claim about “Superman neck” and whether the surgeon ever stated such language. - Erica Kirk: background, ties, and credibility - Erica is described as potentially military-trained and highly prepared; the team explored her past, tying her to Liberty University’s Falkirk Center and alleged trafficking connections, and to Romanian networks. They assert a pattern of deception—multiple inconsistent stories about how Erica and Charlie met, and extensive past relationships with multiple former partners. - They accuse Erica of deleting past social media and press content, pressuring photographers, and hiding past associations. - The team claims Erica has ties to a broader “Mormon Mafia” network tied to Mitt Romney, with connections to Utah and Arizona. They assert ties to CIA and other security entities, and claim involvement in trafficking and political influence networks. - Tyler Boyer, Terrell Farnsworth, and family/political entanglements - Tyler Boyer is described as deeply connected to the “Mormon Mafia” and as someone who previously ran Turning Point, with shell companies enabling political and charitable activities. The interview alleges he conducted surveillance on Colin and has conflicts of interest in Charlie Kirk’s case. - Terrell Farnsworth and his family connections are described as deeply entrenched in the network; Farnsworth’s stepfather reportedly held a senior position at Duncan Aviation, connected to alleged assassination logistics; Michael Burke (Farnsworth cousin) is identified as a top prosecutor connected to Tyler Robertson’s defense. - The discussion highlights a potential conflict of interest: Farnsworth’s cousin is the defense attorney for Tyler Robertson, creating a potential conflict, given Farnsworth’s role in the case and as a witness who allegedly handled the crime scene (removing SD cards and contaminating evidence). - Investigative aims and future directions - The team seeks a complete timeline that identifies every participant’s role and actions, both to present to the public and to pursue potential legal recourse. - They propose a documentary or comprehensive public analysis to expose alleged lies and inconsistencies and to push for accountability, either through court proceedings or public discourse. - They anticipate possible outcomes for Tyler Robertson’s case (conviction via public opinion, or a plea deal) and suggest the possibility of deeper CIA involvement in the radicalization and online manipulation processes surrounding the case. - They emphasize the risk to investigators and supporters, including concerns about surveillance, shadow banning, and potential threats or actions against prominent figures involved in the investigation. - Closing sentiment - Colin reiterates the importance of citizen journalism and collaboration with Candace Owens, Sam Parker, Baron Coleman, and others in pursuing truth and accountability. The interview ends with a pledge to continue the investigation and to keep the public informed as new information emerges.

There are at least two different weapons being fired, with the first three shots coming from a different location than the following shots. The sonic cracks indicate all shots were directed towards Trump and the audience, ruling out the lone shooter theory as false. The hypothesis suggests two shooters, possibly three, with the first three shots likely coming from inside the building. Shots 1, 2, 4, and 5 are believed to have been fired by crooks, while shots 3 and 6 remain puzzling. Echoes and timing discrepancies support the theory of multiple shooters.

They point at the Pacific, noticing someone on the roof. The speaker discusses border security improvements and a chart showing decreased illegal immigration during his presidency. Suddenly, shots are heard at a Trump rally, causing panic. Reports suggest President Trump may have been shot, but he gives a thumbs up. Secret Service reacts swiftly. Snipers are seen on a building. The situation remains unclear.

Aiming at the trees, gunfire is coming from the distance. To our left, you can see the Secret Service reacting quickly, with snipers positioned on the building behind the podium, targeting the trees.

The speaker questioned why Trump continued speaking while police were running around on the ground. The speaker and others pointed out a man with a rifle on the roof to the police, who seemed unaware. The speaker reiterated their confusion about Trump still speaking despite the situation.

We were at a party near the rally, listening to Trump speak when we noticed a man crawling on the roof nearby with a rifle. We pointed him out to the police and Secret Service, but they seemed unaware. After a few minutes, shots rang out, and we were certain they came from the road. The Secret Service quickly responded and shot the man. They approached the roof to confirm he was dead. He was dressed in muted colors, and we could see the rifle clearly. It’s shocking that we could see him for so long without any security on the roof. There are many questions about the security response during the incident.

A Secret Service sniper neutralized a threat from approximately 400 yards away with one bullet. The sniper was able to assess the problem and act within five seconds, potentially preventing further harm. Despite this, some believe a second shooter may have been involved. A video by John Collin allegedly shows a bullet trajectory inconsistent with the identified shooter, Thomas Crooks. The video purportedly depicts a bullet traveling down the bleachers, disturbing clothing, hitting a railing, and creating a puff, with a trajectory misaligned with Crooks' position. There are calls to examine Collin's video evidence and bring him in for questioning regarding the possibility of a second shooter, as bullet trajectory doesn't lie. The video allegedly shows the line of sight to injured people and the stage, raising questions about the number of shots fired. Analysis of the video suggests three kinetic events in a straight line, indicating a trajectory that could be extrapolated.

I'm on the building where the sniper supposedly fired. The roof isn't steep; a 70-year-old man climbed it easily. If there were Secret Service or sniper teams here, he wouldn't have made it five feet up. The windows where the Secret Service was supposedly stationed on the second floor raise questions about their response time. Behind me, where the red roofs are, is where the president was speaking. There are many unanswered questions here, and we aim to conduct oversight to ensure this situation is addressed and prevented in the future.

Former President Trump began speaking at 6 PM. Neither the Secret Service nor the security team knew there was a man on the AGR building roof with a gun until gunshots were heard.

One person was killed, and two others are critically injured, including former President Trump, who reported being grazed by a bullet. Attention is drawn to the shooter, who was positioned on the edge of a building. Visuals show the shooter and the distance from where he fired. The building's size is emphasized, along with the small scale of the police vehicle and bystanders. A lamp on the building is examined, revealing discrepancies in its appearance from different angles. The claim is made that the lamp seen from the back of the building does not match the original, suggesting something is amiss. This inconsistency raises concerns about the situation.

The speaker discusses the shooter's close proximity to a fairground and the president's location. They question why law enforcement did not see the shooter on the low roof before the incident occurred, given the close quarters and visibility. The speaker expresses confusion over the lack of intervention before the shooting began.

Three unsuppressed shots were heard. A counter sniper with a tripod was on his optic. He popped his head up, then back down, and the rifle tilted down, then up, and he backed up. Another person who was prone hunkered their head down. The counter snipers thought they were being engaged because they could hear the sonic crack of rounds passing by them. They thought they were being shot at, not Trump.