reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

The speaker claims the Conservative Party establishment opposed his policies, including abolishing corporate subsidies and the milk, poultry, and egg cartel. He alleges that on election night, they declared Andrew Scheer the winner with 51% of the vote to his 49% and then destroyed the ballots. He further claims that the Global Mail reported 250,000 votes were cast, while the party had only 240,000 members, implying the creation of 10,000 fraudulent votes to ensure his defeat. When he requested a recount, the Conservative Party stated that the ballots had been destroyed. He asserts this cheating in the 2017 leadership contest led to his resignation, believing the party to be morally and intellectually corrupt and unwilling to promote real conservative values when unpopular.

According to the speaker, 53% of people aware of the Hunter Biden laptop story would have changed their vote, including 61% of Democrats. The speaker claims this constitutes election meddling by the FBI on behalf of Democrats, funded by US taxpayers. The speaker characterizes this as collusion, corruption, and unconstitutional.

It's alarming that a candidate running for leadership of the Liberal Party of Canada, potentially our next prime minister, learned of her disqualification via an email received by the media outlet interviewing her. While shocking, it's not surprising. Our internal polls showed my campaign was neck and neck with the front runner. They didn't want me on the debate stage or on the ballot. The Liberal Party wanted to ensure Mark Carney's coronation. The allegations against me are completely false.

Le parti populaire a actuellement 247 candidats et a fait des entrevues sérieuses avec plusieurs autres qui partagent les valeurs du parti. L'orateur allègue qu'il y a eu fraude de la part du parti conservateur. Selon l'orateur, plusieurs candidats qui étaient d'accord avec le parti populaire ne se sont pas présentés au bureau du directeur des élections pour signer leur candidature, donnant des raisons banales. L'orateur croit que le parti conservateur est moralement et intellectuellement corrompu et qu'ils ont payé des gens pour se dire partisans du parti populaire, pour ensuite les laisser tomber à la dernière minute. L'orateur affirme que les conservateurs et les libéraux sont pareils et préfèrent discréditer les autres partis au lieu d'avoir des débats de fond. **Translation:** The People's Party currently has 247 candidates and has conducted serious interviews with several others who share the party's values. The speaker alleges fraud on the part of the Conservative Party. According to the speaker, several candidates who agreed with the People's Party did not go to the returning officer's office to sign their application, giving trivial reasons. The speaker believes that the Conservative Party is morally and intellectually corrupt and that they paid people to say they were supporters of the People's Party, only to drop them at the last minute. The speaker claims that the Conservatives and Liberals are the same and prefer to discredit other parties instead of having substantive debates.

Political Polling Liaison Strategies has been releasing polls daily for the past week after never appearing on the 338Canada website before 03/12/2025. This began right after Mark Carney won the Liberal leadership race. Liaison Strategies, a Toronto-based firm, has received over $7 million in government grants from Canadian Heritage since 2020. The firm's recent surge in polling data on 338Canada coincides with the Liberals gaining a slight lead. The sudden influx of polls could be a strategy to inflate Liberal support and create the illusion of momentum. This could backfire by motivating Conservative voters, who may believe their party could lose if they don't turn out. The situation is described as not normal, and viewers are encouraged to stay skeptical and vote.

A speaker points out that poll data adds up to 110%. They ask if this is intentional or an error and yield for clarification. Another speaker responds that the data is from a Quinnipiac poll held two weeks prior, noting it contains information about Donald Trump's falling poll numbers. The first speaker reiterates that the data adds up to 110% and calls the poll "fake."

The speaker questions the accuracy of polls showing Carney's popularity, claiming the People's Party isn't polled and that mainstream media is biased against them. They allege the Canadian debate rules were changed to exclude the People's Party, preventing them from participating despite qualifying in the past. The speaker highlights concerns about Canada's electoral system, specifically the lack of mandatory photo ID for voting and the promotion of mail-in ballots. They believe being excluded from debates is censorship and undemocratic. The speaker intends to challenge the debate exclusion in court to ensure their voice is heard.

The speaker believes votes were manipulated electronically in favor of Joe Biden, citing TV reports of votes switching from Trump to Biden. In one instance, 12,000 votes shifted, and in another, 20,000. Trump's numbers decreased by the exact amount that Biden's increased. The speaker believes the Dominion Company represents foreign interference because it is a Canadian company storing records in Germany and Spain. The speaker claims the CIA was involved, using servers in Germany for political operations. These servers were seized by US forces with German help and are now in the hands of the FBI. The speaker notes that in Europe, the CIA operates under the jurisdiction of the military.

The speaker alleges that recent polls showing a surge in Liberal support are manipulated. They focus on several polling firms, starting with Liaison, noting it began polling shortly after Mark Carney's leadership selection. Corporate documents reveal Alex Nanoff is involved, and his past website shows he worked as a political assistant for a Liberal MPP. Another individual connected to Liaison, Raymond Edwards, is a chief of equity and inclusion officer and was director general for Corporation Canada. The speaker then examines Main Street, highlighting a small sample size in their polls. Quito Maggi, associated with Main Street, has a history of helping candidates win campaigns. The speaker references a Twitter dispute between pollsters, including Nick Kovaslis from Campaign Research, who claims his polls show the Conservatives ahead, contrary to other polls. The speaker suggests Frank Graves from EKOS Research is biased against Pierre Poilievre. Despite Nick's past Liberal support, his current tweets express support for Pierre Poilievre. The speaker concludes that the polls are manipulated due to the alleged biases and conflicts of interest of the pollsters.

The Prime Minister previously supported ENSCOCOP's role in examining foreign interference in Canada's democracy, but there seems to be a shift in stance. Questions arise about whether a recent ENSCOCOP report revealed involvement of Liberals seeking political and financial gain. Is the Prime Minister still committed to transparency and public trust in institutions, or has external influence changed this approach? In response, the Minister for Public Safety emphasizes the importance of oversight, noting that the government established a committee of parliamentarians to monitor security agencies for the first time. This committee includes members from all political parties, and their recommendations have been acted upon to enhance national security and combat foreign interference.

The speaker questions the organic nature of rallies for figures like AOC and Kamala Harris. They claim that 84% of devices tracked at these rallies also attended nine or more Kamala Harris rallies or Antifa, BLM, pro-Hamas, or pro-Palestinian events, with 31% attending over 20. The speaker suggests this indicates paid attendance due to the travel and time commitment involved. They believe the Democratic party is artificially inflating its popularity by paying people to attend rallies and protests, creating "rally professionals."

The speaker claims to have found the source of ineligible voters being added to voter rolls: an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker. Becker was allegedly involved in a scandal as a US attorney and later worked for left-leaning organizations. The speaker alleges that with George Soros' money, Becker created ERIC, which contracts with states to access DMV records and other sensitive data. According to the speaker, ERIC's membership agreement prohibits disclosing citizenship status, yet they add names to voter rolls and circulate the information. The speaker further claims that this information is then given to the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received funding from Mark Zuckerberg.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, and Uxbridge had been brought to the office to be counted. The individual questions how CTV and subsequently CBC could declare the Liberals as winners without any votes counted from Durham region. They call for an investigation, stating that something is not right.

An open letter to Prime Minister Mark Carney, signed by a retired detective and an active RCMP sergeant, accuses the Liberal government of ignoring national security risks, exposing Canadian intelligence agents, and targeting political opponents. The letter alleges CSIS mishandled the Meng Wanzhou/Two Michaels crisis and provided bad intel to the RCMP, leading to a flawed investigation that attempted to link Conservative party members to Chinese interference without proof. The unredacted documents exposed Canadians involved in covert operations in China. Nine Liberal MPs—Marco Mendicino, Dominic LeBlanc, Bill Blair, David McGinty, Anita Anand, Stephen McKinnon, Melanie Joly, Arif Varani, and Christina Freeland—are accused of inaction or obstruction regarding foreign interference and national security breaches. The RCMP officer who sent the letter had previously informed Trudeau about these issues, but the government allegedly did nothing. CSIS is accused of abusing its powers and smearing innocent Canadians. The speaker urges viewers to research and share this information, citing a lack of transparency and honesty in the Canadian government.

The speaker claims the Liberal Party won due to weaponizing fear and exploiting "Trump derangement syndrome" among Canadians, while the Conservative Party's strategy failed because Pierre Poilievre "went soft." A key factor was Poilievre losing his own riding due to a 2023 redistribution, which the speaker blames on national campaign manager Jenny Byrne. The speaker alleges Conservative HQ micromanaged campaigns nationwide, blocking candidates from debates and local events, and even rigging nomination races to install controllable "red Tory loyalists." They claim HQ staff showed conflicts of interest by getting family members into elite internships. According to the speaker, the election hinged on local races, but grassroots campaigns were sabotaged from the top. The speaker advises Poilievre to fire everyone at Conservative HQ and find a safe seat by having a retiring MP step aside. Despite the demoralizing loss, the speaker urges conservatives not to quit.

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

The speaker claims Stephen Harper is the puppeteer controlling the Conservative Party of Canada through Oz Ventures, a capital fund investing in Israeli-based AI and militarized technologies. Harper is a partner and president of Oz Ventures, which has invested at least $300 million in technologies used to "eradicate Palestinians," including advanced facial recognition software like Coresight, which is being tested by the Israeli military. The speaker hypothesizes that Harper loosened banking regulations as Prime Minister to hide money offshore. They allege Harper's involvement with the IDU helps far-right ideologies in resource-rich countries, and that he misappropriated funds to invest in Oz. The speaker believes Harper is using his influence and Oz Ventures to develop weaponized AI technologies and that he controls the Conservative party at both federal and provincial levels.

The speaker claims that on 10/26/2020, Anita Nann of the Liberal Party signed a Pfizer Canada agreement that states in section 5.5 that the long term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known. The speaker alleges that the government knew in October 2020 that the vaccines were not safe or effective, but forced them on the population anyway. The speaker also references a June 2024 NCI cop report that allegedly identified 11 traitors in the House of Commons. The speaker asks why this information was not disclosed and questions how informed decisions can be made without knowing if one is voting for someone who committed treason. Speaker 1 encourages listeners to visit ledgerwood.ca to learn more and vote for an MP who will fight for them and tell them the truth.

I haven't received official word from the Liberal Party about my disqualification. It's shocking that I learned about it from a news headline before receiving any direct communication. This is alarming. It speaks to the state of the Liberal Party that I'm finding out about my disqualification on air. It's not surprising, though. Our internal polls showed we were neck and neck with the frontrunner. They didn't want me on the debate stage or on the ballot because the Liberal Party of Canada wanted to complete the coronation of Mark Carney. All allegations are completely false and fabricated. I won't allow the Liberal Party of Canada or anyone to smear my name or the name of thousands of volunteers in our campaign.

The speaker attended Mark Carney's rally in Richmond, BC, after attending Pierre Poilievre's rally. The crowd at Carney's rally consisted mostly of older people, Gen X, boomers, and people from the Punjabi community, with a noticeable absence of Chinese and Asian attendees. The speaker felt the rally resembled a retirement home. Carney's speech lacked substance, with no policy discussion or solutions to key issues like the cost of living or housing crisis. The speaker claims the message focused on the idea that America and Trump are bad, and that voting Liberal would solve that crisis. Carney read from a teleprompter, unlike Poilievre, who used bullet points and spoke with passion. The speaker believes the polls are inaccurate, as the support for Poilievre seems much stronger. The speaker alleges that Liberals are supported by boomers who benefit from rising home values and the Punjabi community who benefit from lax policies and the temporary foreign worker program.

Judicial recounts are normal, but the number of seat flips in the 2025 election is unusual. In 2011 there was one flip, in 2015 there were zero, and in 2021 there was one. In 2025, a number of seats have flipped to the Liberal party. This observation is not due to malicious intent or outside influence. The speaker is simply noticing a trend and a flaw. The speaker is calling on Elections Canada to improve voter education or to ensure correct postal codes on mail-in ballots. The speaker feels that the number of flips is weird.

The speaker discusses foreign interference in elections and questions why the president is not pursuing this avenue. They mention evidence of votes being sent overseas and foreign actors meddling in elections. The speaker then explains how voter rolls are kept in foreign nations, such as Pakistan, and how fake ballots are attributed to registered voters who have not yet voted. They reveal that 171,000 blank fake ballots were dropped into the system and attributed to different people, ultimately benefiting the Democratic candidates. The speaker concludes by stating that there are other aspects of foreign involvement in elections.

The speaker claims that recent polls showing a surge in Liberal support are a "scam." They focus on two polling firms, Liaison and Main Street. Liaison allegedly has ties to the Liberal party through an individual named Alex, described as a Liberal operative. Corporate searches revealed Alex's past work with the Ontario Liberal Party and connections to a government DEI officer. Regarding Main Street, the speaker questions the methodology of using text messages for online surveys, citing a small sample size. They allege the president and CEO, Quito Maggi, was a former campaign manager for a Liberal MP. The speaker references a Twitter exchange where Quito Maggi disputes another pollster's findings, who claims the Conservative party was ahead. The speaker highlights that the Canadian Research and Insights Council imposed sanctions against the other pollster for unresolved complaints. They express distrust in polls due to conflicts and bias, and skepticism of polymarket data that relies on these polls.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge had arrived at the office. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The individual believes this situation is suspicious and warrants investigation.