reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow spoke on the phone on November 24, 1963. Rostow suggested that a presidential commission of distinguished, bipartisan citizens be appointed to investigate President Kennedy's murder, as world and American opinion distrust the Dallas police's handling of the situation. Rostow suggested members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers suggested Rostow provide a memorandum for the president, emphasizing the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He said the president could use it in private talks with newsmen or for his joint session next Wednesday night. Moyers wanted the president to reassure the world that America is a land of public order, civility, and guaranteed public safety. Rostow agreed to send a memo right away. Moyers said he would pass on the commission suggestion to the president.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss ways to respond to the Kennedy assassination and the ensuing crisis. Rostow suggests appointing a presidential commission composed of very distinguished, bipartisan Americans to look into the murder, with no Supreme Court justices involved. He proposes a seven- or nine-member group, possibly including people like Tom Dewey, and perhaps Bill Story from Texas, with Nixon mentioned as a possibility. The aim is to address world and American opinion, which Rostow says is shaken by the Dallas police and not believed, and to present a thorough, nonpolitical examination of the affair. Moyers agrees that such a commission would be helpful and adds a practical concern: he plans to pass this suggestion along to the president. He also notes the difficulty Nick Katzenbach faces and asks Rostow to keep him informed about Nick’s condition, emphasizing not to place excessive strain on him. Earlier, Moyers remarks that the shooting in Hawesville, along with recent events, signals a broader breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He asks Rostow to prepare a memorandum for the president to hand to newsmen and use in private talks, including the president’s remarks at the joint session next Wednesday night. The memorandum should urge the president to reinforce institutions that seem weakened or questioned—institutions that undergird society and public order—and to reassure the world that America is a land of public order, civility, and guaranteed public safety. Rostow acknowledges praise for the Gettysburg Address and agrees to send a memo promptly. He confirms the plan to have the president appoint a special commission of distinguished Americans, primarily from the legal field, to investigate the assassination and report on it. Moyers will ensure he passes this idea along and will relay any further information about Nick Katzenbach. Rostow expresses confidence in Nick’s resilience, stating he is fighting back with terrific strength. The conversation closes with Moyers promising to follow through and Rostow thanking him, with an emphasis on coordinating efforts to stabilize public confidence and institutional credibility in the wake of the crisis.

Charlie Kirk addresses perspectives on political assassinations, including JFK’s. In the JFK files, Mossad is mentioned, but not tied to involvement; the best reading is “who wanted JFK dead the most,” with Israel frequently cited, yet Lyndon Baines Johnson, parts of the U.S. government, and the Cubans also implicated. There were “like, 15 or 20 things that happened that day that were inexcusable,” such as changing the parade route, JFK riding in an open-air convertible, LBJ not riding alongside him, the vehicle slowing down as it passed the Texas School Book Depository. The question emphasized is not only who did it, but that more than one person did it; acknowledging that could reveal government lies about JFK, leading to a broader skepticism about future government trust. Another participant comments that Charlie Kirk reminded viewers of common sense and not accepting force-fed narratives or “BS crap” from the government regarding a single gunman; the discussion notes “multiple people were involved” and “a lot of strange things occurred” that day. This aligns with a broader critique of government psychological operations: MK Ultra, Mockingbird, and Mockingbird II. The first government surveillance on the people after JFK’s assassination is described as Mockingbird I, designed to convince there was nothing to see despite much to see, with Mockingbird II deployed again to convince people that questions about Kirk’s narrative are crazy and to suggest there may be Turning Point USA employees engaged in an obvious cover-up. Frank Turek is cited as saying it’s crazy to imply betrayal by trusted individuals, though the historical note mentions Jesus Christ as a betrayal example; the discussion asserts JFK personally selected LBJ as vice president, and that LBJ was clearly implicated in JFK’s assassination. Charlie is said to be open to the idea that Mossad may have been involved, and he asserts that parts of the U.S. government and the Cubans were involved; he asks for more argument regarding Mossad. He suggests JFK’s assassination was plausible to involve multiple actors and notes that the question of “who wanted JFK dead the most” should be pursued further, including in examining who would want Charlie Kirk dead and why. The dialogue then moves to the political fast lane, with three motives for those who might want him dead: money, secrets, and power. He says he refused money, implying he knows his secrets; his youth political organization has gained influence. The discussion speculates on global implications, naming France, Israel, the U.S. government, and Egypt as mentioned in connection with the investigation. The McCrone couple are described as having paid for an assassination threat, and, notably, neither the Pentagon nor the White House or intelligence agencies nor the Elysee Palace dispute that narrative; the FBI is now listed as not denying that threat.

After President Kennedy was assassinated, our nation looked to Gerald Ford and a few others to understand the chaos. Conspiracy theorists can have their own opinions.

President Kennedy's assassination remains a hotly debated topic. While the official Warren Commission concluded Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, evidence suggests a more complex narrative. Many eyewitnesses reported shots coming from the front, contradicting Oswald's position. The rushed investigation and immediate pronouncements by President Johnson and FBI Director Hoover to quell any notion of conspiracy raise serious questions. The CIA actively discredited those questioning the official story, labeling them "conspiracy theorists." Kennedy's shifting stance on the Cold War and his growing conflict with the military and intelligence agencies further fuel ongoing debate about his death. The lack of accountability for those behind Kennedy's murder casts a long shadow over US foreign policy.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow spoke on the phone on November 24, 1963. Rostow suggested that a presidential commission of distinguished, bipartisan citizens be appointed to investigate President Kennedy's murder, as world and American opinion distrust the Dallas police's handling of the situation. Rostow suggested members like Tom Dewey, Bill Story, or Nixon, excluding Supreme Court justices. Moyers then asked Rostow for a memorandum for the president about the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, evidenced by events like the "Impeach the Supreme Court" movement. Moyers wanted the president to emphasize America's tradition of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and in his joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow agreed to send the memo right away. Moyers said he would pass on the commission suggestion to the president.

Upon election, the speaker will establish an independent presidential commission on assassination attempts. This commission will release all remaining documents pertaining to the John F. Kennedy assassination. The commission will also conduct a rigorous review of the attack that occurred last month. The speaker states that many people have asked them to release the documents on the Kennedy assassination.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the assassination of President Kennedy. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the supreme court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America as a land of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and a joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the president along these lines. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.

Nixon, after a few drinks, revealed that Dallas was responsible for JFK's assassination. He admitted that both he and Lyndon Johnson wanted to be president, but Nixon wasn't willing to kill for it. This revelation inspired the speaker to write a book. They acknowledge that various theories exist, such as the CIA's involvement, as suggested by Robert Kennedy and Sam Gianconda's daughter. The speaker believes that within 84 hours of JFK's death, Johnson allowed the military-industrial complex to pursue their interests in Vietnam. Johnson also provided assurances to Alan Dulles, whom Kennedy had recently fired for betraying him.

Speaker 0: He delivered a speech at Riverside Church on 04/04/1967, a year to the date before he was assassinated. And that was a powerful anti war speech that he delivered. Speaker 1: What would you say was the significance of that particular speech? Speaker 0: The real significance was that it put him, his footprints heavily into the anti war movement for the first time. And he termed The United States the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today. And so he was rising as a severe principal critic of the government in that speech. Another negative significance is that he was attacked from all sides. He was called a traitor by mainstream media. Millions of dollars were withdrawn from his organization, Southern Christian Leadership Conference. So he lost a great deal by taking that position. All of that is significant. Speaker 1: What do think was the primary motivation behind the killing? Speaker 0: I think assassinations, political assassinations are a last resort, as a rule. But I think in terms of The United States from what I've observed and throughout its history, and there have been assassinations other than those in the sixties, remember, I think it's a last resort. I think if they can, if a person is troublesome to them and potentially can develop a following, I think they have to stop him. Now they can do that by rendering him unemployable, by having him set up in some kind of a scandal or sexual activity that destroys his credit or her credibility. They can buy him off by giving him a job or position. There are a variety of techniques by blacking them out in terms of the media. And so if they can't control any other way, and the person is that critical in terms of potentially mobilizing people, that's when political assassinations take place. Assassination is the last resort. Martin King was assassinated not only because he was bringing enormous thought to the whole Vietnam War effort opposing it and the corporate militarists of the society, the weapons providers, energy providers, all of that were going to lose huge fortunes of money if that war ended. So it was not only that but it was the fact that he was going to bring half a million people to Washington in the Poor People's March. And the military believed that they would see their mission as a failure because they would go to the congress, try to get them to change the the priorities for public funding from from the military, take some money from the military, and bring it into social services programs, and they wouldn't be successful. And that would that would radicalize the group to such a point where they might have a revolution on the streets of Washington with masses they couldn't control. They didn't have the troops. Westmoreland wanted 200,000 more in Vietnam. They didn't have those. They certainly didn't have the troops to put down that kind of revolution on the streets. So they had to kill King, make sure he didn't bring that kind of dynamic into Washington.

Speaker 0 introduces the topic of Israel allegedly having influence over the US government and mentions that Israel assassinated JFK, pointing to William Cooper as the source who was also assassinated by Israel. Speaker 0 references Cooper’s book Behold a Pale Horse and notes that Cooper was the first to obtain original footage from a CIA whistleblower showing who shot Kennedy and how they shot Kennedy. He says the media’s clips started at a cropped frame, and that Cooper’s release prompted further questions. Speaker 1 explains that the assassin was the driver in the car with Kennedy, visible in a film with public help. He brings the film, saying it shows the motorcade on Elm Street in front of the Book Depository Building, Kennedy having been shot in the throat, Jacqueline pulling Kennedy toward him in shock, and the driver turning around with a pistol in his left hand, firing over his right shoulder and shooting the president in the head. Speaker 2 asks for a repeat and then the duo watches the film. Speaker 1 identifies the driver as William Greer, noting he was a secret service agent. He describes the weapon as an electrically operated gas-powered assassination pistol built especially for the Central Intelligence Agency, asserting there is no puff of smoke. Speaker 2 questions whether the weapon is indeed a pistol in the lower right corner of the frame. Speaker 1 confirms it is an air-operated pistol (pneumatic) and claims it fired an exploding pellet that injected shellfish toxin into the president’s brain, so that if the pellet’s explosion did not kill him, the toxin would. He states that he read all of this in the documents. Speaker 0 asks what type of weapon was used to assassinate JFK and references the 1963 time frame, saying that intelligence agencies would have such weapons. He then questions whether intelligence agencies could have used such weapons to assassinate Charlie Kirk. He suggests listening to Jack Posobiec and others who are “carrying water for this administration,” implying time will tell.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the assassination of President Kennedy. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers asks Rostow for a memorandum for the president regarding the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country. He suggests the president emphasize America as a land of public order and civility in upcoming talks and a joint session. Rostow agrees to send a memo immediately and Moyers says he will pass along the suggestion of a commission to the president. They briefly discuss Nick Katzenbach and his work.

Lyndon Johnson became president after Kennedy's 1 PM death. Some claim supporters of Israel's nuclear weapons program were involved in JFK's assassination. Robert Kennedy was shot in 1968 after winning the California primaries, potentially paving the way for Richard Nixon's presidency. Both Kennedy assassinations are often treated as unconnected tragedies, but the speaker argues they are linked and will solve them beyond a reasonable doubt. John trusted Robert unequivocally, making him his attorney general and closest advisor. Robert encouraged John to endorse black civil rights. Robert ran for president in 1968 to continue his brother's legacy. Robert doubted the Warren Commission's conclusion about JFK's assassination and started his own investigation, including sending a message to Nikita Khrushchev suggesting a right-wing conspiracy. Jim Garrison believed the fatal shot came from the front, not from where Oswald was positioned. Ballistic evidence suggests Sirhan Sirhan's bullets didn't hit Robert Kennedy, and multiple witnesses reported a second shooter. Some claim Sirhan was in a trance and may have been hypnotically programmed. The speaker questions why Israel would kill Robert Kennedy if he was pro-Israel, suggesting his pro-Israel statements were merely campaign rhetoric. The Kennedy family wasn't known to be particularly fond of Jews. The speaker claims a Zionist cabal was involved in JFK's assassination, motivated by Kennedy's opposition to Israel's nuclear program. Lyndon Johnson is implicated, with claims he was secretly loyal to Israel. The speaker concludes that both Kennedy assassinations share common elements: Johnson and Israel. John Kennedy Jr. died in a plane crash, which some believe was not an accident, preventing him from potentially reaching the presidency.

Dark clouds of political crisis loomed over America after the assassination of President Kennedy. In the aftermath, the nation looked to Gerald Ford and a select few to make sense of the chaos. While conspiracy theories abound, the Warren Commission report remains the definitive account of this tragedy. This is largely due to Ford's involvement, as he was a respected figure in the nation.

Good evening. After Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald, many Americans questioned the official narrative of the Kennedy assassination. The Warren Commission concluded that both acted alone, but doubts persisted. The term "conspiracy theory" emerged in 1964 as skepticism grew. Psychiatrist Louis Joylan West, who assessed Ruby, was a CIA contractor involved in mind control programs, raising further questions about his motives. A 1976 House committee suggested a conspiracy in Kennedy's murder, with the CIA as a prime suspect. Despite laws mandating document disclosure, recent administrations have withheld thousands of pages. A source with access to these documents claimed the CIA was involved in the assassination. This suggests a powerful, unaccountable force within the government, undermining democratic control. Trust in government has eroded since Kennedy's death, and many key figures have been aware of this troubling reality.

The speaker discusses a series of alarming claims related to political violence and distrust in U.S. institutions. They reference online activity on social media and a book that appeared prior to what is described as the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The speaker states that the book “was put up, I believe, twenty four hours or within a certain period of time before he was assassinated,” and they recall seeing it but are unsure if there was any follow-up. Turning to broader issues of trust, the speaker asserts that skepticism toward the government, and specifically agencies like the FBI, does not arise from nowhere. They frame this distrust as grounded in “decades of the federal government and elected officials' failures and actually being transparent and honest with the American people.” In their view, there has been a history of corruption within the FBI, described as “corruptness that exists within the Department of the FBI previously,” which they juxtapose with references to “the deep state individuals in various branches of government that have engaged in coups against the American people.” The speaker then suggests a possible topic for discussion, stating, “We can talk about Kennedy if you want,” implying that discussions about government overreach or conspiratorial actions could include the Kennedy assassination as a point of reference. Overall, the points highlighted are: (1) a book about the assassination of Charlie Kirk appearing online shortly before the alleged event, with uncertainty about follow-up; (2) a claim that distrust in government institutions stems from long-standing failures and lack of transparency by federal authorities; (3) allegations of FBI corruption and deep-state actors across branches of government who have engaged in coups against the American people; and (4) an invitation to discuss related topics such as Kennedy.

The speaker discusses the conspiracy theories surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy. They mention Rob Reiner's claim that JFK was shot by four shooters and question the official investigation. They also mention a CIA agent who confirmed the CIA's involvement in the assassination. The speaker highlights the lack of trust in the government and the existence of powerful forces within the US government that are beyond democratic control. They mention a Secret Service agent's account that challenges the lone gunman theory. The speaker concludes by calling for truth and honesty in the matter.

Checklist for the summary approach: - Identify the core claim and the proposed link between the Demona project and JFK’s assassination. - Note the main actors and roles: Angleton, the Oswald file, the Kennedy White House, and the Israeli government. - Capture the central conflict: Kennedy’s push for on-site inspections versus Israeli resistance, and why inspections would reveal a bomb-making program. - Emphasize the claim that the juxtaposition of these facts should be part of the public record. - Preserve key terms and phrases from the transcript without adding new analysis or qualifiers. Summary: The speaker begins by asking why the Demona project, described as the Israeli nuclear program, which “has never officially been admitted by anybody but Israel,” could plausibly relate to the assassination of JFK. The reply asserts that the connection lies in what James Angleton was doing in 1963. It is stated that there were profound conflicts between Israel and the Kennedy White House over Israel’s nuclear program. Specifically, Kennedy pressed for on-site inspections, while the Israelis resisted these inspections because they would have revealed that Israel possessed a bomb-making program. The dialogue characterizes this disagreement as a real bone of contention between the Israeli government and the Kennedy administration in 1963, a period when Angleton controlled the Oswald file. The conclusion drawn is that the juxtaposition of these facts means that everything about the issue should be on the public record.

Our first investigation will thoroughly examine the John F. Kennedy assassination. Preliminary findings suggest flaws in the single bullet theory presented in the initial congressional hearing. We believe there were two shooters. We're working to access secure information, hopefully before public release, to uncover more evidence. We'll announce our findings soon.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the aftermath of President Kennedy's assassination. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the Supreme Court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America's tradition of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and a joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the President outlining these points. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.

Our first investigation will be announced soon and will cover a thorough investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination. Based on what I've seen so far, the initial hearing held in Congress was faulty regarding the single bullet theory. I believe that there were two shooters, and we should find more information as we gain access to the SCIF, hopefully before the files are released to the public.

Bill Moyers and Dean Eugene Rostow discuss the aftermath of President Kennedy's assassination. Rostow suggests a presidential commission be appointed, composed of distinguished, bipartisan citizens, excluding Supreme Court justices, to investigate the murder. He believes world and American opinion is shaken by the Dallas police's behavior, causing disbelief. Moyers relays his own idea: that President Johnson should address the breakdown of respect for law and order in the country, referencing the "impeach the Supreme Court" sentiment. He suggests the President emphasize America's tradition of public order and civility in upcoming talks with newsmen and in his joint session next Wednesday night. Rostow offers to send a memorandum to the President along these lines. Moyers says he will pass along Rostow's commission suggestion.

On Air Force One, before takeoff from Dallas, President Johnson called Attorney General Robert Kennedy to secure his approval for the presidential oath administration. This call was incredibly difficult for both men; Johnson was calling his nemesis, while Kennedy was still reeling from his brother's assassination. Johnson pressed Kennedy with questions about the oath's requirements, a detail Kennedy found insensitive and irrelevant at that moment. Kennedy, somewhat puzzled by the call, promised to check with an assistant. There's disagreement over who initiated the idea of the in-flight oath; Johnson claimed it was Kennedy's suggestion, a manipulation tactic to involve Kennedy and deflect responsibility. This tactic backfired, further escalating tensions between the two.

Secrecy is repugnant in a free society. The assassination of President Kennedy occurred at 1 PM CST. We must overcome societal divisions – racial, economic, etc. – and work together. The assassinations of both Kennedy brothers are acknowledged. The dangers of excessive concealment outweigh the justifications for it. We must not let the need for security be used to expand censorship. The CIA’s purpose was creating constant wars for the military-industrial complex. Many Americans distrust the Warren Commission report. We must protect our freedoms; they are coming after us. No official should use my words as an excuse to censor, stifle dissent, or withhold facts. Some media push personal agendas, threatening our democracy. We seek a true peace, not one enforced by American weapons; we all share this planet and our children’s future.