TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In October, the speaker was on a Zoom call with New Yorker colleagues. During a break, the speaker was caught masturbating on camera. As a result, the speaker was fired from the New Yorker after 27 years and has since been on leave from CNN.

I'm facing charges of human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang for sexual exploitation. OnlyFans is the best hustle. I'm accused of using the "Lover Boy" method, being nice to coerce women. I never mention webcamming until after sex. My PhD program, "pimp and hose degree," teaches how to get girls to love me and work on webcam. I encourage them to work for me so we can spend more time together. My bottom girl is trained to do the selling. My MO was to find girls, make them love me, and make them work for me. I had multiple locations with many girls working for me, taking around half the money, claiming the disparity was due to taxes. I used sex to make women love and obey me, living in my house to make me money. I consider that being a pimp. I see the term pimp as a positive thing, referring to a positively inspirational and motivating person.

Okay, so that video clip that's circulating is from ten years ago, when I was explaining how my webcam business worked. The main point was, you can't just approach women about doing webcam work. It doesn't work that way. The video is about my "PhD program" on corporatetake.com, which teaches how I got girls to like me, fall in love with me, and ultimately, work for me on webcam. My method was finding girls, making them love me, and then having them work for me. It covers everything from attracting women to retaining them. I realize now that how I discussed women and dating back then is not how I would approach those topics today. Currently, I still have three girls that work for me.

I sat on a huge story for three years after interviewing Virginia Roberts. At first, nobody knew who Jeffrey Epstein was and the story was killed. Then the palace found out about the allegations against Prince Andrew. They threatened us in so many ways. We were afraid of losing access to Prince William and Kate. Alan Dershowitz was also implicated. Roberts had pictures and told me everything. She'd been in hiding for years and we convinced her to come forward. The story was unbelievable. It had Clinton, everything. I tried for three years to get it on air, but couldn't. Now that it's all coming out, I'm so pissed. I had it all. We had other women backing it up. Brad Edwards said three years ago that one day, we'd realize Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known.

The episode centers on a controversial incident in a Miami nightclub where a group of influencers were seen celebrating a song that included Nazi references. Video clips from Vendome on 743 Washington Avenue showed people laughing and engaging with the lyrics “Heil Hitler,” and one participant giving a Nazi salute. The club publicly stated it does not condone antisemitism or hate speech and said it is examining safeguards to prevent repeats. Miami Beach officials and local operators condemned the behavior, noting the incident sparked widespread backlash. Andrew Tate, the central figure in the discussion, explains that he did not request or choose the songs played that night. He describes entering a nightclub where songs were played by others, and asserts that he did not dance to, repeat, or endorse the lyrics. He reflects on how internet culture rewards shock value and contends that many young streamers seek provocative moments to gain views, which can lead to unintended consequences for those associated with the content. Tate discusses the social dynamics and accountability within their circle. He notes that he did not know all the people in the group, emphasizing that he had only recently met two of them (Clav and Nick) and had not met Snico before the night. He states that Tristan looked uncomfortable in the footage, and he acknowledges that being linked to the event has caused widespread scrutiny. He denies antisemitic intent and argues that the incident was “the main reason this is being done” due to the pursuit of clicks and attention, not due to genuine hatred. The conversation broadens to address antisemitism and its rise in America. Tate offers a theory: antisemitism increases when young men feel disenfranchised and told that Jews control the system, even if not true. He says there was antisemitism historically tied to economic and social instability, and argues this is part of a broader dissatisfaction among young men who are looking for someone to blame. Several participants debate the age and maturity of those involved, with some noting that not all individuals in the group are young. They discuss the responsibility of leadership within their circle, emphasizing that a leader’s choices influence others’ behavior. One speaker asserts that Tate is the leader, and that others “follow his lead.” There is contention about who actually played the offending song, with some suggesting Sneako might have played it, while others defend Sneako or the others present. Personal reflections surface about past experiences and growth. Tate describes his general approach to social environments, noting that he typically avoids clubs and is cautious about who he associates with. He acknowledges the possibility of being set up or misrepresented online, and he emphasizes that he did not organize the incident or endorse the lyrics. He also discusses the idea of recreating oneself and moving toward higher-level opportunities, while recognizing the potential consequences of associating with controversial figures. A recurring theme is accountability versus blame. Some participants argue that Tate should have severed ties or left the scene to avoid being connected to the controversy, while others defend him as a target of scrutiny by association. They discuss the role of clout and controversy in online culture, the impact on reputations, and the importance of choosing associations that align with personal standards and future ambitions. Toward the end, speakers acknowledge that Nick Fuentes had never been to a club before and that Myron Gaines and Snico’s involvement complicated the situation. They reflect on the possibility of misjudgment, the need for clearer boundaries, and the impact on relationships within their circle. The conversation closes with a sense of learning from the episode and a recognition that leadership carries responsibility for the actions of those who look up to you.

I was asked about my relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I've said many times I shouldn't have had dinners with him. It was just dinner, nothing more. Regarding my divorce, my ex-wife has stated that my meetings with Epstein were a problem in our marriage. She made it clear she didn't like them. She even met Epstein once to see who he was but regretted it immediately, describing him as "abhorrent" and "evil personified," and had nightmares afterwards. I don't know why I kept seeing him. I am a rich man, but that's not a reason to take me seriously.

For three years, I held onto this story and an interview with Virginia Roberts. At first, no one knew who Jeffrey Epstein was, so we were told it was a stupid story. Then the palace got wind of the allegations against Prince Andrew and threatened us in various ways. We were scared we wouldn't be able to interview Kate, so we dropped the story. Virginia had evidence, including pictures, and she was in hiding for 12 years. Eventually, we convinced her to come forward and speak to us. The information we had on Clinton was unbelievable. We had everything.

Speaker 0, Jeffrey Edward Epstein and my residence address is 6100 Red Hook Boulevard in Virgin Islands. Speaker 1: Is it true that you forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with numerous friends of yours? Speaker 0: Wouldn't love my fifth amendment right. Speaker 2: You had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, who, when you met him ten years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors. Speaker 3: And, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners regretted having those dinners. We did what we did because we wanted to see Epstein go to jail. He needed to go to jail. Were there young women in another part of the house giving massages, when I wasn't around? I have no idea of that. Speaker 1: Sent him three 12 year old girls from France who spoke no English for defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. Speaker 0: Please, they never saw a young underage woman. Speaker 3: You know, those meetings were were a mistake. They didn't result in what he purported, and I cut them off. You know, that goes back a long time ago now. There's you know, so there's nothing new on that. Speaker 2: We now know that he was and had been procuring young girls for sex trafficking. Speaker 0: We now know that. At the time, there was no indication to me or anybody else. I kept my underwear on during the massage. I don't like massages particularly. Speaker 3: If we had had more transparency, perhaps this case would have gone differently. Speaker 2: It was reported that you continued to meet with him over several years. Speaker 3: You know, I had dinners with him. I regret doing that. Speaker 0: You have what's been described as an egg shaped penis. Speaker 3: Well, he's dead. So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.

The speaker admits to being the head of an organized criminal group that recruits girls for TikTok videos. They face charges of human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang. The speaker discusses their involvement in the webcam business, using the "lover boy method" to coerce girls into working for them. They claim to have built an empire of webcam girls, taking around 50% of their earnings. The speaker also mentions instances of physical abuse and manipulation. They deny being a rapist but admit to living in Romania for freedom. The speaker sees themselves as a positive and motivating figure, referring to themselves as a pimp. They recommend a book on pimping as a guide. The speaker denies some of the accusations made against them.

For three years, I had an interview with Virginia Roberts, but we couldn't air it. At first, no one knew who Jeffrey Epstein was, so they dismissed it as a stupid story. Then the palace got involved and threatened us because of her allegations against Prince Andrew. We were scared of losing the chance to interview Kate and Will, so we dropped the story. Alan Dershowitz was also implicated. Virginia had evidence and was in hiding for 12 years, but we convinced her to talk. We had everything, including Clinton. I tried for three years to make it public, and now I'm furious because it's all coming out. We had it all, with other women supporting her claims. Brad Edwards, the attorney, said three years ago that Epstein was the most prolific pedophile in the country.

Yesterday, at the Department of Justice, I spent several hours reading the unredacted files and the absolutely horrific and depraved messages exchanged among rich and powerful people across every sphere of influence. These individuals sit at the top of governments, academic institutions, giant corporations, and hold positions such as cabinet secretaries. The messages show they absolutely believed they were above the law, above morals, and immune to societal norms. They joked in these emails about pedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls, and about creating spaces—entire islands even—where they could do anything they wanted and get away with it because of their wealth, power, and connections. This was a massive global sex trafficking ring with thousands of victims that we know of and thousands more that we probably don't. So when the DOJ says that there is nothing to investigate, we, the American people, must rise up. We must allow the courage and determination of the survivors who have spoken out at great risk to themselves to push us to never give up until every single one of these predators and pedophiles and predator protectors is brought to justice. It is the voices of the survivors ringing through in the darkness of all of this horror that has gotten us this far. And in speaking to so many of them myself, I know that this effort is not just for them. They're not doing this just for them. They're doing it for their girls, for their children, for other people who have been affected, to all the survivors of sexual assault everywhere across the world who are watching to see if we can get accountability right here in The United States Of America. Many rich and powerful people thought over the decades that they got away with this. They definitely did. You can see it in the emails. But as Lauren said to me the other day, the earth is shaking because every single one of them now is becoming known. And around the world, princes, ambassadors, even prime ministers are being brought down for their participation in this global sex trafficking ring.

I met Donald Trump at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion when I was 13. During a party, he asked me for a sexual act, and although I was uncomfortable, my recruiter insisted I comply. He insisted I use a glove before I proceeded. Afterward, he left, and I didn't see him again that night. I had come to New York to model and was recruited by a girl named Tiffany, who introduced me to these parties. Epstein, aware of my age, made inappropriate advances toward me. He seemed to prefer younger girls and was aware I was a virgin. It felt like he wanted to have first access to me before anyone else.

The old content from ten years ago is being conflated with the current charges from 2021, but anything before 2021 has nothing to do with the case. Here's context for a video circulating of me talking about the "Lover Boy method." You can't just ask a girl to work for you doing webcam. My recruitment process is like a PhD course; I message them on Instagram. I don't mention webcam until after I've had sex with the girl. After that, she takes the PhD test. If she passes and wants to be with you, then you can suggest she works for you. Approaching girls directly about webcam doesn't work. Also, tax is important for controlling your woman. Tell her you're paying the tax, even if you aren't because you are being paid in Bitcoin. This makes her think her taxes are taken care of, so you can pay her less.

I met Candace in December 2018 and we got engaged very quickly, after only seventeen days. I met Andrew Tate at a dinner with my husband and his friend before he was really known on the internet. I've known Andrew for many years, before he was famous. Andrew is a great guy. My Romanian assistant spoke with him at the dinner. Afterwards, she told me she thought Andrew Tate was a pimp in Romania. Like all humans, Andrew is flawed. If you're a guy from America or the UK and you move to Romania, it's likely because you can get away with more "dodgy" stuff there. It's the Eastern Corridor; that's just how it is.

After my Tucker Carlson interview, a viral video was created showing conflicting clips of me. People are weighing in with many opinions. I responded with my own video to address these allegations. I used to run a webcam company. The business is legal, but I'm now being charged with human trafficking, forming an organized crime group, and rape. What they're saying is that I use the Lover Boy method. I find girls, make them love me, then make them work for me. Every single girl who ever worked for me defended me. These charges began in 2021, but they're circulating old videos. International visitors came here, had a nice time, asked for money, and then said they were kidnapped. CCTV proved that was a lie. I believe in truth and justice, and I believe in the Romanian judicial system.

- The conversation centers on Andrew Tate and a divide in the conservative space about whether he is a “good guy” or a bad guy. A video of Tate is shown to frame the discussion. - A video excerpt from Speaker 1 features Tate describing how he became a multimillionaire by creating a webcam studio. He explains he took girls who lacked experience or equipment and built a system that allowed him to convince them to participate, retain 100% control of their income, and ensure they were effective in a highly competitive industry. He stresses that it’s not easy money and that the process requires many tips and tricks to ensure a girl can make money from home, implying that once trained, a girl could potentially earn unlimited money. He also questions why a girl would stay with him once she can make money independently. - Speaker 0 argues that Tate was a webcam operator who objectified women and acted like a pimp. They reference a separate video showing Tate allegedly whipping a girl and note that if the girl was 15 at the time based on Tate’s stated age, that would be problematic. They ask whether Tate should be given a pass and invite thoughts on fairness in criticizing him. - Speaker 2 weighs in with nuance, saying it is not black-and-white and that they have not done a deep dive into Tate’s entire situation. They acknowledge Tate’s past involvement with encouraging girls to participate in OnlyFans-style content and express disapproval, hoping Tate would publicly acknowledge that this was a mistake and express regret. They note that many women enter porn or stripping due to desperation or trafficking, suggesting vulnerability in those Tate might have preyed upon. They admit uncertainty about whether Tate committed criminal acts, mentioning potential legal age issues (Tate operating in a country where the legal age of consent is 16, and a separate girl possibly being 15) and the absence of victims coming forward. - Speaker 2 also claims Tate has been unfairly persecuted. They describe a prior raid/arrest and a social media “PizzaGate” narrative on X (formerly Twitter), arguing that while PizzaGate itself is real, Tate’s alleged actions do not compare to Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged activities. They emphasize that Tate is being portrayed unfairly and that redemption would be preferable. - Both speakers discuss redemption and reform: Speaker 2 suggests Tate could seek redemption by stating regret for past actions, condemning the porn/OnlyFans route, and encouraging women to avoid or leave such work, highlighting the need for support, healing, and respect for women who have experienced abuse. They suggest a forgiving community could respond positively to an acknowledgment and a commitment to change, rather than punitive treatment.

Speaker 0 notes that the people are not accusing him of rape or selling anyone; they are facing charges including human trafficking, rape, and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit. Speaker 1 describes OnlyFans as “the best hustle in the world.” He explains the alleged methods: using the “lover boy method,” coercing by being nice, and not mentioning webcam until after sex. He says mentioning webcam on dates “just doesn’t work” and claims he would never do that, arguing the technique is to proceed normally and introduce webcam later. Speaker 2 and Speaker 3 discuss a program called PhD on corporatetake.com: “PhD is a pimp and hose degree.” He claims it teaches how he met girls, how he got girls to like him, how he got girls to fall in love with him to work on webcam, and how to have them spend more time with him. He describes inviting a prospective recruit to a meeting and bringing a girl who works for “Your bottom bitch” to explain the selling. The process emphasizes a “first girl” as pivotal, with girls on camera together the first day so the new girl can observe and imitate. Speaker 4 recounts specific experiences: being bought wine and becoming nervous about webcam work; the narrator describes wealth from webcam operations and retaining girls; he mentions four locations and 75 girls, with roughly half of the money going to the workers, claiming a 50% split and suggesting taxes explain the disparity. Another worker, paid a flat £15 per hour, notes large sums from clients who believed they would meet the girl. Speaker 1 describes a pattern where men fell in love with his models and sent large amounts of money, including people selling houses and life savings. He states: “I used sex as a tool to make women love me so they'd obey me and live in my house to make me money. That’s what I wanted. So I was a pimp in that sense.” He discusses the emotional manipulation that led clients to believe they would meet the girl. Speaker 5 remains skeptical, labeling the operation “pimpy.” Speaker 1 argues about the Me Too era, saying he is not a rapist in a way that would be labeled, yet he admits he likes the freedom to do what he wants. Speaker 6 challenges Speaker 1 by quoting his own statements: that his job was to meet a girl, sleep with her, get her to fall in love, and then get her on webcam to become rich together. Speaker 1 denies that exact quote, but Speaker 6 insists it matches what was said on the website. Speaker 0 reiterates that the belief is he was charged with human trafficking, and Speaker 1 clarifies that “human trafficking” is framed as forcing a girl to work for financial gain, noting TikTok accounts from some girls as part of the justification. He reiterates the PhD as a pimp and hose degree he claims to be pleasant about.

The speakers discuss why Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens would give Andrew Tate a platform. Owens interviewed Tate in Romania while he was under house arrest. It's noted that Owens was aware Tate was allegedly a pimp in Romania when they first met. The interview is framed as conservatives pressuring Tate, which is considered false. Tate was allegedly running a webcam business as recently as 2021, and allegedly only stopped because of his 2022 arrest. Owens' interview is considered a "softball" that allowed Tate to lie without pushback. Tate makes false equivalencies that resonate with conservative voices. Unlike Russell Brand, who disclaimed past actions, Tate has said he regrets and apologizes for nothing. He has never disclaimed anything he's ever done or said. Despite claims it's an act, Tate stands by everything. He is not repentant, despite suggesting to Owens that his controversial behavior is in the past.

In 2001, one of the most sought after models in the world goes on a talk show. Karen Mulder frantically starts name dropping everyone who had either assaulted her or sold her to be assaulted. This list would include royalty, politicians, cops, and her own family. But before she’d be done, she’d be taken off the stage and eventually put into a psych ward paid for by the very person she claimed started selling her in the first place, her agent and owner of Elite Paris, the man who signed her at just 15 years old, Gerald Marie. He would be prosecuted years later with an insurmountable amount of rape and sexual assault claims, only for the case to be closed in 2023 due to France’s statute of limitations, which could have been avoided if anyone in the French courts had taken her seriously at the time she reported them because, yes, she did report them. And if that wasn’t enough, I have something even more infuriating. One of the names she dropped during that talk show was Jean Luc Brunel. He was an Epstein associate who was found dead in his cell in 2022. He was jailed on suspicion of rape and trafficking of minors. Sorry. Hold on. After Karen’s 2001 interview, numerous publications would come out claiming that she was going through a psychotic episode. Her parents would publicly blame this outburst on drugs, and her sister Saskia would go on that same talk show just to discredit her sister, which may sound surprising. But remember, part of her desperate plea for someone to listen and do something included the abuse she endured in her childhood. So it’s safe to say Saskia was also a victim. It’s complicated, but it fueled the media and it fueled the tabloids to call her crazy, and she tried to take her own life in 2002. Thankfully, she survived and she’d returned to that same talk show to confront the host, heard this desperate plea, pulled her from air, and then deleted the tape. So the video of her speaking her truth would be scrapped altogether. The reason that we know this exists is because of his testimonies in the tabloids, hers, and audience members. Everyone called her crazy until the Epstein case started coming out. I read someone here on TikTok, a female influencer with a lot of followers, comment once on a video and say that human trafficking was like the new satanic pan. I remember it had a lot of likes, and I was so disturbed then, and I’m even more disturbed that comment lives in my head when I read the story because that interview could have saved twenty years of children. Twenty years. And to be put in a psych ward by the very man who first did it, who by the way was the ex husband of Linda Evangelista. Feel free to go down that rabbit hole. This isn’t satanic panic. This is real. And the idea of it being satanic panic, like this huge, silly conspiracy everyone’s talking about is actually so destructive. And I feel like the desensitization that we have towards the Epstein files is becoming more and more rampant because when something is so devastating and so traumatizing and we’re not getting a conclusion, the go-to is to turn it into humor, which I do get. I’m not villainizing anyone for that. But if we’re gonna do that, we still have to keep this level of anger. Karen is 55 years old now. She is still a person in this world. Her only mistake was not doing that interview on a live television show.

I had a story for 3 years about an interview with Virginia Roberts. Initially, no one knew who Jeffrey Epstein was, so we couldn't air it. Then the palace got involved and threatened us because of her allegations against Prince Andrew. We were scared of losing the opportunity to interview Kate, so we dropped the story. Alan Dershowitz was also implicated. Virginia had evidence and was in hiding for 12 years, but we convinced her to come forward. Our story had everything, including connections to Clinton.

The speaker references Brock Pierce, described as an Epstein client and alleged child abuser and as a cofounder of Tethr, and asks, “Who is friends with Epstein client and alleged child abuser, Tethr cofounder Brock Pierce.” They then say, “I don't know shit about Brock's history, and I've never met him. I don't know if he's an Epstein client. I don't know anything about these allegations, and I don't really care at this point because it doesn't affect my life at all.”

I regret having dinners with Jeffrey Epstein, as he claimed to have connections to people interested in global health philanthropy. However, those meetings were a mistake and did not result in what he promised. This happened a long time ago and there is nothing new to add. When I learned about his background, I cut off contact with him. The lesson here is to always be cautious. Despite this, I am proud of the philanthropic work we do at the foundation, which is my main focus every day.

The speaker confirms being caught masturbating on camera during a break on a Zoom call with New Yorker colleagues in October. This led to their termination after 27 years with the magazine. They are also currently on leave from CNN.

Did you know that, like Diddy and Hunter Biden, Jeffrey Epstein was never convicted of sex crimes? People were quick to judge Joe Biden based on Ashley Biden's diary, but when it comes to Andrew Tate, it's "innocent until proven guilty." There's a video of Tate whipping a 15-year-old girl with a "Tate's property" tattoo, which he claims is consensual. But, that's a crime! People are screaming to release the Epstein files but ignoring the Tate files. Tate himself has admitted to his crimes on camera, like teaching men how to manipulate young women into cam work. The Protect Act says that any US citizen who travels abroad and engages in sexual activity with a person under the age of 18 is guilty of a felony of up to thirty years in prison! Tate is worse than Epstein because he has uploaded his own crimes.