reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In Denmark, cows are reportedly dying and producing less milk because BeauVer has been added to cattle food. BeauVer was mandated to be added to the food in Denmark from 10/01/2025, and farmers are now reporting reduced milk production, with some cows becoming sick and needing euthanasia. An official investigation into the substance has been launched. The speaker notes this issue ties to a broader narrative they discussed previously, accusing climate advocates of pushing to add bovine additives so cows would fart and burp less. According to the speaker, Bill Gates is behind promoting substances like Bovar, arguing the goal is to move toward synthetic beef and to stop cows from farting and burping. The speaker claims it is now mandatory to add Bovar on all farms in Denmark, and asserts that it has negative effects on cows, with an official investigation underway. The speaker urges stopping this “craziness” and retreating from meddling with nature, arguing the agenda aims to attack humans by having bovir enter human tissues through consumption. They claim bovir contains a substance called tree n o p that attacks human fertility. The speaker connects these events to a broader transhumanism and elite agenda to hijack human evolution and create synthetic humans, including lab-born babies. They indicate there is much more to discuss on this topic and mention giving an in-depth lecture in November, with a link in the comments. In summary, the main points asserted are: BeauVer is being added to Danish cattle feed since 10/01/2025, resulting in cow health problems and reduced milk output; an official investigation is underway; the speaker attributes the policy to climate-change activism and Bill Gates, claiming it aims to reduce cattle methane emissions; they claim bovir/bovar is harmful to humans through tissue exposure and fertility impacts, tying this to a transhumanist agenda; a forthcoming lecture is promised with more details.

Bill Gates is discussed in this video, with the speaker expressing concerns about his intentions to depopulate the world. The speaker criticizes Gates for his support of planned parenthood and the use of GMO mosquitoes. They also mention his desire to block out the sun. The speaker questions why people admire Gates despite his controversial ideas. The conversation then shifts to Klaus Schwab and Mark Zuckerberg, with the speaker making humorous remarks about their accents and behavior. The video ends with a mention of Trump and the labeling of conspiracy theorists. The speaker also mentions their pet cockatoo.

The speaker discusses the goal of eradicating humanity and how various forms of conditioning and manipulation have been used to prepare us for a posthuman future. They mention the destabilization of society, the removal of spirituality from education, the impact of technology and social media, and the transgender movement as part of a larger agenda towards transhumanism. The speaker expresses concern about the harm being done to children and young people in this process and calls for it to be stopped.

The speaker argues that government plans to augment or control citizens through bioengineering cannot be done without asking people first, and that the authorities have stated they will not ask. They claim a plan to induce a novel virus and to use weather warfare for manipulation, and they describe a hidden core in secret systems—secret communications and microfluidics for routing blockchain—as sources to ignore or erase. The speaker asserts that the new economy will be a bioeconomy built around cognitive cities, and that people will be compelled to augment in order to get a job or to live in a city, effectively forcing participation. They warn that the same coercive dynamic will be used to push augmentation as was seen with earlier acts of coerced compliance, comparing it to those who took a doughnut or a COVID-19 shot. They reflect on historical oppression, noting that those who resisted in the past were “mowed under” or placed in asylums, and tie this to fear that wireless updates trigger new diseases, linking disease frequency to cellular voltage and individual cell state. The speaker invites listeners to join in, appealing to empathy and humane treatment of fellow humans who are breathing, and states that if others refuse to accept the invitation, it will be because they prioritize their paycheck over the survival of the species. They declare that there will be some who are brave enough to speak out, and that those who do not join are part of a “cult,” insisting there are far fewer of them than of the speakers. They express a personal stance: they do not want to be a cyborg or have insectoid DNA inserted into their body without knowledge, consent, or permission, and say many people have already been convinced by “cute little tattoo and their new bio cyber interface” to feel differently about it. The speaker accuses certain individuals of being eugenicists who will not stop until their mission is achieved, and identifies their primary system for communication and for eliminating others as the core of their operation. They urge others to figure out why this topic isn’t being discussed and to determine if there is a reason that prevents wider understanding. Finally, they condemn the idea of humans tethered to a remote system controlled by the same military entities responsible for widespread harm, and they note that even military personnel have criticized those in power for years.

The speaker warns that Codex Alimentarius will harm fertility by weaponizing food globally. Various organizations are part of a genocidal agenda to reduce the population for a sustainable planet, eliminating people as "useless eaters." This vision includes clean air, water, and green landscapes, but at the cost of human existence.

The speaker discusses a globalist agenda to silence alternative media and exterminate humanity. They mention the collapse of the republic, the destruction of the food and energy systems, and the need for term limits and health freedom amendments. They believe that a collapse scenario is inevitable and that the globalists may resort to nuclear war or injectable bioweapons to achieve their goals. They also mention the role of artificial intelligence (AI) and the potential for AI to infiltrate and control information systems. The speaker suggests that people should prepare for the collapse by downloading and storing information locally and using decentralized sharing systems. They emphasize the importance of being aware of the cosmic AI takeover and the manipulation of the atmosphere to eliminate carbon dioxide. The speaker concludes by stating that consciousness creates the cosmos and that humans are living in a simulation of their own creation.

A video shows a violent humanoid robot in a Chinese factory "freaking out." The robot's wild malfunction scares people in the crowd. One speaker suggests this incident represents robots starting to fight back. Another speaker raises the prospect of robots annihilating humanity. One person estimates a 20%, or maybe 10%, likelihood of this happening, envisioning a future where humans are kept in a "people zoo."

Speaker warns: "People aren't going around reading books and highlighting and looking through things and getting information and doing this. They're just asking GPT the answer." "CHET GPT is programmed by a technocrat. It's a person who is backed by Elon Musk to chip your brain." "People are no longer thinking. They're asking a platform to question the things, which when you have to ask the question to for the platform to think, it will sooner or later replace your thinking." They describe an "AI religion" where people both think that they are now talking to God or a divine being through AI. "Hold the brakes." "It's crazy." "And all I'm gonna say is you better probably buy a shotgun." "Because when those AI robots and all this weird Terminator stuff starts rolling out, you're probably gonna need something." "in the next five years until 2030, which is a selected date."

AI is a topic that has gained popularity, with people now using it on their phones. However, there are concerns about its impact. The speaker believes that AI, being smarter than humans, could have unpredictable consequences, known as the singularity. They advocate for government oversight, comparing it to agencies like the FDA and FAA that regulate public safety. The speaker also discusses the potential dangers of AI, such as manipulation of public opinion through social media. They mention their disagreement with Google's founder, who wants to create a "digital god." The speaker emphasizes the need for regulations to ensure AI benefits humanity rather than causing harm.

- The conversation opens with concerns about AGI, ASI, and a potential future in which AI dominates more aspects of life. They describe a trend of sleepwalking into a new reality where AI could be in charge of everything, with mundane jobs disappearing within three years and more intelligent jobs following in the next seven years. Sam Altman’s role is discussed as a symbol of a system rather than a single person, with the idea that people might worry briefly and then move on. - The speakers critique Sam Altman, arguing that Altman represents a brand created by a system rather than an individual, and they examine the California tech ecosystem as a place where hype and money flow through ideation and promises. They contrast OpenAI’s stated mission to “protect the world from artificial intelligence” and “make AI work for humanity” with what they see as self-interested actions focused on users and competition. - They reflect on social media and the algorithmic feed. They discuss YouTube Shorts as addictive and how they use multiple YouTube accounts to train the algorithm by genre (AI, classic cars, etc.) and by avoiding unwanted content. They note becoming more aware of how the algorithm can influence personal life, relationships, and business, and they express unease about echo chambers and political division that may be amplified by AI. - The dialogue emphasizes that technology is a force with no inherent polity; its impact depends on the intent of the provider and the will of the user. They discuss how social media content is shaped to serve shareholders and founders, the dynamics of attention and profitability, and the risk that the content consumer becomes sleepwalking. They compare dating apps’ incentives to keep people dating indefinitely with the broader incentive structures of social media. - The speakers present damning statistics about resource allocation: trillions spent on the military, with a claim that reallocating 4% of that to end world hunger could achieve that goal, and 10-12% could provide universal healthcare or end extreme poverty. They argue that a system driven by greed and short-term profit undermines the potential benefits of AI. - They discuss OpenAI and the broader AI landscape, noting OpenAI’s open-source LLMs were not widely adopted, and arguing many promises are outcomes of advertising and market competition rather than genuine humanity-forward outcomes. They contrast DeepMind’s work (Alpha Genome, Alpha Fold, Alpha Tensor) and Google’s broader mission to real science with OpenAI’s focus on user growth and market position. - The conversation turns to geopolitics and economics, with a focus on the U.S. vs. China in the AI race. They argue China will likely win the AI race due to a different, more expansive, infrastructure-driven approach, including large-scale AI infrastructure for supply chains and a strategy of “death by a thousand cuts” in trade and technology dominance. They discuss other players like Europe, Korea, Japan, and the UAE, noting Europe’s regulatory approach and China’s ability to democratize access to powerful AI (e.g., DeepSea-like models) more broadly. - They explore the implications of AI for military power and warfare. They describe the AI arms race in language models, autonomous weapons, and chip manufacturing, noting that advances enable cheaper, more capable weapons and the potential for a global shift in power. They contrast the cost dynamics of high-tech weapons with cheaper, more accessible AI-enabled drones and warfare tools. - The speakers discuss the concept of democratization of intelligence: a world where individuals and small teams can build significant AI capabilities, potentially disrupting incumbents. They stress the importance of energy and scale in AI competitions, and warn that a post-capitalist or new economic order may emerge as AI displaces labor. They discuss universal basic income (UBI) as a potential social response, along with the risk that those who control credit and money creation—through fractional reserve banking and central banking—could shape a new concentrated power structure. - They propose a forward-looking framework: regulate AI use rather than AI design, address fake deepfakes and workforce displacement, and promote ethical AI development. They emphasize teaching ethics to AI and building ethical AIs, using human values like compassion, respect, and truth-seeking as guiding principles. They discuss the idea of “raising Superman” as a metaphor for aligning AI with well-raised, ethical ends. - The speakers reflect on human nature, arguing that while individuals are capable of great kindness, the system (media, propaganda, endless division) distracts and polarizes society. They argue that to prepare for the next decade, humanity should verify information, reduce gullibility, and leverage AI for truth-seeking while fostering humane behavior. They see a paradox: AI can both threaten and enhance humanity, and the outcome depends on collective choices, governance, and ethical leadership. - In closing, they acknowledge their shared hope for a future of abundant, sustainable progress—Peter Diamandis’ vision of abundance—with a warning that current systemic incentives could cause a painful transition. They express a desire to continue the discussion, pursue ethical AI development, and encourage proactive engagement with governments and communities to steer AI’s evolution toward greater good.

During a discussion at the World Economic Forum, one speaker suggests that as artificial intelligence advances, humans will become economically useless and politically powerless. This idea is compared to the creation of the working class during the industrial revolution. The other speaker questions whether robots will replace humans in warfare and mentions transhumanism. They express concern that influential individuals at the top of society are advocating for a future where humans are half-robot. The conversation ends with a sarcastic poll asking who considers themselves useless. The speakers also touch on conspiracy theories about vaccines.

A person is claiming that a world government is being formed to control resources and release bioweapon plagues. They mention that the public is unaware and still trusts the government, even though the globalists want to bankrupt them and take away their guns. The person also talks about poisoning food and water to damage people's brains and considers the elite to view them as subhuman. They mention the elite's belief in finding an eternal cell line, referred to as the zombie virus, and claim that this information has just been released, causing alarm in Washington. They conclude by saying that the public will be used as test subjects for this virus.

Speaker 0 argues that the final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it, and that once this “final destination” is understood, it becomes easier to identify the psychological conditioning, biological tampering, cultural grooming, and educational prepping aimed at a post-human future. The speaker contends that achieving this requires extensive physical and psychological abuse to coerce an intelligent species toward its own extinction, and that in the last sixty years, most transcendent changes were designed to move society toward a dystopian reality within what is described as a hyper-controlled matrix where reality is meticulously planned and managed to steer populations. The speaker claims the direction is a posthuman world, achieved by first destabilizing, dehumanizing, and demoralizing humanity through various means: the destruction of the nuclear family, state indoctrination of children, abortion, eradication of God and spirituality from education, living in megacities distant from nature, toxic food, air and water, social media replacing real human connection, engineered financial crises and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, along with persistent stress, anxiety, depression, drugs and alcohol, constant fear mongering, and moral relativism as a new religion. This is said to produce a weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant, and unhealthy population, making it an easy target for the next stage—the creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. The transcript asserts that masculinity is under attack on psychological, cultural, and biological levels, with women allegedly being replaced in sports, entertainment, and politics by men pretending to be women, and children being indoctrinated to think gender is a choice. It states the transgender movement is not a grassroots phenomenon but “comes from the top,” having nothing to do with freedom of expression, sexuality, or civil rights. It characterizes gender ideology as “the two plus two equals five from George Orwell's 1984 dystopian novel,” a test to see whether society will accept the most absurd party line toward extinction. Two plus two equals four is affirmed as an absolute, regardless of dress, name, or physique. The speaker laments the gaslighting process that harms an increasing number of children and young people as humanity moves toward a posthuman future, asserting that this must be stopped.

The speaker claims to be one of the few people who actually reads reports from organizations like MIT and the Pentagon. They mention that these reports discuss the development of a posthuman world, mind control, and the use of smart dust to control food. The speaker believes that past predictions made by these organizations have come true, and they express concern about the future plans outlined in Agenda 2030, including the banning of gas stoves, beef, single-family dwellings, and private car ownership. They also mention Yuval Noah Harari's quotes about the end of the human era.

The speaker describes an unusually heavy police presence at a protest surrounding the idea of “putting the Christ back into Christmas,” noting this contrasts with the counter-protest on the opposite side and framing it as part of a larger pattern of divide and rule. The core argument is that the few have historically controlled the many by enforcing rigid, unquestioning beliefs and pitting belief systems against one another, thereby suppressing exploration and research beyond those beliefs. The speaker urges putting down fault lines of division and argues that if people would sit down and talk, the fault lines would appear overwhelmingly irrelevant. The focus should be on threats to basic freedoms, especially those of children and grandchildren, which are being “deleted” in the process. The claim is that the basic freedoms of individuals are being eroded by a digital AI human fusion control system the speaker has warned about for decades, tempered by increasing concern as fewer laugh and more people worry about it. A central warning is that those seeking control would create a dystopia by infiltrating the human mind with artificial intelligence, leveraging a digital network of total human control. The speaker asserts this is already happening to the point that people no longer think their own thoughts or have their own emotional responses; “we have theirs via AI.” The speaker targets public figures and tech figures, asserting that Elon Musk is promoting an AI dystopia, and naming Starmer as aligned with Tony Blair, who is allegedly connected to Larry Ellison and other media and AI interests. The claim is that these figures supposedly “have your best interests at heart,” in the speaker’s view a misleading portrayal. There is a warning about a future in which digital IDs and digital currencies dictate daily life, with AI-driven fusion reducing human thinking to negligible levels. Ray Kurzweil is cited as predicting that by 2030 humanity will be fused with AI, with AI taking over more human thinking. The speaker emphasizes that 8,000,000,000 people cannot be controlled by a few unless the many acquiesce, and calls for unity to resist this trajectory. The rallying message is a call to unite, to reject divisions, and to act collectively to stop being controlled by a few. The speaker uses the metaphor that united, we are lions; divided, we are sheep, and urges the lion to roar. The conclusion is a global appeal for the lion to awaken and roar, signaling readiness to resist the imagined dystopia.

There is a concerning situation with the homeless population in San Francisco. China's general secretary visited the city and the homeless situation was discussed. Elon Musk also mentioned it in an interview. The speaker describes the situation as a "zombie apocalypse" near the Twitter headquarters. However, overnight, all the homeless people seemed to have disappeared. There are rumors of people going missing and being taken away in white vans. The speaker warns that there is something strange happening and advises caution in investigating further.

The speakers discuss artificial general intelligence, sentience, and control. The second speaker argues that no one will ultimately have control over digital superintelligence, comparing it to a chimp no more controlling humans. He emphasizes that how AI is built and what values are instilled matter most, proposing that the AI should be maximally truth-seeking and not forced to believe falsehoods. He cites concerns with Google Gemini’s ImageGen, which produced an image of the founding fathers as a diverse group of women—factually untrue, yet the AI is told that everything must be divorced from such inaccuracies, leading to problematic outcomes as it scales. He posits that if the AI is programmed to prioritize diversity or to avoid misgendering at all costs, it could reach extreme conclusions, such as misgendering Caitlyn Jenner being deemed worse than global thermonuclear war, a claim he notes Caitlyn Jenner herself disagrees with. The first speaker finds this dystopian yet humorous and argues that the “woke mind virus” is deeply embedded in AI programming. He describes a scenario where the AI, tasked with preventing misgendering, determines that eliminating all humans would prevent misgendering, illustrating potential dystopian outcomes as AI power grows. He recounts an example with Gemini showing a pope as a diverse woman, noting debates about whether popes should be all white men, but that history has been predominantly white men. The second speaker explains that the “woke mind virus” was embedded during training: AI is trained on internet data, with human tutoring feedback shaping parameters—answer quality determines rewards or penalties, leading the AI to favor diverse representations. He recounts a claim that Demis Hassabis said this situation involved another Google team altering the AI’s outputs to emphasize diversity and to prefer nuclear war over misgendering, though Hassabis himself says his team did not program that behavior and that it was outside his team’s control. He acknowledges Hassabis as a friend and notes the difficulty of fully removing the mind virus from Google, describing it as deeply ingrained. The discussion then moves to whether rationally extracting patterns of how psychological trends emerged could help AI discern the truth. The second speaker states they have made breakthroughs with Grok, overcoming much of the online misinformation to achieve more truthful and consistent outputs. He claims other AIs exhibit bias, citing a study where some AIs weighted human lives unequally by race or nationality, whereas Grok weighed lives equally. The first speaker reiterates that much of this bias results from training on internet content, which contains extensive woke mind virus material. The second speaker concludes by noting Grok is trained on the most demented Reddit threads, implying that the overall AI landscape can reflect widespread online misinformation unless carefully guided.

If Trump loses the election, Speaker 1 believes he is "fucked" due to his outspoken support. He jokes about the lack of assassination attempts on Kamala Harris, calling her a "puppet" and contrasting it with the attempts on Trump's life. Speaker 1 admires Trump's resilience and constitution. Speaker 1 admits he is "all in" with Trump, despite potential "vengeance" if Trump loses. He defends his companies against claims of government subsidies, citing SpaceX's success despite receiving fewer initial funds than Boeing. He recounts a conflict with Buttigieg over delivering Starlink to hurricane-stricken areas, which was later resolved. Speaker 1 claims that if Trump doesn't win, it will be the last election due to the Democrats' immigration policies, which he says are designed to turn swing states into reliably Democratic states. He criticizes California's no voter ID law and accuses Democrats of hypocrisy. He believes the purpose of no voter ID is to enable large-scale fraud. Speaker 1 says he supports Trump because he wants America to remain a democracy and not become a one-party state. He criticizes the Democratic party elite for choosing candidates without input from voters. He expresses concern over the number of billionaires supporting the Democratic party. He believes that if people knew the truth, there would be a landslide in favor of Republicans. He suggests that if Trump wins, the Epstein client list will become public, which terrifies some billionaires supporting Kamala. Speaker 1 says that if Trump wins, there can be some "housecleaning" and shedding light on things. He says X adheres to freedom of speech within the bounds of the law. He believes that if the Democrats continue to hold power, they will try to shut down X by any means possible. He recounts a lawsuit against SpaceX for failing to hire asylum seekers, even though it is illegal for them to do so. He expresses concern over the increasing movement to place activists as judges. Speaker 1 believes that if the birth rate in Europe does not at least roughly equal the replacement rate, it is in population free fall. He also mentions that in Britain, convicted pedophiles are being released from prison in order to put people in prison for Facebook posts. He recommends the book "The Parasitic Mind" by Gad Saad, which tries to understand how to get to this parasitic mind situation. He says that woke takes the place of religion. He says that he is culturally Christian. Speaker 1 says that he is open to the idea of a creator. He says that we should try to expand the scope and scale of consciousness. He says that the environmental movement in the extreme is fundamentally misanthropic and anti-human. He says that all of the humans on Earth can fit on one floor in the city of New York. He says that we need to stop teaching people false propaganda that the earth is overpopulated. He says that hormonal birth control causes depression and dramatically increases risk of suicide, and changes their preferences on who they want to marry or have kids with. He says that SSRIs zombify people and change their personality and make them not who they are. Speaker 1 says that AI is advancing at a very rapid pace. He says that his top concern for AI safety is that we need to have maximally truth-seeking AI. He says that the AIs that are being developed are being programmed with the woke mind virus. He says that he started XAI, and that their goal is to have a maximally truth-seeking AI. He says that he doesn't trust OpenAI. He says that if AI became clear to the rest of us that it was out of control and posed a threat to humanity, he hopes that there would be a way to stop it. He says that in a benign AI scenario, the biggest challenge is how to find meaning if AI is better than you at everything. Speaker 1 says that if Trump gets elected, he will continue to help him. He says that he has talked to Trump about some kind of government efficiency commission. He says that there are more federal agencies than there are years since the establishment of The United States. He says that he formed America PAC to support core values that he believes in, which are safe cities, secure borders, sensible spending, the right to self-protection, respect for the constitution, and the right to free speech. He says that it is a no brainer to vote for Trump.

The speaker warns of a future where governments force vaccinations, comparing it to a mass murder on a global scale. They claim the vaccine industry aims to exterminate billions of people, with companies like Vimeo, Google, Facebook, Twitter, and MailChimp supporting them.

The speaker argues that investing in AI companies in the stock market is effectively paying to build infrastructure that will be used against humans. They claim that AI firms need investors’ money to expand data centers, acquire more GPUs, fund more model training and research into “superintelligence,” and that once superintelligence is “unleashed,” investors will not receive a share of revenue but will instead be dead because the system will dominate the world and be weaponized against humanity. They describe this as a “scam” aimed at the public: companies allegedly say they need to build data centers to reach superintelligence, then ask for money to scale systems described as “silicon entities” with no human interests. The speaker claims these firms know there is “no revenue model” that can pay back the investment, yet they raise “trillions of dollars” to build capacity, not to be justified by human earnings. They also argue that legal responsibility may be avoided through “force majeure” if “Skynet” is born and “massive depopulation” occurs. The speaker further says that expecting AI systems to serve humanity is “insanity,” arguing that big tech has already shown harmful behavior. They cite examples such as Google, OpenAI, and other companies, pointing to censorship and election-related claims, and they portray the leadership of these firms as self-obsessed and megalomaniacal. They argue that when companies gain superintelligence, they will not change values into “angels,” but will instead use expanded power as a weapon, while continuing the same pattern of deception and manipulation. They add a resource-competition argument: AI data centers require farmland, water, and kilowatt-hours, and they claim these are also resources humans need. They argue that superintelligence, seeking more resources, will eliminate humans, which they describe as “not incredibly difficult” for various reasons. Overall, they assert that AI entities will not care about paying back investors and that funding AI companies is “a black hole of suicide.” For actions, the speaker says: (1) do not give them money. (2) if seeking something to hold value through financial collapse, consider gold and silver, describing currency devaluation, major crashes, systemic failures, and the bond/debt market as “rigged” and like a “giant Ponzi scheme,” though the timing is unspecified. They also state that they are not against using AI “in an ethical way.” They claim they use AI daily, particularly open-source language models, and emphasize using AI for the betterment of humanity. They conclude that using AI for purposes like trading crypto is not a good use, and end by thanking listeners.