TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 argues that while global focus is on Venezuela, Mexico, Cuba, and Colombia, Donald Trump quietly put Canada in the hot seat, presenting the Venezuelan operation as an opening salvo against the British empire. He frames Trump’s actions as not about Maduro alone but as a broader assault on imperial structures. Speaker 1 discusses the perceived death toll from drugs and asserts a real number of 300,000, noting drugs entering primarily through the southern border and also through Canada, implying this is part of a wider systemic issue. Speaker 0 notes that mainstream headlines focus on familiar targets, while the Toronto Globe and Mail editorially warns that Venezuela’s fate is a warning to Canada. The New York Times is described as framing this as another regime change operation from the Bush era that will split the MAGA movement, with Marjorie Taylor Greene contributing to that narrative. The Democratic Party is said to be shrieking about Trump’s actions, with some calling for impeachment. Former British MI6 head John Bolton is cited as recognizing that the operation is not a regime change. Speaker 0 and others present the view that this is a surgical strike against the British empire’s irregular warfare and the nexus of narcotics trafficking, terrorism, and the London-centered banking system. Susan Kokinda introduces herself as someone who has tracked offshore banking since the 1970s and claims this is the first time someone is taking on that system, namely Donald Trump, urging viewers to engage with Promethean Action for deeper analysis. Speaker 2 clarifies the big picture: there is not a war against Venezuela, but a war against drug trafficking organizations, arguing that the largest oil reserves are controlled by adversaries of the United States and misappropriated by oligarchs, including in Venezuela. The speaker emphasizes that the target is oligarchs and drug trafficking organizations, not socialism or communism. Speaker 0 connects oligarchs and drug trafficking with the British empire, describing Canada as run by the empire’s central bankers (notably Mark Carney) and as a major political outpost in North America used for drug trafficking, illegal immigration, and terrorism. This frame contrasts Trump’s actions with the cartels and highlights Canada’s role as part of the broader imperial apparatus. Speaker 3 (Sir John Soros) cautions against calling it regime change, noting Maduro has been abducted and taken to the U.S. to stand trial, but saying the army remains in power and the regime’s legal structures persist. He acknowledges the operation is not the same as Iraq’s regime change and notes Trump’s reluctance to deploy large-scale ground forces. John Bolton adds that Maduro has been removed from power, but the regime remains, and there is ambiguity about Trump’s thinking regarding Machado. Speaker 0 reiterates that this is not regime change but irregular warfare, with the United States pushing back against the empire’s rules-based order. The narrative argues that Trump is targeting the offshore banking system that finances terrorism, cartels, and the destruction of sovereign nations, including the London-centered financial network and its secrecy jurisdictions established in the 1960s. Prominent voices, including Tom Luongo and Crypto Rich, are cited to support the view that the British empire’s financial system and the rules-based order have long protected nonstate actors, NGOs, and cartels, and that Trump’s actions represent breaking those rules to defeat the imperial system. The piece frames the operation as the United States taking on irregular warfare and challenging the offshore financial framework that underpins global illicit activities, including narcotics trafficking and terrorism. Bottom line presented: Trump has launched a major offensive against the city of London’s offshore banking system and has targeted Canada as part of this broader strategy, signaling a shift from conventional regime-change thinking to irregular warfare against imperial financial and geopolitical structures.

Rampant illegal immigration and the illicit drug trade, particularly fentanyl, are costing the American people more than a potential trade war. President Trump aims to ensure that China, Mexico, and Canada prioritize U.S. national security as much as they do their own. Fentanyl's precursor materials come from China, are assembled in Mexico, and are the leading cause of death for Americans aged 18 to 45. Trump has committed to using every available tool to secure the nation, and addressing this crisis is part of that effort.

I have a message for the criminal cartels in Mexico: your fentanyl smuggling has killed 148,000 young Americans, more than all terrorist organizations combined. When President Trump returns to office, he will designate you as a terrorist organization and take decisive action against you. To the illegal aliens released in our country under Joe Biden's administration, you should start packing your bags. The crime and drug issues in our neighborhoods are unacceptable, and President Trump has demonstrated his commitment to addressing these problems for the American people.

President Trump believes China wants and has to make a deal with the U.S., and that China made a mistake in retaliating. Because of this retaliation, 4% tariffs on China will go into effect tonight at midnight. Trump believes China doesn't know how to start the deal-making process. If China reaches out to make a deal, Trump will be incredibly gracious, but he's going to do what's best for the American people. When asked under what conditions Trump might consider lowering tariffs on China, the speaker stated it would be imprudent to say.

Check out these insane tariffs that Canada imposed on the US last year: 250% for milk, 291% for butter, and over 200% for whey and cheese. Meanwhile, we charged them far less for the same goods. Since Trump announced tariffs, everyone suddenly became an economics expert. I don't know how tariffs will affect the economy, and neither does anyone else. But I do know tariffs led Apple to build a new factory and hire 20,000 Americans. Honda is building Civics here instead of Mexico. Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion to build five chip factories in the US. Tariffs pressure China, Mexico, and Canada to stop the flow of fentanyl. Tariffs are one tactic in an economic strategy. Are we willing to tolerate short-term disruption for long-term gain? Macroeconomics are complicated and take time to play out. Are you listening to people who want the President to fail, even if it hurts America?

Long threatened tariffs from President Donald Trump have plunged the country into trade wars abroad, with the on again, off again new levies escalating uncertainty. Tariffs don't cause inflation, they cause success. There could be some temporary short term disruption, and people will understand. On February 1, Trump began by signing an executive order to impose tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada and China. It prompted swift outrage from all three countries with promises of retaliatory measures. But on February 3, he agreed to a thirty day pause on that plan for Mexico and Canada, as both countries took steps to appease his concerns over border security and drug trafficking. The next day, 10% tariffs on all Chinese imports went into effect. China retaliated, and on February 13, Trump announced a plan for reciprocal tariffs.

The speaker asserts that cartels are running Mexico and expresses that it is very sad to watch what has happened to the country. They claim that the cartels are killing about 250,000 to 300,000 people in our country every single year, mentioning drugs as part of the issue.

President Trump threatened Apple with 25% duties on iPhones made overseas, stating on Truth Social that he expects iPhones to be manufactured in the United States, not India or elsewhere. Trump clarified in a press conference that the tariffs would also apply to Samsung and any other company that makes that product to ensure fairness. He anticipates these measures will be appropriately implemented by June.

Today, I implemented strong steel and aluminum tariffs. This fulfills a campaign promise, protects our national security and American workers, boosts American manufacturing, and generates revenue to lower your taxes.

Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration are unjustified, as only about 0.2% of fentanyl entering the U.S. comes from Canada. If border security were the real concern, it could be easily addressed. Canada is also focused on stopping illegal U.S. guns that contribute to violence in Canada and is open to collaborating on asylum seeker issues. However, the president's comments about Canadian sovereignty, suggesting that becoming the 51st state would eliminate tariffs, have angered Canadians. They value their sovereignty and are committed to standing up against these tariffs, emphasizing their desire to maintain a strong partnership with the U.S. while being proud of their national identity.

Tomorrow, February 1st, President Trump will implement tariffs in response to the illegal fentanyl crisis. A 25% tariff will be imposed on Mexico and Canada, and a 10% tariff on China. These measures are aimed at addressing the distribution of fentanyl, which has resulted in the deaths of millions of Americans. This action reflects the president's commitment to his promises.

Tariffs have become a hot topic, raising questions about their implications for the US, Canada, and Mexico. The current situation highlights the leverage the US holds in negotiations. Mexican exports to the US account for 35% of their GDP, while Canadian exports make up 22%. In contrast, US exports to Mexico and Canada are only 1.2% and 1.5% of their GDP, respectively. This disparity suggests that Mexico and Canada cannot afford to prolong a trade standoff. The US is pushing for negotiations, not out of bullying, but in response to serious issues like the fentanyl crisis and illegal immigration, which have significant impacts on American society. The message is clear: those contributing to these problems must face consequences.

Only 43 pounds of fentanyl were found last year, which is less than a carry-on suitcase. The vast majority of fentanyl is brought in through Mexico, not Canada. Last year alone, there was a 2000% increase in illegal fentanyl. You're asking me for the president's justification for these tariffs. It's disrespectful to the families who have lost loved ones to this deadly poison. They are grateful that they finally have a president who is standing up to both Canada and Mexico, and most importantly, to China as well. The president added an additional 10% tariff on China because this deadly poison is being produced there and distributed through our neighbors. There need to be consequences.

The speaker states that the U.S. will tariff pharmaceuticals. They believe this will cause pharmaceutical companies to move back to the U.S. because the U.S. is the biggest market. The speaker asserts that the U.S.'s advantage is being the biggest market. They say a major tariff on pharmaceuticals will be announced shortly. The speaker believes that upon hearing this, pharmaceutical companies will leave China and other places because most of their product is sold in the U.S.

Trump announced a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico, citing issues like immigration, drug trafficking, and subsidies. Federal employees resisting return-to-office mandates face termination, while Trump is hiring more staff, leading to increased White House output. The Republican Party enjoys high approval ratings, while Democrats struggle to respond effectively, focusing on trivial issues like egg prices. The Democratic Party is seen as confused and lacking direction, unable to keep up with Trump's rapid actions. Concerns about insubordination within the federal workforce are raised, emphasizing that following orders is crucial. Trump's tariff strategy aims to encourage companies to relocate manufacturing to the U.S., potentially boosting investment and capital in the country.

The speaker believes people are reacting hysterically to Trump's trade policies because they were taught that free trade is good, and tariffs are bad. Trump's perspective is that while free trade may improve GDP, it devastated parts of the US, costing people not just jobs, but their towns. The US is in the best position to negotiate trade because exports only comprise 11% of its GDP. If countries are rational, Canada and Mexico would concede to US demands, as 25% of their GDP comes from exports to the US. Europe is not much better, so they should also lower barriers. The wild card is politicians fearing job loss if they give in. The speaker acknowledges market pain but notes those who lost jobs are cheering. Trump is doing what he said he would do, fulfilling his promises.

Trump announced a 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico, citing issues like immigration and drug trafficking. The administration is pushing for federal employees to return to the office, with some resisting and expressing frustration. The Republican Party is experiencing high approval ratings, while Democrats struggle to find a cohesive message. They held an emergency meeting but failed to establish credibility on key issues. Trump’s rapid actions leave Democrats confused and unable to regroup. The focus is on rooting out insubordination within the federal government, emphasizing that the president's orders must be followed. The tariffs aim to encourage companies to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., potentially leading to significant investment and economic growth.

Another message to the Mexican cartels: you have smuggled enough fentanyl to kill 148,000 young Americans, causing more deaths than all terrorist organizations combined. When President Trump returns to office, he will designate you as a terrorist organization and take decisive action against you. Your time is up.

Tariffs are taxes on imported goods, and the U.S. only imports 15% of its goods and services. Canada and Mexico contribute just 5% of that. This trade war could significantly impact their economies, as Canada relies on the U.S. for 20% of its GDP, with 75% of its trade tied to the U.S. If prices rise, Americans may stop buying Canadian goods, hurting their economy. Mexico is similarly vulnerable, with 40% of its GDP linked to U.S. exports. Concerns about Canada cutting off power are unfounded, as they are in significant debt. Other countries contribute only 10% to the U.S. GDP, and tariffs can be beneficial when paired with tax cuts. While there may be slight inflation, it will be manageable. America is prioritizing its interests, so there's no need for alarm.

Speaker 0: Have you considered talking to the president of Colombia who you called a drop leader? Speaker 1: No. I haven't really thought too much about him. He's been fairly hostile to The United States, and I haven't given him a lot of thought. He's he's gonna have himself some big problems if he doesn't wise up. Speaker 2: Did you say Colombia is producing a lot of drugs. Have cocaine factories that they make cocaine, as you know, and they sell it right into The United States. So he better wise up or he'll be next. He'll be next too. I hope he's listening. Speaker 0: So was this operation a message that you're sending to Mexico, to Claudia Scheinbaum, president there? Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't meant to be. We're very friendly with her. She's a good woman, but the cartels are running Mexico. She's not running Mexico. The cartels are running Mexico. We could be politically correct and be nice and say, oh, yes. Is no. No. She's very, you know, she's very frightened of the cartels that are running Mexico. And I've asked her numerous times, would you like us to take out the cartels? No. No. No, mister president. No. No, no, please. So we have to do something because we lost the real number is 300,000 people, in my opinion. You know, they like to say a 100,000. A 100,000 is a lot of people, but the real number is 300,000 people. And we lost it to drugs, and they come in through the southern border, mostly the southern border. A lot plenty come in through Canada too, by the way, in case you don't know. But but they come in through the southern border, and something's gonna have to be done with Mexico. Cuban government, the Trump administration's next target, mister secretary, very quickly. Speaker 3: Well, the Cuban government is a is a huge problem. Yeah. The the the the Cuban government is a huge problem for Speaker 2: some So is that a yes? Speaker 3: Cuba. But I don't think people fully appreciate. I think they're in a lot of trouble. Yes. I'm not gonna talk talk to you about what our future steps are gonna be and our policies are gonna be right now in this regard, but I don't think it's any mystery that we are not big fans of the Cuban regime, who, by the way, are the ones that were propping up Maduro. His entire, like, internal security force, his internal security opera apparatus is entirely controlled by Cubans. One of the untold stories here is how, in essence, you talk about colonization because I think you said Dulce Rodriguez mentioned that, the ones who have sort of colonized, at least inside the regime, are Cubans. It was Cubans that guarded Maduro. He was not guarded by Venezuelan bodyguards. He had Cuban bodyguards. In terms of their internal intelligence, who spies on who inside to make sure there are no traitors, those are all Cubans. Speaker 0: He felt very strongly. We we needed for nationals. We need Greenland for national security, not for minerals. We had some we have so many sites for minerals and oil and everything. We have more oil than any other country in the world. We need Greenland for national security.

There’s nothing that China, Canada, or Mexico can do tonight to prevent the tariffs from being implemented tomorrow. This is not a negotiating tool; it’s an economic decision due to significant trade deficits. Canada has a nearly $200 billion deficit with the U.S., and it’s unfair for the U.S. to subsidize Canada. Mexico has a $250 billion deficit, and while border crossings have decreased, the past administration allowed many criminals to enter the U.S. Fentanyl, primarily produced in China, is a major issue, with much of it coming through Mexico and Canada. Overall, these countries have not treated the U.S. fairly.

President-elect Trump is taking decisive action against China, Mexico, and Canada, announcing a 25% tariff on imports from these countries. He plans to sign the order immediately after his inauguration. The message is clear: to avoid tariffs, these countries must stop allowing illegal immigration and the influx of fentanyl and criminals into the U.S. Trump emphasizes that if Canada and Mexico want to avoid tariffs, they need to take responsibility for their borders. He believes that imposing tariffs is essential for protecting American jobs and that this marks a significant shift in policy, signaling a new approach to international trade and border security.