TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Three years after the events of January 6th, Congressman Clay Higgins questions FBI Director Christopher Wray about the presence of FBI assets among the protesters. Higgins believes there is evidence that FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters were inside the Capitol before the doors were opened, suggesting entrapment. He claims that the FBI infiltrated online groups and planted seeds of radical actions. Higgins estimates that there were over 200 FBI assets involved in the events of January 6th. He also criticizes the shooting of Ashley Babbitt and expresses his hope that the evidence will be released to the public.

Three years after January 6th, questions remain about the events of that day and the FBI's involvement. Congressman Clay Higgins directly questioned FBI Director Chris Wray about whether FBI assets were embedded among the protesters. Higgins asserts that evidence suggests the FBI had undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol before the doors opened, potentially entrapping attendees. He estimates over 200 FBI assets were present, influencing the crowd and orchestrating actions leading to arrests. Higgins emphasizes the need for transparency and urges Speaker Mike Johnson to release all digital evidence from that day to the public, believing it will reveal the truth about the government's role in the events of January 6th.

There's no cross-examination allowed in this committee, so important questions remain unaddressed. For instance, why did a Capitol Hill police officer with a history of mishandling firearms shoot an unarmed Air Force veteran in the neck? We're also not allowed to inquire about the thousands of hours of surveillance footage or why police were seen letting people into the Capitol on January 6th. These critical issues are off-limits for questioning.

I was going to discuss the January 6 hostages and the actions being taken regarding them. There's a lot happening, and you'll see more action soon. I also wanted to address Joe's recent pardons for individuals guilty of serious crimes, particularly related to the unselect committee that destroyed crucial information, including evidence about Nancy Pelosi rejecting an offer of 10,000 soldiers for security. Even 500 soldiers could have made a difference that day, despite the large crowd. There are many great photos from that day that aren't shown, focusing instead on the Capitol events. I was encouraged to wait to discuss these topics, but I felt it was important to bring them up now.

Two years ago, Capitol Hill Police Officer Michael Bird shot and killed unarmed Ashley Babbitt. Bird had a prior record of firearm negligence, including leaving a loaded pistol in a public restroom. Babbitt was a 14-year military veteran and ran a pool cleaning business. Bird admitted Babbitt was unarmed and posed no visible threat. Instead of facing charges, Bird was declared a national hero by Nancy Pelosi's congressional police force and the media. He appeared on television and complained about racism. He was never punished for Babbitt's death but instead was rewarded. Babbitt's mother was arrested by Capitol Police for attempting to hold a memorial service for her daughter. The speaker claims that Ashley Babbitt's death is the most significant, yet least discussed, event of January 6th.

- "Do you know who Ray Epps is, and where is he? And, is he sitting behind bars like some of these other, protesters who've been sitting there without bail for so long?" - "And what we need to know is whether or not that cooperation existed on January 5 and January 6 to get people to do things that they might otherwise not do, like enter the capital." - "We already know as a consequence of reporting in revolver.news and in re really, that was confirmed by the New York Times that there were people texting their handlers from the crowd in January 5 and January 6." - "Now we just need to know whether the folks being controlled by the federal government were, in fact, the very people that were doing the worst things on January 6."

Two years ago, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot unarmed Ashley Babbitt during the January 6th events. Despite a history of negligence, Byrd faced no consequences and was celebrated as a hero. In contrast, Babbitt's mother was arrested for holding a memorial for her daughter. The narrative surrounding January 6th has been manipulated, with false claims about police fatalities and misleading accounts of events, including the death of Officer Brian Sicknick, who actually died of a stroke later. Questions remain about the involvement of federal agencies and the identity of the pipe bomber near the DNC. Additionally, Ray Epps, who encouraged illegal actions, has not faced charges, raising concerns about accountability and transparency in the official narrative.

We thank you for your service in protecting our country. However, there are questions about what exactly was being protected. Security footage shows that individuals were allowed to enter without resistance, without weapons, almost like a guided tour. It's important to note that the only casualty was Ashley Babbit, who was shot by Capitol Police. So, it raises the question of what exactly was saved that day. The speaker mentions having written a book before going to break.

In light of the January 6 incident in Washington DC, the speaker highlights the violation of basic rights experienced by individuals involved, including her husband, a former law enforcement officer. She mentions the raid on their home by the FBI and the subsequent relocation of her husband multiple times. The speaker emphasizes the common mistreatment faced by the January 6 defendants, such as solitary confinement, denial of basic necessities, and limited visitation rights. She recounts a violent assault her husband endured in jail and the lack of medical attention afterward. The speaker also mentions the impending release of a marine veteran with no place to go. She urges Congress to address the government's overreach and lack of transparency in these cases, emphasizing the need for justice and accountability.

The speakers discuss the need for transparency regarding the January 6th events at the Capitol. They express concern about withheld videos showing violence and call for their release to the public. They believe the government is hiding the truth, comparing it to the Kennedy assassination. They mention instances of police brutality and the deaths of Roseanne Boylan and Ashley Babbitt. They argue that the truth will eventually emerge and emphasize the importance of allowing the public and media to objectively assess the evidence. They assert that democracy requires knowing what happened and appreciate efforts to uncover the truth.

The discussion centers on the security failures during the January 6, 2021, Capitol breach. It is clarified that there were three calls between the Chief and Speaker Pelosi on that day, contradicting her claim of no communication. The Chief expressed concerns about the House Sergeant at Arms, Paul Irving, who prioritized optics over security, delaying the National Guard's deployment. The conversation shifts to political implications, with accusations that Speaker Pelosi politicized security issues. Several speakers criticize the focus on January 6 rather than pressing issues like crime and inflation. They emphasize the need for serious discussions about security and governance, expressing frustration over perceived political gamesmanship. The dialogue also touches on the treatment of January 6 detainees and the use of force by correctional officers, highlighting concerns about civil rights violations.

Let's discuss January 6th. There’s no evidence it was an inside job; that’s a fringe theory. However, the released video footage raises questions about the number of federal agents present that day. It shows Capitol Police allowing people in, some of whom are now facing severe consequences, including suicide. This could be seen as entrapment, where authorities provoke individuals into actions they wouldn't normally take, then arrest them. Many were convicted before this evidence emerged. If law enforcement hadn't used forceful measures like concussion grenades and pepper spray, the situation may have remained peaceful.

Jacob Chansley, also known as the QAnon Shaman, became the face of the January 6th Capitol insurrection. He was sentenced to nearly 4 years in prison. However, internal surveillance videos show that Capitol police officers actually helped Chansley during the attack. They opened doors for him and acted as his tour guides. Chansley even thanked the police in a prayer on the Senate floor. The media coverage portrayed Chansley as a dangerous terrorist, but the videos reveal a different story. The footage challenges the narrative and raises questions about who the real violent extremists are. The Republican Party has shown little interest in defending Chansley, and the incident is not receiving the attention it deserves.

A friend involved in the January 6th events has been in jail for hundreds of days without trial, raising concerns about due process. Footage shows police opening doors and guiding protesters, suggesting a lack of intent for insurrection. The idea of an armed insurrection without weapons is questioned, and misinformation about police deaths is discussed. There’s a recognition that government agents may have incited actions that day, complicating the narrative. While acknowledging the poor decisions made, there's a call for accountability and a push for the January 6th prisoners to receive trials. The conversation emphasizes the need for transparency and standing against injustices.

Three years after January 6th, questions remain about the events of that day and the FBI's involvement. Congressman Clay Higgins directly questioned FBI Director Christopher Wray about whether the FBI had undercover agents among the protesters, particularly inside the Capitol. Higgins asserts that evidence suggests FBI assets were present, potentially instigating actions that led to the chaos. He believes there were over 200 FBI agents involved, manipulating the situation to entrap Trump supporters. Higgins emphasizes the need for transparency and calls for the release of all digital evidence from January 6th to the public, asserting that the American people deserve to know the truth about what transpired. He expresses concern over the implications of government actions and the need for accountability within federal agencies.

"That was so crazy about that incident is not even that it happened, but that it happened on the Capitol Steps right in front of a Capitol police officer." "And he wasn't even asked to take a step back." "And it just like I really just can't help but think about all of that footage and evidence that we saw the day of all these Capitol Police officers helping and being sympathetic to the insurrectionists on January 6." "But if you raise questions about that or if you don't feel safe, it's construed as you attacking the entire institution of public safety." "And we saw a lot of that show up not just in our politics now but even the State of the Union because now both parties are in a contest of how much money they can shovel in the system without critically holding any of it accountable."

The speaker poses questions regarding the shooting of Ashley Babbitt. They ask if the officer knew Babbitt was unarmed, and if not, what led them to believe she was armed. The speaker questions whether the officer verbally ordered Babbitt to stop using commands like "freeze," "halt," "go back," or "stop." Referencing police guidelines, the speaker asks what imminent deadly threat Babbitt posed, especially since she was unarmed and not within reach of an officer or member of Congress. The speaker inquires if the officer was aware of John Sullivan recording the shooting. Finally, the speaker asks about the officer's political views of President Trump and Trump supporters, and whether negative views influenced the decision to shoot. The speaker believes these questions deserve answers.

The speaker was told that the DOJ is still opposing the Babbitt family's wrongful death lawsuit. The speaker responded that they are a "big fan of Ashley Babbitt," who they believe was a "really good person" and a "big MAGA fan" who was "innocently standing there" and that it was a "disgrace" that "a man did something to her that was unthinkable when he shot her." The speaker will look into the case. The speaker was told that the officer who shot Babbitt, Michael Bird, is still on duty and was given a raise and a medal. The speaker believes he may have also received a promotion and that it is a "disgrace." The speaker will look into Bird's reputation. The speaker claims that the people at the January 6th riot "had no guns," and that "there was something to do with the FBI" and "Antifa." The speaker believes that this group of people has been treated more harshly than any other group, with few exceptions. The speaker pardoned people involved in the riot, and believes that "this whole movement that we have is just a it's a very inspiring thing what's happened to our country."

Two years ago, Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd shot unarmed Ashley Babbitt during the January 6th events. Byrd had a history of firearm negligence but faced no consequences for the shooting. Instead, he was celebrated, while Babbitt's mother was arrested for holding a memorial for her daughter. The narrative surrounding January 6th has been manipulated, leading to false claims, such as the deaths of five police officers, which are untrue. Officer Brian Sicknick, initially reported to have died from violence, actually suffered a stroke later. Key events, like the pipe bomb incident and the role of Ray Epps, have been obscured, raising questions about federal agency involvement. Despite evidence of orchestrated actions, Epps faced no charges, highlighting inconsistencies in the official narrative surrounding that day.

Two men approach police officers at the second line. One discusses his recent release from jail and claims the government has misled the public about January 6th. He argues that while many law enforcement officers were injured, the narrative that protesters killed anyone is false; the deceased were all protesters, including Ashley Babbitt, shot by police. He highlights instances of police brutality and the lack of investigations into officers’ actions. He also mentions the presence of undercover agents, particularly Ray Epps, who allegedly incited the crowd. He criticizes the harsh sentences faced by January 6th participants compared to leniency shown to others in similar situations, calling for their pardons. He emphasizes the unfair treatment and suffering endured by those involved, urging for justice and accountability.

On January 6th, I was in the House chamber when Ashley Babbitt was shot and killed by Lieutenant Byrd. She was seen as a threat, but it's unclear what her intentions were. Byrd yelled for her to stop, but she didn't listen. If this had happened during the 2020 riots, Byrd would have been indicted quickly. The events of January 6th were driven by lies.

I have a friend who participated in the January 6th events and has been in jail for hundreds of days without trial. This seems unjust, as due process is expected. Watching the footage, it appeared that some officers were allowing people in, and there were even agents inciting the crowd. The narrative around police deaths that day is misleading; one officer died of a stroke, not due to protesters. Many people were involved in the chaos, but the lack of weapons suggests it wasn't a true insurrection. There were government agents encouraging the actions, raising questions about their intentions. It’s crucial to speak out against these issues, especially when it comes to the treatment of those still imprisoned without trial.

During a town hall with CNN, the speaker discussed the January 6th incident and the possibility of FBI entrapment. They questioned why footage of police using rubber bullets and tear gas on the crowd had been suppressed. The speaker believed that the violence was instigated by the Capitol Police, who threw munitions and injured people outside the Capitol. They mentioned instances of police brutality, including a man who suffered a heart attack and died after being hit by a concussion grenade. The speaker expressed concern about the lack of coverage and video evidence of these events. They emphasized the importance of transparency to prevent similar incidents in the future.

The speaker questions witnesses about the presence and activities of federal agents or assets during the January 6th Capitol riot. One witness states they do not know if any federal agents or assets were present on January 5th or 6th, whether they agitated the crowd, or whether any entered the Capitol. The speaker suggests this may be perjury, noting the witness has had two years to find out. The speaker also asks about confidential human sources and the erection of gallows, claiming FBI Director Wray and Attorney General Garland have stonewalled inquiries. Another witness confirms their report will include information about confidential human sources operating on Capitol grounds on January 6th, but cannot provide a number. The report is in draft form and requires classification review, making its release before the upcoming election unlikely. The report will address whether confidential human sources followed DOJ protocols and include information about travel reimbursements. The speaker expresses frustration with the delay and lack of transparency.

Speaker 0 expressed confusion about the lack of answers regarding two significant events on January 6. Firstly, other federal agencies withheld crucial information from the speaker, who was in charge of security at the Capitol. Secondly, despite the situation escalating for 71 minutes, Speaker Pelosi denied permission to bring in the National Guard. The speaker questioned why there is a lack of investigation into these matters, suggesting a lack of interest in uncovering the truth. The situation is described as worsening beyond these events.