TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In this video, John Loughlin, director of FVD International, discusses a letter written by Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament to the European Medical Agency (EMA). The letter raises concerns about the procedures followed and the alleged harmful nature of COVID vaccines. The speakers highlight issues such as the lack of transparency in vaccine contracts, the differences between approved and administered batches, and the potential dangers of the vaccines. They also discuss the corruption and illegality surrounding the approval process and the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen. The speakers emphasize the need for accountability and the protection of citizens' safety.

Dr. Robert Malone, a physician scientist, discusses the rushed development and deployment of mRNA-based gene therapy vaccinations. He highlights the breach of ethics and regulatory norms, as well as the lack of informed consent. Dr. Malone emphasizes the need for open and transparent access to data regarding the safety and effectiveness of these products. He mentions the numerous adverse events associated with the vaccines, including menstrual cycle disruptions, reproductive health issues, blood clotting, damage to various body systems, immunologic and oncologic harms, and even death. Dr. Malone urges governments to disclose the data so that scientists can evaluate it and resolve the controversy surrounding these products.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. They also admitted a lack of data on vaccine effectiveness against infections. The government's campaign to vaccinate for the sake of others was based on misinformation. Furthermore, the EMA emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination campaign should be halted as it does not meet the EMA's requirements and puts people's health at risk. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception.

A group of European Parliament members wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization, not for controlling or preventing infections. They also emphasized the lack of data on preventing infections and even mentioned that exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection, even in vaccinated individuals. The EMA highlighted the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccines. The government's vaccination campaigns were deemed unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA's information undermines the vaccination policies of the Dutch government, and they should be held accountable for their actions.

The speakers discuss a document released by court order in 2021, which analyzes adverse event reports related to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. They mention the large number of diagnoses during the preliminary phase of the study, expressing concern about the speed at which these diagnoses were made. They emphasize the importance of allowing individuals to choose whether or not to receive the vaccine, especially in the military. One speaker highlights the high number of adverse events associated with the vaccine, suggesting it indicates a significant safety issue. They explain that the vaccine is a genetic product that can affect every organ in the body, making it different from traditional medications. The speakers also mention the impact of vaccine mandates on healthcare workers and describe the militarization of public health.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted to providing misleading information to the public, and the lack of evidence for transmission control makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that this is for the benefit of vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

Last month, a group of European Parliament members, including myself, wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) expressing concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA's response revealed shocking facts. They admitted that the vaccines were only approved for individual immunization and not for controlling or preventing infections. Furthermore, there is a lack of data supporting the vaccines' effectiveness in preventing infections. In fact, the EMA stated that repeated exposure to the virus increases the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others were unauthorized and based on misinformation. The EMA also emphasized the need to carefully consider safety information before administering vaccines. The mass vaccination efforts were in direct contradiction to the approved use of the vaccines. The government and supporting political parties should be held accountable for their lies and deception. The vaccination campaign needs to be halted as it is not safe and does not meet EMA requirements.

Willem Engel, a pharmaceutical scientist and human rights activist, discusses the concerns and safety issues surrounding COVID vaccines. He criticizes the spread of misinformation by governments and the lack of accurate registration of vaccine risks. He questions the validity of informed consent when crucial information is not shared with the public. Another speaker highlights the patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, suggesting that informed consent was impossible due to the unknown risks associated with each batch. The statistician presents data showing three distinct patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a concerning safety signal. The speakers call for the withdrawal of vaccine marketing authorizations and accountability for the alleged mishandling of the vaccination campaign.

The speakers discuss the discrepancy between the disclosed plasmid map from Pfizer and what was actually found, suggesting that something important is being hidden. They claim that the vaccines being administered are different from what was tested in the trials, which may explain adverse reactions like anaphylaxis. They emphasize the need to raise awareness about this issue as it affects everyone. The speakers also mention that informed consent was not possible because people were not informed about the significant changes in vaccine manufacturing.

John Loughlin, director of FVD International, discusses a letter written by Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and other members of the European Parliament to the European Medical Agency. The letter raises concerns about the procedures followed and changes made in the approval process for COVID vaccines. It also highlights the alleged harmful nature of the vaccines and the confusion between testing batches and those used on people. The speakers argue that the vaccines are not effective and that the approval process has been corrupted. They discuss the dangers of the vaccines, including myocarditis and heart disease, and question the legality and safety of genetically modified organisms used in the vaccines. The speakers also mention allegations of corruption and suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen.

Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted that the information provided to the public was not for informed consent. The lack of evidence for transmission control from the start makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that it is a disservice to vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.

The speakers in the video discuss various red flags and concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. They highlight the importance of accurate information and informed consent for individuals deciding whether to get vaccinated. They criticize government policies and media campaigns for downplaying the risks and side effects of the vaccines. The speakers also raise concerns about the registration of adverse events and the existence of a closed database containing more serious side effects. They emphasize the need for transparency, accountability, and further investigation into the safety and long-term effects of the vaccines.

I am Marcel de Graaf, Member of the European Parliament for Forum for Democracy. I recently sent a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the approval of medications in the European market, specifically questioning the COVID-19 vaccines. We have received a response that clarifies many issues. This response is highly critical of the vaccination policy in the Netherlands. I will provide more details in a press conference tomorrow at 3 PM via a livestream from Strasbourg. The EMA's response confirms that Forum for Democracy's criticism of the vaccination policy is justified.

In this video, the speaker discusses the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and criticizes the lack of transparency and accountability in the vaccination process. They highlight the rise in serious health emergencies, the neglect of natural immunity, and the higher rate of adverse events compared to other vaccines. The speaker calls for the release of data on vaccine dosage, dates, and deaths, and expresses concern over the public's diminishing trust in health services, media, and politics. They also mention their personal sacrifices for speaking out against the vaccines and emphasize the need to challenge the powerful interests involved.

The speaker claims COVID vaccines are not actually vaccines and have caused unbelievable problems and damage. They allege the virus escaped from a lab with six manipulated inserts and the vaccine was 80% homologous to humans, causing major side effects. The speaker states that governments were informed but ignored warnings. They further claim the vaccines' quality control was appalling, the manufacturing process changed, and they were full of contaminants that can integrate into the genome, leading to massive excess deaths and a rise in cancer. The speaker questions why the vaccines haven't been banned, given COVID's diminished threat. They criticize the vaccination of children and call the vaccines "horrible gene therapies" causing "turbo cancers." They advocate for trials for those involved and accuse medical officers and regulatory bodies like MHRA, TGA, and FDA of incompetence and negligence, likening the situation to the Nuremberg trials. They assert the vaccines were never effective or safe, citing Pfizer's initial submissions to the FDA.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which may have been changed during production or transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The Vice President of Pfizer admitted to building the plane while flying, and we have shown that one wing has fallen off. There is a safety issue that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and national institutions should have addressed and informed the public about. Our study also suggests a potential link between certain cancers and different vaccine batches. We have observed increased mortality rates in European countries since May 21st. The EMA should have reacted to these findings and halted vaccinations or at least withdrawn the problematic batches. As a concerned citizen and doctor, I expected more action from the EMA. Thank you.

I am one of the scientists involved in a study on the safety and dependency of vaccine batches. We found three types of side effects: mild, severe, and even death. These adverse effects were present in the initial batches, which were later changed, possibly due to Pfizer altering the product or during transportation. Patients were not informed of the risks and some received poor-quality batches. The study also reveals a safety issue that both Pfizer and regulatory institutions should have addressed. Pfizer had already informed the European Medicines Agency (EMA) about the safety problem in August 2021. Our data from Sweden indicates that this is a European issue, not just a Danish one. We are concerned about long-term side effects and their potential links to cancer and increased mortality rates. The EMA should have taken action based on the data and informed the public. The vice-president of Pfizer's statement about building the plane while flying is apt, as we have shown that one wing has fallen off.

Last month, Joachim Küs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament wrote a letter to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding concerns about the arrival of vaccines. The EMA responded, stating that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization, not for infection control, prevention, or reduction. The EMA also highlighted a lack of data on contagion and stated that repeated exposure to the virus could increase the risk of infection even in vaccinated individuals. The government's massive vaccination campaigns, aimed at protecting others, were not authorized and lacked factual basis. The EMA emphasized the importance of carefully considering safety information before administering vaccinations. The government's policy of not reporting complaints within the first 14 days of vaccination was seen as deliberate endangerment of human life. The speaker called for an end to vaccination campaigns and accountability for the government's lies and deception.

In this video, various experts discuss the risks and concerns surrounding experimental vaccines, particularly in relation to COVID-19. Professor Christian Péronne criticizes the rushed development and lack of long-term safety data for these vaccines, questioning their efficacy and safety. He highlights the importance of proper placebo-controlled studies and the need for further research on vaccine safety. Another speaker discusses the effectiveness and limitations of vaccines, emphasizing the importance of reading vaccine notices carefully and considering various factors in treatment decisions. They express concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on medical research and advocate for transparency. Additionally, the impact of the HPV vaccine on reducing precancerous lesions is discussed, along with concerns about the influence of pharmaceutical companies on authorities and the lack of independent studies. The speaker calls for a reform of the World Health Organization (WHO) and expresses skepticism about the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccine. They emphasize the importance of vigilance against the suppression of freedoms and criticize the influence of big corporations.

Today's press conference featured Marcel De Graff, a European Parliament member, along with Joachim Kus, Evi Becquehmanish, and Max Schmeling. They discussed the shocking response from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the authorization of COVID-19 vaccines. The EMA explicitly stated that the vaccines were only authorized for individual immunization and not for infection control or prevention. This contradicts the government's messaging and raises concerns about the safety of the vaccines. The speakers also highlighted the lack of proper reporting of side effects and the potential risks associated with different vaccine batches. They called for an immediate halt to vaccination campaigns and accountability for the government's misleading information.

Dr. Paul Oosterhuis and whistleblower Winston discuss the lack of transparency and data surrounding COVID-19 vaccines in New Zealand. They express concern about the government's handling of the vaccine rollout and the potential risks associated with the vaccines. The speakers highlight the high number of deaths and clusters of deaths in certain areas, particularly in the South Island. They call for further investigations, accountability, and a reevaluation of medical ethics. The video emphasizes the importance of transparency, truth, and informed consent in analyzing the data and rebuilding the medical profession.

The speaker argues that there was no informed consent regarding the COVID vaccine, as the government and pharmaceutical companies knew it wasn't a traditional vaccine. They hid potential adverse reactions and lack of evidence on transmission prevention. Despite good intentions, people were misled into taking it.

In this video, John Loughlin interviews Marcel de Graaf, Joachim Koos, and Willem Engel about their letter to the European Medical Agency (EMA) regarding the withdrawal of COVID vaccines. They discuss various arguments against the vaccines, including procedural violations, alleged confusion between test batches and actual batches, and the harmful nature of the vaccines. They highlight the dangers of the vaccines, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, and the potential corruption and illegality surrounding their approval. They also mention the suppression of text messages by Ursula von der Leyen and the erosion of sovereignty by the European Union. The speakers express their concerns and call for action against the vaccines.

Willem Engel, a human rights activist, and other speakers discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines. They highlight the problem of adverse events not being properly registered within the first 14 days after vaccination, leading to a false sense of security. They also raise concerns about the classification of mRNA injections as vaccines and the potential long-term side effects. The speakers present data showing different patterns of adverse reactions in different vaccine batches, indicating a lack of consistency and informed consent. They criticize the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for not taking appropriate action and call for the withdrawal of market authorizations.

COVID-19 vaccines are deemed unsafe and should be removed from the market due to reported deaths and injuries. The spike protein found in patients who died after vaccination is believed to be extremely dangerous, causing blood clotting and affecting various organs. Pfizer allegedly concealed information about vaccine-related deaths, but external lawyers managed to make it public. The vaccines are considered emergency countermeasures, so standard safety rules are not followed. Only a small percentage of people are getting vaccinated, and there are concerns about cardiovascular damage, blood clots, and immunologic issues. Some batches of vaccines have severe side effects, but there is no system in place to recall them. The vaccines have failed to stop COVID-19 and are not medically necessary. The speaker recommends removing the vaccines from the market and implementing a moratorium on genetic vaccine research.