reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I'm here investigating the administrative state. I confronted a former FBI special agent and current advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon. I questioned him about potential ethical conflicts, including fundraising activities and his work with retired generals. He became angry, called me names, and accused me of fraud and lying. I'm operating within my First Amendment rights as a journalist, but he claimed I needed his permission to record him, which isn't true in Washington D.C. He was visibly upset, and at one point even cried. I believe he lied about his activities and shared sensitive information. It's concerning to see such political behavior from government officials.

I have worked in high-profile media roles, faced danger, and been falsely accused. The media faces challenges in the age of information warfare, with censorship and propaganda threatening freedom of speech. Nonprofit organizations act as political propagandists, stifling free thought. Big tech companies wield immense power over what we see and hear. The importance of freedom of speech, especially in the United States, cannot be overstated. The fight for truth and freedom is crucial in the current media landscape.

Four years ago, I came forward as a whistleblower about the Biden family's business dealings. Now, I'm campaigning for Donald Trump in Pennsylvania because I believe in the truth and want to see him back in the White House. Despite the media's blackout of my story, all my claims have been proven true through various testimonies and court rulings. I recently attended Hunter Biden's court hearing, where he pled guilty to multiple charges, and I found it shocking that his wife was laughing during such a serious moment. Over the next few weeks, I will be working to inspire voter registration and turnout in Pennsylvania to support Trump. Truth and transparency are essential for our country, and I'm committed to fighting for them.

I am Emma Jo Morris, a politics editor at Breitbart. I reported on Hunter Biden's laptop scandal in 2020, revealing emails showing Biden's involvement in family business deals. Social media platforms censored the news as hacked or Russian disinformation, with support from former intel officials. Recently, it was revealed that federal agencies influenced social media to discredit the reporting. This included FBI directing Twitter's censorship operation and granting top secret clearances to Twitter management.

Emma Jo Morris, politics editor at Breitbart, discusses her reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop and the subsequent censorship by social media platforms. She reveals verified emails from the laptop showing Joe Biden's involvement in his family's foreign business deals. The reporting was censored on major platforms, falsely labeled as hacked or Russian disinformation. Morris highlights the unholy alliance between the intelligence community, social media platforms, and legacy media outlets. She exposes how federal agencies primed social media companies to discredit her reporting and reveals the extensive presence of intelligence community members in these companies. Morris emphasizes that the censorship was not due to false information but because it posed a threat to the country's power centers. She warns that this undermines the First Amendment and calls for a response to protect the freedom of the press.

One son asked if I would go to jail, and I couldn't assure him that democracy and a free press are valued here. I was shocked by the firing, but it felt politically motivated due to my reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop. The media should release full transcripts of Biden's interviews to assess his cognitive state. There’s a need for accountability journalism, focusing on the powerful rather than the vulnerable. The Press Act is crucial for protecting journalists' sources, especially as independent media rises. My recent investigation revealed failures in the military's treatment of a soldier with a heart condition linked to the COVID vaccine. The public deserves credible information, and I aim to provide it. The landscape has changed, and I’m committed to pursuing impactful stories that hold power accountable.

One son asked if I would go to jail, reflecting on the state of democracy and press freedom. The media's reaction to Biden's debate performance surprised many, despite prior indicators of his decline. There's a need for transparency in releasing interview transcripts to assess his fitness for office. The press should hold powerful entities accountable, and the lack of diverse reporting is concerning. Independent journalism is flourishing, as audiences seek credible information. The Press Act aims to protect confidential sources, essential for investigative reporting. My recent work focuses on military accountability regarding health issues linked to vaccinations. The landscape has shifted, and there's a hunger for honest journalism that serves the public interest.

Emma Jo Morris, politics editor at Breitbart, discusses her reporting on Hunter Biden's laptop and the subsequent censorship of the stories on social media platforms. She reveals that her reporting showed Joe Biden's involvement in his family's foreign business deals, with verified emails from the laptop. However, the stories were censored and labeled as hacked or Russian disinformation. Morris highlights the unholy alliance between the intelligence community, social media platforms, and legacy media outlets. She emphasizes that the censorship was not because the information was false, but because it was true and a threat to the power centers in the country. Morris argues that this relationship undermines the First Amendment and the freedom of the press.

I believe President Biden is a much worse threat to democracy than Trump. Biden is the first president to use federal agencies to censor political speech, targeting opponents. I won a case proving he censored me shortly after taking office. The greatest threat to democracy isn't questioning election returns, but using presidential power to force social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to censor political critics through portals accessible to the FBI, CIA, IRS, and other agencies. Biden also weaponized the Secret Service, denying protection to a political opponent for political reasons. These are critical threats because he is weaponizing federal agencies.

One of our sons asked if I would go to jail, and I couldn't assure him that wouldn't happen in a country that values democracy and a free press. Reflecting on Biden's recent debate performance, it's clear there's a need for more transparency in media coverage of his cognitive health. Many journalists seem surprised by his decline, but I believe they should release full transcripts of past interviews for public scrutiny. The media landscape is changing, with independent outlets gaining traction as audiences seek credible information. I'm now focused on investigative journalism, including stories about government accountability and immigration issues. The importance of protecting confidential sources is paramount, especially as I face legal challenges regarding my reporting. This moment is crucial for press freedom, and I remain committed to shining a light on important stories.

Speaker 0: It's been a few days since you issued that resignation. You’ve been called weak by the president of the United States. You’ve been called a traitor by Lindsey Graham. You’ve been called an anti-Semite by Mitch McConnell, among others. Now there are reports that you’re under a leak investigation potentially accusing you of a felony that could put you in jail even though you now are raising your two boys. You’ve remarried, but you’re their sole biological parent still here. I ask you now whether this was worth it. Speaker 1: I think it most certainly was, Megan. I mean, the attacks against me are to be expected. The ad hominems from people like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham at this point are fairly laughable. They don’t wanna discuss the issues. I wanna discuss the issues. As for the leak allegations, I’m not concerned because I know I did nothing wrong. Of course, I am concerned because we’ve all seen the FBI and the full way of the government come down on individuals who speak out. So that has me a little bit concerned, but I know the truth and the facts are on my side. So I think the important issues to address are what’s at hand, why we’re at war, and how we get out of the state that we’re in right now. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Your boys have already lost one parent. I mean, the thought of this government for which you’ve been working and the government for which you’ve sacrificed so much, actually trying to put you in jail over an alleged leak after the number of leaks we’ve seen go unpunished over the past ten years is truly outrageous, Joe. I mean, does it anger you? How does it make you feel? Speaker 1: You, you know, it it does anger me, but it it’s all just to be expected. I I knew this was going to happen. I I know their playbook. I think we’re all very familiar with their playbook. So, actually, the fact that they’re leaking these allegations so so they have to leak the allegations of an FBI investigation. If there truly was an FBI investigation, and who knows, maybe there will be, there would be a process and procedure for that. They would actually formally come to me. And if they were still collecting information, they most certainly wouldn’t leak it. So the fact that the FBI, DOJ, or really probably just partisans are leaking this this so-called investigation against me at a time when I’m going on and publicly speaking out against the course the administration is on, to me, that tells me everything that I need to know. I feel very confident in what I’m doing right now. I think I have a mission, and I think it is to do everything I can to stop this war. So to me, I kinda view everything else as a sideshow, and I just wanna stay focused on the mission.

Our government is radical and dangerous. The FBI is investigating me for looking into Biden corruption in Ukraine. Special Agent Bracco questioned my sources about me, a member of the free press. I wonder why the Bidens live in luxury on a civil servant's salary. They would imprison me if they could. Translation: The government is dangerous and investigating me for probing Biden corruption in Ukraine. The FBI questioned my sources about my work as a journalist. I question how the Bidens afford lavish lifestyles on a government salary. They would arrest me if possible.

I believe the media is protecting Biden like big tech. It's outrageous that the media focuses on his ice cream flavor while ignoring serious allegations. The mayor of Moscow's wife gave his family millions, and Hunter Biden mentioned giving "the big guy" 10% of some massive income. China gave them a billion and a half dollars to manage. This is a huge scandal, second only to the spying on my campaign, which is totally verified. But you won't cover any of it. You're going to ask him about ice cream instead of the millions from Moscow or the energy company paying his son with no experience. The laptop is a major issue because it reveals potential corruption involving money from Russia, Ukraine, and China. It's one of the biggest scandals ever, yet you claim it can't be verified, even though they found the laptop.

One of my sons asked if I would go to jail, and I couldn't assure him that wouldn't happen in a country that values democracy and a free press. The media's reaction to Biden's recent debate performance surprised many, but I believe it's crucial to analyze past interviews to assess his cognitive state. The lack of transparency in releasing interview transcripts raises questions about accountability. After losing my job, I chose to pursue independent journalism, focusing on stories that matter, like the military's treatment of soldiers. The Press Act is vital for protecting journalists and their sources. As I navigate this new chapter, the importance of free speech and a free press has become my guiding principle.

I filed a lawsuit against the Biden DOJ for misconduct after my complaints about harassment went unanswered. My aim is to have my FBI files opened and the sealed criminal case against me revealed. The investigation stems from my public accusations of sexual assault against Joe Biden, which I believe led to retaliation against me. I faced threats and harassment, especially after being invited to testify as a whistleblower. I sought political asylum in Russia after receiving warnings about potential charges under the Foreign Agent Registration Act. Despite my credible allegations against Biden, the media has largely ignored my story, while I continue to fight for accountability and justice. I miss my daughter and have faced relentless attacks, but I remain determined to speak out.

I was held in contempt of court for protecting my confidential sources, highlighting the need for the Press Act to protect journalists. The legislation would prevent legal jeopardy for reporters, ensuring federal protections for sources unless there's an imminent threat. Without it, investigative journalism could suffer. I faced challenges in court, including potential fines, emphasizing the importance of the First Amendment and press freedom. CBS News seizing my files showed the need to safeguard sources. I appreciate the support from fellow journalists, organizations, and my former employer, Fox News. The Press Act is crucial for independent journalism and diverse voices in our democracy. I am hopeful for its passage this year. Thank you.

I'm a journalist investigating the administrative state. I confronted a former FBI special agent, now an advisor to the joint chiefs at the Pentagon, about his political activities and fundraising efforts with retired generals. He became angry, called me names, and accused me of fraud and being a liar. He even claimed I needed his permission to record him, despite being in a one-party consent state. He denied saying things that I have on tape, including discussing plans after Trump wins. I questioned the ethics of his political involvement as a Pentagon advisor, and I asked him whether he thought it was appropriate to share sensitive information with strangers, even joking about whether I was a Russian spy.

Speaker 1 insisted that a story should be aired because it is "bad for Biden," while Speaker 0 refused because it "can't be verified," specifically referencing a laptop. Speaker 1 claimed the laptop story is "one of the biggest scandals" and that the family is in hiding. Speaker 1 accused the media of being "fake" and said social media is the only way to get his voice out. Speaker 0 claimed Speaker 1 once said the media was discredited to ensure negative stories would not be believed. Speaker 1 denied this. Speaker 1 contrasted the interview with what he characterized as "softball" interviews given to Joe Biden. Speaker 1 took issue with the interview beginning with the interviewer stating there would be "tough questions." Speaker 1 then ended the interview.

I can appear on shows like yours, even if the atmosphere is tense. We covered a lot of policy, and while it felt fair to express my views, the questions were tough. I've noticed that interviews with other politicians, like Biden, tend to be much softer. For example, George Stephanopoulos's interviews often focus on light topics rather than pressing issues. It’s puzzling why the press doesn’t seem to prioritize strong borders, quality education, and a robust military, which are essential for our country’s future.