reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Many Californians question my focus on China, given our state's problems like homelessness. But climate change knows no boundaries. California has faced extreme heat, drought, and floods. We can't solve these issues alone. We need China, and China needs us. Some suggest China is influencing me, similar to how they allegedly influenced the Bidens. They see my visit and entourage as signs of this. Regardless of national politics, California will remain committed to these issues. Critics argue my engagement with China overlooks human rights issues and accuse me of running a shadow presidential campaign, hoping Biden steps aside. China has a history of backing political candidates, but they misjudged Trump. Now, some fear they're betting on me.

We are here to address a long-standing issue in our province regarding the systematic and legal intervention in weather patterns. We have been denouncing the use of cloud-seeding planes by certain companies and insurers, which prevents rainfall and leaves us without water. These practices have been going on for over 20 years, and we demand that they be prohibited and investigated. These planes inject chemicals into the atmosphere to prevent hail, but they also disperse storms and hinder rainfall. This is a well-documented phenomenon, supported by organizations like the World Meteorological Organization. These weather modification practices, including anti-hail efforts, have been around for over a century in Argentina.

Experts have warned of a coming water crisis, possibly already spurring conflicts due to scarcity. While Earth appears to be a blue planet, 98% of its water is saline, with much of the fresh water locked in glaciers. The available fresh water is unevenly distributed, and reservoirs are being depleted. Big Tech's growing demand for water is exacerbating the problem, though this is intentionally kept secret. The speaker investigated Big Tech's water consumption and its potential disastrous consequences. This video you are watching is brought to you by water. Data centers, which host massive amounts of data, require vast amounts of water for cooling. An average data center consumes up to 5 million gallons of water daily, equivalent to the usage of 50,000 people in an American city.

Speaker 0: You guys still having water problems? Yeah. Yeah. No water. No water problems. No water alone.

There is a claim that addressing this issue is a money-making scheme, similar to what the Rothschild family did in the past. The speaker challenges David Rothschild and accuses him of being involved in a scam. They mention that the polar ice caps on Mars are receding faster than ours and that the moons of Saturn and Jupiter are melting. The speaker questions how SUVs could be causing this, stating that these planets are not closer to the sun.

Katie Hopkins enters a West Country field where a solar panel farm is being installed. She films as she argues that the countryside is being destroyed to place solar panels, claiming that “the valley is so pretty” and describing it as “heartbreaking.” She says she walked onto the site because the gate was open and insists she is showing what’s being done to farmland. She points to plastic packaging around the solar equipment, asserting that it “cannot be recycled, obviously,” and contends that the packaging is environmentally harmful. Hopkins highlights the solar panels themselves, noting their large size and the plastic wrap on them, and she states that “these solar panels can’t be recycled,” implying that much of it will become landfill in the future. Hopkins identifies herself and frames her critique as a stand against what she calls “the ridiculousness of net zero,” arguing against a perceived lie about net zero and its supposed benefits. She calls the situation “Batshit Bonkers Britain” and says she is trying to show people what’s been done to the countryside, vowing not to blame the workers but to condemn the vandalism of the countryside. She emphasizes that the valley belongs to the public and not to the company (“this is my countryside. It’s not yours, and it’s certainly not Canadian solar panels”). Hopkins describes herself as a countryside walker and rebukes those in the site, telling them she does not have access and that she shouldn’t be there, while noting that she did “let myself on” because the gate was open. She addresses the workers, arguing that they are angry with her and that she does not deserve to be there. Hopkins insists that the installation amounts to vandalism, even as she acknowledges the workers’ jobs. She asks what the workers are doing and expresses concern for safety, claiming she is “a dangerous person” and that her safety is at risk. She prays for reform to roll back net zero policies and for the end of what she calls “needless wanton vandalism of our countryside.” Throughout, she reiterates her stance against net zero and frames the solar project as environmentally and aesthetically harmful, arguing against the idea that the project is good for the environment and for rural areas. She also repeatedly asserts ownership of the countryside and questions the legitimacy of the installation by Canadian Solar. The scene ends with her leaving the site after maintaining that she filmed to inform her audience of what she perceives as damage to the countryside.

In the transcript, the speaker describes a situation in Argentina where fires are spreading around Patagonia. They claim there is speculation that Israeli tourists are starting the fires to purchase land at cheap prices. The speaker asserts that Argentina’s president, Javier Milei, is allegedly in cahoots with this idea, because he repealed a law that formerly banned the sale of land immediately after a fire, arguing that laws like this are important in Patagonia due to the land’s beauty. The speaker notes another action attributed to Milei: an executive order in 2023 that repealed a law limiting foreign ownership of rural land, allegedly removing any cap on how much land foreigners can purchase in Argentina. They argue that this, combined with fires and the opening of the market to foreigners, could create a scenario where land is purchased cheaply after fires, potentially attracting Israeli buyers. The speaker claims Milei is so focused on Israel that he is described as selling what they call one of the most beautiful places on Earth—Patagonia, Argentina—to Israelis, with the Argentine people supposedly having no say in the matter. They relay watching domestic Argentine news, describing the fires as horrible for those affected, including a viral video of a crying woman who says they’re burning Patagonia and selling the land to Israelis. Another similar video is mentioned, with a man remarking that people are unsurprised that Patagonia is being set on fire for a real estate interest. The speaker alleges that there is no aid from the government, asserting that the country has realized that Patagonia is being destroyed potentially for large financial interests to purchase land and create a “colony” for Israel, or some similar outcome. The overall claim remains that the fires are purposeful real estate-driven acts tied to foreign ownership changes and pro-Israel policy under Milei, with Patagonia’s destruction framed as a consequence of these political and economic moves.

The video documents a drive through rural farmland in Indiana to a growing AI data center. The area is described as “super rural,” with miles of farmland and few signs of life until the data center lights appear, creating a noticeable intrusion in an otherwise empty landscape. The narrator notes the drive covers “30 plus miles, maybe more of nothing but just beautiful rural farmland,” and expresses strong emotion about returning to this area after a year away. As the video continues, the scenery remains rural and expansive, with mentions of semi trucks and cement trucks on the way to the site. The narrator highlights the emotional impact of the development, stating, “the first time I drove this, it genuinely made me so emotional because I haven't been this way. I haven't left town in, like a year.” The content hints at a pause in filming near a small parking lot or staging area before continuing along the corridor toward the project. A key claim is that the Meta AI data center is being built on this farmland, consuming “beautiful farmland that we will never be able to replace.” The narrator emphasizes the contrast between the large land use for the data center and the relatively small number of jobs it will create, stating that it will “only employ one to 500 people,” which the speaker finds startling. The final sentiment underscores the perceived imbalance between the considerable land impact and the limited employment opportunity, describing the situation as “pretty fucking insane.” The video ends after confirming the path to the data center and the ongoing construction.

Primary water is created deep within the Earth from hydrogen and oxygen synthesis. Under pressure from Earth's internal heat, water vapor rises through rock fissures and becomes liquid. There is potentially more primary water in the Earth's crust than water in the oceans. Weather modification creates artificial droughts and floods to push climate change narratives and profit from natural disasters. All countries are allegedly involved in weather modification. In 2003, Libya built a water irrigation system, tapping into the primary water cycle in the Sahara, bringing 6,000,000 gallons of water to the surface every day. The UN drone-striked the wells because Libya was trying to create a gold-backed dollar. The primary water cycle is not taught in schools to maintain control. Past the 800-foot mark, one can tap into primary water veins for unlimited fresh water, which is mineralized and rejuvenating. This knowledge is suppressed to enslave people through lack of knowledge.

The conversation centers on the claim that Iran has faced long-running weather manipulation and climate intervention, pushing the idea that weather warfare is being waged against Iran for decades and that this has contributed to severe droughts, disrupted rainfall, and harsh living conditions amid sanctions. Dane Wiggington, founder of geoengineeringwatch.org, leads the discussion with Clayton and Natalie, presenting a narrative that goes beyond mainstream geopolitics to point to covert weather manipulation as a central factor. Key points and assertions include: - Weather warfare against Iran has “gone back forty years plus,” with Iranian meteorologists and former president Ahmadinejad publicly asserting that NATO was cutting off precipitation, thereby destabilizing weather patterns and food production. The guests describe this as ongoing warfare that destabilizes populations. - The practice is described as not just about Iran; the tactic, historically used by the US in conflicts such as Vietnam (Project Popeye), has led to international attempts to regulate weather modification (INMOD treaties) in 1976, though the speakers argue that nations still engage in such activities over their own citizens. - The mechanism of climate engineering is presented as two main methods: diminishing and dispersing precipitation, and completely cutting it off. The discussion highlights ionosphere heater technologies (notably HARP) as tools to heat portions of the atmosphere, creating high-pressure heat domes that steer moisture patterns and produce chemically nucleated rainfall or drought. This is linked to current US West Coast heat waves and is described as a deliberate manipulation of moisture cycles. - The oil-cloud phenomenon in Iran is described as a result of such warfare, with reports of oil covering streets, doors, cars, and lungs from inhalation of aerosolized oil. The guest connects this to broader environmental impacts, including toxic precipitation and altered air quality, and claims similar operations have caused dramatic weather and pollution events elsewhere. - The discussion cites historical and contemporary examples to illustrate broader patterns: Kuwait’s oil wells torched by US forces allegedly to justify infrastructure moves; allegations that US military operations use climate intervention as a weapon; and a claim that blizzards and chemical cooling downs (including alleged chemical ice nucleation) have been weaponized in various regions, including the Gulf Coast and the US Northeast. - The conversation ties climate engineering to geopolitical strategies, arguing that portraying Iran as a nuclear threat serves to justify aggressive actions and to obscure the manipulation of weather and climate systems. Netanyahu’s warnings and statements about water and control of resources are presented as part of this broader manipulation. - The speakers argue that the US and allied governments are maintaining control through deception, suggesting that media coverage is insufficient or complicit. They claim that mainstream outlets like Forbes “cover” for the narrative of cloud theft and downplay the severity of drought and weather manipulation in Iran, while asserting that Western North American snowpack is at record lows, much of it chemically nucleated, reducing runoff. - They emphasize the scale of water stress domestically, warning that tens of millions in the US Southwest could face severe water shortages, with reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead described as near dead pools with substantial sedimentation reducing usable capacity. - The dialogue connects climate engineering to broader biosphere collapse and asserts that the greatest single source of pollution is the US military. They argue that climate engineering is the crown jewel weapon used to inflict misery while remaining hidden, urging listeners to awaken, form supportive networks, and push for action at the legislative level. - They reference the documentary The Dimming as a resource for evidence of climate engineering and invite audiences to explore geoengineeringwatch.org for ongoing information. Throughout, Dane Wiggington reiterates that climate engineering and weather manipulation are central, ongoing operations that intersect with geopolitics, media coverage, and public health. The conversation maintains a consistent stance that these interventions are real, pervasive, and inadequately addressed by mainstream discourse, urging viewers to seek out more information and grassroots advocacy.

Some people who own beachfront homes claim that the water is rising. Others who fly in private jets talk about global warming. There are also those who advocate for saving the environment, but use child labor to mine cobalt for electricity. The underlying idea is that people are easier to control when their lives rely on electricity.

California has been managing its water reserves in ways that raise questions. It's puzzling why certain decisions are made, leading to speculation about potential motives. One wonders if there is a deliberate intent behind these actions, even though it seems extreme to think so. The uncertainty leaves us questioning whether there is a larger purpose at play, such as a desire to depopulate the state.

There is a significant water issue despite no drought, as water is being diverted to protect a small fish species. This water, which flows naturally from Canada, could be used to benefit the land and forests, which are currently dry and at risk. The lack of water contributes to the high costs of forest fires, amounting to billions annually. Additionally, environmental regulations prevent proper forest management, such as raking and clearing debris. Simple maintenance could reduce fire hazards and improve forest health.

A continuous stream of unrealistic ideas about California's water situation is unhelpful. The state has reservoirs at historic highs, and the notion that there's a simple solution, like a magical spigot to produce rain, is misleading. This kind of thinking undermines our understanding of facts and truths. The impact of misinformation, amplified by influential figures like Elon Musk, is significant and concerning. It contributes to a broader issue of division in the country on various topics. This situation is serious and requires attention.

The speaker questions why Greta Thunberg never criticizes Saudi Arabia or Russia, only Western energy. They ask if she will condemn OPEC energy and every delegate who arrived on a private jet. They challenge her to condemn private jets and ask if she has ever been on one. The speaker claims to own 100 private jets and asks if Greta has ever been on one, to which she responds affirmatively.

I helped make the tractors for the water issue serious. We need to solve it together. Farmers face water curtailment. I had to shut off water on my farm. We need changes for certainty. Everyone must know the water situation for next year. It's not good to wait. Let's fix this together.

Speaker 0 asserts that governments claim they must invade countries for oil, and says, "Oh, you didn't know it's unlimited? Oh, that's just a banker's tale." They claim Russian petroleum geologists have drilled past the strata and have noticed that the oil doesn't run out.

The discussion centers on Libya’s water program during Muammar Gaddafi’s rule. Speaker 1 describes it as an ambitious endeavor that would have marked one of the “eighth wonders of the world.” The project purportedly aimed to deliver water across the continent of Africa and into the Middle East. The speaker asserts that Gaddafi tapped into what is described as primary water, understanding that there is water beneath the desert, and he extracted this water to create a vast supply. According to the speaker, the plan involved pulling up primary water and constructing the largest pipeline in the world for water. This pipeline was intended to bring water to Libyan people so they could establish organic farms and have unlimited water to grow crops. The overarching objective, as stated, was to use this water to generate an “organic oasis” by leveraging the primary water that was described as indisposable and never going to run out. The vision extended beyond Libya’s borders, with ambitions to share this resource with other countries in Africa and various nations in the Middle East. The narrative emphasizes the scale and transformative potential of the project, portraying it as a transformative water infrastructure effort designed to sustain agriculture and ensure abundant water supply. The speaker notes that when outsiders initially entered Libya, the first element of the program that was targeted or removed was this water initiative, described succinctly as “the first thing which was taken out.” The implication is that the water program was of foundational importance and encountered early disruption or appropriation. In summary, the transcript presents a description of Gaddafi’s water program as an extraordinary, continent-spanning plan to harness primary water, construct the world’s largest water pipeline, and supply Libyans with abundant water for organic farming and growth, with aspirations to extend this resource to Africa and the Middle East, and it highlights that the initial impact in Libya involved the first removal of this project.

I saw water jugs near the San Diego border, set up by someone, possibly an NGO. They were near the Hotel Indigo. I'm curious if this is a Hotel Indigo initiative, a targeted strategy, or if the water was stolen and placed there. Perhaps Hotel Indigo can clarify their involvement. Was this a deliberate action, or was their water improperly used? I'd appreciate any information to understand the situation.

A speaker claims that in the event of another civil war, blue states would control all the fresh water. The speaker suggests that supporters of MAGA are not considering this potential outcome.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss Libya’s water program associated with Muammar Gaddafi. They describe it as an ambitious effort that, in their view, would have constituted transformative water provision for the region. They begin by noting familiarity with Gaddafi’s era and the program’s fate after his removal, stating that the program “went to waste.” They then assert that Gaddafi claimed to have created “the eighth wonder of the world,” a plan to deliver water to the entire continent of Africa and the Middle East. Central to this claim is the idea that he “tapped into primary water,” understanding that there was water beneath the desert. According to the speakers, he pulled that water up and built “the largest pipeline, I think, in the world, actually, for water,” which was designed to bring water up and distribute it. The speakers assert that this water was used to benefit Libyan people by enabling organic farming and providing “unlimited water to grow.” They describe the project as creating “an organic oasis” by leveraging primary water, which they characterized as “indisposable” and “never going to run out.” The stated intention was to extend this water supply to other regions, specifically noting Africa and all the different countries in The Middle East. This conveys a vision of a regional water network powered by the primary water source. Finally, the speakers remark that when “they first went into Libya, that was the first thing which was taken out.” This concluding line implies that, in their view, the initial priority or element of the program was removed or damaged when outsiders entered Libya, though no additional details are provided about who took it out or the circumstances surrounding that action.

Cloud seeding is expanding with 200 more machines planned. Research shows chemicals used are safe. Manipulating nature is not new, like building parking lots. Monitoring effects on people downstream is important as programs grow.

Because the plan is to cover the whole planet with this to produce enough power for these data centers. I don't think this is really a one for one swap on the positive side for humanity to cover our entire planet with this to to divert power when there's so many other ways to do it, you know? We can't get clean coal technologies. Only pure spring water slash artesian water slash deep well water punching into aquifers will work. So the call is once they get the electrification route from Eritrea, Ethiopia down through Tanzania, you're gonna watch a bunch of AI data centers pop up along there and they're gonna tap all those sandstone aquifers beneath to get that water. No data center left behind.

Gazans face numerous challenges as Hamas fires rockets from mosques and steals fuel meant for water supplies. The corrupt government in Gaza has neglected investments in electricity and water, falsely blaming Israel for the shortages. The ongoing war is a result of Hamas' acts of violence, including murder, rape, and invasion of Israel. It is important to recognize that we all share the same problem.