reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0: Facial recognition will be used to unlock your digital identity, which is going to be a tool of control for the agendas that are coming down the pipeline. Elements of that control are already with us. Alexa, good morning. Good morning. You are never alone in your home, and this is why. All your devices at home and all smart appliances, they are all connected on a wireless network. Many of these devices will have cameras, many will have microphones, and so they are monitoring everything all the time. Your smart appliances are communicating with the smart meter and sending it real time usage data. If there is a Ring camera also in your home, a mesh network is formed and all your devices are being tracked within the home, its location, its usage and all the data is going to Amazon's servers. When you leave your home, all modern vehicles are connected to the Internet, so your automobile is being tracked all the time. When you are going under a string of smart LED poles and smart LED lights on the highway and in the streets of your towns and cities, those form a wireless network and are tracking your vehicle. They are tracking all the devices on you from smartphones to smartwatches when you're walking on the streets. So data is being collected twenty four seven continuously on every human being whenever you are within these wireless networks. Speaker 1: And it's obviously not good for health also because of all the electromagnetic radiation. Speaker 0: In the long term, the plan is to pretty much lock up humanity in smart cities, which is kind of a super set of a fifteen minute city. Speaker 1: They've sold all the state and local governments and countries that smart cities are about sustainability and the good of the city. But in reality, the language from the UN and WEF and their white papers is all inverted. So their monitoring is really about limiting mobility and no car ownership. Right? Surveillance control via LED grid is why the smart lighting is death. Water management is about water rationing. Noise pollution is about speed surveillance. Traffic monitoring is about limiting mobility. And then, of course, energy conservation is all about rationing heat, electricity, and gasoline. Another concept one should be familiar with is called geofencing, and that's think of it as an invisible fence around you where you cannot go beyond a certain point, and that'll be related to your face recognition, digital identity, and access control. Your smart contracts, Softbrick can turn off your digital currency beyond a certain point from your house. Our world has been turned into a digital panopticon. Speaker 0: That means you can be monitored, analyzed, managed and monetized.

The WEF has introduced the concept of 15-minute cities, called C40 cities. In these cities, petrol and diesel cars will be banned in favor of electric vehicles. Residents will receive calorie-controlled food sent by text. Violating rules may result in frozen bank accounts. This plan, supported by the WEF and London's mayor, aims to be implemented worldwide. The speaker opposes this idea, calling it a form of lifelong confinement and criticizing its lack of public awareness.

They are creating mini cities called districts with mixed-use buildings in Toronto. These buildings have residences, offices, and retail spaces but limited parking. The goal is for residents to live, work, and shop within the same building, resembling lockdown conditions during COVID. The concept, known as the 15-minute city, aims to keep people within a 5-kilometer radius of their homes if they do not have a car.

I'm a brainwashing expert, and I am personally terrified of short form social media like that. And I'm not immune. And I'm one of the best in the world, and I am not immune to it. And I think that should be a stark warning for a lot of people. What's the cost, though? What's the cost of the life, in your view, of living this kind of life where we go home and we just burn our brains out with these social media apps and fry our dopamine receptors? Is there a cost? Yeah. I think the cost is increased loneliness. And that these apps any app that sells ads has two main goals. Number one, and all advertising shares these two main goals. Number one, make you compare yourself to other people in unhealthy ways. Number two, make you think I am not enough, and we see that everywhere. I'm not enough, and I'm comparing myself to other people, and it gets us into an us versus them. Then it traps you into a corner of confirmation bias. Whatever you think, I'm gonna show you this group of a 150 people that agree with you. No matter how stupid, how radical, how absolutely bizarre your ideas are. Let me show you all of these people. And then you start thinking the whole world's like that. So really quickly, what happens when we conglomerate people together? Like, I've only been in New York once in my life, but we're in New York right now. I'm looking at my hotel. I was like struggling to find a piece of nature. Like, I think I have more trees on my property than they're in the whole city here. So on the whole, when you squeeze people together, have you heard of the bystander effect? So there there's a very good experiment that was led by doctor Phillips and Barto that they did at Liverpool Street Station. Oh, in London? In London. Yeah. Okay. So right at Liverpool Street, there's three or four steps to get up to the main. So from the street, there's a curb, and then there's three or four steps. They had this woman laid out on the ground wearing like a normal skirt and top, and I think 395 people either walked by her or stepped over her. And then they did it with a guy. And then they did it with a guy who's holding a beer, and he's asking for help. And they they it may have changed all these variables. But it's happened in New York City before. There's a woman named Kitty Genovace in the sixties, I think just two blocks from here, who was stabbed to death in front of, like, 55 witnesses. Don't quote me on that number. And no one called the police until much, much later, mostly because everyone thought somebody else would act. But if I described to you saying, watched a person get stabbed, and three people just watched, and they watched it happen. Would you say that that's psychopathy? That's a psychopath. So these large cities and stuff and the apps that are messing with the social part of our brain that makes us think the tribe is way bigger than our brains are made to handle causes this almost psychopathic behavior, which the bystander effect has been proven hundreds of times as an experiment.

We need to be cautious about climate solutions to avoid perpetuating injustice. Instead of just focusing on electric vehicles, we should rethink mobility and redesign cities to be more sustainable. Making cities less car-friendly can lead to greener spaces, like local food systems and playgrounds, making cities more resilient to extreme heat.

While in the US, I notice how little I walk. I don’t own a car in Italy, and I walk everywhere—grocery store, doctor, train station. Walking is such a part of everyday life in Italy that I feel sad when I’m in the US and can’t walk. You drive everywhere, even for a street crossing. There are some walkable US cities, but for the most part the country isn’t very walkable. In the US I have to make a conscious effort to move my body every day; otherwise, I don’t move. In Italy I don’t even need a gym membership—I just walk so much in my daily life, move so much in my daily life that activity is part of my lifestyle, and I honestly prefer that.

The speaker vented strong anti-European liberal sentiments, claiming liberal Europeans are inferior to North American Europeans, and stated a preference to defend Americans in their disputes with Europeans. They asserted personal experience across continents: they are Canadian, working in the American oil field, with origins in Europe and experience in the European oil patch, and they claim to know “how big of a pussy you guys actually are.” They attacked European men as “man bun wearing” and using explicit insults related to Mohammed, accusing liberal Europeans of being “commie pieces of shit” and praising Western-style personal freedoms. The speaker contrasted American behavior with European restrictions, saying Americans are “nice and welcoming,” and claimed to drive a large diesel truck “bigger than your dick,” implying Americans have more freedom to own personal vehicles and engage in risky driving, while claiming Europeans face stricter enforcement (such as tickets for minor speed violations in some cities). They referenced pickpocketing in Europe, claiming that in Europe one must “thank them and take it up the ass,” while an American mother of five in Italy allegedly confronted a pickpocket, slapped them, and that in Europe such actions would be met with fatal consequences (“she’d be meeting Jesus”). They asserted the incident went viral and inspired other Americans to resist such behavior, with the government issuing warnings to tourists. The speaker criticized European attitudes toward crime and safety, stating that governments protect criminals in Europe and that criminals target the native European population. They directed insults at a German commenter and claimed that Mohammed’s influence is pervasive in Europe, linking it to energy and resource siphoning from Europe. They asserted experience with Norwegians in the oil field, describing a safety meeting as overly cautious and complainant about “pussies” with minor injuries, contrasting this with American workers who “cowboy up” and complete work in three to four days. They concluded by urging Europeans to travel outside Europe to realize they have “domesticated, propagandized pussies,” implying a need to recognize perceived cultural differences in work ethic and freedom.

I'm in Dubai at 1:30 AM, and I just walked to the supermarket for water because I'm really thirsty. The reason I feel comfortable doing this here is because I know I'm safe. Unlike in Europe and many parts of the US, where women can face danger when alone at night, here, the consequences for harassment or assault are severe, like deportation or jail. As a result, people respect personal boundaries, and you feel secure. I think there's something to be learned from this culture to make our streets safer for everyone.

Speaker 0 argues that facial recognition will be used to unlock a digital identity and will serve as a tool of control for upcoming agendas. They claim that elements of this control already exist and describe a highly connected home environment: all devices and smart appliances are on a wireless network, many have cameras and microphones, and they monitor everything continuously. Smart appliances communicate with the smart meter and send real-time usage data. If a Ring camera is present, a mesh network forms and all devices are tracked within the home, with location and usage data sent to Amazon’s servers. When leaving home, modern vehicles are connected to the Internet and tracked constantly. On highways and in cities, smart LED poles and lights form a wireless network that tracks vehicles and all devices (phones, smartwatches) people carry, enabling continuous data collection on every person within these wireless networks. Speaker 1 notes that this is obviously not good for health due to electromagnetic radiation. Speaker 0 continues by stating that the long-term plan is to lock humanity into smart cities, described as a superset of a fifteen-minute city. They claim governments have been sold on smart cities as promoting sustainability and the common good, but quote language from the UN and the World Economic Forum (WEF) as inverted. In this view, surveillance is used to limit mobility and reduce car ownership. They describe surveillance via an LED grid as essential to smart lighting and view it as harmful. They extend this to water management, which they say is about water rationing; noise pollution as speed surveillance; traffic monitoring as mobility restriction; and energy conservation as rationing heat, electricity, and gasoline. The speakers introduce the concept of geofencing as an invisible boundary that people cannot cross, tied to facial recognition, digital identity, and access control. They mention smart contracts and a mechanism called Softbrick that can disable digital currency beyond a point from a person’s house. They summarize their view by stating that the world has become a digital panopticon, enabling monitoring, analysis, management, and monetization of people.

They emphasize the importance of defending freedom, but forget that freedom also has its limits. The right to drive anywhere does not exist. What needs to be ensured is people's freedom to move within urban areas efficiently, as urban mobility is a right.

"We tend to think of the in the paradigm of yesterday." "So first, we would say, here's a car. Let's put an electric engine into it. Oh, let's make this car self driving." "But if it's the same car in a road that is completely congested, it doesn't matter whether this car is autonomous or electric or whatever, you still don't get anywhere." "So this is why we talk about mobility because, actually, if you can get people to share a car, you can take out, I mean, a lot of cars in the streets." "Think of Singapore where they looked at how they could bring it down to about 40% of the cars if we would use them smarter." "And I think it's very important that we do not just try to fix yesterday's paradigm, but think about how do we want a city to move."

In the past, electric vehicles were popular and had mercury charging stations. They were affordable, efficient, stylish, and constantly innovating with compressed air vehicles. However, when controllers took over and established oil monopolies, things changed. The architecture lost its beauty and grace, and the roads suffered too. It's important to remember that our history is simply a reflection of these events.

Having recently moved to the South of France, the speaker appreciates the relaxed pace of life where people aren't in a rush. In restaurants, servers don't bring the check unless asked, which can frustrate Americans. Europeans are willing to spend time lingering over meals or at the beach, creating a boundaryless feeling. Hotter climates, like Hawaii and Mexico, also tend to have a slower pace. The United States, in contrast, generally does not have this mentality. Many parts of the world have a more relaxed vibe where pushing hard all the time is seen as strange. The speaker believes this contributes to better mental health, unlike in the stressed-out United States, where people rarely take time to relax and enjoy life.

Designing mini cities called districts with mixed-use buildings that have residences, offices, and retail spaces but limited parking. City of Toronto is rezoning these areas, resulting in identical buildings with minimal parking infrastructure. The concept is to encourage residents to live, work, and access amenities within the building, similar to COVID lockdown restrictions. The 15-minute city aims to limit travel distance to 5 kilometers, making it difficult for those without cars to venture beyond their immediate vicinity.

We discuss sustainable mobility, emphasizing that it is primarily a female form of mobility. Who moves in cities in a healthy, sustainable, and safe manner? Women.

I have a Tesla. I got it because it's a cool car. Nothing to do with its green aspirations, which I don't buy into anyways. But in The US, the largest segment of employment in The United States is driver. And the FSD is to the point now, it will be within the next six months, it's gonna eliminate over time all of those jobs. When I asked AI about it, it said in ten years, you will be perceived as a, an insane person for wanting to drive your own car, and you'll be banished. Driving is just like, forget it, unless you live in an inner city and you take mass transit all over. But for most of us in the world here in North America, driving is fundamental to our day to day existence.

In the 20th governance summit, I bet that you will use an app similar to Uber. Instead of calling a driver, a self-driven car will automatically pick you up from your location and take you to the airport. The mayor of Los Angeles mentioned that by 2030, the city will be free of private cars, which will enable the transformation of highways into parks and public spaces.