reSee.it - Related Video Feed

We're not debating whether there's waste in government; everyone agrees on that. The issue is how we're addressing it. Firing staff overseeing nuclear weapons, only to realize the mistake and try to bring them back, seems clumsy. It's like using a sledgehammer to remove fat from a steak, making a mess. You're focusing on the messenger, not the results. Under the Biden administration, someone in charge of nuclear secrets, who stole women's luggage, wasn't questioned. Humans make mistakes, but these programs are bloated. People are upset about returning to work, but no one disagrees there's bloat. Why aren't you exposing wasteful spending like the $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique? You only focus on Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which is why your ratings are down.

I've uncovered a secret Justice Department memo outlining plans to target 12 new "perversions," including bestiality and pedophilia. This memo details strategies to undermine churches, pastors, and businesses that assert their religious freedom. The LGBT movement is just the beginning; they plan to expand to other perversions. So, you're saying you are aware of a Justice Department memo that says there will be an effort to legitimize bestiality, pedophilia, and other perversions? That's correct. They're coming down with twelve new perversions, expanding beyond the LGBT movement. Nothing surprises me anymore.

Right. It's not illegal to say Charlie deserved to die and you're glad he did. They have a right to say that, but we have a right to fire you. You can't walk into the office and say you're into homicide. You can't work at CNN and tweet, I'm comfortable with cold blooded murder. Speech is free, but you're not free from the consequences. If you're glad Charlie's dead and thought he had it coming, I'm supposed to sit next to you in the break room, you're going to teach my kid at school or serve in government, and I'm supposed to just say, free speech. You're advertising that you're a maniac and that you have no decency, compassion, or humanity. That you're indifferent to death. That makes you a threat. What do we do with beasts? We leave them out in the wild. We're not saying these people should be put in prison. We're saying they're not walking into my office. I don't want to be anywhere near them.

It's saddening if young women feel judged or uncomfortable at work. I won't tolerate supervisors who don't support and uplift my staff. I won't date anyone who works under me. Society understands that relationships can happen, but citizens are concerned about inappropriate contact with employees. It's distracting and inappropriate for the top law enforcement officer. It saddens me, and it would be unfortunate if taxpayers had to pay for lawsuits. That's how I feel too.

Someone who snuck into that chat that was not a part of that was not an employee there. And they screenshotted what they saw and leaked it out on x. This is a chat group that was created and administered by the NSA, one of the premier intelligence collection entities that we have. It was obscene. It was talking about sex toys and sex tricks for people who had gone through, you know, some kind of transgender surgery. During the workday on an intelligence hosted work chat group. The supervisors said anybody who's involved with this is getting fired and getting their security clearance revoked. Imagine you're in any office and you're having these kinds of sexually explicit conversations in the workplace. This cannot be happening in the workplace, and it must not be happening in our premier intelligence agency that has people who have the highest clearances that that anyone can hold. This chat group had existed for over two years. Because of president Biden's DEI initiatives, they were essentially told, shut up. It's none of your business.

So after twenty years of service in the military, yesterday, I got pulled into an officer's office and counseled for a post that I have on my social media. During the counseling, they told me I'm under investigation as a threat to national security, and the proof they gave me are anti Israel post. When I joined the military, I took an allegiance to support The United States Of America. I did not ever take an allegiance to support Israel, but yet I am deemed a national a threat to national security because I do not support Israel. Since when does not supporting a foreign nation get a US soldier investigated for being a threat to national security.

I'm speaking in Sarah McBride's district tomorrow night. There's a lot of media attention on him for dressing as a woman and making a political career out of it. He takes selfies in women's bathrooms, claiming he should have access to our private spaces. I believe this is a form of sexual abuse and reflects a mental health disorder. If they want to use a bathroom, they should seek help in a mental health facility, as that is the appropriate response.

I used to work for the Army Corps of Engineers, and the abuse I witnessed was shocking. My boss even bragged about how hard it was to get fired. People would take advantage of the lax environment. One employee ran his farm during remote work, another bragged about drunk driving during work hours. Some wouldn't even log in, and no one checked. The 80/20 rule was in full effect, with 80% of the work done by 20% of the employees. One guy slept at his desk every morning, while another napped in his government truck at a park. I spent three months cleaning up their disaster of a file room. Our government is full of lazy, incompetent people, and the hard workers are punished for outshining their colleagues. Our government organizations are so outdated, they basically need to be rebuilt from scratch. That's why I don't feel bad for federal employees being forced back into the office.

Some staffers discussed my personal life with donors in the boardroom, and without my consent, these discussions were shared with donors who have no knowledge or right to ask about my past relationships with women.

I used to work for the Army Corps of Engineers, and the abuse by government employees was astounding. My boss said it was nearly impossible to get fired. People were taking advantage of the work from home situation. One employee ran his own farm. Another bragged about drunk driving during remote work. No one checked if people were even logged in. The 80/20 rule is true. 80% of the work is done by 20% of the people, because it's so hard to fire people. One guy napped at his desk every morning. Another took the government truck to nap in the park. I spent three months cleaning up their real estate files. The government uses an antiquated system and regulations from the nineties. Our government is full of incompetent, lazy people, and hard workers are punished for outperforming. I don't think government employees should get to work from home until they start doing their jobs.

It's concerning if young women feel judged or uncomfortable at work. I won't tolerate that as a leader. Supervisors who don't support and uplift their staff won't last in my administration. I won't date anyone who works under me either. Society has relationships, but the community is more concerned about inappropriate contact with employees. It's distracting and inappropriate for the top law enforcement officer in the state. It saddens me, and it would be unfortunate if taxpayers had to pay for lawsuits. That's how I feel about it too.

I discussed some of the concerning individuals surrounding Musk. Does this surprise you? Sadly, no. It's a familiar pattern. Experienced professionals aren't drawn to such chaotic and toxic environments. This approach appeals to a specific type of person, as we saw at Twitter. Inexperienced engineers evaluated our code, and we endured loyalty exercises like printing code and justifying our work—a demoralizing and insulting process. I'm hearing similar accounts of long-tenured federal employees facing similar humiliating situations. This is insulting to the dedicated federal employees who work hard daily. It's truly unacceptable.

We've uncovered a serious breach of trust involving over a hundred intelligence community members. They misused an NSA platform for unprofessional conduct, thanks to Chris Rufo for exposing it. I've issued a directive to terminate their employment and revoke their security clearances. This action is just the beginning. Accountability has been lacking for too long, especially considering past violations of public trust. The Trump administration is committed to cleaning house, rooting out corruption, and ending the weaponization and politicization of these institutions. Our goal is to rebuild trust in the intelligence community, ensuring they fulfill their mission of serving the American people and safeguarding our safety, security, and freedom.

I'm not outraged about the bromance aspect of this situation, I care about who's being hurt. I don't like that unelected officials are posting classified information. The Doge guys posted classified information on their website and claimed they didn't realize that agency was classified. You shouldn't let people run rampant through offices with classified information. I view this from the perspective of Virginia, a veteran-heavy state, where there's a war on veterans. When there are indiscriminate cuts to the VA, I'll tell you who it hurts: veterans.

There were over a hundred people across the intelligence community who participated in an egregious violation of trust, and basic rules and standards around professionalism. I put out a directive that they all will be terminated and their security clearances will be revoked. These people were brazen in using an NSA platform intended for professional use to conduct this kind of really, really horrific behavior. This action is just the beginning of what we're seeing across the Trump administration, which is carrying out the mandate the American people gave him. Clean house, root out that rot and corruption and weaponization and politicization so we can start to rebuild that trust in these institutions that are charged with an important mission of serving the American people, ensuring our safety, security, and freedom.

It's good to be here. Regarding the transgender sex chats among intel officials, action has been taken. Over 100 individuals from the intelligence community participated in a violation of trust, using an NSA platform for horrific behavior. A directive was issued to terminate them and revoke their security clearances. This is just the beginning. These people acted brazenly because there has been a lack of accountability for years. Today's action is the start of fulfilling the mandate the American people gave the Trump administration: to clean house and root out corruption, weaponization, and politicization. This is necessary to rebuild trust in institutions that are charged with serving the American people and ensuring our safety, security, and freedom.

When you come at the intelligence community, they have many ways to retaliate. So, for a businessman, it's dumb to treat them poorly. From what I'm told, they're very upset with how they've been treated. We need the intelligence community. Without them, we wouldn't have discovered the Russian hacking. Does he have an agenda to dismantle parts of the intelligence community? This taunting hostility is not constructive. Whether you're a super liberal democrat or a very conservative republican, you should be against dismantling the intelligence community.

I've identified leakers within the organization, and we're actively uncovering more. Let me be clear: these individuals will be terminated, and they will face serious repercussions. Leaking information to the press, especially when it jeopardizes operations, puts law enforcement lives at grave risk, potentially leaving families without their loved ones. We're employing every available tactic, including polygraphs, email analysis, and communication monitoring, to identify these individuals. It's astonishing how these bureaucrats, driven by their agendas to undermine our mission of ensuring American safety, will betray one another to protect themselves. Rest assured, I am fully committed to finding and removing these leakers to ensure the safety of our law enforcement officers and agents, and to enable us to continue our vital work.

Senior officials at the National Security Council (NSC) were reportedly fired, including Lieutenant General Timothy Hawk, the director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and commander of CyberCom. These firings were allegedly not due to incompetence or involvement in the Signal Group chat. Instead, a right-wing influencer and conspiracy theorist purportedly advised the president to remove them based on claims from an internet troll who alleged the officials were not sufficiently loyal to the president. The speaker suggests this action betrays national security and indicates a pattern of turning away from allies.

There's a "shock and awe" playbook being used, keeping people scared and uninformed with impossible demands, creating an unhealthy environment where no real work gets done. Federal employees should avoid workplace conversations and devices, using encrypted networks to prevent surveillance. Be cautious about what you say on any platform. It's not surprising to see inexperienced people being brought in to evaluate experienced employees' work, creating a demoralizing environment. The practice of feeding sensitive federal data into AI systems without proper vetting is a privacy and cybersecurity nightmare, ignoring the laws in place to protect information and government security. These rules are there for a reason.

I'm a platform services manager for the Department of Homeland Security. I'm not thrilled about Kristi Noem's appointment. The truth is, we don't let political appointees get in our way. It's my job to filter things. By the time marching orders get to me and below, we can steady the ship. I feel bad for the GS fifteens because they have to deal with the crazy stuff. They have to kiss ass and re-word ideas. DHS could fall on Noem's head, and she wouldn't even know it. The secretaries can set priorities, but they can't tell us what to do. If we don't agree with the priorities, there's a lot of room for interpretation. We can filter the marching orders, like a septic tank. Also, my trans colleagues are freaking out because this administration is super anti-trans.

People that members of Congress are sleeping with, either legally or not, are employed by forces that want to control members of Congress. That's what they used to do. knew of instances where that happened when I was in the legislature, and now they do it through the employment agencies. Through employment agencies. I have noticed, just having spent my life in DC, that people's personal lives are getting weirder in the Congress. It's not just sleeping with your scheduler, it's weirder than that now. I never heard of anybody participating in an orgy in Washington DC in my entire life, and I've heard a lot about it recently.

General Timothy Hawk, who ran the NSA and Cyber Command, was fired by Donald Trump. The NSA is in charge of signals intelligence, spying on foreign entities using electronic technology, balancing national security with privacy protection. Hawk was confirmed 100-0 in the Senate and was considered to be doing a great job. Hawk was fired because Laura Loomer, a right-wing Twitter troll, self-described white nationalist, and 9/11 truther, was invited to the Oval Office. Loomer presented Trump with a list of people she considered disloyal, and Trump fired them, including Hawk and Wendy Noble, the number two at the NSA. The president is taking advice from a Twitter troll and firing top national security professionals.

If we were seen as a sanctuary program, especially one using federal dollars, we'd face a lot of problems. To avoid scrutiny, we strategically omit status inquiries from our federal statutes by subtly influencing bill language in congress. Now, with the new efficiency team's surveillance, communication has moved offline to encrypted apps like Signal, even though we're not supposed to conduct business there. They've installed software to track keystrokes and monitor our calls. If I end up on leave, I'm headed to the beach, taxpayer money well spent! Many in administrative roles are already leaving since we can't do much anyway. If I'm in Mexico, don't worry about it.

The speaker discusses internal resistance to RFK Jr.’s policies and the idea that “deep staters” have been entrenched in government. They mention being forwarded an anecdote from a “good career employee.” They point to the FDA, noting that when Marty Makary came in, he had only about 10 political appointees he could choose. Jay Bhattacharya at the NIH allegedly had one political appointee. The speaker claims that every government employee is a “deep stater” who has been there a long time and that an email from a good employee circulates a CIA manual called How to Be a Bad Bureaucrat and Subvert an Institution from Within. The email supposedly asserts that 90% of employees at HHS, which has 70,000 employees, are talking in lunchrooms about the manual and telling each other that their job is to save America and save science from the agenda of President Trump and RFK Jr. The speaker asserts this reflects how people think across major departments and asks how to get rid of them, suggesting firing them as a solution, and mentions SIOP in this context. The CDC is presented as a case study of failure, described as a public health disaster in its COVID-19 response. The speaker alleges that the CDC’s guidance on school lockdowns copied directly from a teacher union document with which they were aligned, reproducing paragraphs from the teacher’s union advocating for two years of school shutdowns. It is claimed that the CDC also said that cloth masks were fine. The speaker says the CDC led the response and that the NIH funded the entire pandemic, including gain-of-function research, asserting that this constitutes “the creation of the pandemic.” In contrast, RFK Jr. is said to have fired three employees, and this action is described as national news. The overall narrative emphasizes a view of pervasive internal opposition within federal agencies, a controversial and sweeping critique of the CDC, NIH, and HHS responses to the pandemic, and a framing of RFK Jr.’s personnel decisions as transformative and newsworthy.