reSee.it - Related Video Feed

People are angry at Elon Musk for exposing financial issues, but shouldn't we be more concerned with what politicians are doing with our money? Whether you like Musk or not, the money he's uncovering affects everyone, so gratitude might be more appropriate than hate. I believe Doge is beneficial for America. The level of corruption is mind-blowing. People are acting emotionally instead of logically. How can politicians accumulate wealth far exceeding their salaries? Instead of questioning Musk's position, consider the bigger picture: Many of us support him, and he's working to improve America's financial standing.

Since becoming director of DOGE, I've uncovered massive corruption, fraud, and scams, possibly the biggest scam of all time, totaling trillions of dollars. Imagine someone with evil intentions deeply embedded within organizations like USAID, manipulating the system for decades. George Soros is a master at using NGOs to rinse billions from taxpayers. He figured out how to hack the system by leveraging small amounts of money to create nonprofits. He then lobbies politicians to send a ton of money to those nonprofits, turning a $10 million donation into a billion-dollar NGO. These NGOs, with nice-sounding names like the Institute for Peace, become graft machines funded by the government year after year.

I believe Doge isn't about money, but shrinking government to limit its power, even against figures like Trump. But, if Trump is the head of the government, why would the government try to stop him? Because the bureaucracy should uphold the Constitution and prevent authoritarianism, holding everyone accountable and ensuring the government works for the people. Trump is shredding the Constitution, but we never said the bureaucracy should resist political leadership. We are saying that the President will put someone in charge who will contravene the constitution. This is what dictatorships do. The President is in charge of the military, as per the Constitution, which vests executive authority in the President. The idea of an independent military or a bureaucracy resisting political leadership is dangerous.

The speaker praises a "Doge" segment for revealing government workings, incentives, and potential fraud. They were unaware of a mine in Pennsylvania until Doge highlighted it. Doge also exposed issues like Social Security problems and a lack of oversight in the Treasury. The speaker believes leftists project their own instincts onto Doge, assuming ulterior motives like greed, unable to fathom an altruistic endeavor from successful individuals. They view leftist attacks and violence as a result of confusing actions with individuals, disliking people for their beliefs rather than the specific acts. The speaker believes Doge is something neither Republicans nor Democrats would have attempted until Trump, who inspired modernizing the government. This scares "corrupt dinosaurs" who feel threatened by Trump.

Doge is proving that the Democratic Party is no longer a political party but an international crime syndicate. Doge found $3 trillion improperly used by the US government through USAID since 2004, including $764 billion in the last three years under Joe Biden and $170 billion in the last year alone. This includes $530 million going to illegals and $644 million of fraud. The more Doge digs, the more it seems like this is just the tip of the iceberg. The Democratic Party is in trouble because looting the treasury is unconstitutional. These folks need a lawyer.

I see NGOs as a hack, and George Soros was a master at it. He understood how to use a relatively small amount of money to establish a nonprofit, and then lobby politicians to funnel large sums of money into it. For example, a $10 million donation could be leveraged into a billion-dollar NGO. These NGOs, or nongovernmental organizations, often have appealing names, but they can essentially be graft machines. They receive grants with minimal requirements, and the government often assumes they're doing good work, even when they might not be. Many within the government are aware of this dynamic, but the funding continues.

Doge is effective at eliminating waste and fraud, which overwhelmingly originates from left-wing NGOs. These NGOs are funded and exploit loopholes, but Doge is preventing them from taking advantage. The biggest concern is that Doge will stop fraudulent entitlement payments, including Social Security, Medicare, unemployment, disability, Small Business Administration loans, from going to illegals. This is the core reason why people are against Doge.

The whole NGO thing is a nightmare because government funded non-governmental organizations are essentially just government organizations, it's an oxymoron. Government funded NGOs are a loophole that allows the government to do things that would otherwise be illegal, by sending funds to a nonprofit. These nonprofits are then used for people to cash out and become very wealthy, it's a gigantic scam. There are probably millions of NGOs, and tens of thousands of large ones. It's a hack to the system where someone can get an NGO for a small amount of money. Soros was really good at this, he figured out how to leverage a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby politicians to send a ton of money to that nonprofit.

Our nation was founded on the principle that elected officials run the government, but today, much of our governance comes from unelected bureaucrats. This growing bureaucracy poses a threat to our republic, and politicians have allowed it to expand. Doge aims to change this. Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswami, as entrepreneurs and outside volunteers, will not be traditional government officials. Instead of merely producing reports, they will focus on reducing costs and eliminating unnecessary regulations that were never passed by Congress. Their goal is to stimulate the economy and create prosperity for the American people. Now is the time for decisive action to create a government that aligns with our founders' vision.

The courts are the first line of defense against illegal activity. I'm working with lawyers bringing these cases forward, and we're seeing many temporary restraining orders issued recently. This reflects the Trump administration's illegal use of executive orders to bypass Congress and make sweeping changes. I'd like to see Doge and Project 2025 put up for a vote in Congress; I believe they would fail. Trump avoided these issues on the campaign trail because they're unpopular. Now, he's using executive orders to push them through and has Elon Musk doing his "dirty work".

Doge started unraveling government spending, revealing allocations like $200,000,000 for transgender experiments on monkeys. This is claimed to be just the tip of the iceberg. The speaker references a map of 50,000 NGOs, alleging it was exposed as a Democratic propaganda machine with money being funneled in a circular fashion.

Jacob, it's surprising you haven't gotten involved with Doge. If I had known, I would have started an NGO. The U.S. government runs a massive deficit, and cutting spending in Washington is met with outrage. The money is flowing to various entities, including media outlets and foreign governments. For instance, Viktor Orban noted that his opposition in Hungary is funded by USAID, and similar patterns exist in Poland. The BBC and many left-wing organizations globally receive substantial funding from USAID, which disperses about $50 billion annually. This raises questions about the grassroots nature of left-wing movements, suggesting they may be more top-down than they claim.

There's graft occurring, and the left is upset because Elon Musk bravely stated there is a paper trail that will expose where taxpayer money is going, likely into politicians' pockets. In the past, it's been documented to go into campaigns, but now, people, possibly even members of Congress, should go to jail if they or their family members are profiting from this. Billionaires form NGOs with prominent board members, and the government dumps stolen taxpayer money into them, which is then filtered out among board members and political friends. Musk will document this, which is why there's such a strong reaction. Many prominent Democrats have ties to these NGOs, including Obama's transportation secretary, Biden's EPA chief, Nancy Pelosi, and Gavin Newsom. The hope is to prevent America from going bankrupt.

Doge has uncovered some serious issues. The Democratic Party isn't just a political entity anymore; it seems to be an international crime syndicate. Doge has found that the US government, via USAID, has misused $3 trillion since February 2004. Under Joe Biden, we're looking at $764 billion in the last three years alone, with $170 billion in the last year. There were $530 million funneled to illegals and $644 million in fraud. Doge's findings are just the beginning, it seems. The Democratic Party is in trouble because looting the treasury is unconstitutional based on Article 1 Section 9. They're going to need a lawyer.

The shocking part of investigating government-funded NGOs is that small decisions lead to massive, multi-billion dollar outcomes. I saw one instance of $1.9 billion being sent to an NGO that was formed a year prior and had no prior activity. Government-funded NGOs are essentially a loophole, allowing actions that would be illegal for the government directly but become permissible through nonprofits. These nonprofits are then used for personal enrichment, with individuals cashing out and paying themselves exorbitant sums. It's a giant scam where people can establish an NGO for a relatively small investment and then lobby politicians to funnel vast sums of money into it. There might be some good that comes from them, maybe 5 or 10%, but the rest is not.

I believe Doge represents shrinking the government to limit its power, potentially in the context of Trump's plans. The government should uphold the Constitution and serve the American people, holding everyone accountable, regardless of who is in office. There's a concern that Trump might be undermining the Constitution, potentially leading to an authoritarian situation by controlling the military, silencing media, and appointing individuals who might contravene the Constitution. The president is the commander in chief, but the fear is that someone appointed by the president will act unconstitutionally. It's dangerous to think the bureaucracy should resist political leadership.

The DOGE program is definitely targeted at bureaucrats. Take the Department of Education, for instance. They have a $280 billion budget, but less than 25% actually goes to educating students. The other $220 billion? It goes to bureaucracy, consultants who donate back to Democrats, more consultants, and NGOs. It's money laundering at its finest, and you'll find it in almost every agency. The brilliance of DOGE is not that he has the authority to cut spending, we do. I want him to create a report, going agency by agency, identifying programs we shouldn't fund and assigning a number to each. We'll add a preamble, cut each agency's budget by a set amount based on the report, and halt those programs for good.

I work for the Treasury, reviewing investments into the US for national security risks. Recently, Doge gained access to the Treasury to cut waste, but people are resisting. They're an easy target because there are people who don't do much, and we should be getting rid of them. What Elon is doing feels like government-sanctioned harassment, and everyone in my office is worried about being fired. No one knows what Doge wants to do with the system or why they need access to certain information. When you give people access, it creates vulnerabilities. They could take that information and give it to someone they shouldn't. There's a class of people in this country who care more about money, and Elon is showing that what he cares about is money.

The whole NGO thing is a nightmare because government funded NGOs are essentially government organizations, an oxymoron, and a loophole. It's a way for the government to do things that would be illegal if they did it directly. People cash out and become very wealthy through these nonprofits, paying themselves enormous sums. It's a gigantic scam, maybe the biggest ever. There are millions of NGOs, tens of thousands of them large. Someone can get an NGO up for a fairly small amount of money. Soros was really good at this, he figured out how to hack the system. He's a genius at arbitrage. You leverage a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, lobby the politicians to send a ton of money to it, and turn a $10 million donation into a billion-dollar NGO, which the government continues to fund every year.

The speaker believes that Trump and Doge are perceived as threats to democracy, but are actually threats to the bureaucracy. The speaker claims elected officials have little power relative to the bureaucracy, and Doge is the first real threat to this system. The speaker describes investigating a situation where an NGO, formed a year prior with no prior activity, received $1.9 billion. They state that government-funded NGOs are a loophole allowing illegal government activities to occur legally through nonprofits. These nonprofits are allegedly used for personal enrichment, with individuals becoming wealthy and paying themselves large sums. The speaker calls this a gigantic scam, possibly the biggest ever.

Government-funded NGOs are a way to do things that would be illegal for the government, but are made legal through nonprofits. These nonprofits are used for people to cash out and become wealthy, paying themselves enormous sums. It's described as a gigantic scam, possibly the biggest ever. There are potentially millions of NGOs, with tens of thousands being large. Someone can establish an NGO for a relatively small amount of money. George Soros is described as a system hacker who figured out how to leverage a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobby politicians to send a ton of money to it, turning a $10 million donation into a billion-dollar NGO. The government continues to fund these NGOs yearly, and they often have nice-sounding names, but are essentially graft machines with no real requirements. Many in government are aware they are not doing good work.

I had two questions regarding tariff revenue and the IRS. President Trump discussed replacing income tax with tariff revenue to combat waste, fraud, and abuse. The China tariff revenue, estimated between $500 billion and a trillion dollars over ten years, should facilitate the passage of a Republican bill. I also asked about comments regarding cutting $50 billion in waste, fraud, and abuse by unelected bureaucrats. The narrative from the president's critics is that Elon Musk is an unelected bureaucrat. Is one of Doge's objectives to get rid of the federal bureaucracy? The executive power is vested in the president. The existential threat to democracy is the unelected bureaucracy. President Trump is removing federal bureaucrats who defy democracy by failing to implement his lawful orders, which are the will of the whole American people.

Doge has saved at least $170-200 billion. On day one in the White House, they had to stop a payment, but nobody knew where the computer was that wired the money. There was a lot of waste and grift in the federal government. Many people were "slurping." Humanitarian programs send money for medicine and food, but the money is contracted out, and there are three or four middlemen. Marco Rubio estimated that 88 cents of every dollar was collected by middlemen, so only 12 cents made it to the people who needed it. Elon Musk was doing it for free because he doesn't need money.

The speaker believes Doge is a crucial reform initiative, evidenced by the strong negative reaction to it. Over the past seven weeks, the narrative has shifted from waste, fraud, and abuse to the idea that Elon and Doge have revealed government operations as slush funds for the left, allegedly funding allies, pet projects, and anti-American behavior. The speaker is pleased with Trump's public support for Elon and Doge's work. They also mention "crystal knock behavior of the little fascists on the left burning Tesla dealerships and attacking Tesla owners."

I see NGOs as a hack to the system. People can establish one fairly inexpensively. George Soros was excellent at this, leveraging a small amount of money to create a nonprofit, then lobbying politicians to direct substantial funds to it. A $10 million donation could become a billion-dollar NGO. These NGOs often have appealing names, like the Institute for Peace, but they can be graft machines. The government provides grants, assuming they're doing good work, but there are really no requirements attached to the money, and the government continues to fund them annually. While many in the government are aware they might not be effective, the system persists.