TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims scalps of five-month-old aborted babies were grafted onto lab rats and mice in a University of Pittsburgh study funded by NIAID, which is run by Dr. Anthony Fauci. According to the speaker, photos of baby scalps with hair growing on the backs of lab rats exist in the published study. The speaker alleges Planned Parenthood abortion providers supplied the aborted baby body parts for the experiments. The speaker asserts Dr. Fauci is responsible for the study because, as head of NIAID, he oversees how grants are spent. The speaker suggests obtaining whole scalps from fetuses indicates partial-birth abortions or live births. The speaker believes Dr. Fauci should be questioned by Congress about what his office did to ensure the grants and experiments complied with federal laws and regulations.

A study funded by grants from the NIAID office, run by Dr. Anthony Fauci, involved grafting scalps from 5-month-old aborted babies onto lab rats. The study aimed to see how long the scalps could keep growing. The photographs in the published study show baby scalps with growing hairs on the backs of lab rats. Planned Parenthood abortion providers claimed to have supplied the aborted baby body parts for these experiments at the University of Pittsburgh. Dr. Fauci has not been held accountable for this study, despite being responsible for overseeing the grants. It is important for him to answer questions about the ethical and legal compliance of these experiments in front of the United States Congress.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discussed newly obtained documents from the Obama-era FDA that purportedly show the Food and Drug Administration purchased fetal body parts from a fetal-tissue provider. The key items cited include purchases of “intact calvarium baby skulls, eighteen to twenty four weeks” for $515 per skull. Fitton told One America’s John Hines that taxpayers’ money was used “to purchase, basically, the dead bodies of unborn human beings,” noting that the bodies were divided up, with heads, livers, and other parts sold. During the interview, it was highlighted that government records indicate the federal government demanded that purchased fetal organs be “fresh, never frozen,” with documents stating they were to be shipped on dry ice. Fitton described this as horrifying and insisted that these were organs, not just cells, and included skulls up to twenty-four weeks gestation. He asserted there was no doubt these were human beings and claimed organs were being sold, chopped up, and sold. Fitton referenced additional documents from a separate lawsuit filed on behalf of the Center for Medical Progress, pointing to a large operation at the University of Pittsburgh funded with tax dollars and involving Fauci’s agency. He suggested Fauci’s agency should be asked about involvement in both the NIH and NIAID, as well as about alleged support for gain-of-function research and dismemberment of fetal organs, describing it as a “fetal organ chop shop.” The interview noted that a Freedom of Information Act request had been filed with the FDA to uncover whether the agency was buying or selling body parts, and that officials did not initially respond. A judge granted discovery, allowing redactions to be removed, and the released information allegedly showed the FDA was purchasing fetal tissue, including human heads, for $515 per skull. Fitton recalled that the government had sought to withhold price details, but the court ruled against this secrecy. Fitton also mentioned a separate case involving NIH and NIAID, highlighting an alleged “one stop shop operation” at the University of Pittsburgh, and raising questions about whether aborted fetuses were still alive when organs were taken. He claimed the Obama administration was involved, the Trump administration halted the activity, and the Biden administration was reportedly preparing to resume funding of similar activities. When asked what a new learner should think, Fitton described the documents as among the worst he has seen in his twenty-three years of work and called for a thorough investigation into how this was done, why it occurred, whether it violated the law, and how to stop it. He concluded by thanking John Hines for the interview.

During cross-examination, Speaker 1 describes fetal tissue work: the Wistar Institute study involving 76 fetuses, all three months or older when aborted and normally developed. Tissues were harvested by coworkers, cut up, and cultured, including pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart (tongue probably). In his career, he says he worked with “quite a few” fetuses, but cannot recall exact numbers. He notes objections to using aborted fetal tissue in vaccines and cites that “The Catholic Church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact, and that I I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad.” Regarding religion, he says “Vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease?” and answers “Yes” and “Are you an atheist? Yes.”

Speaker 0: Have you used orphans to study an experimental vaccine? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine? Speaker 1: What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s it was not unusual to do that and I wouldn't deny that I may have done so. Speaker 0: There's an article entitled Attenuation RA273 Rubella Virus in WY38 Human Dimplex Cells. You familiar with that article? Yes. In that article is one of the things that says, 13 surrogative mentally retarded children were given RA273 vaccine. Okay. Well, that that's in that case, that's what Speaker 1: I did. Speaker 0: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Did you do so in the Belgian Congo? Speaker 1: Yes. Did that experiment involve almost a million people? Well, Speaker 1: alright. Yes. Okay.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton spoke with One America’s John Hines about records they received from the Obama-era FDA related to fetal tissue procurement. Fitton said the documents show the FDA was buying “intact calvarium baby skulls, eighteen to twenty four weeks for $515 per skull,” along with other fetal body parts, and that the bodies were divided up for sale. He emphasized that the sale involved organs and skulls, not just cellular material, and noted the materials were described as “fetal organs,” including heads, being sold. Hines pointed out that the documents also state the purchased fetal organs were to be “fresh, never frozen,” and that the FDA demanded they be shipped on dry ice. Fitton described this as “awful stuff” and stated that the documents indicate these were organs, not merely cells, and that there are “no doubt that any normal person would call these a human being.” He said organs were “being sold chopped up and sold.” Fitton referenced other related documents from a different lawsuit with the Center for Medical Progress showing a “massive operation” at the University of Pittsburgh, funded with tax dollars, and involvement from Fauci’s agency, implying NIH/NIAID involvement and raising questions about whether the aborted fetuses were still alive when organs were taken. He asserted that the Obama administration was involved, that the Trump administration stopped it, and that the Biden administration was reputedly prepared to open funding again for this work. Hines noted that Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the FDA to learn whether the agency was buying or selling body parts, and that the agency did not initially respond. A judge granted discovery, the redactions were removed, and the information obtained confirmed that the FDA was purchasing fetal tissue, including human heads, for $515 per skull. Fitton recalled that the government had sought to withhold some price details, but the court said that could not be done. Fitton also referenced a separate lawsuit involving NIH and NIAID that suggested a one-stop operation at the University of Pittsburgh, with the Fauci agency involved, and questioned whether organ collection occurred while the fetuses were still alive. He claimed the Obama administration was involved, the Trump administration halted the activity, and the Biden administration was allegedly preparing to fund it again. He described the documents as among the worst he has seen in government conduct and called for a thorough investigation to determine how it was done, why it happened, whether it violated the law, and to ensure it stops.

The speaker is questioned about their work with vaccines and the use of fetuses. They confirm being an author of an article that involved a study at the Wistar Institute using 76 fetuses. The fetuses were 3 months or older and were normally developed. Various organs were harvested from the fetuses, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue. When asked about the total number of fetuses they have worked with, the speaker cannot provide an exact number but mentions working with quite a few. They are aware of objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, but state that individuals who need vaccines should receive them regardless of this issue. The speaker also expresses disagreement with religious beliefs that oppose vaccination.

Speaker 0 denies funding gain of function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 1 reveals that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded research on a bat coronavirus at the Wuhan lab, making it more contagious. Speaker 2 questions Dr. Fauci about his previous statement, but he stands by it. Speaker 3 mentions a letter raising concerns about experiments in the Wuhan lab. Speaker 0 interrupts and accuses Senator Paul of lying. Speaker 2 argues that if the virus originated from the lab, those who funded it should be held responsible. Speaker 4 states that the NIH admitted funding gain of function research at the Wuhan lab, contradicting Dr. Fauci's claims. Speaker 0 maintains that he has never lied before Congress.

In this video, the speaker discusses a study involving 76 fetuses. Various organs and tissues were harvested from these fetuses, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue. The speaker is unsure of the exact number of fetuses they have worked with throughout their career but mentions using them for vaccine development. The plaintiff in the case objects to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, citing it as an ingredient. The Catholic Church has also addressed this concern in a document.

Republicans on the subcommittee recount two years of work aimed at linking the COVID-19 origin to a Wuhan lab, arguing that Democrats hindered the pursuit of truth by blocking hearings. They contend mounting evidence supports a lab-origin, and they frame the hearing as a step toward uncovering the truth for Americans who have suffered from COVID-19. Dr. Redfield is cited as having pointed to the lab-leak hypothesis as early as 2020, urging Fauci, Jeremy Farrar, and Tedros to take the lab-leak possibility seriously and to investigate both lab-origin and natural-origin hypotheses. Farrar convened an 11-scientist meeting across five time zones on February 1, inviting Fauci to join, with a note to treat the matter in total confidence. Redfield notes he was excluded from that call despite being included in prior discussions, and asks why he was left out. Emails following the February 1 conference show the four scientists who had attended later told Fauci that they found the genetic sequence inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. Yet, just three days later, these four scientists drafted the proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 paper, arguing the opposite. The subcommittee asks for the likelihood that these scientists, after making that earlier statement, could conclude with such certainty that COVID-19 came from nature instead of a lab leak, and suggests Fauci prompted the paper to discredit the lab-leak theory. Speaker 0 characterizes the February 2020 approach as antithetical to science, saying science requires debate and that this process squashed debate. They ask whether Fauci used the proximal-origin paper to hide gain-of-function research that created the virus. Speaker 1 responds that they cannot speak to Fauci’s motivation but asserts the paper is inaccurate and part of a narrative to support a natural-origin story. They state the pandemic did not start in January at the seafood market, noting infections as early as September, and allege a narrative was decided to claim a wet market origin and to negate discussion about a laboratory origin. With twenty seconds left, Speaker 0 raises a point that Fauci was told in January 2020 about NIH’s monetary relationship with the Wuhan Institute through EcoHealth Alliance and asks whether Fauci intentionally lied under oath when denying NIH funding of gain-of-function research. Speaker 1 asserts there is no doubt NIH funded gain-of-function research and adds that American tax dollars funded gain-of-function research from NIH, the State Department, USAID, and DOD. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 noting time and recognizing Ms. Dink.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker clarifies that they are referring to fetuses that are 5 months old. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, described using various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccine production. Scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The conversation then shifts to discussing the science behind this issue.

Animal rights activists have more influence than vaccine companies and anti-abortion activists. There is concern over the lack of outcry regarding human babies born alive at 5 to 6 months old for research purposes. These babies are delivered alive and their hearts are cut out without anesthesia. The speaker emphasizes that they wouldn't do this to a mouse. The conversation then shifts to discussing the use of fetuses in vaccine production. Stanley Plotkin, a scientist, allegedly used various parts of aborted fetuses for vaccines. The speaker confirms that scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker mentions receiving a catalog with prices for body parts from 20 years ago. The conversation concludes by acknowledging the moral implications and transitioning to discussing the science.

The speaker questions why the Obama administration sought fresh, non-frozen 1st and 2nd trimester fetuses. They claim to have evidence of this request and express disbelief. They mention finding numerous pages on the topic and bring up the adrenochrome conspiracy theory. They state that Trump ended the program, but Biden reinstated it. The speaker is shocked by the mention of intact fetal heads and expresses confusion.

According to Speaker 1, Dr. Fauci was informed via email on January 27, 2020, that NIAID had a financial connection to the Wuhan Institute through EcoHealth Alliance. Speaker 1 believes NIH was funding gain of function research. Speaker 1 also claims American tax dollars likely funded gain of function research that created the virus, not only from NIH, but also from the State Department, USAID, and DOD.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss government funding for scientific and medical research, focusing on a grant referred to as a Doge grant and a series of other NSF-funded projects. The exchange opens with Speaker 0 asking, “What is a birthing person?” and presses Speaker 1 to identify who birthing people are, including whether it is another word for a woman. Speaker 1 says he is not familiar with the Doge grant and notes that he takes a position that “all kinds of government research, medical, pharmacy” should be considered, but does not clarify the term further. Speaker 0 labels the term as erasure language and asks again whether a conference titled “gender equity in the mathematical study of commutative algebra” is a valid form of government spending. Speaker 1 replies that mathematical research of all types is deserving of government support. Speaker 0 asks about “women and non binary mathematicians” as described on the National Science Foundation’s website. Speaker 1 again supports government investment in mathematics broadly, stating, “I think all kinds of government investment should be dedicated toward mathematics.” When Speaker 0 questions whether there should be any limit on spending, Speaker 1 reiterates that he is talking about Doge, and notes he is not familiar with the particular grant but supports government investment in mathematical biology. Speaker 0 introduces another grant, “TranscendentHealth, adapting an LGB plus inclusive teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys,” and asks whether that is a useful form of tax spending. Speaker 1 says he is not familiar with that grant but emphasizes that bench research and government investment in scientific and pharmacotherapy are important, though he does not describe the grant’s specifics. Speaker 0 then asks about “the racialized basis of trait judgments from faces,” stating it is a $500,000 NSF grant, and asks for Speaker 1’s view. Speaker 1 confirms unfamiliarity with the subject matter but again asserts that government investment in all kinds of scientific research is of utmost importance. The conversation moves to “prostate steroid therapy and cardiovascular risk in the transgender female,” with Speaker 0 pressing on the usefulness of funding. Speaker 1 maintains that government investment in scientific research is important, without further qualification. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 thanking Speaker 1 for his testimony, and Speaker 1 acknowledging appreciation for the opportunity to testify.

Speaker 1, a doctor, admits to working with 2 fetuses in their personal work related to vaccines. They confirm being an author of an article that involved 76 fetuses at the Wistar Institute. Various organs, including the pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, heart, and possibly the tongue, were harvested from these fetuses. The doctor cannot recall the exact number of fetuses they have worked with throughout their career but mentions studying them before using them for vaccine development. They are aware of objections to the use of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines, including religious concerns. The doctor stands by their statement that vaccinations are often criticized by religious zealots who believe that death and disease are part of God's will.

The speaker claims Anthony Fauci funded research at the Wuhan lab, providing them with the technology to develop coronavirus. It's alleged Fauci gave them the precise technology for developing the pathogen and published about it, crediting NIH for financing the studies. Ralph Barack from the University of North Carolina allegedly developed a technique called seamless ligation, which hides the laboratory origins of a manipulated virus. This technique, also called the "no see" technique, conceals evidence of human tampering. The speaker questions why Fauci would give this technology to the Chinese, as the lab was a military lab run by the military.

Animal rights activists have more influence on vaccine companies than anti-abortion activists. The lack of outcry over live-born human babies, aged 5 to 6 months, being used for research is concerning. These babies are delivered alive and have their hearts cut out without anesthesia. Some scientists purchase different body parts for research purposes. The speaker recalls seeing a catalog with prices for body parts of 32-week-old babies. The moral implications are revolting, but the focus will now shift to the scientific aspects.

The speaker claims that the MMR vaccine contains millions of pieces from cultured cell lines derived from aborted fetuses. They allege the rubella virus is grown on these cell lines. The speaker references a study involving over 70 healthy fetuses aborted specifically for research. According to the speaker, these fetuses were dissected into small pieces, and attempts were made to culture viruses on them to determine the optimal body part for virus growth. The speaker states that some of these abortions occurred past the first trimester.

A study grafted scalps from five-month-old aborted babies onto lab rats and mice to observe their growth, with photographs documenting baby hairs growing on the rats' backs. According to the speaker, Planned Parenthood provided the aborted baby body parts for these experiments at the University of Pittsburgh. The speaker claims the study was funded by grants from the NIAID office, headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is therefore responsible for ensuring ethical and legal compliance in the use of these grants. The speaker suggests that obtaining intact scalps from five-month-old aborted babies implies partial-birth abortions or live births. The speaker believes Dr. Fauci should be questioned by Congress regarding his office's oversight of these experiments and their compliance with federal laws and regulations.

The speakers discuss the use of aborted fetuses in medical research. Speaker 1 confirms that various organs, including the lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart, were included in a study. Speaker 0 questions the number of fetuses Speaker 1 has worked with throughout their career, to which Speaker 1 admits not remembering the exact number but acknowledges studying quite a few before using them for vaccine production. When asked about the number of studies involving fetuses, Speaker 1 cannot recall. Speaker 0 then mentions that one objection to vaccination is the use of aborted fetuses.

Senator Paul accuses Dr. Fauci of lying to Congress about the NIH funding gain of function research in Wuhan. Dr. Fauci defends his statement, stating that the research was conducted in China due to the expertise of a well-known laboratory. He acknowledges that he cannot guarantee everything happening in the Wuhan lab but emphasizes the importance of studying the animal-human interface to understand potential virus infections. Senator Paul argues that gain of function research was indeed conducted and funded by the NIH, accusing Dr. Fauci of obfuscating the truth. Dr. Fauci denies this accusation.

The speaker questions why the Obama administration sought fresh, non-frozen 1st and 2nd trimester fetuses. They claim to have evidence supporting this and express disbelief. They mention finding numerous pages on the topic and connect it to previous discussions about adrenochrome. The speaker alleges that Trump ended the program, but Biden reinstated it. They express shock at the search for intact fetal heads.

The transcript revolves around claims and counterclaims regarding whether the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Dr. Anthony Fauci funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Dr. Fauci denies that the NIH and NIAID "categorically" funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan and states he has never lied to Congress. He asserts Senator Paul does not know what he is talking about. Others claim the NIH provided grant money to a research group that conducted experiments with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan. They allege the NIH acknowledged funding research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that unexpectedly made a bat coronavirus more contagious. One speaker states that the NIH funded controversial gain-of-function research using coronaviruses at the Wuhan lab, contradicting Dr. Fauci’s claims. Another speaker suggests that evidence points to the virus originating from the lab and that those who funded the lab will be held responsible.

Speaker 0 introduces a provocative claim, warning the video might be removed and urging viewers to watch and download it while possible, saying the content sounds like a horror movie. Speaker 1 raises a question about research involving implanting aborted baby parts into a lab animal, asking if such research exists. Speaker 2 confirms a prior analysis indicating that over ninety percent of experiments using human fetal tissue involving animals were funded by Fauci's NIAID. They add that much of the tissue comes from colleges and universities that have affiliate hospitals performing the procedures. Speaker 1 suggests the need to investigate where the aborted human fetal tissue is sourced and asserts the issue should be looked into, addressing the Madam Chair. Speaker 0 clarifies that the video is for entertainment purposes, but describes a certain person’s claim that aborted fetal parts are being used and combined with other animals, implying a practice beyond ordinary science. The speaker acknowledges skepticism but says the rumor should be investigated regardless of political alignment, arguing that it would be understandable to be unsettled by such alleged activities. The speaker shares a personal stance: they will take the claim with a grain of salt because it originates from a random person on X, yet reiterates the claim that people are “playing god” and that humanity is unprepared for the extent of these actions, suggesting that the truth is being concealed to avoid public outcry. The speaker adds a conspiratorial thread: “these USOs under the sea” are related to the topic, and mentions a family acquaintance who allegedly knows an ex-military person who had to deal with a creature created in a lab that merged with AI. If the claims are true, the speakers imply this would constitute a true horror story, indicating that humanity is not in control of the government globally. They urge the audience to remember this when they see references to the USA. A broader existential claim follows: humanity is making decisions and following orders from ancient “gods” such as the Anunnaki, an alien race. The people at the top are portrayed as having sold their souls, believing they have no chance of going to heaven, and having been traumatized from birth. The speakers emphasize that these powerful individuals fear humanity—our soul, love, kindness, strength, fierceness, and capabilities—and urge listeners not to be manipulated any longer, concluding with a call for awakening and healing the world through collective awareness.