reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Something strange is happening with our food. I left a watermelon out, and it didn't rot or get eaten by bugs or birds. It stayed untouched for a whole day and night. This makes me question what we are really eating. It's concerning and needs to be discussed.

The speaker discusses the connection between financial control and the food supply, highlighting a push for synthetic lab-grown food controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. They warn against the potential consequences of losing control over transactions, which could lead to mandated consumption of artificial food products. The speaker emphasizes the importance of supporting farmers and fishermen to prevent the mass production of lab-grown meat in manufacturing plants and laboratories.

This video discusses the concerns about the quality and safety of fruits and vegetables in the food supply. The speaker expresses frustration with the appearance and genetic modification of a mango, as well as the labeling system for organic produce. They explain that a chemical called MCP, used to preserve the shelf life of fruits and vegetables, can have negative effects on the human body by blocking beneficial microorganisms in the colon. The speaker emphasizes the importance of growing one's own food to avoid synthetic and chemically-treated produce. They also suggest that the use of MCP may be linked to disrupting the pineal gland and overall health.

Speaker 0 hasn't eaten at McDonald's in over 10 years and wanted to test a theory about their fries. However, they couldn't get fries because it was too early. Speaker 1 explains that McDonald's uses russet Burbank Potatoes for their fries and insists on having flawless potatoes. To achieve this, farmers in Idaho use a toxic pesticide called monitor, which is so dangerous that they can't enter their fields for 5 days after spraying. The potatoes are then stored in large sheds for 6 weeks to remove the chemicals. Speaker 0 finds it crazy that McDonald's puts so many chemicals on their fries and expresses their dissatisfaction.

The speaker says they looked into “seedless watermelons” because they consider them “a mind blowing thing.” They claim that seedless watermelons are made by using an antibiotic so the fruit becomes infertile, preventing seeds from growing. They then connect this to what they believe happens after eating seedless fruit, arguing that if seedlessness is caused by making the watermelon infertile—so there is no seed and the fruit has been altered—then it will “make you infertile” in the gut lining. The speaker extends the claim beyond watermelons, saying that going into seedless grapes, seedless oranges, seedless lemons, and seedless watermelons are “Monsanto’s products” aimed at making people infertile. They say this is tied to a broader “fertility crisis” discussed by many people. In their view, the lack of seeds in food leads to a lack of seeds for people to “procreate” and “continue on” their lineage, because they argue seeds are involved in feeding fertility for both males and females. They claim that seeds “are going to feed the fertility of a male or a female” and that these reproductive parts need to be fed; therefore, eliminating the seed also eliminates fertility. The speaker advises that when choosing fruit like watermelons, people should look for “seeded watermelons.” They also say that seeds contain nutrients and that those nutrients are “the counters to many different diseases.” According to the speaker, a reason seeds are removed is that if people ate the actual seeds of the fruit, the seeds would counter illnesses. They then add that removing seeds makes it possible to keep people sick and to profit from it. Overall, the speaker’s argument is that seedless versions of multiple fruits are produced by applying an antibiotic to make the fruit infertile and seedless, and that removing seeds from food leads to infertility by removing seed-related fertility support. They further claim that eliminating seeds removes nutrients that would counter diseases, and they frame this as part of a larger system that benefits from keeping people unwell.

Be cautious when shopping at grocery stores, especially in the produce aisle. Look out for the label "Apeel," a product funded by the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates, which is sprayed on fruits and vegetables nearing spoilage to make them appear fresh. This coating, approved for USDA organic produce as "OrganiPeal," contains monoandiglycerides and hazardous solvents like ethyl acetate and heptane, which can harm internal organs. The World Health Organization has classified one of its ingredients as probably carcinogenic. This raises concerns about the nutritional value of treated food. It's essential to prioritize organic, local, and chemical-free options. Consider growing your own food or supporting local farmers to avoid these harmful practices.

Foods like tomatoes, potatoes, asparagus, broccoli, and cauliflower are purposely modified, and farmers must buy seeds from the government. Seedless watermelons are not recommended. The air is no longer breathable due to chemical sprays in major cities, containing electronic metal. Gwyn Towers, HARP, ILATA, and ISACAT broadcast billions of watts of electrified air particles, including titanium, aluminum, barium, and non-human t-cells. This, along with smoke stacks and car exhaust, causes rapid aging and cellular deterioration. People are described as dumbed down, comatose, brainwashed, vaccinated, inoculated, and encrypted, rendering them unusable to society. Chips are being put in prosthetics and potentially food. Vaccination leads to encryption. Encryption or mind control occurs when anything invades under the skin. The speaker believes the planet is under mind control and experimentation, but the globalists' time is short, and consciousness will prevail.

Fruit from the supermarket is often treated with SmartFresh, a product that preserves freshness. The process involves placing fruit in a sealed chamber, introducing SmartFresh to water to create gas, and letting the fruit absorb it for about 24 hours. A time-lapse comparison shows that treated apples remain unchanged over three months, while untreated ones deteriorate. Many consumers are unaware that the fruit they buy can be nearly a year old. SmartFresh's active ingredient is methylcyclopropene (MCP), a simple hydrocarbon similar to butane and propane, raising concerns about its petroleum-based origins. SmartFresh is also approved for use with organic produce, leaving many unaware of its widespread application.

The speaker contrasts GMO sweet corn from the store with heirloom corn, noting the sunflowers turning away from the sun. They claim aluminum levels in the soil are now five to ten times higher than last year. Cucumber and hot pepper plants are not producing as much as in previous years. Normally, the speaker would have excess produce to give away, but this year the garden has suffered the worst. The speaker states they will still be able to maintain operational costs and can enough for their family. However, they claim they won't be able to provide for others as much as in the past.

The speaker explains that glyphosate is a systemic chemical. A systemic herbicide is absorbed by the plant when glyphosate is sprayed onto the leaves, and it is translocated into the rest of the plant, meaning it goes into the plant and stays there. The speaker emphasizes that washing vegetables does not remove the glyphosate, underscoring that residue can remain in the plant even after cleaning. This point is presented as a key characteristic of glyphosate’s behavior in sprayed crops. The discussion then shifts to soil and dirt. The speaker recalls a saying from a farmer: even the soil, the bacteria in the soil, have been known to increase serotonin levels in the minds. This statement is presented as a positive connection between interacting with soil and mental well-being, suggesting that getting hands into dirt and feeling dirt can be beneficial. The speaker attributes positive outcomes to soil biodiversity and the natural state of farming, highlighting a contrast with chemical use. Throughout the message, the speaker reinforces a stance against chemical use in the food system. The closing remarks thank the audience for their support and explicitly credit the audience with helping to keep chemicals out of the food system. The overall framing ties together a concern about glyphosate’s persistence in plants with a broader appreciation for soil health and non-chemical farming practices.

PSA warns about Appeal or EDAPEAL, a world economic forum and Bill Gates funded product that is sprayed on fruits and vegetables on the verge of spoiling to appear fresh and last longer. Apeel has been approved for use on USDA organic produce under the name Organapeel. The main ingredient found in the Apeel coating is mono and diglycerides which are extracted from grapeseed oil, processed with two solvents, ethyl acetate and heptane, both of which are hazardous chemicals. This coating cannot be washed off. IARC recognized glycidol, another name for these same ingredients, as 'probably carcinogenic to humans.' The startup is a $2,000,000,000 Bill Gates backed venture with 'zero proof of preserving any nutritional value.' When opened, it gets very tough and 'like it's glue.' The piece ends with a claim about tyrannical globalists and urging to grow local, chemical-free food.

Speaker 0 describes a range of claims about food modification, environmental engineering, and public health interventions. He states that many basics, including tomato, potato, asparagus, broccoli, and cauliflower, are purposely modified, and mentions a “terminator seed” concept, claiming farmers cannot plant seed unless purchased from the government. He notes seeds come up one season and are gone, and asserts watermelon is modified to be seedless. He asserts that the air we breathe is contaminated with toxins, and that chemical sprays are used over 245 major U.S. cities and around the world. He alleges the presence of electronic metal, small in the air, and explains this is done with “Gwen towers,” HARP programs (high frequency active auroral research project), ILATA in Russia (electrified atmospheric discharge), ISACAT in Europe (scattered radar manipulation). He claims these systems broadcast billions of watts, resulting in billions of watts of ionic electrified air particles in the air we breathe. He lists contaminants such as titanium, aluminum, barium, nonhuman T cells, and other substances sprayed from ships, along with emissions from smokestacks and cars, which collectively contribute to metal particulates and electrified air that are poisonous to the body. He asserts that the body will age quickly and cells will deteriorate unless these factors are addressed. He describes people as “dumb toe,” “comatose,” “dumb down,” “brainwashed,” “vaccinated,” “inoculated,” and “encrypted,” claiming that encryption includes being chipped if the person encounters a prosthetic device or certain lab work, implying that food, vaccines, and military service can render a person encrypted. He equates encryption with mind control in many cases, and suggests that those who are not encrypted are mind controlled. He warns that there is extensive activity and apathy among people, expressing concern about a planet being manipulated and controlled by forces described as globalists. He contends that the globalists are on their way out, describing their behavior as crazy and noting that their time is short while consciousness endures. He emphasizes the existence of a dichotomy in humanity (black and white, brown and yellow) as part of this described undermining control and manipulation. The overarching message is a warning about modified foods, chemtrails, advanced atmospheric and surveillance technologies, encryption and mind-control concerns, vaccines, and a perceived decline in human agency, with a claim that globalist forces are fading but still active.

So you're telling me you still think organic means it's safe to eat? We all know that Bill Gates launched a product called Appeal, a coating for fruits and vegetables that abnormally extends shelf life. But did you know there is an organic version called OrganiPeel that is sprayed on your organic produce? OrganiPeel is registered as a pesticide with the EPA, but it still qualifies for that organic sticker. The ingredients list of Organapeel, you have citric acid, point 66%, and other ingredients, 99.34%. You are just receiving a mystery coating on your food. The warning label causes moderate eye irritation. Avoid contact with eyes or clothing. But don't worry, they say it's plant based, but so was agent orange. So next time you bite into your organic produce, ask yourself, what am I really eating?

The transcript centers on a claim-filled comparison between organic and conventional produce, framed as a discussion about nutrient content and the broader value of organic farming. The speaker opens by referencing a public perception—that organic is overpriced and ineffective—citing a perceived lack of recent research: “This was the last study done on organic in 1995. This is why there are no more studies on this.” The speaker then uses a single food example, tomatoes, to illustrate dramatic differences in mineral content between organic and conventional farming. According to the speaker, tomatoes grown organically show substantially higher mineral levels across a range of nutrients. The stated figures are as follows: - Calcium: six times higher in organic. - Magnesium: almost 10 to 12 times higher in organic. - Potassium: three to four times higher in organic. - Sodium: six times higher in organic. - Manganese: 68 times more in organic. - Iron: 1,900 (implying a dramatic increase in organic versus conventional). Additionally, the speaker asserts a striking contrast for copper: “Zero copper in the conventional because they sprayed it with pesticides and ruined it. Meanwhile, you have 53 times.” This statement implies that organic tomatoes contain copper at a level that is 53 times that of conventional tomatoes, with the conventional crop allegedly having zero copper due to pesticide use. The overall argument presented is that organic tomatoes have markedly higher mineral content compared to conventional ones, and that conventional farming’s use of pesticides has negative consequences—specifically, eliminating copper content. The speaker uses these numerical claims to suggest a broader nutritional deficiency in populations eating conventionally produced produce, tying the data to a broader critique of conventional farming practices and referencing the supposed lack of ongoing research since 1995 as part of the narrative. Key items highlighted include the large multipliers for calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, and manganese, plus the extraordinary claim regarding iron (1,900) and copper (zero in conventional, 53 times higher in organic). The framing emphasizes “mineral content” as a core differentiator and uses tomatoes as the concrete example to illustrate how organic farming could impact nutrient availability. The segment combines a debunking of perceived inertia in organic research with a bold presentation of comparative mineral data to argue for the superiority of organic farming in delivering richer mineral profiles in produce.

"Can prevent Bifidobacteria from going up? So many things. I mean glyphosates, you know, sugar." "Sugar if it's so sugar from honey should not, right because it's a pure sugar but you know even the sugar that we're eating now the white sugar how is that processed right I mean are they how do they keep the sugarcane clean to get into your kitchen table? What is the process of you know, remember, all these products are are processed to keep them longer. Right." "So in our, you know, attempt to make things last longer over the counter to sell it, we've killed the product. Right." "The endosperm is removed from the from the flowers." "That's it." "So you're saying that fresh homemade things." "Fresh homemade, but how many people do you think are gonna have access to that fresh homemade thing? I mean, I"

A PSA warns consumers to avoid produce with the "Apeel" or "EDAPEEL" label, claiming it's a World Economic Forum and Bill Gates-funded product sprayed on produce to extend shelf life. Apeel is allegedly approved for use on USDA organic produce under the name "Organapeel." The main ingredient, mono and diglycerides extracted from grapeseed oil, are processed using ethyl acetate and heptane, hazardous chemicals that can damage internal organs with repeated exposure. The coating cannot be washed off. Glycidol, another name for these ingredients, is recognized by the World Health Organization's IARC as probably carcinogenic to humans. The speaker questions why this "literal poison" is being sprayed on food, alleging that Apeel, a $2 billion startup, extends shelf life without preserving nutritional value. The coating allegedly makes food tough and gives it a fake texture. The speaker urges people to eat organic, local, and chemical-free food, grow their own food, or buy from local farmers markets, claiming globalists are trying to destroy healthy living.

Something's not right. I left a watermelon out, and it didn't attract any bugs or birds. It stayed untouched all day and night. This makes me question if our food is truly natural. What do you think about this? It's mind-blowing.

Citric acid is not lemon juice, though it is found in fruits like lemons. Manufactured citric acid was first produced by Pfizer in 1919 using a mutant strain of aspergillus niger, or black mold. The manufacturing process involves feeding sugars, often derived from GMO corn, to black mold, which then ferments them into citric acid. This is presented as an example of a symbiotic relationship where pharmaceutical companies profit from an unhealthy population, which is made unhealthy by the food system. The speaker believes the food system is deeply flawed.

Major grocery stores have been applying a peel coating to fruits and vegetables for several years. Costco and Walmart sell produce with the Apeel label, which cannot be washed off and is made from grapeseed oil processed with solvents. The coating contains various ingredients, including soap, metals, and chemicals. It is considered generally safe, but the FDA did not conduct its own safety review. Even organic products can use the Organi Peel label. While the company behind Apeel has prominent investors and aims to reduce food waste, it is seen as a temporary solution. Instead, the speaker suggests buying directly from farmers to address the larger issue of disconnection from food sources.

The speaker emphasizes choosing organic coffee over conventional coffee, arguing that drinking regular coffee means consuming pesticides. They warn that paying $8 or $9 for coffee at Starbucks results in ingesting a hot cup of pesticides and that this constitutes poisoning the body. The suggested alternative is to brew organic coffee at home, which they claim costs about ten pennies per cup. The speaker further criticizes the additives commonly found in non-organic coffee purchases, asserting that such coffee is filled with pesticides, fillers, gums, and a “whole bunch of garbage.” They contrast this with organic coffee, implying it avoids these substances. The discussion extends to beverages that accompany coffee, specifically criticizing almond milk and other plant-based milks. They claim almond milk does not make sense because you cannot milk an almond, and they argue that no one milks almonds, walnuts, chestnuts, cashews, or other nuts. This line of reasoning is used to challenge the logic behind using almond milk in coffee. Additionally, the speaker mentions “Monsanto chemicals” and artificial flavors as components in the non-organic coffee experience, suggesting that these contribute to the overall unhealthy nature of the beverage. They describe the presence of “fake milk” and other additives as part of what makes a typical, non-organic coffee experience undesirable. A recurring theme is a recommendation to avoid conventional coffee in favor of organic options, with a practical tip to brew at home to save money and minimize exposure to pesticides and additives. The speaker connects the idea of paying premium prices for coffee at mainstream venues to the broader issue of ingesting pesticides and artificial ingredients, arguing that doing so leads to unnecessary health concerns. Finally, the speaker ties the experience of consuming non-organic coffee to physiological effects, specifically bloating, attributing this symptom to the use of gums and fillers in non-organic coffee products. They suggest that the consumer only realizes the bloating after purchasing and consuming coffee that is not organic and has been loaded with gums and other additives, implying a direct link between price, quality, and digestive discomfort.

One of the mysteries in organic produce is how Organi Peel, backed by Bill Gates, got approved. The coating's ingredients are unclear, with citric acid at 0.66% and 99.34% unspecified. The EPA lists it as a pesticide, with a caution to wash thoroughly before eating. The organic material review institute approved it as a fungicide without specifying ingredients. This lack of transparency raises concerns about its safety and organic status. The speaker finds Organi Peel unappealing and will not use it on their produce. Translation: The approval process for Organi Peel, a coating for organic produce, is mysterious due to unclear ingredients and safety concerns.

I ruined taco night by buying nonorganic avocados. Appeal is a plant-based coating applied to fruits and vegetables to slow spoiling, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It aims to save food waste and energy costs. However, I have concerns about its safety and the potential for toxic residues. It may also affect our ability to choose fresh, nutrient-dense produce. The coating could lock in toxins that are difficult to wash off, even on organic produce. This means that even organic avocados could be months old without us knowing. Overall, this technology doesn't prioritize the highest quality or most nutrient-dense food.

A coating, registered as a fungicide and backed by Bill Gates, is being applied to food labeled as organic. While the active ingredient is said to be 0.66% citric acid, the other 99.34% is undisclosed. This hidden portion allegedly contains arsenic, cadmium, and palladium. The speaker claims the organic label is now a mask, and this process is an inversion of truth and a defilement of the natural order. They allege this is a form of control over nature and humanity, a desecration of what was sacred. Buying these coated foods, like shiny, waxy avocados, is described as taking a sacrament of submission. These actions are characterized as rituals, not coincidences.

The speaker points out visible mold on an organic raspberry and argues that mold is beneficial rather than harmful. They claim people are allergic to mold because, as children, they received a vaccine containing penicillin, which purportedly made them allergic to mold; the speaker also claims mold “pulls the toxins” and “pulls the metals” out of the body. The speaker contrasts this with their own experience of eating a moldy raspberry, saying they are “perfectly fine” and not poisoned. They argue that fear about mold is widespread, claiming mold exists everywhere: in the air when stepping outside, in pollen, and in mushrooms. They further say that if mold were as toxic as people claim, they would not be able to speak while handling moldy fruit such as a blackberry. They address the idea of mold in walls by stating that the mold is attempting to eat toxins and heavy metals in building materials, and that building materials “automatically” mold as soon as they get wet. They claim that when people say “the mold got me,” it is actually toxins in their environment that got them. The speaker then gives examples of foods commonly eaten despite mold, including blue cheese, saying raw blue cheese is moldy and that people eat it “all the time.” They conclude that if mold were as toxic as told, people would be “gone today,” citing moldy raspberries and other mold-containing foods as reasons.

Speaker 0 describes food as an “electromagnetic barcode of photosynthesis,” linking it to how the sun travels around the earth. They argue that people on different parts of the planet experience different conditions, which is why eating a coconut or pineapple in Boston on December 31—just because it is sold as a whole food—does not make it “a food,” comparing it to eating a Big Mac and saying it is “great” for something related to mitochondria because it is “not designed to go there.” They claim pineapples and coconuts have special problems with hydrogen in those fruits that cannot be obtained at high latitude; instead, they are grown at low latitude. Speaker 0 connects this to an explanation of how leptin works, using the example that trying to grow a cactus in the tundra would be unsuccessful, while the pineapple and coconut example causes offense because people have eaten them and “seen this points out the big effect of why people really have a problem.” Speaker 0 states that humans are the only mammal on the planet with a “quantum computer” in their head that allows them to “break the laws of nature.” They then assert that, for food, the primary law is photosynthesis and that there is no food on the planet that does not link back to photosynthesis. They conclude by saying they do not care what type of doctor someone has seen—chiropractor, functional medicine doctor, or allopathic doctor—and ask when anyone was told that “that’s where it begins.”