reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker clarifies a headline, stating that three US citizen children (ages four, seven, and two) were not deported. Their mothers, who were in the US illegally, were deported, and the children accompanied them. The speaker asserts that if the children are US citizens, they can return to the US if their father or someone else wants to care for them. The speaker claims the US does not have a policy to deport children, even US citizens, without due process. The speaker explains that if someone is in the US unlawfully and has a young child, the parent can choose to take the child with them upon deportation. Alternatively, they can leave the child in the US. The speaker suggests the children likely have fathers in the US and that the family decides where the children go. The US deported the mothers who were illegally in America.

Entering the U.S. legally and ignoring a judge's deportation order are crimes. Choosing to have a U.S. citizen child while in the country illegally puts the family in a difficult position. The speaker claims they removed children with mothers who requested it, calling it a parental decision. The speaker argues that if they hadn't removed the children with their mothers, they would be accused of separating families. They assert that when a parent wants their child to go with them, they facilitate it, and that the parents, not the government, made the decision. The speaker then references Lincoln Riley and Rachel Moran, stating they will never see their children again, and concludes that the administration is doing the right thing.

The exchange centers on accusations of hyperbolic statements and the accuracy of quoted posts. Speaker 0 challenges Speaker 1's credibility, citing a series of posts and asking whether the statements were read correctly. - On 02/11/2026, Speaker 0 cites a Blueski post: “my words or your words, not mine. The democrats video telling service members to ignore illegal orders didn't go far enough. They should have also urged them to refuse unethical orders, whether illegal or not. There are many things deemed legal that are still obviously unethical, and everyone should hold themselves to this higher law,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 confirms reading it and asks if Speaker 0 disagrees with it, questioning whether people should do unethical things in their capacity of [unknown context]. - On 12/31/2025, Speaker 0 references a post reading, “in front of god and country. … They referring to Republicans think they control their way into us accepting ethnic cleansing,” and asks, “Did I read that correctly?” Speaker 1 responds that it related to a DHS security post advocating a 100,000,000 deportations, stating that “A 100,000,000 deportations would be ethnic cleansing,” adding, “You would be True. One third of the country. So, yes, there are people within the Department of Homeland security.” Speaker 0 asks whether this is hyperbolic and requests more time. - On 02/05 (implied), Speaker 1 notes, “advocating a 100,000,000” but the sentence is cut off in the transcript. Speaker 0 comments, “reputations is … cleansing,” while continuing to engage in the discussion with the chair and audience; Speaker 0 asks for thirty more seconds. - On 03/02, Speaker 0 quotes Speaker 1: “if you rule against Trump's population purge agenda, no hyper permanently there, the nativists will name you, threaten you, and come after you. These judges are much braver than the ICE agents who hide behind masks while violating the constitution. They are much braver.” Speaker 1 clarifies, “They put their names on their rulings, and they stand behind their constitutional rulings. When I talk about population purge, I'm talking about the fact that they're trying to deport US born citizens, people born here. They are trying to deport them as well. So it's not a mass deportation agenda. It is also an agenda intended to reduce the population of The United States, including US born people.” - Speaker 0 responds, “Thank you.” Speaker 1 adds, “These are not hyperbolic statements. I appreciate you reading my account. Here's the good news.” The conversation escalates in tone as Speaker 0 interjects with disbelief, asking, “What planet … parachute him from?” Speaker 1 replies, “No. No.” Speaker 0 comments, “Hey, guys. You're you you You trigger my gag reflex,” and Speaker 1 closes with, “Mr. Bieber.”

We are being conquered by a complete resettlement of America with millions of people bringing different cultures and beliefs. This will permanently change the country unless there are massive deportations.

What's your name? Where are you from? I was born in Thailand. Have you ever been deported from the U.S.? No, I've never been deported. What have you been charged with? I'm not a citizen; my mother is. I've seen Dr. Phil on TV. This is an example of sanctuary cities, where illegal immigrants, like those involved in sex crimes against children, are walking the streets instead of being detained by federal agents. You've been charged with sex crimes? Not really. So, you've never been deported? Nope. We need to process and lock them up.

Speaker 0: In fact, I've listened to their and I tell them to go themselves. I don't I don't can't believe I used that word. My kids will be shocked. My grandchildren will be further shocked. I'm just quoting the president of The United States. And so, I think

The speaker claims that if an American commits crimes such as rape, lewd acts in front of a child, sexual assault, fentanyl trafficking, illegal gun possession, child pornography, or sexual offenses against children in a foreign country, they will face severe consequences, possibly the death penalty or life imprisonment. The speaker asserts that Joe Biden and the Democrats were allowing such individuals into the country, harboring and protecting them. They praise President Trump and his administration for arresting these individuals, stating they will face consequences, and that America voted for this action.

The speaker claims the incoming administration wants to rectify abuses by enforcing immigration law, stating that those who entered illegally should leave. They allege the administration is stopping deportations. The speaker asserts that, according to the courts, it is lawful to be unlawful if you're Joe Biden, but unlawful to be lawful if you're Donald Trump.

A person says they had a good time. A Republican congressman appears and says that now that they're in charge, they're rounding up illegals. He is told that a woman he is targeting was born in the US and is a citizen, but he says he doesn't care because she looks like one of them. He says she'll have lots of company when she's in prison in El Salvador.

The speaker clarifies that a headline is misleading because three US citizen children (ages four, seven, and two) were not deported. Their mothers, who were in the US illegally, were deported, and the children went with them. The speaker states that if US citizen children are deported with their parents, they can return to the US if a father or someone else wants to care for them. The choice of whether the children accompany their deported parents rests with the parents. The alternative would be for the US to hold the children while deporting the mother, which would lead to different negative headlines. The speaker assumes the children have fathers in the US who can care for them. The US deported the mothers who were in America illegally.

What is happening in America? Children are being picked up at the border and handed to predators. This is not aligned with American values. Democratic leaders claim to be on the right side of history, but they are not. The situation at the border is out of control, and we are determined to bring change through legal means and public opinion. The current policies have pushed people to seek a return to normalcy, where caring for children and upholding strong values should not be considered radical. We are fed up with the ongoing issues: trafficking, violence, and suffering. This cannot continue for another 50 days. The America I know is better than this, and we will not accept it. The people have spoken, and we are ready for change. Your time is up; we are coming for you.

Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee just voted to allow Donald Trump to deport US citizens. Every single Republican voted in favor. The speaker expresses disbelief, stating they never thought they would see this happen. The speaker emphasizes that this is not about deporting unlawful violent immigrants, but about deporting US citizens.

The speaker claims that under the current administration's policies, individuals can face significant jail time for child trafficking. They allege the Biden administration trafficked 500,000 children into the U.S. and helped them disappear, which they consider criminal. The speaker asserts that sanctuary states and cities violate laws against harboring, evading authorities, smuggling, concealing, and obstructing justice. They state President Trump is preparing an executive order to clamp down on sanctuary cities, calling them a "cancer on our democracy." The speaker says President Trump will soon take action against the radical left's efforts to shield illegal aliens, with measures more robust and aggressive than anything done before.

FBI agents arrested my husband in Coachella. This nightmare unfolded as we were simply trying to run errands. I want everyone to know that my family has been separated. According to my account, eight FBI agents surrounded us and stated that they had a deportation order for my husband, but they didn't show it to us. We have been married for 20 years, and he has lived in the United States for 30 years. He has lived in this country longer than his own. He wasn't perfect, but he paid for whatever he did.

Let's be clear, the sanctuary city mayors are here with legal counsel. Things have changed since the election. We've exposed how quickly the border could be secured if the executive branch enforced the law. Now, cities are paying attention and lawyering up. These mayors' policies, like those of the previous president, have real consequences. I have with me a family who lost their son to an illegal immigrant. You mayors have a responsibility to everyone. You cooperate with other law enforcement agencies, but not ICE, which removes criminal illegals. America is tired of this betrayal. Some of you said you'd go to jail. We might take you up on that. People are separated from their children all the time when they commit felonies, but at least they get to come home. This young man will never come home, and it never should have happened. We're entering a new era of enforcing our laws.

The speaker warns Congress members who have taken APEC money to stop now or “you will be on the menu.” They claim these people have “sold our country out” and call them “treasonous traitors” who will be “hanging from the gallows” for treason. The speaker asserts that foreign assets and agents who “do not care about white children” will take over the country.

Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 she will be taken too because she has brown skin. Speaker 1 calls this racist, stating she is an American citizen. Speaker 0 says it doesn't matter, and Speaker 1 accuses her of saying she will be deported because she is brown. Speaker 1 says she voted for Donald Trump, who she met and is very nice, and that Speaker 0 is racist. Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 is supporting mass deportation. Speaker 1 says she supports mass deportation of people who are not American citizens. Speaker 0 says she is Catholic. Speaker 1 says American citizens are not going to get deported. Speaker 0 says potentially, citing Raz Baraka's arrest, claiming he was targeted by ICE. Speaker 1 says he was charged with trespassing. Speaker 1 calls Speaker 0 a whole ass adult calling people Nazis in 2025. Speaker 0 says this is Nazi behavior. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 thinks it was racist to tell her she was going to get deported because she's brown. Speaker 0 says she doesn't know that happened.

Speaker 0 questions the practicality of a mass deportation program, particularly concerning families with American-citizen children, suggesting a single negative image could halt the entire program. Speaker 1 acknowledges that deporting a woman with children, resulting in media coverage, would complicate the effort. Speaker 0 then asks for confirmation of support for mass deportation, "even of women and children." Speaker 1 responds that they will look at it very closely, noting that the deportation of even one "wrong person" could be exploited by the "radical left lunatics."

If Jesus were alive today in the U.S., the current administration would have removed him without due process, falsely claiming he was an MS-13 gang member to justify it. The speaker is baffled that people still support this administration despite how clear its actions are. While believing in the inherent goodness of humanity, the speaker finds it terrifying that anyone is okay with the administration's behavior. The speaker urges those who look like them to speak up, believing they may be the only ones safe and able to stop what's coming, making it their duty to act.

The speaker states they will close the border, but people will still come in legally because the country needs them. The speaker believes the current system is unfair to those waiting in line for years, studying and taking tests. The speaker claims to tell these people to go to the southern border instead, because it's faster.

If Jesus were alive today in the U.S., the current administration would have removed him without due process, falsely claiming he was an MS-13 gang member to justify it. The speaker is baffled that people still support this administration despite how clear its actions are. They believe in the inherent goodness of humanity, but this is being tested. The speaker is terrified that anyone is okay with the administration's actions. They urge people who look like them to speak up because they may be the only ones safe and able to stop what's coming, stating it's their duty to do so.

The speaker states it is time to track down ICE agents, find out who they work for, determine if they have families and where their households are, and then "rip them the fuck apart from their family and put them in fucking jail."

If I were the governor here, I would be afraid. We see trucks and groups of people crossing the border, and the Border Patrol is watching. There are a lot of people coming in, and this is just the first wave. There are more coming. It's not good that Joe Biden is allowing this. I want Trump back in office because he would deport these people. Islam is terrible for the world, like a new virus. We have a lot of terrorists in America, but I don't have the exact numbers.

Some believe that many millennials, dreamers, and undocumented people, who contribute to the country, are fearful of voting because they worry immigration will find them and deport their families. One speaker claims that this is untrue because voting is confidential and voting rolls are not transferred for investigation. Another speaker expresses disbelief, stating that the President is questioning whether an illegal person is voting, and reminding people that only citizens can vote. The speaker believes the President is saying not to worry about being caught for illegal voting. The speaker emphasizes that undocumented people cannot vote because they are not citizens.

Don't touch my phone! Someone just ran her over. You think you're tough? Let’s talk about the rape trees and the children harmed by coyotes and cartels. You’re quiet now? If you're here illegally, enjoy your stay, but you’ll be deported soon. This land wasn’t stolen; it was conquered. Families can be deported together. Borders matter, and being here illegally is a crime. If you love Mexico, go back. I can't wait for ICE to deport you. You’re free to leave right now. We’re going to restore law and order in America. Your flag is upside down.