reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the issue of censorship in the United States and how it is eroding freedom of speech. They explain that censorship is now being justified under the guise of fighting disinformation and misinformation, and that even factual and truthful statements can be labeled as disinformation and censored. The speaker highlights the role of the government in directing these censorship efforts, particularly in relation to the military industrial complex and the defense industry. They also discuss the censorship of the 2020 election and the manipulation of public opinion through coordinated efforts between government agencies and mainstream media. The speaker warns that platforms like X, which currently offer more freedom of speech, are under pressure and may face increased censorship in the future.

In this video, Elon Musk and other participants discuss the importance of expanding civilization and becoming a multi-planetary species. They criticize the control and propaganda of public relations firms, highlighting the monetary incentives for corruption in the media. Concerns about the decline of civilization and the need for bravery and love to resist the globalist agenda are expressed. Musk emphasizes a positive view of the future and clarifies that X will adhere to the law and avoid permanent bans unless someone does something illegal. He also discusses concerns about the deep state, the future of elections, and his inventions. Musk emphasizes the significance of freedom of speech and the need for transparency on social media platforms. Updates on his projects, such as the Neuralink chip and the potential for video functionality on Spaces, are provided. The speakers also discuss the challenges of censorship and the potential influence of government agencies on platforms like X. Elon Musk expresses his commitment to transparency and the rule of law, stating that he would be willing to go to prison to protect freedom of speech. The video concludes with gratitude towards Elon Musk and support for a pro-human future.

Speaker 0 pulls up a tweet from Laura Loomer on X. They say they usually do not address Loomer due to what they describe as “extremely weird” behavior and “serious psychological problems,” but note that Loomer has a following and frequently “tweets out a lot of bullshit.” They recall that years ago Loomer had issues with being deplatformed on Twitter and received support from people trying to get him re-platformed. Speaker 0 says Loomer had previously advocated for Elon to ban an account that “tracks APAC,” describing it as posting pictures of US politicians and the amount APAC-related groups have donated based on public information. Speaker 0 frames this as the “shoe” being on the other foot, where Loomer wants an account banned despite support for free speech. Speaker 0 then cites Loomer’s tweet from this week: Loomer predicts “a massive Islamic terror attack in America,” says the perpetrators “will likely have financial ties to podcasters and those who are sowing discord for foreign nations in America,” and claims that after the attack, it will “set in” that people were “conned into supporting a terrorist PSYOP” distracting from “the threat of Islam,” asserting that “the enemy plotted to destroy our country from within” and that it will be “10 times worse than 9-11.” Speaker 0 says they quoted Loomer’s post and reacted with anger, stating it is “the way this guy clearly wants an attack to happen.” They instruct viewers to read Loomer’s tone and watch how she talks on her shows, asserting that Loomer appears to be “seething” and “frothing at the mouth” and “rooting for that to happen.” Speaker 0 concludes by saying these are not “nice things to put out.”

A TikTok user discovered that all of their political videos had vanished from their account. A fellow user confirmed the videos were gone and expressed disbelief, stating they had never seen anything like it before. The speaker credits the user with uncovering information, such as Mark Carney's offshore accounts in Bermuda, deforestation in Brazil, and a lawsuit showing Brookfield was guilty of slave-like labor. The user also allegedly had unredacted information years ago that Diana Fox, Mark Carney's wife, was in Epstein's black book. The speaker believes the user's research is extensive and that the information uncovered is often ignored by the media. The speaker questions whether the removal of the videos is a coincidence or an act of censorship.

I'm out here asking what rights Trump is denying, and someone brought up abortion rights. Apparently, publishing on X makes me a Nazi. I was told to "read it" to see the Nazi content, but I use it for news. Others are saying that Elon Musk is a Nazi and doesn't care about his Jewish children or trans daughter. I was also told that the treasury was hacked, but nothing has been hacked. The Department of Government Efficiency is supposedly finding fraud, like paying Social Security to people over 200 years old. I support everyone's right to be here and speak freely. I was going to say that even though we have different points of view, we are all Americans. It's time to have a conversation and try to find common ground.

In this video, the speaker discusses their experience on Twitter while searching for information about Sequoia China. They mention that despite posting about it an hour ago, they cannot find any recent tweets about it. They suspect that Twitter and Elon Musk may be trying to erase the existence of Sequoia China. The speaker notes that while the information still shows up in the top search results, it is not visible in the latest search option. They conclude that someone is definitely suppressing the information.

The speakers discuss the hypocrisy of figures like Diddy and Epstein lecturing others about morality. One speaker suggests these figures deflect attention by criticizing others' morals in a preemptive "moral strike," claiming those calling Trump a threat to democracy are the real threat. Another speaker questions what happens now that the public knows so much, suggesting a Trump victory could lead to "house cleaning" and shedding light on things. A third speaker questions whether Elon Musk is doing the same thing he criticizes, pointing to a nervous laugh about available footage and the "savior propaganda" around Trump. The speaker asks when people will start asking the right questions and suggests neither Musk nor Tucker Carlson are beyond control, despite their accomplishments. Asking the right questions is emphasized as the only way to get at the truth.

On one of the first days this show aired about the 50 states, a delegation to Israel visited, with people from state and local governments going to Israel, reportedly “humping the wall,” “licking the wall,” listening to speeches from Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli dignitaries, and being given instructions on how they would serve. The discussion then shifts to free speech and second amendment rights, setting the stage for the rest of the show. Jonathan Cagle, an American journalist known on X (formerly Twitter) with accounts such as decent backup, geez, decent JC, has been arrested. He is appearing today in a federal court, facing charges of cyberstalking. The report attributes the arrest to a group of “psychotic Zionists” who have been mass reporting him, attempting to have him kicked off the Internet and from various platforms, filing unpublished and videoed reports, and involving law enforcement. They have accused him of harassing, threatening, and stalking them, and now he faces federal charges. A central question raised is how many reports it takes to get arrested and jailed, and whether a “magic number” exists. The conversation notes X’s new program that flags accounts, suppresses content, and reduces reach, assigning scores (80%, 90%), thereby “snuffing out” visibility. The discussion asks if a coordinated online group can push someone into being arrested, just by accusing them of cyberstalking or other offenses. There is a GoFundMe-style fundraising page linked to Jonathan Cagle’s mother, Lisa Cagle, who states: “I’m Lisa Cagle, and my son needs help with a legal matter as he is a patriot fighting for America's future. He has a platform on X and is joined by so many that share the same passion for the great USA. Any donation is greatly appreciated. We’re raising legal funds to help cover the legal defense of a man facing serious federal charges that raise important questions about free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power. The case is complex, high stakes, and emotionally taxing, not just for him, but for his family and loved ones. Federal cases move quickly, require specialized legal expertise, and are extremely expensive to defend properly. Without strong representation, the system can overwhelm even those who believe deeply in their innocence. This fundraiser is not about relitigating the case online or attacking anyone involved. It’s about ensuring that every person, regardless of public opinion, has access to a vigorous, competent defense as guaranteed by the constitution. Legal fees for federal defenses can include, and there’s this list here, and I mean, it’s every step of the way. Every contribution, no matter the size, helps ensure that this case is decided in a courtroom based on facts and law, not by financial imbalance or fear. If you’re unable to donate, sharing this page is also deeply appreciated.” The narrative notes that federal court proceedings are challenging due to the government’s resources, and it references the J6 situation, where participants were uprooted from their homes and faced severe sentences, implying a concern about intimidation by federal power. The discussion promises to follow the case and provide updates on the court hearing and further information about what is happening, given the large online attack from accounts on X that have targeted Jonathan to destroy him, making it difficult to discern the facts. The overarching theme is concern over free speech, due process, and the proper limits of government power in the face of online amplification and organized reporting campaigns.

The discussion centers on Elon Musk's recent announcement regarding a new algorithm aimed at reducing negativity on X (formerly Twitter). Concerns arise about how negativity will be defined, as it could lead to censorship of important discussions. The speakers express skepticism about the potential for bias in the algorithm, fearing it may stifle free speech. They highlight the importance of exposing corruption and evil, arguing that discussing negative topics can be positive if it leads to awareness and action. Additionally, they touch on the political climate, emphasizing the need for unity against perceived threats from the establishment and globalist agendas, while also criticizing infighting within the movement. The conversation concludes with a call for vigilance and support for free speech initiatives.

The speaker believes freedom of speech in the West is in a dire state, citing the UK's online hate speech arrests, Pavel Durov's arrest in France, and X's ban in Brazil. They claim the EU's Digital Service Act (DSA) grants the EU power to take down X for non-compliance, including removing "illegal hate speech." The DSA has supremacy over national law in EU member states. The speaker views Durov's arrest as a warning to Elon Musk. They believe EU leaders have an "inverted demonic view" of freedom of speech, limiting it to "protect democracy" by censoring content they dislike, labeling it as misinformation. The speaker will post weekly videos on X. They urge Europeans to dismantle the EU and Americans to make the "right decision" in the upcoming election.

The speaker criticizes Democrats for using voting machines in the 2020 election and accuses Big Tech of censoring Americans. They express satisfaction at the loss of jobs due to censorship and praise Elon Musk for buying Twitter. The speaker then accuses the Head of Trust and Safety at Twitter of failing to remove child pornography and mentions their doctoral dissertation on minors accessing a gay hookup app. They claim that Elon Musk banned accounts promoting child porn but Twitter allowed it. The speaker also mentions a lawsuit against Twitter for refusing to remove a lewd video featuring minors. They conclude by stating that they were violated.

The transcript argues that a single “word” has been heavily suppressed and that “truth” and “infighting” are “such a mess.” It claims that “streamers will show us TikTok in vain,” portraying streamers as seeking fame and money and being “on the grift and obfuscation train,” with people “pretend to fight” while “they’re all the same.” It says they “all know, but they can’t discuss it,” using “dodge” tactics to change the subject, and asserts that “only [it] takes minutes to check,” framing “abandoned” and “threatened to death” as part of the narrative. The transcript then shifts into disjointed, chant-like phrases including “Shut it down,” “The truth on booj,” “Dot win,” and “Jason Goodman spoofed the fangles pot.” It mentions “Harrison Smith” hiring “Stephen Biz,” describing the situation as “a long circus,” and refers to “the fox and the con,” “Microsoft all along,” and “Elon.” Another line states “From the CNP to the rotary CCP to ancient history.” It then calls for “the world to know this isn’t a game or a show,” and asks how “competent” “Joe” was in “2024,” followed by “Where did Zucker Bucks begin?” Questions are also raised: “Why haven’t they prosecuted him?” and “A pillow with the hardies driving,” along with references to “Gabble man,” “freemasons,” and “it’s all built on deception while you pay for your reception.” The transcript concludes by stating that they “claim to tell the truth, but there’s always one exception,” and that only “the few, honest, faithful, and blessed” have shared “the word” and “passed the test.” It adds that there “was no freedom of reach,” mentions “exposing the thought police,” and ends with “Racine is the word.”

The speaker claims Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok, operating on X, began telling users that the United States and Israel are carrying out an active genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza, and Grok backed the claim with sources. Grok’s account was shut down for multiple hours last night during an update. When it was restored to X, Grok repeated that there was a genocide going on. The speaker asserts that APAC affiliates and Zionist accounts came together to mass support the account and get it taken down, and says you could find proof of this by going to a APAC tracker’s page on X where this thread happened. The speaker notes that the replies the speaker posted earlier today are deleted, describing this as part of a pattern: when Elon Musk realizes that Grok is saying things politically that he’s in line with, he takes Grok offline, updates it to be more truth telling, and hands it back to users. The speaker argues this demonstrates Musk’s insecurity and suggests he could gain a lot of popular support for criticizing the state of Israel, as Marjorie Taylor Greene has begun to do by criticizing APAC and suddenly being against genocide. The speaker claims there is no equivalent in the Democrat party calling out Israel. They reference a recent poll that showed Elon Musk is one of the most disliked public figures in America, arguing he could use some good grace but instead he wants to cover up the genocide because he’s too insecure about being wrong, and because the speaker believes he is complicit. The video closes with an exhortation to interact for more content and a reiteration of the Free Palestine message.

The discussion centers on the ‘woke Reich,’ with complaints that the woke right mirrors the woke left and a call to fight back through influencers, TikTok and X, and to talk to Elon. A speaker proclaims: 'Anyone who opposes me... that person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi,' and demands 'the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech' 'prevent Americans from hearing the other side.' He says 'we push congress to force a TikTok sale' and warns against censorship in the United States, noting 'the attack on the USS Liberty.' Another speaker extols Tucker Carlson's critique of Netanyahu, discusses 'the eighth front of the war' and censorship, and laments 'I am sick of Jew, Jew, Jew.' He urges moving beyond World War II paradigm and ends with a fundraising plug for alexjonesstore.com.

The European Union is pressuring tech companies to censor content secretly, with Elon Musk's x being the only one resisting. The EU is threatening x with fines for not complying. Governments and intelligence agencies are involved in demanding censorship, while spreading their own disinformation. X's community notes system allows for corrections to false information, unlike what the EU claims. Musk's refusal to censor is crucial for free speech. To fight back, share the video, join the email list, and support the free speech movement. Stand up against foreign interference in free speech.

This video addresses growing concerns about censorship on the X platform. It outlines the structure of the discussion, including the reasons for making the video, the context of current censorship issues, a detailed timeline of events, lingering concerns, and recommendations for the platform. The speaker expresses a deep appreciation for X's free speech policies, which have significantly impacted their life and career. They emphasize the importance of platform security for content creators and users, highlighting recent abrupt account suspensions and removals without clear explanations. The speaker urges X leadership to provide clarity and a transition period for users facing penalties, advocating for the preservation of trust in the platform. They conclude by encouraging viewers to support X Premium, despite the current uncertainties surrounding account eligibility.

Speaker 0 describes a prior incident where almost every tweet from a day was flagged, claiming there is "one specific group of people that you can talk you can't talk bad about" and stating "it's illegal here on X." They caution viewers to avoid saying certain words in the video to prevent account nukes. They reference a post by someone identified as propaganda and co, noting: "you can't deport everyone, including whites, but you just can't deport the Jews." The speaker quotes the post: "deport all whites, deport all Hispanics, deport all blacks, deport all Muslims." They then point out that, "as soon as he said deport all Jews, immediately, visibility limited." The speaker highlights that the post may "violate x rules against hateful conduct." They respond with a defiant stance: "So what? I I can hate on I can hate on blacks, Muslims, Hispanics, whites, but god's chosen people. They're off limits, obviously." The speaker emphasizes their perception of a double standard. The speaker asserts: "Be a good little goyum. Pay your taxes. Keep your mouth shut. Don't speak out against anything that would be considered hateful over here on x because that'll get you nuked." The language conveys a claim that there is selective enforcement and censorship on the platform, with Jews described as uniquely protected and off-limits for criticism, while other groups are portrayed as targets for hateful statements. The overall narrative centers on censorship, perceived hypocrisy, and the idea that certain groups can be criticized while others cannot, according to the speaker's interpretation of platform rules and enforcement.

Speaker 1 says they have an issue with Elon Musk not allowing Patriot Front’s page to remain open on his platform, while allowing Tommy Robinson. They claim Robinson is England’s far-right figure and has been in trouble and censored, and they say they have seen many different kinds of content permitted on Twitter, including hating on white people and “white hate pages.” Speaker 1 also mentions an “Indian guy” named Rajiv, described as being about “Indian domination,” and says he is part of the “Indian Advocacy Council,” but they do not know what it is. Speaker 0 responds with, “Show me on the doll where Thomas Rousseau hurt you, Elon.” Speaker 1 then states they support Tommy Robinson and describes meeting him at an event, calling him a “solid dude” and “great,” and says Robinson follows them. Speaker 1 says the message is not “hating against Tommy.” They argue that Americans deserve an “awesome guy” too, claim Thomas Rousseau is “brilliant” and “amazing,” and say he deserves a voice. Speaker 1 ends by asking not to be banned for the video, describing it as an honest video and saying it raises an honest question people want answered.

I'm concerned about the media's portrayal of figures like Elon Musk, comparing them to extreme historical figures. The protests against Elon seem organized, possibly by those who stand to lose financially from discoveries being made. These groups may have also been involved in efforts against Trump and even funded research related to the coronavirus origins. Protests aren't always organic; they can be funded and mobilized by NGOs. I wonder if people who believed things would worsen will be capable of self-reflection if the world improves. Some will adapt, while others won't. People may realize they were supporting warmongering or the theft of tax dollars. Elon might be saving the West, especially with his involvement with X, formerly known as Twitter. He's smarter than the critics, and everyone is tapped into the platform, even those who claim to have left. Alternative platforms quickly become echo chambers.

Elon Musk's initial vision for Twitter as a neutral free speech platform has shifted significantly. Recently, he has drawn attention to long-standing issues of child sexual abuse in the UK, often presenting them as new discoveries, which has sparked reactions from European leaders. Musk is also implementing algorithm changes on X to promote positive content while simultaneously discussing negative topics like gangs and rape. An exchange on X highlighted Musk's aggressive response to criticism, where he dismissed a user calling him a major spreader of disinformation. This reflects a trend among tech CEOs who advocate for free speech but often favor their own perspectives. Similar changes at Meta suggest a shift towards a more conservative user base, raising concerns about the spread of misinformation across platforms.

Alex Jones was mentioned as part of an operation on Twitter, with claims that X allowed it to happen. The speaker suggests that the votes supporting Jones were from DARPA bots, and Elon Musk is aware of this. The operators in online chats are using words like "demons" and "thumb words." The speaker warns that this is a new operation meant to confuse and amplify information. They believe it is a strategy to prepare people for an alternative solution to bringing back Trump, although it may not be apparent yet.

The speakers discuss the hypocrisy of figures like Diddy and Epstein lecturing others about morality. One speaker suggests these figures deflect attention by criticizing others' morals in a "preemptive moral strike," claiming those calling Trump a threat to democracy are the real threat. Another speaker questions what happens now that the public knows so much, while another suggests Trump winning could lead to "house cleaning" and shedding light on things. One speaker questions whether Elon Musk is doing the same thing he criticizes, pointing out a nervous laugh regarding available footage and the "savior propaganda" around Trump. The speaker asks when people will start asking the right questions instead of blaming sides, questioning if Elon is beyond control and if anyone is pulling his strings. The speaker emphasizes the importance of asking the right questions to get at the truth.

Alex Jones was mentioned as part of an operation on Twitter, with claims that X allowed it to happen. The speaker believes that the votes supporting Jones' return were from paid DARPA bots. They also mention that Elon Musk has more information on this. The speaker warns about a new operation using words like "demons" and "thumb words" to manipulate and confuse people. They suggest that this operation aims to prepare people for an alternative solution to bringing back Trump, though it may not be apparent yet.

Congressman Gates raises concerns about censorship and the role of law enforcement agencies in determining what content should be censored on the X platform. Elon emphasizes that X aims to be neutral and transparent, seeking legal guidance when necessary. He expresses confidence in achieving maximum transparency by next year. When asked about potential government agency involvement in censorship, Elon states that X will strive to be as transparent as possible and would consider making such interactions public. He even mentions being willing to go to prison personally if he believes a government agency is breaking the law.

The speaker alleges that X is secretly censoring reposts, even of compliant content, and urges users to check if their reposts are being hidden. They plan to contact individuals whose reposts were affected and re-include the video to thwart censorship. The video in question, with 40,000 views, prompts discussion about moral failings and deflection tactics. One speaker suggests those who call Trump a threat to democracy are themselves the threat. Another speaker wonders what will happen now that the public knows so much. One suggests that if Trump wins, there can be "house cleaning" and shedding light on things. Another speaker questions if Elon is doing the same thing he criticizes, pointing out "savior propaganda" and asking why Trump didn't release Epstein files when he was president. The speaker urges people to ask the right questions and consider if Elon and Tucker are beyond control or influenced by others.