reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker claims the WHO intends to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations and treatments globally. They assert that all mRNA vaccines are dangerous and threaten life, regardless of the protein they encode. The danger stems from the immune system's ability to recognize non-cells, which should not be allowed. The speaker identifies the WHO as a privately financed club, with Germany as the top financier and Bill Gates as number two. They warn against allowing children to be vaccinated, claiming mRNA vaccines change mankind, alter personality and the brain, and weaken the heart. The speaker concludes that every injected mRNA vaccine will cause severe damage and must be forbidden.

The speaker claims the WHO intends to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations and treatments globally. They assert that all mRNA vaccines are dangerous and threaten life, regardless of the protein they encode. The speaker says the danger stems from the immune system's ability to recognize non-cells. They state the WHO is a privately funded organization, with Germany as the top financier and Bill Gates as the second. The speaker warns against vaccinating children, claiming mRNA vaccines change mankind, alter personality and brain function, weaken the heart, and cause severe bodily damage. They conclude that mRNA vaccines must be forbidden.

The speaker claims that the spike protein in the COVID-19 vaccine is a bioweapon, as it is a gain of function developed virus. They express concern about the experimental phase of vaccinating children and criticize the government for allegedly experimenting on various groups. The speaker argues that there is no statistical benefit to the vaccines, and mass vaccination has led to the emergence of variants and adverse effects. They call for the vaccines to be stopped, companies to be held accountable, and accuse the violation of international treaties.

A 30,000-person rally in Tokyo protested the deployment of self-replicating RNA vaccines, which some Japanese citizens are calling the "3rd atomic bomb." This deployment is a cooperative agreement between a US company (Arturis), an Australian company (CSL), and a Japanese company. The CEO of the Japanese company stated that anyone spreading misinformation about the vaccine will be pursued legally and potentially jailed. Concerns exist about the untested technology, including its potential to infect others, spread, replicate uncontrollably, and affect the brains of the elderly. The speaker believes this is an attempt to control the narrative, deploy psychological warfare, and suppress dissent, and urges listeners to fight this "new tyranny."

Singapore needs to understand the importance of managing the situation. They have the power to say no to those who bring harmful substances like nanorobots disguised as vaccines. These nanorobots control people's minds and are made of oxide graphene, a metal. Japan even halted the use of Moderna vaccines due to the presence of metal. Many scientists are urging for action to be taken. The speaker mentions Pascal and questions the number of prepared vials.

We cannot accept the arrival of lorries with weapons disguised as vaccines. These so-called vaccines are actually nanostructure nanorobots made of oxide graphene that attach to our synapses and control us. Japan stopped the Moderna vaccine due to the presence of metal. Many scientists agree that we must put an end to this. Pascal has already prepared a large number of vials.

I am here today to address the WHO's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. However, it is important to understand that all mRNA vaccines, regardless of what they encode for, pose a threat to life. The danger lies in the immune system's ability to recognize non-salty substances, which should not be allowed. It is crucial to remember that the WHO is a private club funded by Bill Gates and German taxpayers, who are pushing for mRNA vaccination. We must not allow our children to be vaccinated as it will alter their personality, change their brain, and weaken their heart. Injected mRNA vaccines will cause severe damage and should be prohibited.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these vaccines. They explain that normally the immune system only attacks foreign substances, but when mRNA is introduced to the body, it instructs cells to produce a foreign protein, causing the immune system to attack the cells. The speaker believes this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies producing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and potentially harmful. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution.

The speaker is concerned about a potential future pandemic, referencing reports indicating September as a possible timeframe. They highlight a new law in Singapore where citizens can face jail time and fines for refusing mandatory vaccines, with no exemptions allowed, even medical ones. The speaker suggests this law was enacted after visits from Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates, and fears it could become a prototype for global implementation during a future health crisis, possibly involving a lab-created virus like Ebola. The discussion then shifts to the specifics of the Singapore law, citing Section 47, which allows for imprisonment of up to six months and fines for refusing vaccines during an outbreak, with increased penalties for subsequent offenses. The law raises concerns about potential overreach during declared outbreaks.

- The mRNA on plasmids was produced, and after processing, much DNA from plasmids remained; Kevin MacKinnon found that vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it, and this was published. Authorities claimed it doesn’t matter and that vaccines have saved millions of lives, so why not have some DNA in them. - The DNA in the vaccine vials was packaged in lipid nanoparticles and was shown by colleagues last year (the INMODIA publication) to enter human cells in culture and remain stable in cells for days, as did the mRNA. Despite this, the message given was to poof, never mind, don’t worry, be happy. - A radical change occurred due to a discovery by Kevin MacKinnon three weeks ago: during transcription on the chromosome, byproducts are generated; some mRNA strands do not detach from the DNA where they’re formed, creating hybrids of DNA and RNA that come off together. These hybrids are dangerous. - In cells, an enzyme called RNase H takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately; otherwise they can cause damage to the chromosome, potentially lighting “fires” on the chromosomes. If not extinguished, the fires can cause diverse damage depending on where they occur, potentially leading to illnesses described in medical textbooks, including tumors (neoplastic disease), autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, birth defects, or death. - The speaker asserts these hybrids and their mishandling could lead to a broad range of illnesses, and emphasizes that this situation is not limited to the COVID vaccine but applies to all Moderna RNA vaccines, including new Moderna RNA vaccines entering the market, such as a flu vaccine, and mentions veterinary RNA vaccines as well. - The claim is made that these vaccines will be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids, and it is the duty of authorities and controlling authorities to stop proceeding and not turn away; otherwise they will face court for not fulfilling their duties. The speaker has been giving interviews and asserts this narrative is spreading worldwide, framing it as akin to attempted murder and urging physicians to refuse vaccination.

The speaker expresses concern about the World Health Organization's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. They argue that all mRNA vaccines are dangerous and pose a threat to life, regardless of the specific protein they encode for. The speaker emphasizes that the immune system's ability to recognize non-self is crucial in preventing harm, and advises against following the WHO's recommendations. They also mention that the WHO is privately funded, with Bill Gates and Germany being major financiers. The speaker strongly opposes mRNA vaccination, claiming it can change one's personality, alter the brain, and weaken the heart, and calls for a ban on all injected mRNA vaccines.

Singapore needs to understand the importance of managing its borders. The speaker believes that the country should reject the entry of lorries carrying weapons disguised as vaccines. These so-called vaccines are actually nanostructures, nanorobots, and parasites that control people's minds through small tubes attached to their synapses. The speaker claims that the vaccines contain oxide graphene, a metal that caused Japan to halt the use of Moderna vaccines. Many scientists support these claims. The speaker also mentions Pascal's concerns about the number of vaccine vials already prepared.

The transcript discusses self-amplifying replicon mRNA injections and asserts that they are being deployed for both humans and animals globally. It states that the UK approved Arcturus Therapeutics’ self-amplifying COVID-19 vaccine for adults over 18, and that the European Union previously approved the same inoculation for adults, placing it in both the EU and the UK. It also claims that Japan approved it in 2023, and that India has approved these replicon injections as well, indicating a global rollout. It highlights that in the United States, the USDA approved the self-amplifying mRNA particle injections for pets, specifically mentioning Merck’s Novavax NXT for dogs and cats, and asserts that this is being injected into pets and that shedding onto human owners across the US is possible. It notes that the FDA has fast-tracked an H5N1 bird flu replicon injection trial, emphasizing concern about these developments. The speaker outlines purported dangers of these replicating genetic materials, including the possibility of shedding from humans to humans or from pets to humans, and the potential for recombination with wild viruses to create chimeric mutants. It emphasizes the claimed approval of Arcturus Therapeutics’ injection “everywhere in the clinical trials” and then provides adverse event statistics: eighty-five percent suffered systemic adverse events, and fifteen percent required medical attention. A Uganda study is cited, claiming that the replicon injections induced severe blood abnormalities in ninety-three percent of recipients, with thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, and neutropenia reported, implying degraded immune systems and increased risks of internal bleeding in a majority of participants. The Uganda study is also described as showing eighty-five percent experiencing vomiting, high fevers, and feeling absolutely terrible. The speaker concludes with a strong stance against these injections, calling them a “self amplifying assault on humanity” and arguing that they should be pulled off the market and banned for human use. The overall message is a warning about global deployment, potential shedding and recombination risks, significant adverse event rates, and a call to ban self-amplifying mRNA injections for humans. The named entities include Arcturus Therapeutics, Merck, Novavax NXT, and references to regulatory actions in the UK, EU, Japan, India, and the US.

The speaker claims the WHO intends to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations and treatments globally. They assert that all mRNA vaccines are dangerous and life-threatening, regardless of the protein they encode. The danger stems from the immune system's ability to recognize non-self cells. The speaker urges people to resist, stating the WHO is a privately funded organization, with Germany as the top financier and Bill Gates as the second. They warn that mRNA vaccines change mankind, altering personality and weakening the brain and heart. The speaker concludes that every injected mRNA vaccine will cause severe bodily damage and must be forbidden.

Please protect Japan. Let's protect Japan. It's okay if Japan is gone in 100 years. The coronavirus is artificially created and linked to the vaccine. At first, I thought it was a lie. I couldn't believe something so terrible would happen. But after analyzing the data, it will soon become clear. We must follow the government completely. You may think I'm crazy, but as a former Kyoto University student, I had to come here to convey this message. I want to leave Japan to the younger generation.

I am here today to address the WHO's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. It is important to understand that all mRNA vaccines, regardless of their purpose, pose a threat to life. The danger lies in the immune system's ability to recognize foreign substances. Even if the WHO supports it, we should not allow this. The WHO is funded by private entities like Bill Gates and Germany, who are pushing for mRNA vaccination. We must not let our children be vaccinated as it will alter their personality, change their brain, and weaken their heart. Injecting mRNA vaccines will cause severe damage to our bodies and should be prohibited.

The speaker believes that the vaccine is useless and scientifically flawed. They argue that it is based on a protein that is not relevant and is toxic to the endothelium. They criticize the use of mRNA technology in vaccines, stating that it has never been used before and that it is the first time in history that the body is being asked to produce antibodies against the virus. They claim that this goes against medical knowledge and rationality. The speaker also mentions the importance of consent and the need for more time before approving such vaccines. Overall, they believe that the principles of vaccination and medicine have been disregarded.

The speaker, who claims to be a specialist in carbon chemistry, discusses the presence of graphene oxide in vaccines and its potential dangers. They explain that graphene oxide is like a nanoscale razor blade that can cut blood vessels and cause harm when injected into the body. The speaker questions why these "razor blades" are being included in vaccines and expresses concern about the potential risks, especially for children. They urge politicians and doctors to consider the implications and choose the right advisors. The speaker concludes by stating that if they continue to administer these vaccines, they are committing mass murder.

Everything evil in the world is related to Geneva, where organizations like WHO, Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are based. The speaker, a Swiss citizen, calls for the arrest of these entities for promoting a global injection of nanolepits into billions of people. They claim to be a victim and assert that justice will correct this wrongdoing. The speaker urges everyone to change their mindset and refuse to comply with the vaccination, as they believe it is poison. They emphasize the power of the masses in standing up against evil and protecting humanity.

I am here today to address the WHO's plan to introduce mRNA vaccines for all vaccinations, including cancer treatment. However, it is important to understand that all mRNA vaccines pose a threat to life, regardless of what they encode for. The danger lies in the immune system's ability to recognize non-similarity. Even though the WHO supports this, it should not be allowed. It is crucial to note that the WHO is funded by Bill Gates and German taxpayers, who are pushing for mRNA vaccination. This cannot be permitted as it will change mankind, altering our personality, brain, and weakening our hearts. Injected mRNA vaccines cause severe damage and must be prohibited.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, stating that they contain deliberate toxicities. They explain that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker also highlights that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the same spike protein, which they claim is biologically active and toxic. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution, suggesting intentionality.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna, claiming that they contain deliberate toxicities. They argue that when the body is instructed to produce a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode, potentially harming the body's own cells. The speaker believes that this mechanism of toxicity is intentional and points out that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines chose the spike protein, which can trigger blood coagulation, as the target. They find it unlikely that multiple companies would independently choose the same solution and suggest that this is a deliberate decision.

The speaker expresses concern about the mRNA vaccines, specifically the Pfizer and Moderna ones, stating that they believe there are deliberate toxicities built into these materials. They explain how the immune system normally distinguishes between self and foreign substances, but when mRNA is used to make a piece of a foreign protein, the immune system goes into attack mode. The speaker argues that these vaccines cannot be safe for mass market use as they may cause the immune system to attack its own cells. They also claim that all four companies developing COVID-19 vaccines intentionally chose the spike protein, which they believe is biologically active and potentially toxic.

The speaker believes the mRNA vaccine is unsafe and ineffective, yet it is still being promoted in Canada and the United States. The speaker proposes a moratorium on immigration for a couple of years to address the problem of mass immigration, as well as a moratorium on mRNA vaccines. The speaker acknowledges that one may not always get what they want but emphasizes the need to fight for it.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.