reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the safety of the COVID vaccine, specifically focusing on Pfizer's safety trials. They highlight that the trials were short and had a 1 in 800 rate of serious adverse events per shot. They express concern about the long-term effects and mention a potential estimate of 17 million deaths globally from the vaccine. The speaker acknowledges the magnitude of this number, comparing it to the death toll of a global war.

Speaker 0 asked about a report and how concerning it is, questioning whether “10” is the real number. Speaker 1 said the main concern is that the report “dramatically understates the problem.” They argued that analyses rely on doctors and that it was difficult to obtain autopsies during the pandemic. Speaker 1 stated that medical professors did not want to know, resulting in very few autopsies. They said NIH, CDC, and FDA reviewed 96 autopsies of children and identified about 10 cases they considered possible or probable. Speaker 1 then pointed to VAERS, stating there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They said that of the 39,000 deaths, 24% occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. They acknowledged FDA officials say VAERS does not prove causation, but said that if someone was perfectly healthy and died on that day or within one or two days, they would assign blame. Speaker 1 also said there may be cases where people were already in bad health and vaccination “tipped them over,” with death ultimately caused by something else. Speaker 1’s “bigger revelation” was described as information they said was not covered by mainstream media. They stated that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks, head of CBR within FDA, was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS safety would hide and mask safety signals. Speaker 1 said that 26 days later, Marks ran a new algorithm that unmasked 49 cases of extreme masking and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. Speaker 1 said that in the next three months, similar data runs with the new algorithm showed more safety signals and more types of sudden death. They said the report described not “pin[ning] a badge” on doctor Anna Scharzman (identified as the dad of Speaker 1’s expert), ordering her to cease and desist, and continuing to use the algorithm the briefing warned would hide safety signals “to this day.” Speaker 1 said Peter Marks later went to work for Eli Lilly and claimed that the world is in denial. They stated they could not get the story broadcast or interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MS Now, or CNN, and said they challenged Jake Tapper, sending the report and requesting an additional appearance.

The CDC triggered a comprehensive review of all databases after seeing a signal in one small database regarding potential safety issues with the booster. However, no safety concerns were found in the review of all databases in existence. The speaker mentioned that their own investigation in Europe, Israel, and the US also found no safety issues. They have a team collaborating with scientific institutions to constantly review and analyze data, and no signals of safety concerns have been found.

The speaker wants to raise awareness about what happened to Alexis, hoping it will aid medical professionals and those helping Todd and his family. The speaker states that administering three shots simultaneously in a hospital involves tetanus, meningitis, and pneumonia vaccines. The speaker claims that medical doctors at the hospital are unaware that there are 19 different brand-name tetanus, meningitis, and pneumonia shots listed on the CDC's vaccine excipient summary. The speaker asserts that Alexis's symptoms are identical to those caused by three known published poisons found within those 19 vaccines, of which Alexis received three.

Speaker 0 is pleased about vaccination effectiveness in preventing severe COVID and long-term effects. They mention rare side effects from vaccines and emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring. Speaker 1 questions the safety of products on the market without complete testing. The TGA lacks data on adverse events due to underreporting, leading to audience frustration.

The discussion centers on concerns about the safety of pediatric vaccines, the governing framework for vaccination and related notifications, and how schools and child-care settings handle cases where vaccination is incomplete. Key points raised by Speaker 0 (in Japanese) include: - The number and variety of pediatric vaccines have been increasing, with regular schedules reaching up to about 30 doses from birth. - Some vaccines include additives such as thiomersal (mercury-containing) and, in the case of influenza vaccines given after six months, thiomersal and aluminum compounds, causing anxiety about brain development and cancer risk. - Thiomersal is described as an organomercury compound that biodegrades to ethylmercury; its linkage to neurodevelopmental disorders has been asserted in materials from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW). The materials indicate thiomersal and other additives (e.g., aluminum compounds) can be associated with concerns about cancer risk and memory impairment. The presenter cites materials labeled as current vaccine formulations like “Beugen” (B型肝炎ワクチン) containing thiomersal and organic silver derivatives, and notes concerns about aluminum compounds. - The speaker emphasizes that even with explanations from experts that trace amounts are unlikely to have measurable effects, caregivers remain cautious, influencing decisions about vaccinating their children. - There is a claim that disease risk reduction and broader environmental exposure concerns (e.g., artificial sweeteners, nicotine residues, colorants) contribute to vaccine hesitancy, especially given declining birth rates yet rising incidences of developmental disorders, dementia, or behavior-related conditions. - The speaker asks for the audience’s attention to the confusion surrounding vaccines and their additives, seeking to understand why some guardians opt not to vaccinate. Key organizational questions and clarifications provided by Speaker 1: - Under the Public Health Vaccination Act, local governments issue vaccination recommendations and encourage vaccination, including sending vaccination advisories that specify the timing and method. The notices concern vaccines such as the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), human papillomavirus (HPV), and Japanese encephalitis vaccines. The advisory notices are not mandatory, but vaccination is strongly encouraged. - When a guardian declines vaccination, it does not constitute abuse or neglect according to the law; preventive services and enforcement do not classify non-vaccination as neglect. Speaker 3 and Speaker 4 address practical and ethical concerns in child-care and education contexts: - In child-care facilities, there is no legal right to label a guardian as neglect simply for non-vaccination, though vaccination status is recorded in health forms. They stress the goal of preventing punitive treatment of guardians and promoting fair, informed medical care for children. - Questions are raised about whether vaccination histories influence admission or screening processes for child-care and school enrollment. The response indicates vaccination status is not a disqualifying factor for admission, and the health information form includes vaccination history; non-vaccinated children should not be disadvantaged in enrollment. - It is acknowledged that some guardians and teachers may hold misconceptions about vaccines, including concerns about toxins. The discussion calls for improved information sharing among health services, childcare, and education officials to reduce misinformation and support informed decisions. Speaker 2 (Takena Kazuko, Head of Childcare Family Division) and Speaker 4 (Ministry or Education official) respond to concerns about information sharing and the role of staff training: - They emphasize the distinction between compulsory vaccination guidance and voluntary advisories, reiterating that withholding vaccination is not automatically considered neglect. - They agree on the need to prevent punitive attitudes toward guardians, to inform teachers and childcare staff about how to communicate vaccine information, and to ensure consistent understanding across health, childcare, and education sectors. - A request is made to improve public awareness so that vaccination decisions are respected and differences in opinion are honored. Overall, the transcript details regulatory mechanisms for vaccination recommendations, the non-punitive stance toward non-vaccination in guardians, and the need for better information sharing and respectful dialogue among public health, childcare providers, and schools to address vaccine hesitancy without resorting to neglect determinations.

The discussion revolves around the lack of complete safety study information in the patient package insert for the Moderna vaccine. The speaker acknowledges the missing data but assures safety based on personal experience. When asked about the specific studies supporting the vaccine's safety and effectiveness, the speaker admits to not having an answer. The conversation ends with the speaker feeling inadequate for not being able to provide more information.

A recent paper reported that two-month-old infants who received all six CDC-recommended vaccines had about a 68% increased odds of dying in the following month compared to unvaccinated infants. The speaker says this adds to a body of evidence described as 12 studies comparing vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated individuals. According to the speaker, all 12 studies found the same overall pattern: vaccinated individuals are “far sicker” than unvaccinated individuals. The speaker lists multiple categories of health differences reported in those comparisons, stating that vaccinated individuals have more chronic disease and more autoimmune disease. They also report higher rates of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism, speech delays, and speech disorders. The speaker also says vaccinated individuals have more ticks and more skin disorders, describing these as part of “everything under the sun.” The speaker then describes an additional analysis related to the Henry Ford study. They say they “recently expanded on that in a reanalysis of the Henry Ford study,” finding that all 22 chronic disease categories were higher in vaccinated children. This is presented as extending the pattern beyond the specific mortality finding, adding chronic disease elevations alongside mortality elevation. The speaker characterizes the combined results as “very serious” and emphasizes that it should be discussed more widely and replicated in other states. The call to action is focused on starting to talk about the findings and replicating them elsewhere, rather than limiting the conclusions to the initial studies or settings described.

They discuss the number of people who have experienced long-term health issues after receiving the vaccine. The speaker asks if it's hundreds or thousands, and Helen responds that it's actually around 10. She mentions a report from April 2023, which states that there were 11,289 medically significant or serious reports. Out of those, 1,062 were listed as disabled, 118 were considered life-threatening, and 184 resulted in death. Helen clarifies that the long-term consequences are not in the hundreds or thousands, but rather around 10.

Speaker 0 asks about a report and how concerning it is, suggesting that if the reported figure is 10, there is a “real number” that could be higher. Speaker 1 says the main concern is that the analysis “dramatically understates the problem.” They describe the difficulty of getting autopsies during the pandemic and say medical professors didn’t want to perform them, resulting in very few autopsies. They state that NIH/CDC/FDA reviewed 96 pediatric autopsies and concluded about 10 were possible or probable. Speaker 1 then argues that safety signals were “screaming,” and points to VAERS. They claim there are almost 1.7 million total adverse events and 39,000 deaths worldwide. They say 24% of the 39,000 deaths occurred on the day of vaccination or within one or two days. Speaker 1 also references the point that VAERS doesn’t prove causation, while stating that if a person who was “perfectly healthy” died that day or within one or two days, they would “be blaming” the jab. They add that in some cases people may have been in bad health already, with death tipped over by another cause. Speaker 1 says the “bigger revelation,” which they claim was unveiled three weeks ago and is “still not being covered by the mainstream media,” involves FDA’s VAERS algorithm. They state that on 03/01/2021, Peter Marks (head of CBER/FDA’s division approving vaccines and surveilling post-approval safety) was briefed that their algorithm analyzing VAERS would “hide and mask safety signals.” They say that 26 days later, a new algorithm unmasked safety signals, producing 49 cases of extreme masking revealed and 25 safety signals, including sudden cardiac death, pulmonary infarction, Bell’s palsy, and different types of strokes. They claim that similar data runs over the next three months showed more safety signals and more sudden death. Speaker 1 further claims that FDA did not “pin a badge” on Anna Scharzman, referred to as the father of their expert, and instead “shunned her off to the side,” ordered her to cease and desist, and decided to use the algorithm they had been warned would hide safety signals, which they say is still being used. Speaker 1 states that Peter Marks left for Eli Lilly and claims “the entire world” is in denial. They say they have been unable to broadcast the story or get interviews on CBS, ABC, NBC, PBS, MSNBC, or CNN, and that they challenged Jake Tapper, who they say agreed to read the report but has not invited them back yet.

The speaker discusses a paper from Denmark that reveals a significant variation in suspected adverse reactions to the Pfizer vaccine. The data shows a 1,000-fold difference in incidence depending on the batch of vaccines administered. This information is currently gaining popularity.

The speaker discusses the safety data of Pfizer's vaccine trials, highlighting the short duration of the trials and the potential for serious adverse events. They mention a 1 in 800 rate of serious harm per shot and express concern about the long-term effects and mortality risk. They mention an estimate of 17 million global deaths from the vaccine and compare it to the death toll of a global war. The speaker emphasizes the seriousness of the situation.

The speaker argues that an irrational, unbridled enthusiasm for new possibilities leads to a sacrifice of safety. This enthusiasm, in their view, has adversely affected precautionary considerations and risk assessment. They reference presenting autopsy findings related to deaths following COVID-19 vaccination at the American Society of Microbiology, an event attended by thousands of microbiologists, vaccinologists, and immunologists. In conversations with attendees, the speaker was surprised by what they describe as a scientific seduction surrounding messenger RNA technology. The core concern expressed is that this eagerness to embrace mRNA platforms is accompanied by a neglect of safety considerations. The speaker asserts that there will be a cataclysmic recognition that messenger RNA technology represents an unsafe platform. They emphasize that, as they understand it, there is no way to break down certain aspects of the technology they refer to as “pseudourogenated messenger RNA,” noting this within the context of their work in research laboratories. The statement implies a belief that the degradation or metabolic processing of this form of RNA poses unresolved issues. A central, striking claim presented is that circulating messenger RNA from Pfizer or Moderna has been found in their patients’ bloodstream three years after vaccination, and that this RNA is intact. The speaker underscores this as evidence tied to their observations and research experiences, asserting the persistence of the RNA in the circulatory system over an extended period. Overall, the message conveys a perspective that rapid adoption and optimism around mRNA vaccines and technologies have overshadowed safety considerations, and it anticipates a future realization of safety concerns associated with these platforms. The speaker ties their warnings to concrete experiences at a major scientific conference and to specific, long-term biomarkers observed in patients, presenting a narrative of ongoing research findings and anticipated paradigm shifts in how the safety of mRNA vaccines is perceived.

The speaker discusses the severe damage caused by multiple doses of a certain substance, suggesting that taking it once is enough. They mention leaked documents from Pfizer and Moderna, revealing different lot numbers and formulations. The FDA's role is to ensure uniformity and safety across the country, but the speaker claims that different concentrations and ingredients were used, resulting in varying effects. Some lots were found to be 5000% more lethal than others. The speaker suggests that this variation was intentional to prevent clear correlation and discourage people from realizing they were being poisoned.

Speaker 0 says the CDC has been “an embarrassment for The United States,” citing “12,000 employees” and a “$9,000,000,000 budget.” Speaker 0 claims the CDC “didn’t take care of a single patient,” does not “operate a clinic” or “operate a hospital,” and “didn’t provide a single suggestion to anybody to help them avoid hospitalization and death.” Speaker 0 argues that the CDC should have “immediately gotten behind very effective nasal sprays and gargles” and lists ingredients and bases including “dilute iodine,” “xylitol base,” “colloidal silver,” and “saline.” Speaker 0 states there is “not a single mention from the CDC anywhere about using twice daily nasal sprays and gargles.” Speaker 0 references “a randomized trial by Boundforth and colleagues” using a “xylitol based spray” and claims that the product is available in the United States and Canada as “clear, x l e a r.” Speaker 0 says the trial’s nasal spray “done twice a day was better than a vaccine in preventing COVID.” Speaker 0 concludes that “it’s shocking that our CDC made blunder after blunder after blunder.”

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to explain why the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis. Speaker 1 mentions rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with vaccination but does not provide a clear explanation. Speaker 0 insists on understanding the mechanism and questions why the vaccine is considered safe without addressing the risks. Speaker 2 intervenes, suggesting that Speaker 1 will address the question later. Speaker 1 talks about the benefit-risk ratio and the global recommendation of health authorities. Speaker 0 reiterates the question, to which Speaker 1 agrees to provide a response later. Speaker 2 confirms this agreement.

The speakers express concern that only a small percentage of adverse reactions to vaccines are reported. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, an average of 1500 adverse event reports were received each year for all vaccines in New Zealand, resulting in one or fewer reported deaths annually.

The head of the vaccine program, Dr. Stanley Plotkin, discusses the need for more post-authorization vaccine safety studies. He acknowledges the lack of proper safety studies before licensing vaccines and calls for more research to understand adverse reactions. Plotkin emphasizes the importance of identifying biological mechanisms of adverse reactions to develop safer vaccines. He highlights the slow progress in vaccine safety science and the need for adequate funding to address public concerns about vaccine safety. Ultimately, he urges for more comprehensive safety studies to ensure the safety of vaccines.

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about a report stating that serious adverse reactions occur in 1 in 800 vaccinated individuals. Speaker 1 claims to be unaware of the report but mentions routine screening of literature for adverse events. When asked about Moderna's rate of serious adverse events, Speaker 1 cannot provide the information. Speaker 0 expresses frustration and finds it extraordinary that a multinational company cannot provide this data. Speaker 1 offers to provide the information later but states that no safety concerns were observed in their clinical trials. Speaker 0 concludes that the conversation is a waste of time.

They received texts claiming extraordinary lives, but the speaker asks how many people have suffered long-term health consequences from the vaccine. The other person, Helen, responds that there have been 10 cases of long-term consequences. In March 2023, MedSafe received 11,289 reports, with 1,062 listed as disabled, 118 as life-threatening, and 184 as deaths. The speaker clarifies if it's 100 or 1,000 cases, but Helen confirms it's around 10 for long-term effects.

The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification, autoimmune attacks, or even future cancer. The speaker acknowledges that these concerns are theoretical but believes they warrant further investigation.

The speaker asked about the long-term effects of the vaccine, but the response was unclear. The speaker mentioned that the effects at one year are known, but not at three to five years. They also mentioned that 93% of the population will be vaccinated. The speaker seemed unsure and mentioned feeling pressured at work.

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to explain the process of how the vaccine causes myocarditis and pericarditis. Speaker 1 mentions rare reports of myocarditis and pericarditis associated with vaccination. Speaker 0 insists on an explanation of the mechanism, but Speaker 1 does not provide a direct answer. Speaker 1 emphasizes that all medicines have benefits and side effects and refers to the benefit-risk ratio. Speaker 0 continues to press for an explanation of the biochemical pathway, but Speaker 1 agrees to provide a response later. The transcript ends with Speaker 2 confirming Speaker 1's agreement to give a further response.

Are there concerns regarding the side effects of medicines? Is safety testing necessary? We are administering genetically modified organisms through injections, particularly in young children.

The speakers express concern about the limited reporting of adverse reactions to vaccines. They mention a report suggesting that only 5% of adverse reactions are recorded in the database. Despite this, they assure viewers that the COVID vaccine is safe. They highlight that prior to the COVID vaccine rollout, the average number of adverse event reports for all vaccines in New Zealand was 1500 per year, with one or fewer deaths reported annually.