TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In a local county commissioner race, the Dominion machine results showed Lorne Alexander with 34.67%, Marshall Orson with 41.35%, and Michelle Long Spears with 23.98%. Since no candidate reached 50%, a runoff was needed. Spears found precincts where she received zero votes, including her own. A hand recount revealed discrepancies, with Spears gaining 3,620 votes. The hand count showed 2,810 more votes than the machines reported, raising concerns about the machines' accuracy. This highlights the need for trustworthy voting systems. If Spears hadn't raised concerns, the discrepancies may have gone unnoticed. Translation: In a local election, the Dominion machines initially showed Lorne Alexander and Marshall Orson leading, but Michelle Long Spears raised concerns after receiving no votes in some precincts, including her own. A hand recount revealed significant discrepancies, with Spears gaining thousands of votes. This raised doubts about the accuracy of the machines and the need for reliable voting systems. Without Spears' intervention, the issues may have gone unnoticed.

The speaker discusses the victor of an election and expresses uncertainty about who it is. They mention that the election was corrupt, but do not provide any specific details.

The transcript discusses concerns about election irregularities and voting machines. One speaker claims a voting machine subtracted votes, displaying a negative number. Another speaker states that such subtraction cannot occur accidentally and that someone consciously tried to steal votes. A third speaker says that when they press the button next to their name, another person's name appears on the display, questioning the accuracy of the vote count. Another speaker asserts that the machines are working correctly, recording votes accurately, and that the results will be accurate and reliable. One speaker expresses concern about private corporations controlling the voting system and calls for a formal debate about election irregularities, warning that the democracy and republic are at risk.

They stopped counting votes on election night to determine how many mail-in ballots to add, which the speaker believes was fraudulent. The speaker insists it was a planned event, claiming it wouldn't happen in Texas. They express concern over the authenticity of mail-in ballots and assert that anyone could have filled them out. The other person questions the validity of these claims, but the speaker stands by their belief based on personal experience.

The speaker questions the statistical possibility of a sudden increase in votes for Biden without any votes for Trump. They argue that even in the bluest city, there should be some votes for the other party. They also mention that the increase in votes occurred around 4:30 in the morning. The speaker then discusses the sudden halt in vote counting in Nevada, which they find inexplicable and illogical. They question why counting would be stopped in the middle of the day and suggest that it doesn't make sense to shut everyone down.

The speaker questions the certification of the election results, stating that the margin of victory is less than 1%. They mention testimony from the secretary of state's counsel, who sent letters to 8,000 people who voted illegally, advising them not to vote in the US senate race. This number is almost three-fourths of the margin of victory. The speaker also points out that there is a 10% margin that is not accurate. They ask how the senate and house can stand by the certification.

Speaker 1 questions the accuracy of Elections Canada, suggesting the Tarrabon incident, where an error occurred, is not an isolated event. Speaker 1 expresses doubt that this was the only error of its kind and wants to know the probability of it being a unique occurrence, implying there are likely more errors that have been overlooked or "obsoleted."

The speaker questions the accuracy of polls showing Carney's popularity, claiming the People's Party isn't polled and that mainstream media is biased against them. They allege the Canadian debate rules were changed to exclude the People's Party, preventing them from participating despite qualifying in the past. The speaker highlights concerns about Canada's electoral system, specifically the lack of mandatory photo ID for voting and the promotion of mail-in ballots. They believe being excluded from debates is censorship and undemocratic. The speaker intends to challenge the debate exclusion in court to ensure their voice is heard.

The speaker discusses a report and rates its significance on a scale of 1 to 10. They mention that the final report reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to addresses where the individuals no longer lived, yet votes were still cast on them. These ballots were identified through a national change of address form, which people fill out when they move. The speaker finds this illogical and believes the attorney general should provide an explanation. They emphasize that the election was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes, while the issue of the 23,344 ballots is just one example of irregularities.

Biden consistently received high numbers of votes while Trump received none, which the speaker deems statistically impossible. They claim that the Secretary of State should be aware of this incorrect information, as it has been publicly available for months. The speaker challenges the media and anyone who denies the existence of election fraud, stating that there is evidence and those who claim otherwise are lying.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, and Uxbridge had been brought to the office to be counted. The individual questions how CTV and subsequently CBC could declare the Liberals as winners without any votes counted from Durham region. They call for an investigation, stating that something is not right.

The speaker observed that when people received Republican straight ticket ballots, they often ignored them or circled Donald Trump's name and put them back in the envelope. The speaker noticed USPS boxes filled with these ballots on the floor. They questioned the legitimacy of the process, as it seemed impossible to count all the votes accurately. The speaker mentioned that only a small number of ballots were counted at a time, with each pile containing no more than five ballots. They expressed concern about the removal of many Trump vote ballots.

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. According to the worker, none of the packages had arrived at the office yet from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

The speaker claims the Liberal Party won due to weaponizing fear and exploiting "Trump derangement syndrome" among Canadians, while the Conservative Party's strategy failed because Pierre Poilievre "went soft." A key factor was Poilievre losing his own riding due to a 2023 redistribution, which the speaker blames on national campaign manager Jenny Byrne. The speaker alleges Conservative HQ micromanaged campaigns nationwide, blocking candidates from debates and local events, and even rigging nomination races to install controllable "red Tory loyalists." They claim HQ staff showed conflicts of interest by getting family members into elite internships. According to the speaker, the election hinged on local races, but grassroots campaigns were sabotaged from the top. The speaker advises Poilievre to fire everyone at Conservative HQ and find a safe seat by having a retiring MP step aside. Despite the demoralizing loss, the speaker urges conservatives not to quit.

Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."

An Elections Canada worker in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The worker's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order for tabulation. According to the worker, not a single vote package had arrived at the office from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The worker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

The speaker claims that someone received 14,000,000 votes but was thrown out of office. The speaker states this action is a threat to democracy. The speaker also claims that this person hates the woman who ran instead of him and cannot stand her.

An individual who was supposed to be working for Elections Canada in Durham region states that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The job entailed ensuring that all packages were sealed and documentation was in order after votes were brought to the office from each polling station, so votes could be tabulated and counted. According to the speaker, not a single vote in Durham region had been brought to the office or counted. The speaker questions how CTV and then CBC could declare the Liberals as winners when votes from a large area east of the GTA, including Pickering, Ajax, Whippy, Oshawa, Uckbridge, and Uxbridge, had not yet been counted. The speaker believes this situation "reeks" and warrants investigation.

The Bloc Québécois candidate for the riding of Terrebonne is evaluating her options after losing by a single vote. Following a judicial recount, the vote reversal was described as spectacular and unexpected. The candidate stated she owes it to herself to evaluate all options.

The speaker discusses the final report released to the public, which reveals that 23,344 mail-in ballots were sent to individuals who no longer lived at the address. Despite this, votes were still cast using those ballots. The speaker emphasizes that this is just one example of irregularities in the election, which was decided by a margin of 10,000 votes. They express their confusion and call for the attorney general to address this issue.

Judicial recounts are normal, but the number of seat flips in the 2025 election is unusual. In 2011 there was one flip, in 2015 there were zero, and in 2021 there was one. In 2025, a number of seats have flipped to the Liberal party. This observation is not due to malicious intent or outside influence. The speaker is simply noticing a trend and a flaw. The speaker is calling on Elections Canada to improve voter education or to ensure correct postal codes on mail-in ballots. The speaker feels that the number of flips is weird.

An election candidate is investigating a possible error involving an uncounted or invalid mail-in ballot in the Terrebonne riding. The voter, Emmanuel Gagne, wrote on Facebook that he will keep people updated on the next steps. The voter received an envelope from Elections Canada with an incorrect address label. She mailed in her ballot in early April using the addressed envelope provided by Elections Canada, but it was returned to her as undelivered. Elections Canada says part of the postal code printed on the envelope was wrong and that it's working to gather more facts.

The speaker discusses a situation where an election result hinged on a single vote, which they find statistically improbable. They mention a previously uncounted vote that was discovered, potentially creating a tie or necessitating a recount. The speaker raises concerns about 800 canceled votes and questions the criteria and oversight involved in rejecting votes. They call for transparency and scrutiny of every rejected vote, suggesting potential errors or biases in the process. The speaker questions Elections Canada and whether they will review every single thing. They express the opinion that winning by one vote in this scenario suggests possible manipulation, implying someone may have arbitrarily decided the outcome.

An individual working for Elections Canada in Durham region claims that no votes from that region had been counted when CTV declared the Liberals the winners. The individual's job was to ensure that sealed packages and documentation from polling stations were in order before tabulation. They state that no votes from Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, Oshawa, or Uxbridge had arrived at the office. Following CTV's declaration, CBC also reported the Liberals as winners. The individual believes this situation is suspicious and warrants investigation.